Slashdot Mirror


Cervical Cancer Just Got Much Deadlier -- Because Scientists Fixed a Math Error (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Cervical cancer is 77 percent more deadly for black women and 44 percent more deadly for white women than previously thought, researchers report today in the journal Cancer. But the lethal boosts aren't from more women actually dying than before -- they're from scientists correcting their own calculation error. In the past, their estimates didn't account for women who had undergone hysterectomies -- which almost always removes the cervix, and with it the risk of getting cervical cancer. We don't include men in our calculation because they are not at risk for cervical cancer and by the same measure, we shouldn't include women who don't have a cervix," Anne F. Rositch, the study's lead author and an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins told The New York Times. For the study, the researchers looked at national cervical cancer mortality data collected between 2000 to 2012. They also looked into national survey data on the prevalence of hysterectomies. Then, they used those figures to adjust the number of women at risk of dying of cervical cancer. The researchers found that black women have a mortality rate of 10.1 per 100,000. For white women, the rate is 4.7 per 100,000. Past estimates had those rates at 5.7 and 3.2, respectively. The new death rate for black women in the US is on par with that of developing countries. Though the new study wasn't designed to address racial disparities, experts speculate that the large difference reflects unequal access to preventative medicine and quality healthcare.

9 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Yes we can by lucm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The new death rate for black women in the US is on par with that of developing countries.

    In other news, insurance companies make record profits since Obamacare

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  2. Re:Why wasn't this caught in peer review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh, peer review ultimately found and corrected the error....

  3. If it helps any . . . by mmell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cervical cancer didn't become deadlier, we've just become slightly better informed.

  4. Re:So what can I, as a 30 YRO male, do? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask your doctor about getting an HPV vaccination.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  5. Re:Vitamin D by Imrik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The racial disparity they're talking about in this case is that white women are more likely to get a hysterectomy after they get cervical cancer than black women are. They aren't talking about the overall higher death rate among black women, which could be affected by vitamin D.

  6. Re:Pretend this is slashdot by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cancer might not be caused by lack of quality healthcare, but dying of cancer certainly can be. i.e. People who have access to quality cancer treatments are more likely to survive than people who don't.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  7. No no no no by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Cervical Cancer Just Got Much Deadlier -- Because Scientists Fixed a Math Error"

    No, it's just as deadly as it always was, it's just being measured more accurately now. The perception of the mortality value changed, but nothing else.

    The headline would have you believe that scientists changed a physical property of the universe because they moved a decimal point or something.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  8. Re:Pretend this is slashdot by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This new number was created by explicitly removing women that do have quality healthcare by removing women from the study that had hysterectomies, a form of quality healthcare when cervical cancer is involved. What is left are women that do not have quality healthcare.

    You do realize that a woman NOT having a hysterectomy does NOT mean they don't have access to quality healthcare, right?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  9. Re:So what can I, as a 30 YRO male, do? by silentcoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make no mistake, HPV vaccinations are good for men to get too - even though they don't have cervices because the virus has been linked to other cancers - including throat and tongue cancer. Even if you argue those links are not really definitive yet, getting the vaccine prevents the risk of becoming a carrier and acting like a cervical cancer typhoid-Mary (now watch as the MRA's start demanding men not get the HPV vaccine because men shouldn't be expected to NOT kill women they have sex with).

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *