Slashdot Mirror


Russia Extends Edward Snowden's Asylum To 2020, To Offer Citizenship Next Year (cnn.com)

Whistleblower and former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden has been allowed to remain in Russia for another three years and will next year qualify to apply for Russian citizenship. From a report on CNN: Edward Snowden's leave to remain in Russia has been extended until 2020, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has confirmed to CNN. Snowden, a former US National Security Agency contractor, sought asylum in Russia in June 2013 after leaking volumes of information on American intelligence and surveillance operations to the media. On Tuesday, Zakharova announced an extension of a "couple of years" in a Facebook post that criticized former CIA acting director Michael Morell for an opinion piece he wrote suggesting that Russian President Vladimir Putin should consider returning Snowden to the United States as "the perfect inauguration gift" to President-elect Donald Trump. Snowden settled in Moscow after initially traveling to Hong Kong following his 2013 public disclosure of classified information. The Russian government granted him asylum soon after. In August 2014, Snowden received a three-year extension to his leave to remain in Russia. That extension was due to expire this year.

18 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Trump and Putin sitting in a tree... by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since Trump and Putin are BFFs, then Trump should pardon Snowden for helping both Russia and America deal with the NSA which Trump doesn't trust anyway.

  2. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that Trump surrounded himself with former Nixon supporters, KGB sympathizers, and crony capitalists is no joke.

  3. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I don't normally post as an AC, but this is so politically-charged that I really don't want to end up a virtual fine red mist all over the Internets..

    Current evidence is suggesting that Trump, being a wealthy, 'successful' Western businessman, who has little self control, little self discipline, little situational awareness, and impulsive as hell, went to Russia at some point, allowed himself to get drawn into one or more highly compromising situations (wouldn't at all be surprised if he killed someone, or was made to look like he killed someone, probably a prostitute), and Putin, being ex-KGB, did what KGB does: blackmailed the living hell out of Trump, who now is going to be a traitor to the U.S.. He's in too deep to just admit what happened and take the hit, that would now be at least as damaging to the United States, both materially and optically, to even be considered as a way out. So we endure 4 years of possibly being sold out to Russia, having the U.S. turn a blind eye to Putin trying to resurrect the Soviet Union, which he's obviously pining for, and to Hell with whatever shreds of dignity and credibility the U.S. had in the eyes of the rest of the nations of the world. Never mind climate change eventually killing us all, Trump and Putin will do it for us in single-digit years. I sure hope all you two-digit IQ morons who voted for Trump are happy with yourselves when 'making America great again' blows up in your faces.

  4. Re:fake news from cnn by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Umm.. he sought asylum in Russia not because if he flew to England they wouldn't let him in, but because if he flew to England, they would put him in chains and on a plane to the US.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  5. Strange Logic by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand the logic behind pardoning Manning but not Snowden.

    Snowden was very careful about how he released material not to get people hurt, the information he released was relevant and sincere whistle-blowing, not just random data dumps from sensitive sources.

    Manning was just a show-off trying to data-dump anything she could get her hands on without a greater purpose in mind. She did it because she could, not because she had any morale compass.

    Snowden should be the one forgiven and returned to the US public sector, not Manning. Obama got this one backwards.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  6. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, by "hacking the elections", which is pure hyperbole, meaning "hacked the democrates, the DNC, HRC campaign and exposing the collusion with the MSM and even some Republicans, the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Foundation, you're saying that all of that was .. done by the Russians to help Trump?

    So, the Russians made the democrats, Hillary and all the rest do all those unsavory (criminal??) things just to get Trump elected. You're a special kind of person aren't you.

    Sorry, but the Hillary loss can be placed at the feet of Hillary, the Democrats, the MSM and the RINOs who were conspiring against the american people. But yeah, keep blaming the Russians!

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. One good deed by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would certainly complicate a lot of people's opinions of Donald Trump around here.

    Not for me. I'd still think he was an asshole who has no business being president. One good deed doesn't excuse a lifetime of douchebaggery.

  8. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by Altus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who do you think hacked the DNC? Who had a motive to do so and then not claim credit for it?

    You are right about Hillary being a flawed candidate, im right there with you, but someone hacked the DNC and her campaign and that didn't just happen by accident, it was a targeted attack so someone had to have a reason to do it.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  9. Re:Try to at least remain consistent, america by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Replace "Hacked the democratic process" with "Exposed Democratic(DNC) process to hack the election" and you'd be right.

    The HRC loss can be firmly placed on HRC, The Democrats, the MSM and a few RINOs, By all measures, Trump should have lost, and "bigly", but enough people hated HRC, the Democrats and the MSM to ... actually ... not vote for them. I know, it is SHOCKING that Trump won. But consider that HRC was the ONLY candidate the DNC could have put up that he could actually beat.

    This isn't the Russians fault at all. But keep on blaming them all you can, and you'll never really understand why the Democrats keep losing ... bigly.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  10. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hillary is more likely to start world war III.
    She was more than happy to destabilize Syria if it got more donations for her "foundation".

  11. Trump is worse by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the Russians made the democrats, Hillary and all the rest do all those unsavory (criminal??) things just to get Trump elected.

    Whatever "unsavory" thing you imagine the Clintons to have done, Donald Trump can match it or top it for sheer asshattery. And judging by the Bond villians he's nominating for cabinet positions he's just getting warmed up on the unsavory activities. Is Hillary a saint? Hell no. Nobody who runs for high office is without sin. But Trump is worse in pretty much every imaginable way when it comes to being a criminal and an all around terrible person.

    Sorry, but the Hillary loss can be placed at the feet of Hillary, the Democrats, the MSM and the RINOs who were conspiring against the american people.

    "Conspiring against the American people"? Snort... That's rich. I think you might be off your medications if you think the republican party is any more concerned about the well being of the American people than the democrats are. Doubly so if you think Trump has the best interests of you and me at heart.

  12. Not Surprising by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Putin has many reasons to hold on to Snowden and almost no reasons to turn him over to the US.

    Turning him over to the US _might_ curry favor with Trump, however
    A: Trump is too inconsistent for something like that to have a dependable long term effect, and
    B: More importantly we're pretty sure Putin already owns Trump, probably along multiple lines. You don't need to curry favor with your pawns.
    C: And whether Putin owns Trump or not, it certainly doesn't benefit him to _appear_ as if he owns Trump any more than he can avoid, and sending him Snowden as an "inauguration gift" would definitely lend itself to that appearance.

    On the other hand, Snowden is an embarrassment to the US (or more accurately, he brought to light and continues to emphasize the way in which the US has embarrassed itself) which is valuable PR for Russia. Even if Putin owns the president it never hurts to have multiple lines of attack available.

    Keeping Snowden in good standing encourages other people who might have negative information about the US or whose mere existence and freedom might embarrass the US to look to Putin for support, potentially giving him more ammunition in the future.

    And as long as he has Snowden under his control Putin can always offer him up as a bargaining chip in the event that the puppet strings on Trump fail and he really needs to make a deal for some reason. (At which point of course the FSB will suddenly discover evidence that Snowden has been betraying Putin all along, so that it won't be a betrayal on Putin's part to return him to the US.)

    Or alternately if he orders Trump to do something for Russia that is so outrageous that it strains credulity he can offer up Snowden as an excuse for Trump making the deal. (Again, shortly after the FSB "discovers" evidence against Snowden.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  13. Re:fake news from cnn by fredan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    none of what you provide in your reply to me is true.

  14. Re:fake news from cnn by fredan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Which part of that statement did CNN fabricate?

    All of them.

    That term is getting thrown around so much lately that it is obscuring the actual "someone just made this up without any regard to the facts, not because of errors, bad sources, or flawed methodologies but because of deliberately trying to pass off fiction as fact" fake news.

    You usually call this Fox News.

  15. Two parties are here to stay by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My hope is that the Trump administration will continue to highlight the inequalities that are baked into the current system.

    Unless there is some path to actually do something about them what exactly would be the point of that? I have close to zero confidence that anything will meaningfully change any time soon.

    The two party system must come to an end.

    Only way that will happen is if we change the voting system to be something other than First Past the Post and we get rid of Gerrymandering. However since both of those things support the interests of the two major parties neither is likely to see any meaningful reform any time soon.

  16. My buddy lives and breathes by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because the ACA Medicare expansion pays for his meds. He almost died a couple of times because we couldn't afford them. So yeah, people are gonna die because of that leak. Lots of them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  17. Re:Down with Putin - Down with Trump by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How could they "release it all in the beginning?" How are they supposed to release emails about how Hillary got the debate questions in advance from CNN in March 2016 when the primary season started in summer 2015? Did the Russians hack time, too? Why the fuck not apparently they've hacked everything else.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  18. Wholly Delusion Batman! by s.petry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone who watched the process KNEW full well that there was massive collusion by the DNC and Media to INSTALL Hillary as the candidate. In the first election, she won 6 straight coin tosses to take Iowa. That was day 1. So did Russia fix all of the coin tosses, card flips, and dice rolls of which Hillary won 100% of the "tie breakers"?

    Good grief, I honestly wonder how much medication some of the people spreading these conspiracies are missing. I personally really enjoy researching conspiracies, which has led to me personally debunking most of them. What people are claiming over this last election cycle fails the most basic of scrutiny. Russia did not make Hillary attack women who accused William J of rape. The Russians did not make Hillary setup an illegal server. The Russians did not make her spread the lie that a crappy Youtube video caused 4 Americans to die. The Russians did not make her give 2-4 Hundred thousand dollar speeches where she said foolish things about erasing borders. The Russians did not make Hillary praise Sanger and Byrd. Those are things off the top of my head which have been public information for a very long time, all reported by sources OTHER THAN RT.

    The Democrats ran a worse candidate than the Republicans. That is why Hillary lost! Not some baseless allegations. Good grief, think about the allegation. "Trump hates Obama so much that he paid hookers to piss on the bed that the Obama's slept in."

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.