Slashdot Mirror


Why Has Cameroon Blocked the Internet? (bbc.com)

It has been over three weeks since English-speaking parts of Cameroon, a country on the west coast of Africa between Nigeria and Gabon, has had no internet connectivity. Residents believe, according to a BBC report, that the government is behind it. From the report: The two regions affected, South-West and North-West, have seen anti-government protests in recent months. Just a day before services disappeared, the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications issued a statement in which it warned social media users of criminal penalties if they were to "issue or spread information, including by way of electronic communications or information technology systems, without any evidence." There has been no official comment about the internet since then (or any credible reports of technical faults) leading many Cameroonians to conclude that the severing of services is part of government attempts to stifle dissent. In criticising their government, some Cameroonians have also taken aim at the mobile phone companies who provide the services through which many access the internet. These firms may not have been able to prevent the outage, since they all rely on fibre-optic infrastructure provided by a state-owned company, but nor have they been objecting publicly about the interruption to their services.

13 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Because it's a totalitarian government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Block internet ==> I now know you are not a government worthy of honor or power.

    1. Re:Because it's a totalitarian government by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's no longer funny.

      Sad.

    2. Re:Because it's a totalitarian government by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      The rule is "no Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator.", Elizabeth Warren was reading and quoting a letter by others, so quite literally she did not break the rule, as she was quoting some one else. So Senator Warren did not make the claims, the Senator simply quoted other peoples works as such McConnell broke the rule and should be barred because he falsely implied Senator Warren broke the rule.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Political opponents by Gilgaron · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ruling politicians sent their political opponents out to investigate the issue, but they never returned for some reason...

  3. Re:Sounds nefarious by Pascoea · · Score: 2

    America should take a stand here.

    Sounds like we should send over some Freedom(tm)

  4. Re:Sounds nefarious by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their citizens deserve a voice! America should take a stand here.

    This idea that America needs to try and help every country in the world when we have our own problems is what gets people like Trump elected. "America First" isn't just about foreign labor.

  5. Re:Sounds nefarious by loonycyborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not every country. Just ones that have exploitable resources and where puppet governments can be installed.

  6. Imperialism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shame on you, ex-British Prime Minister David Cameroon!

  7. Re:Sounds nefarious by networkBoy · · Score: 2

    IDK if we have all that much to spare these days...

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  8. three weeks since no internet connectivity by whizzard · · Score: 2

    It has been over three weeks since English-speaking parts of Cameroon [...] has had no internet connectivity.

    So it's working then?

  9. Re:Sounds nefarious by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This idea that America needs to try and help every country in the world when we have our own problems is what gets people like Trump elected.

    Standing up for human rights worldwide does not diminish our ability to deal with our own problems. A far better argument is that efforts to "fix" other countries have been futile and counterproductive. Look at North Korea and Cuba. We have isolated and embargoed them for decades, and their oppressive regimes have lasted far longer than any others. The Castro and Kim dynasties would likely be long forgotten if they had been unable to blame their economic incompetence on foreign devils, and unable to accuse their opponents of being American stooges.

  10. Re:Sounds nefarious by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    More importantly, sanctions don't hurt the dictators, they hurt the people..
    Decreased trade impacts the people, while those in power continue their black market trading, and reduced communication makes it easier for such regimes to control the flow of information to the people.
    If anything, increased trade and closer relations with such governments would be far more effective.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  11. Re:Sounds nefarious by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    You aren't using much, so there must be a big stockpile somewhere.

    When I say big, I mean yuuuuuuge.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."