Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Updates Echo, Echo Dot To Let You Address It As 'Computer' (theverge.com)

ewhac writes: "Computer, what is the time, please?" is now a spoken command that will actually work with Amazon's updated Alexa/Echo smart speaker. Previously, your options were "Alexa," "Echo," and "Amazon." Now you can also choose, "Computer." In practice, it's a bit clunkier than you might hope, depending on how often you speak the word "computer" on a day-to-day basis; and "computer" is harder for machine speech recognition to pick out than "Alexa," so it may not hear you as reliably. But for those who've been yearning for a Star Trek-like future, this small bit of silliness gets you one step closer.

2 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Does "Hello Stasi" work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get a clue Your computer and your phone also have microphones, and transmit WAY more traffic that could hide spying.

    Damn. I'm such an idiot. I wish I had said something like: "yeah cell phones and your laptop have mics and cameras too.." Thanks for making that really insightful observation that I never would have considered. Though when I last checked, my laptop doesn't have a 7-microphone omnidirectional array either and isn't designed and positioned for maximum surveillance of my residence.... And yeah... that bit you said about "transmitting WAY more traffic that could hide spying" is completely logical and makes total sense. The echo, which streams music, podcasts, and basically everything else a computer does... it's totally different and you could never "hide spying" in there.

    As for your *extremely* sophisticated technical analysis, let's begin with...

    Amazon Echo does not have enough on board computing to do voice recognition of anything except the trigger word,

    Right-- understanding the trigger word uses way fewer resources than all the other words.. that are processed.... by the hardware. That makes sense. But no matter-- the DM3725 features an ARM A8 core... definitely too shitty to do anything.... aside from power OMAP3 devices.. and no one could ever use those to record audio. Oh wait, damn. Of course, if I were actually concerned about the technical limitations of a specific Echo model... well, you still don't have a point. But I was speaking more to concerns about the general idea of putting an always-on microphone in your house. Not that you seem capable of understanding the difference.

    I really want to address the rest of what you said, but when re-reading it, it's just so dumb I can't. As your argument essentially boils down to "Echos are for inarticulate, naive idiots" well, I guess that's as close as you'll get to a point. But, getting back to my original concerns, I'm not sure we're in disagreement then.

  2. Re:Does "Hello Stasi" work? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The point is, I'm blown away by the willingness to plop an omnidirectional microphone in the middle of your house.

    Get a clue. Your computer and your phone also have microphones, and transmit WAY more traffic that could hide spying.

    I'm blown away by the dismissive response and display of technical ignorance.

    Amazon Echo does not have enough on board computing to do voice recognition

    It has 250MB of RAM, 4GB of flash and DM3725 arm processor. My blackberry 9000 did local voice recognition with half the RAM a quarter of the onboard flash and slower less capable processor. The original version of dragon recognized 25k words in less than 30MB of ram.

    4GB of flash is enough to store a bit less than two months of continuous non-silence detected cell phone quality audio. With silence detection in most settings and a more complex/aggressive codec you could easily push a year.

    it has minimal memory for buffering, and it transmits a very small amount of data when, and only when, the trigger word is used.

    If you worry about the Echo, and you don't worry about your cellphone or laptop, then you're an idiot.

    Every time someone raises a concern about x you will always find someone jumping on the...but what about y and z bandwagon. WTF do cellphones and laptops have to do with the topic at hand? Is it really necessary for someone raising a concern about x have to enumerate a list of everything else that can possibly raise similar concerns without being called an idiot?