Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Take Over Unsecured Radio Transmitters, Play Anti-Trump Song (arstechnica.com)

Ars Technica is reporting that "a certain model of Low Power FM radio transmitter with known vulnerabilities has been targeted in a new wave of radio-station hacks this week." Hackers have taken advantage of an exploit that was known all the way back in April 2016 to take over terrestrial radio stations and broadcast the YG and Nipsey Hussle song "Fuck Donald Trump." From the report: News of the song's unexpected playback on radio stations began emerging shortly after Trump's inauguration on January 20, and the hack has continued to affect LPFM stations -- a type of smaller-radius radio station that began to roll out after the FCC approved the designation in 2000. Over a dozen stations experienced confirmed hacks in recent weeks, with more unconfirmed reports trickling in across the nation. Thus far, the stations' commonality isn't the states of operation or music formats; it's the transmitter. Specifically, hackers have targeted products in the Barix Exstreamer line, which can decode many audio file formats and send them along for LPFM transmission. As Barix told its products' owners in 2016, Exstreamer devices openly connected to the Internet are incredibly vulnerable to having their remote login passwords discovered and systems compromised. The company recommends using full, 24-character passwords and placing any live Internet connections behind firewalls or VPNs. Reports have yet to connect any dots on why the exploit has apparently focused on the YG and Nipsey Hussle song -- though it is fairly popular, having recently finished in the Top 15 of the Village Voice's 2016 Pazz and Jop music critics' poll. Plus, the uncensored lyrics and topical nature are certainly more likely to catch people's attention, especially when played on stations with formats like oldies, classic rock, and Tejano.

99 comments

  1. Fairly Popular? by clonehappy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, let me tell you. The Village Voice's "Pazz and Jop" chart is where I go first to see what's trending amongst large swaths of Americans.

    In fact, I and everyone in here in the office celebrate the entire catalog of "Nipsey Hussle".

    1. Re:Fairly Popular? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      It's year end list compiled from other music critics year-end top ten lists. It's not their fault that you don't understand the difference between a chart that shows what's trending and a poll that shows what critics thought was best over the past year.

    2. Re:Fairly Popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up, Francis.

    3. Re:Fairly Popular? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      *WHOOSH* The joke is, nobody reads the "Village Voice". Nobody except a tiny number of out-of-touch, aging New York liberals. It's not 1974 any more.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re: Fairly Popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chump is popular with stupid people so the tune will be catchy with smart people.
      That is how it works for the stupid amonst you.
      Just FYI ..

    5. Re: Fairly Popular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Today is the day America is taken over by nazis.
      Pole smoking sperm burping nazis.

      Nazis in the White House.
      What a great thing to see.

  2. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay classy, dissenters, stay classy...

    Unlike slashdot, which has gone down the toilet.

  3. I can't verify this, but by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing "Nipsey Hussle" took his stage name as a play on the name of the comedian Nipsey Russell.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: I can't verify this, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct sir.

  4. It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Trump Derangement Syndrome is in full swing.

    1. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can see it now, every other day another "anti-trump" something will make the news. This is going to make it a long 4 years of whining by the left. At some point, it is going to start wearing on everyone who isn't a nutjob leftist and they are going to find out that whining isn't all that attractive.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Most of my Democrat friends are already turning against the constant protesters and rioters. These people need to stop having a temper tantrum and get a fucking job.

    3. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Didn't stop the right for the past 8 years, did it?

    4. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by mmell · · Score: 0
      Don't worry - after Donald Trump (nee: Drumpf) has been relegated to history's dustbin, we'll all stop trying to convince you that truth is not optional and let you get back to your fantasy . . . er, alternate reality.

      It's the one where Spock had a beard, right?

    5. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      May I please ask what the leftard obsession with the Trump family's old-world last name is?

      Literally millions of Americans alive today had a different spelling or variation on their last name before their families came to this country. Is this supposed to be an insult? Or some kind of snark about his policies against terrorists? I'm genuinely confused, can someone please explain this to me?

      I mean yes, you're correct little child, his ancestors were arguably named Drumpf. So fucking what?

    6. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. It was only "Thanks Obama!" snark. Sure, the GOP media whined, but that isn't mainstream. It wasn't everyday, all the time. CNN runs no less than three anti-Trump stories at any given moment. I've seen up to ten.

    7. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't ruin this for us it's all we have. Now if you'll excuse me I'm going to go jack off and then trade my food stamps for weed.

    8. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, get off your high horse long enough to smell what you're shovelling out of its rear end...

      Remember when Obama was first elected? There was plenty of whining by the right then, and that coagulated into 8 solid years of purposely obstructionist deadlock and "no compromise" bullshit rhetoric.

      The response to Trump is no worse. Which is surprising really, considering how the man has reset the scale when it comes to the awfulness of political candidates.

    9. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs are the opiate of the people.

    10. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump was everyday, all the time proclaiming birtherism, and he was just one of the nattering nabobs of negativism.

    11. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If they have a cause then they are hurting that cause. While trying to shut up a truly despicable person by shutting down free speech they have only given that jerk more ammunition to use as proof that liberals are intolerant thought police.

      If Trump was really so awful then why did they wait until AFTER his election to start protesting, which will cause no change whatsoever in the outcome, when they could have been more effective by actually getting out more people to vote BEFORE the election. Probably they were stupid and thought that because Hillary was going to win they could be lazy and stay home, forgetting that there were many elections for senate, congress, state office, city hall, state and local propositions, and dog catcher. Maybe they are fooled into thinking that the president is a dictator and so they don't need to bother voting for anyone else.

    12. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whining by the left

      Yeah, we should just shut up and let Trump and his cronies ruin this country.

    13. Re: It's time to start killing leftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, we're just trying to trace his roots, so we can make sure the motherfucker was born in 'merica.

    14. Re:It's time to start killing leftards by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Remember when Obama was first elected? There was plenty of whining by the right then, and that coagulated into 8 solid years of purposely obstructionist deadlock and "no compromise" bullshit rhetoric.

      The response to Trump is no worse. Which is surprising really, considering how the man has reset the scale when it comes to the awfulness of political candidates.

      Let's not forget Trump was one of the biggest backers of the "birther" movement, trying to get Obama's birth certificate out.

      It's funny now that HIS presidency is being questioned, it's illegitimate, but it was fine when it was HIM doing the questioning.

  5. Please don't by Solandri · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's really hard to have people take you seriously when you're trying to convince them that Trump is reckless, when those opposed to Trump are the ones pulling stunts like this.

    1. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, everyone opposed to Trump is doing this, youbetcha!

    2. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump will perform an exorcism of the SJW'ers. "The power of Trump compels you, the power of Trump compels you.

    3. Re:Please don't by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why not? Because everyone that opposed Obama was a "Racist" and everyone that opposed Hillary was a "Alt-right" and everyone that isn't far left wing is "Nazi" and .....

      I learned it from the left, who can't actually debate anymore. Everyone is a "Hater" and wants to "kill grandma" and eat kittens and shit.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree.

    5. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this is terrible. We should murder these people and their families.

      What we need is some right-wing common sense! Let's all go to Comet PingPong with guns to find the children!!!!

    6. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh this is most certainly not flamebait

    7. Re:Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been deducted $1.25 for citing false-flags over 1 month old. This is your final warning before employment is terminated.

    8. Re: Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! We need to censor those dirty conservatives! Maybe we should put them all in camps or something.

    9. Re: Please don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual, instead of admitting their own faults, conservatives attempt to denigrate any criticism of themselves.

      They, of course, can rant and attack liberals with no restraint, but no exposure of their own failings will be tolerated.

  6. Exploiting idiots not Barix. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Honestly if you did not have a VPN tunnel in place you deserve this in spades. Only a complete and utter moron would have something as important as the radio station audio feed to be unprotected.

    But after working at several radio stations in my life. 100% of radio station owners are pretty much drooling morons.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by tsotha · · Score: 2

      Technology should be secure by default. Not everyone is an expert in IT security, and most people don't understand enough of the context to ask the right questions.

    2. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's like selling doors and then making the buyer go find their own lock...except that doors come without locks.

    3. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean exactly how you buy doors today? Yep. all doors sold have no locks, you MUST buy them seperate. Feel free to go door shopping, I'll wait.

    4. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise a valid point. If people aren't going to build products with proper security, they should build products without security. If a product has no password authentication , and open http and telnet configuration interfaces, it's obvious it needs to be on a private network or locked behind an IP access control device (not necessarily a VPN).

      Sham security is worse than no security, because it presents a false confidence to the end-user. We wouldn't have the present and coming problem of IoT insecurity if no IoT device had any sort of security and was wide-open, because people would see the necessity of dedicated access control devices, that only security professionals and the practically paranoid (but I repeat myself) currently understand.

      Before IP, and still even now sometimes, printers, barcode readers and all manner of other devices attached to mainframes, minicomputers and unix boxes over RS-232, RS-488 and SNA drops. The computer was the point of access control, and none of these devices had any sort of security protocol built into them, and yet these things were all pretty secure, or at least weren't the "point of fail" for the security model in play at the time.

      Likewise in a well managed corporate network, each ethernet drop is it's own private community; From the print server, it might see 50 printers on the printer vlan, but from the printer's view of the network, the only thing it sees is itself and the print servers. SIP phones can talk to each other with rtp streams, but they can't see each other's configuration interface; that can only be seen from the console of the pbx. Modern managed switches have a vast array of isolation and security capabilities and generally do a good job of being secure and easy to configure. Approaches to providing external security already exist, if they're not present in consumer CPEs or not user-friendly enough, that is the problem to address, not the security of the devices.

      It's not the job of the cookie jar to keep people out, they should never have made it to the kitchen.

    5. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is even if it is secure today. Tomorrow it may not be. Look at every OS out there. A vulnerability comes out a patch/fix is made. Days/Weeks/Months later a new vulnerability is found.

      The only true way to make it secure would be not to make it. take a system keep it off the internet locked in a vault and turned off. But even then the system vulnerability. The location and how it is guarded, the lock on the vault, what is the vault made of, and so on.

      If a human built it. It can and will have vulnerabilities. It is just a matter of time before it is found or created.

    6. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly what the GP stated. Feel free to read it again, I'll wait.

    7. Re:Exploiting idiots not Barix. by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Of course. It would be better if the people using it were all experts. But having it secured, as much as possible, by default is better than nothing.

  7. Little Brown Fucking Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol I read LBFM at first glance.

    1. Re: Little Brown Fucking Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it reminded me of you mother and aunt too

  8. it's not ANTI-Trump by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    it's PRO-Trump. TILF.

    1. Re:it's not ANTI-Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does seem more like a pro-Trump thing to do.

  9. Re: The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to deport you!

  10. Power to the people! by r1348 · · Score: 1

    That will show him, right?

  11. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aw, I don't want to actually *rape* the guy.

    I'll just grab him by the pussy.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  12. Re:Actually, I opposed Obama, too. by tsotha · · Score: 1

    The thing is, to most of us it seems quite a hyperbolic stretch to go from restrictions on what foreigners we allow into our country to "Muslims, Hispanics, and Blacks".

  13. Because it bothers you so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (N/T)

  14. Re: The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to build the wall first.

  15. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do you know this was done by anyone in the US? Oh right, you have no fucking idea but are instantly ready to play politics with any football news item.

    I guess we ought to be proud of you not for inventing any bullshit statistics and passing that off as alternate reality, right? Great job kid.

  16. all the way back in April 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    O. M. G.

    That is like so last year.

  17. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by tsotha · · Score: 0

    Right, right. I'm sure it was Russians.

  18. Re: Actually, I opposed Obama, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but the hyperbole was Trump's.

    He knew what he was saying. I've heard several of his defenders say he was being controversial, whether it be his Mexican-paid-for wall or his Muslim ban, or his literally founded ISIS.

    Hold him to account. I dare you to even admit Trump is prone is pompous bombastic language.

    Or just plain inarticulate gabble, like what he said about Frederick Douglass.

  19. to quote Philip J. Fry .. by thygate · · Score: 1

    "stop making your point so badly" - Philip J. Fry

  20. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    fuck white people.

    If you try to turn it into a race thing, you will lose. We all will lose.

  21. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason there isn't much of a reaction in this case is that people expect hackers to do childish things once they've taken control of something, particularly because they're using other people's property to do so.

    That, and, you know, playing something like "Fuck Obama" wouldn't necessarily have been as overtly racist as "Barak the Magic Negro".

  22. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    All the right sees is that someone else's gain is their loss. It's all about them.

    Mexican gets a job picking tomatoes that Americans won't do? "We lost another American job!"
    Lesbian gets the right to buy a cake wherever she wants? "We lost the right to discriminate!"
    Factory can't pollute the river anymore? "We're losing our freedom to rape the Earth!"
    Everyone gets health insurance? "We're losing our weekly dinner at The Sizzler!"

    It's never,

    "Hey, congratulations on your newly-acquired freedoms and rights!"
    "I'm glad we got some people to do that job that nobody really wanted to do, because it increases income tax revenue and helps support our national infrastructure!"
    "It's awesome we're doing something good for the planet!"

    The right is just one giant selfish asshole. That's why they can't see the different between Trump's election and Obama's election, and can't understand why the reactions to those two elections are so different...

  23. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure evidence wouldn't help you decide either way, just trust your gut and run with it! Russia has zero hackers, and Trump would have won the popular vote if it wasn't for 3 million illegal votes lol.

  24. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mexican gets a job picking tomatoes that Americans won't do for minimum wage or less? "We lost another American job!"

    FTFY

  25. I work in radio & TV by subk · · Score: 2

    We use metro-ethernet, OC3'S, satellite, and microwave to deliver program feeds to transmitters. I don't know of any professionals who do it over the Internet. I would never do it under any circumstances. I have no sympathy for anyone dumb enough to try it.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    1. Re:I work in radio & TV by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      We use metro-ethernet, OC3'S, satellite, and microwave to deliver program feeds to transmitters. I don't know of any professionals who do it over the Internet. I would never do it under any circumstances. I have no sympathy for anyone dumb enough to try it.

      These LPFM stations are run out of the back of groceterias and small restaurants. They don't have engineers or professionals. They got their license by mail order and the tower and transmitter out of boxes they might have got on eBay which came with a set of photocopied manuals in Chinese.

      If it works when they give it internet connectivity, everybody is happy.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    2. Re:I work in radio & TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well. I work part-time for a large FM broadcaster and full-time for a national (not US) broadcaster, and while our normal feed is over a licensed WFM UHF trunk (easy to hijack with a $500 transmitter, but shh!), we use internet and wifi contribution for OB and live crosses quite regularly. We do use IPsec, but we also sometimes have to drop a cross when the internet connection gets crappy.

      We also use LTE connections to the internet for contribution as a substitute for SNG extensively. Again IPsec, again, often with dropouts or less-than-live contribution.

      I really think broadcasters who don't rely on some form of IP contribution are in the minority. I mean heck, when they interview someone over Skype on CNN or RT, they are by definition using IP contribution.

      I really don't see what is wrong with using IP for an STL or S-SL either, as long as you have the right SLAs in place with a decent carrier, it's going to deliver all the time, and potentially cost a lot less than dedicated SDH or ethernet links. Most all telephone calls are carried over IP networks now, and shit just works. Not every internet connection is your home DSL.

    3. Re:I work in radio & TV by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Low power FM. Short range, low cost broadcasting. Probably no budget for expensive, reliable links. Internet streaming works fine 99.9% of the time and a little downtime can be tolerated because it's so cheap.

      The lack of security is inexcusable, but only in so far as the manufacturer didn't bother with it. Can't realistically expect consumers to even know that things like HTTP password login pages are not secure, let alone that they need a VPN.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  26. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by mi · · Score: 0

    Getting thrown off a flight once was not enough for you?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  27. Re:The Rad Left by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not the "right" doing this. That's why there's the new world "alt-right". These are NOT your honest respectable Republicans we've had for so long. There is not just a left and the right in the US, that's just stereotyping people so yu don't have to think too hard. Donald Trump doesn't fit into that mold, he's not really left or right. He won the vote from people who are scared, not from people who have a long held well thought out political viewpoint, and he exploited that fear. The this happens with most politician's these days from every stripe, it is not unique to The Donald.

    When you start splitting the country up into 50% on the one side of the political aisle who are good and honest people and 50% on the other side who are assholes, then you have stopped using your brain and have become a part of the problem. And as long as people continue feeling that way then we'll continue to have abysmal elections where our choices are between staunch bigot from party A versus staunch bigot from party B, and we get stuck again with deciding which is the lesser of two evils.

    Why not look at it this way: Everyone is a giant selfish asshole. What makes society work is that we try to hide that base animal nature and pretend to be higher beings. The giant assholes on the left and the right need to learn how to live together or society stops working.

  28. TV strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hackers" indeed. Suddenly everything is a hack. (insert roller blading hip cool teens)

  29. Reversed Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just more evidence that the progressives are the real fascists here. A form of Reversed Fascism if you will. Violence and criminal behavior is BAD, but if its against trump and people that support him, its OK!

  30. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Fuck Donald Trump song has lyrics like "I like white folks, but I don't like you" and "White people feel the same as my next of kin" in addition to the titular "Fuck Donald Trump." It isn't racist crap like what Rush Limbaugh was pushing, so your feeble attempt at drawing a comparison is completely off base.

  31. Hurrah! by JimSadler · · Score: 0

    Hackers do what you can to drive CHUMP into the dump! We need him gone !

    1. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers do what you can to drive CHUMP into the dump! We need him gone !

      If you're going to post anti-Trump messages, could you please at least not seem like such a tool when you do so?

  32. If you can't win a debate...silence the opposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How utterly pathetic the Left are. Can't they even DEBATE people they disagree with? Of course not, because they know they are wrong. Because most of the Left are parasites, leeching off hard working white people, that's why they're HERE, despite the fact that they continually claim white people are 'mean' to them... (i.e. 'racist'). Look at the Berkley RIOT (or 'protest', as the Jew media would have it) against Milo Yianoppoulos.

  33. Re:If you can't win a debate...silence the opposit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to bother you, but I think you dropped this bit of antisemitism while you were taking out your racism.

  34. Re:Raping a 70 years-old man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay classy, dissenters, stay classy...

    Unlike slashdot, which has gone down the toilet.

    Slashdot would have to crawl up to the toilet first...

  35. I have new favorite song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't heard of the song before...have to get the CD and then blast it in my car stereo with the windows rolled down. On second thought, I probably get shot by a gun-hugging, trigger happy alt-right Trumpist.

  36. Re:The Rad Left by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative

    And yet only one side is burning down buildings and beating the shit out of opposition supporters, and it ain't the right. Hillary's insult wasn't really "deplorable", it was "irredeemable". That means most of America is permanently depraved by left-wing standards, and well obviously anything can be done to them, because that's what happens when you dehumanize people.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  37. Re:The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the basket. It was the being-thrown-away. It was always the basket. Trevor Noah, the man from South Africa who has Seen This Shit (tm) was absolutely correct.

  38. Re:If you can't win a debate...silence the opposit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He isnt wrong though. If youd bother to check who really owns the few media conglomerates out there youd know too.

  39. Re:If you can't win a debate...silence the opposit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like how the right debates with gays before discriminating against them?
    Or how they debate with pregnant women before denying them abortions?

  40. Re:The Rad Left by dave420 · · Score: 2

    A song denigrating someone because of what they are is different to one denigrating someone because of who they are. Especially if the former has to resort to dated, racist language... I can't believe you need this spelled out for you.

  41. Is Ars Tech that this stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, it's not the transmitter. It's the Barix network audio decoder. Audio is received by that and it's audio output is wired to the transmitter (exciter) or separate processor.
    The people/entities that connect the Barix box directly to the internet probably wonder why their home pc/laptop is constantly bricked.
    On top of all this, once that song was heard, whoever is responsible for that LPFM station should have taken it off air remotely.
    I tend to wonder if that song was intentional played. Just the kind of thing some LPFM operators think they're entitled to broadcast. I've heard much the same locally. Rules don't apply when you're part of the special, protected class.
    It kinda helps if there's only 4 listeners, anyway.

  42. Re:The Rad Left by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    Well I don't know why I came here tonight,
    I got the feeling that something ain't right,
    I'm so scared in case I fall off my chair,
    And I'm wondering how I'll get down the stairs,

    Clowns to the left of me,
    Jokers to the right, here I am,
    Stuck in the middle with you

    Yes I'm stuck in the middle with you,
    And I'm wondering what it is I should do,
    It's so hard to keep this smile from my face,
    Losing control, yeah, I'm all over the place,

    Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right,
    Here I am, stuck in the middle with you

  43. Re: If you can't win a debate...silence the opposi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bring facts into this discussion mate. The Bible is against abortions, PERIOD. And trump is a bible supporter to the T, he would never go against the Bible ever. Coincidentally, around their period is usually when woman get pregnant.

  44. Re:If you can't win a debate...silence the opposit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After what Obama did, can you blame them? Turns out, having a gay dude running the show, even with a tranny in his arms, just makes shit worse.

  45. Don't make yourself an easy target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry if it is so easy to stereotype people who are lacking in education.

  46. Re: The Rad Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a moron if you think only one side is doing this: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/11/10/us/post-election-hate-crimes-and-fears-trnd/index.html

  47. Re:The Rad Left by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Have you not paid attention? BOTH sides are bashing each other (although there are indeed more than two sides, they two dominant sides pretend that's all there is). People did not vote for Donald Trump because they thought Hillary had too much negative campaigning.

  48. The "c" in rap is still silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And rap still isn't music.