Slashdot Mirror


US House Passes Bill Requiring Warrants To Search Old Emails (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters: The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Monday to require law enforcement authorities to obtain a search warrant before seeking old emails from technology companies, a win for privacy advocates fearful the Trump administration may work to expand government surveillance powers. The House passed the measure by a voice vote. But the legislation was expected to encounter resistance in the Senate, where it failed to advance last year amid opposition by a handful of Republican lawmakers after the House passed it unanimously. Currently, agencies such as the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission only need a subpoena to seek such data from a service provider.

5 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Republicans vote against safety... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Republicans realize they have more to fear from Trump reading their emails than Obama...

    No, they just had Obama promising to veto any such thing. Republicans tabled all sorts of legislation because of that obstructionism. Which is fine. It's supposed to be an adversarial relationship, between those two co-equal branches of government.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  2. Showing your bias, eh? by ckatko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you love all of the GOP bashing even though the GODDAMN BILL WAS WRITTEN BY A REPUBLICAN?

    You want to give Trump an extra 4 years? Keep bashing and invalidating people who are trying to do good things.

    This article is shit. Where's the actual votes? How can you bash the GOP as if you know they ALL opposed it? Do we know what Democrats tried to oppose it and sell out their country? No? Nah, let's ignore them because it messes with "Muh Narrative."

    Here's a link with more detail than the OP's article and the plumb sum of every comment here too:

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/...

    It doesn't have the votes talled yet. (And the article didn't even mention the fucking bill HR number?) But it's got the list of cosponsers which is a pretty obvious indicator of SUPPORTERS of the bill.

    64 Republicans
    44 Democrats.

    What's that? What? MORE REPUBLICANS cosponsered the bill? No! Surely, the GOP's only goal is to "Take Muh Freedoms!", remember?

    Goddamn. Everyone posting here who whines about "The System" doesn't realize their freaking ignorance and blind "Support the Team!" politics are the reason this country is so damn gridlocked in the first place.

    And I say all of this as a both-side voting, MODERATE. But nah, feel free to disregard my actual facts under the "He's probably a just Nazi" routine and continue ignoring the GOP people helping you (and ignoring the crimes of the Democrats who DON'T help you). That'll sure make the USA a better place.

  3. Re:Republicans vote against safety... by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The house is majority Republican. It is the Republicans that just passed this privacy measure

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  4. Re:Republicans vote against safety... by unixisc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, somehow busts the myth that Republicans are against privacy and for an intrusive law enforcement all in the name of security

  5. Sad state of slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once upon a time slashdot would have rejoiced at news like this. The notion that privacy is serious and given precedence- celebrated. Now we have page after page of politics, and drivel about this not being good enough. This is a win. Requiring warrants is as good as it gets. Be happy.