Slashdot Mirror
Google CEO Says Next Wave Of Affordable Smartphones Should Cost $30 (phandroid.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Google started the Android One program to get affordable smartphones into all corners of the globe. Those devices cost around $100, which is very good for an up-to-date device. However, Google CEO Sundar Pichai doesn't think $100 is good enough. Even $50 is too much. His goal is $30. "The right price point for smartphones in India is $30, and pursuing high-quality smartphones at the price point will unlock it even more." ndia currently has the largest base of Android users, and most of those users have phones that cost less than $150. Pichai went on to say that cheaper devices are only part of the solution. They also need services that can run reliably on "flaky" networks. He says Google is working on making more services adapt to slow internet.
This coming from the company that taking away their affordable mid-ranged phones and has only released an expensive high end phone. Google needs to lead... not order.
No good deed goes unpunished.
He says Google is working on making more services adapt to slow internet.
Ad-free solves 90%+ of the bandwidth problem for many uses. And killing off the financial viability of youtube and facebook is a great idea. I'd be happy to pay $10 a month for 1 gig of ad-free, graphics-free, css and javascript free internet.
"Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
Maybe not that cheap, but to me $650 for a phone is PATENTLY RIDICULOUS, regardless how many features it has or what it can do. My Nexus 5 just died, and I got myself a Huawei Honor 5X for 160 last week. On paper the specs look terrible, in use it's just as fast as the N5, and never feels "slow" All the apps I need work, the camera is more than good enough, and there are no showstopper bugs with the screen. Does it feel "cheap?" can't tell you a phone feels like a phone to me. What am I getting for 3x the price? Apps that open 2ms faster?
The ultimate point is that people are at this point, only buying flagship phones because marketing is telling them to. Everyone that has held and used my 5X think it's a high end phone, and will not believe me on the price, until I show them the sales slip. Once the marketing stops working (soon) well, Apple better be prepared.
"Science is the power of man"
I should be able to get software updates for a phone for at least 10 years before I have to replace it. That it costs $300 is not so big of a deal if I'm not buying a replacement every 2 years.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
The market leader for cheap phones is Mediatek, part owners of ADUPS, the wonderful partnership that recently siphoned off texts, location, and call logs from BLU phones.
This is the same Mediatek that was caught doing the same thing with dozens of brands in the Russian market.
The only way to use such a phone safely is an immediate wipe, followed by a 3rd-party OS install to the eMMC.
The market will shortly realize this.
Was in the Philippines and needed a local phone number. Bought a "Cloudphone" for a little less than US$30.
Definitely not top of the line but works just fine:
- Android
- Dual SIM
- Micro SD card slot
- 2 megapixel rear camera (yes, that's all of 2 megapixels)
- front camera (don't know the resolution but it works)
- Access to Play store, all the Google apps, etc.
- Screen seems cheap
It's a bit slow at times but amazing that it works at all
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?