Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court Will Not Examine Tech Industry Legal Shield (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Reuters report: The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a lower court's decision that an online advertising site accused by three young women of facilitating child sex trafficking was protected by a federal law that has shielded website operators from liability for content posted by others. The refusal by the justices to take up the women's appeal in the case involving the advertising website Backpage.com marked a victory for the tech industry, which could have faced far-reaching consequences had the Supreme Court decided to limit the scope of the Communications Decency Act, passed by Congress in 1996 to protect free speech on the internet.

3 of 51 comments (clear)

  1. CDA was NOT written to protect free speech. by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was written to DENY free speech -- specifically porn.

    It just had to have the happy side effect that, after the porn ban was ruled unconstitutional, the "safe harbor' provision stayed in effect.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  2. Re:Hate voting when I like both sides by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

    The remedies are already in place. Suppose someone posts on Slashdot advertising a human trafficking operation. If Slashdot were liable for user comments, Slashdot would immediately be guilty of abetting said operation. Of course, the site isn't liable so they're not immediately at risk of a lawsuit over the situation. The proper response is to report the comment and Slashdot either takes it down (and thus shields themselves from liability) or decides to leave it up (in which case, they might expose themselves to liability). Alternatively, the authorities could subpoena Slashdot (through proper legal channels) to get information on the person who made the post.

    With this system in place, sites can host user-generated content without hiring armies of human (as opposed to automated) moderators. (Imagine how many moderators YouTube, Twitter, or Facebook would need to hire just to keep up with the flood of content!) Meanwhile, it also allows for illegal comments to be removed - something that any site worth its salt wants to ensure anyway if only to keep the spam out.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  3. Re:Shooting off your cocksucker again troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dear APK,

    There is a reason you were downmodded into oblivion on your main account.

    It has nothing to do with a conspiracy against you. You are simply obnoxious. You also oversimplify and strawman the arguments of others.

    This is why you are not respected and everyone rolls their eyes when they come across your posts.

    Sincerely,

    Almost Everyone On Slashdot