Slashdot Mirror


DragonflEye Project Wants To Turn Insects Into Cyborg Drones

New submitter robotopia writes: Scientists at a research and development company called Draper are using genetic engineering and optoelectronics to turn dragonflies into cybernetic insects, reports IEEE Spectrum. To control the dragonflies, Draper engineers are genetically modifying the nervous system of the insects so they can respond to pulses of light. The goal of the project, called DragonflEye, is enabling insects to carry scientific payloads or conduct surveillance.

78 comments

  1. Killer insects by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 2

    Sounds like an episode of Black Mirror. The bees are next.

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    1. Re:Killer insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bug-bomb... Malfunction...

      *Ow*

      Bug-bomb lost head!

    2. Re:Killer insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually there was a Get Smart episode about this. CONTROL had spend millions developing the spy fly and were demo'ing it when MAX walks in the room and swats it

    3. Re:Killer insects by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      TV Series or Movie? I don't know about the series, but in the movie, it is Agent 23 (played by The Rock) who snatches the fly out of the air and tosses it into a trashcan.

      Get Smart - Agent 23

      The crash into a building bit at the end is not part of the movie, obviously.

    4. Re:Killer insects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the bees! NOT THE BEES! AGHHHH-----beeeeeeeeeeep-- [connection offline]

  2. Not at all creepy by pr0t0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not at all creepy. It's not remotely creepy. It is in no way awfully, shockingly, horrifyingly creepy; and there's no way this can be abused or go wrong.

    Nope.

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    1. Re:Not at all creepy by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      One day they'll malfunction and start digging into people's brains.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    2. Re:Not at all creepy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      "Scientific payloads" . . . or nano-size nuclear weapon payloads . . . Edward Teller and Johnny von Neumann would have loved this . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Not at all creepy by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 2

      Nano-size nuclear weapons? I don't see that coming.

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
    4. Re:Not at all creepy by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because they're nano sized. Duh.

    5. Re:Not at all creepy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      One day they'll malfunction and start digging into people's brains.

      That won't be a malfunction.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re: Not at all creepy by Type44Q · · Score: 2
      I assume that was a joke but cesium-based weaponry offers yields several orders of magnitude greater than chemical explosives (though less than conventional fission warheads) and is well-suited for microminiaturization.

      The future's going to be... interesting.

    7. Re: Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I assume that was a joke but cesium-based weaponry offers yields several orders of magnitude greater than chemical explosives (though less than conventional fission warheads) and is well-suited for microminiaturization.

      The future's going to be... interesting.

      If you weren't on some government "watch list" before, well, you probably are now!

    8. Re:Not at all creepy by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "Scientific payloads" . . . or nano-size nuclear weapon payloads . . . Edward Teller and Johnny von Neumann would have loved this . . .

      Of course, it's going to be a problem to get enough mass into an insect to detonate fissionable material.

      Maybe we can clone some of those carboniferous age insects. Those bastards were huge!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I am NOT for this at all. All I see is downside for this. I am a scientist and so I appreciate that there are neat applications for this, but when is something not co-opted for "national security" or some other state-sponsored purpose that only seems to put the average person under the gun any more?

    10. Re:Not at all creepy by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      The same arguments are made for GMOs and fetal stem-cells.

      Still, you're correct. This can go horribly wrong. A weaponized swarm of bees. Wonderful. Didn't Minority Report has something similar to that?

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    11. Re:Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robot spiders with acid poison, enough said.

    12. Re:Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crystal bats, fly!!

    13. Re:Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with the way Donald is actively trying to suppress information, I'd say he's trying to do the same to Americans.

    14. Re: Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you put a critical mass of cesium in an insect and it blows up a building?
      Very interesting, I'd like to know the further instructions. Revert for the same, senior.

    15. Re:Not at all creepy by cusco · · Score: 1

      I saw a fossil of a half-meter long dragonfly when I was a little kid, and the first thing that came to my mind was I WANT!!!

      "Alexa, send the giant dragonfly to bring me a beer."

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    16. Re:Not at all creepy by J053 · · Score: 1

      2000 or so insects, each carrying a gram of plutonium, flying into a compact mass at a designated point...

    17. Re:Not at all creepy by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      A weaponized swarm of bees. Wonderful. Didn't Minority Report has something similar to that?

      Not sure, but Black Mirror did.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    18. Re:Not at all creepy by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I saw a fossil of a half-meter long dragonfly when I was a little kid, and the first thing that came to my mind was I WANT!!!

      "Alexa, send the giant dragonfly to bring me a beer."

      Humans would have found it very interesting among the humongous bugs back in the day.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re: Not at all creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's not how nukes work. You don't just throw the plutonium down and watch it explode.

    20. Re:Not at all creepy by idji · · Score: 1

      Oh they can come! imagine nano-biobots delivering nanosize nasties like these two famous cases - you would'nt need to get as close as a cup of tea or umbrella. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  3. All life will become a target by AxeTheMax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some time ago I was thinking that the increased use drones could lead to the military killing all birds and larger flying animals from their target areas in case they were used by their enemies. Now it seems that there are reasons for all life to be made a target. An army might find that a literal scorched earth approach - exterminate everything, animal and plant, in the soil and above - is needed to get them victory. As with the use of nuclear bombs on cities, apologists will find ways of justifying this.

    1. Re:All life will become a target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you weren't familiar with the use of Agent Orange and other chemical treatments in Vietnam.

    2. Re:All life will become a target by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Are they going to be granted an exemption for killing members or protected species as well?

    3. Re:All life will become a target by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the US military is so scared of the EPA.

    4. Re:All life will become a target by AxeTheMax · · Score: 1

      What do you mean 'apparently' - yes, not only am I familiar, I'm old enough to remember when it was used. However Agent Orange was not an 'exterminate everything' chemical.

  4. Junk Science by chewie2010 · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a ploy for funding. This is junk science at it's peak.

    1. Re:Junk Science by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      This is obviously a ploy for funding. This is junk science at it's peak.

      Not necessarily so. There have been remote control cockroaches for several years now.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re: Junk Science by PoopJuggler · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're called "Congress".

    3. Re:Junk Science by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "This is junk science at it's peak."

      And that was junk grammar at its peak.

    4. Re: Junk Science by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      No, Congress is an example of cockroaches remote controlling humans.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re: Junk Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked there was nothing no humans in America, only Americans, ie, cockroaches.

    6. Re:Junk Science by cusco · · Score: 1

      In spite of half a century of work on robotics there is still nothing as flexible, adaptable and efficient as living creatures. Ma Nature has had four billion years to get it right, so a dragonfly can zoom around all day refueling in mid-flight while a robotic imitation needs a tether or a battery that runs down in a couple of minutes.

      Here's a practical application; want to check for gypsy moth caterpillar damage in the upper canopy of the closest forest? You could climb up a couple dozen trees, or send the robot dragonfly. Which do you think is the more efficient, safer and less damaging choice?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  5. That's different by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Draper engineers are genetically modifying the nervous system of the insects so they can respond to pulses of light.

    Or is it not much of a stretch?

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  6. Cool stuff! by orlanz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait till Musk gets a wind of this. We will have the Lexx before 2020!

    1. Re:Cool stuff! by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      Can we get Zev first?

      --
      Nope, no sig
  7. Let me get this straight... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Funny

    Scientists are working out a way to make bugs that are... bugs?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      They need to debug bugs in bug bugs first.

  8. OT: Mary Tyler Moore, RIP 80 YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just glad for her that she was able to see Donald Trump become President before she died.

    RIP. I enjoyed your work.

    1. Re:OT: Mary Tyler Moore, RIP 80 YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a moran

  9. Does it scale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I await the day this can be scaled to humans. Humans would be much more tolerable if their minds were all controlled by pulses of light... or is that what we call television?

    1. Re:Does it scale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about that. Trump is being controlled by Putin via a device on his head that looks convincingly like hair. He's not very tolerable.

  10. very late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember Iran taking the cyber-squirrels, upgraded version of "Acoustic kitty" from the 60's. Do you really think we stopped that when squirrels are a bigger threat to our infrastructure than hackers? (https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/17/01/21/039256/are-squirrels-a-bigger-threat-to-our-critical-infrastructure)

    Birds and insects have been on a "wishlist" for a very long time. There are darpa grants to indicate this. In our current hyper-surveillance age, you don't think the massively funded military industrial complex stopped work on these, or that they haven't made any progress, did you?

    If the squirrels were deployed in Iran their capture was inevitable, meaning we likely had secondary trackers that scoped out their response and reverse engineering procedures, and possibly engineered it to have holes to our second line of attack. There would be nothing in them that revealed our current leading/bleeding capabilities.

    Some folks say that current publicly known technology is 50 to 75 years behind what is available but decently classified. Think about that.

  11. Soon by NotInHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Soon the secret service will shoot down every pidgin, every fly entering the air space of the white house. Drones are banned already.

    1. Re:Soon by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I hope not, pidgin has helped people from different cultures communicate for centuries.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re: Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, pidgin is a great IM client that supports many protocols as well. ;) hehe

    3. Re:Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, that's why Trump has signed an executive order banning all pidgin from the capitol.

    4. Re:Soon by dhaen · · Score: 1

      Soon the secret service will shoot down every pidgin, every fly entering the air space of the white house. Drones are banned already.

      I see you are speaking pigeon English - very clever!

    5. Re:Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be before they can stop a man running around the white house.

  12. If I had a dollar.. by 8086 · · Score: 1

    for every single "bug-sized robots are coming" I've read over the years, I'd probably be able to make one myself now. It's a great idea but it's been in the pipeline far too long. Calling it now, in the next 3 months we're going to see another "bug-sized robots are here" story. That's about all one can say with certainty about this invention. As long as science exists, there will always be a researcher looking for funding so they can design a bug-sized robot, only to fail at the last second when they realize they can't put a practical battery on these things.

  13. Respond to pulses of light? by bgarcia · · Score: 1
    Next, we'll need sharks with lasers on their heads to send the commands to the cyborg dragonfleyes.

    I love where this is going.

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    1. Re:Respond to pulses of light? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      So that's where the tornadoes came from; and why the sharks were so pissed when they landed. Got it. Nice to know.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  14. blasphemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone involved should be put to death.

  15. If they can really do this, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    then where's my flying car?

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:If they can really do this, by Z80a · · Score: 1

      When people stop crashing cars into things while drunk.
      In 3D this problem would be significantly worse.

  16. Just wait.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one will welcome our cybernetic dragonfly overlords.

  17. someone is rather out of touch by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Draper Labs has been around for nearly a century; it's a nonprofit R&D institution that does defense-related research, often classified. Referring to it as "a company called Draper" means the poster hasn't done their homework. And they aren't using "optoelectronics", they are using "optogenetics".

    This project is an academic research project, like literally thousands of others at universities and non-profits funded by the US government. This is no Weyland-Yutani or Tyrell corporation.

    1. Re:someone is rather out of touch by Shag · · Score: 1

      Yes, "The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc" is a non-profit that spun out of a little school called MIT in the 1970s. (Not to be confused with "Lincoln Laboratory" which is still officially MIT-run, or "MITRE Corporation" which was created in the late 1950s with mostly former MIT/Lincoln folks.)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:someone is rather out of touch by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It was spun off due to left-wing protests and pressure and hatred of all things military. The cowardly action by MIT administrators damaged MIT, Draper Labs, and the nation.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  18. Animal Torture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look, animal torture masquerading as science.

    The odious Draper scientists need their revolting brains rewired to activate their decency circuits.

  19. War on the honey bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be used to fight the Africanized honey bee. Then we'll make something else to fight the victor of that war and so on..

  20. 1974 - Danny Dunn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We've been here before - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Dunn,_Invisible_Boy

  21. Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point people may need to start keeping lizards, praying mantises, etc. to keep from being spied on (of course then they'll just install their surveillance into the predators).

  22. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Go read Azimov's The Dead Past if you haven't yet. He makes a great point - the ultimate endgame of this type of surveillance technology isn't the government or corporations spying on everything we do. It's regular people using it to spy on each other.

    The voyeurs are going to have a field day with this. You'll never know anymore if your bedroom, your shower stall, the inside of your car as you drive to work, your work office are truly private. Even if you lined a room with metal to create a faraday cage, an insect could be programmed to enter, loiter while a camera records for a few hours, then exit so it can upload the recorded video. You thought companies tracking your web browsing habits with cookies was invasive? You ain't seen nothing yet.

    1. Re:Happy goldfish bowl to you, to me, to everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make some robotic parasites and one can get pictures of the insides.

  23. hash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    #surveillanceculture

  24. wrong subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need such doctoral student

  25. Danny Dunn by mrdogi · · Score: 1

    Not quite exactly the same, but kind of...
    One of my favorite Danny Dunn stories as a kid..

  26. They already created dragonfly drones 10 years ago by ayesnymous · · Score: 1
  27. next: sharks with frickin' lasers _in_ their heads by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... and then human drones.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  28. Danny Dunn Did It.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Dunn,_Invisible_Boy

  29. Obligatory quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 Then out of the smoke came locusts upon the earth, and power was given them, as the scorpions of the earth have power. 4 They were told not to hurt the grass of the earth, nor any green thing, nor any tree, but only the men who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads. 5 And they were not permitted to kill anyone, but to torment for five months; and their torment was like the torment of a scorpion when it stings a man. 6 And in those days men will seek death and will not find it; they will long to die, and death flees from them.

    7 The appearance of the locusts was like horses prepared for battle; and on their heads appeared to be crowns like gold, and their faces were like the faces of men. 8 They had hair like the hair of women, and their teeth were like the teeth of lions. 9 They had breastplates like breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots, of many horses rushing to battle. 10 They have tails like scorpions, and stings; and in their tails is their power to hurt men for five months.
    Rev. 9:3-10
    Yeah, what could go wrong?