Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Teases Windows 10's Upcoming 'Project Neon' Design Language (windowscentral.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Windows Central: Microsoft just gave developers a sneak peek at Project Neon, Microsoft's upcoming design language for Windows 10 that aims to add fluidity, animation and blur to apps and the operating system. We exclusively revealed that this was in the works in late 2016, and today Microsoft has given us a first peak at what Project Neon will look like. During the Windows Developer Day livestream, an image of Project Neon was seen the background of one of the PowerPoint slides being shown off on stage. Although not much, it's further confirmation that this is the end goal for Windows 10's UI, and Project Neon will be bringing a fresh coat of paint to apps. Project Neon should benefit all types of Windows 10 devices, including Windows 10 Mobile, HoloLens and even Xbox. We're still several months away from Project Neon being everywhere in Windows 10, and we're expecting to see more at BUILD this coming May. In fact, a lot of the Project Neon APIs are available in the latest Insider Preview builds of Windows 10, meaning developers can already begin taking advantage of these new user interfaces and design language! Animations and transitions are a big deal with Project Neon, with the goal of making the operating system and apps feel like they work together. Peter Bright does a good job summarizing the looks of the screenshot via Ars Technica: "The picture shows a refreshed version of the Groove music app on a Windows desktop. The fundamentals of the app and its layout aren't changed, underscoring that Neon is very much an iteration of the current Metro/Microsoft Design Language (MDL). The window has shed its discrete title bar and one pixel border, with the application content now extending to the very edge of the window. The search text field no longer has a box around it, and the left hand pane has a hint of translucency to it." You can view the screenshot here and judge it for yourself.

8 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. So even worse than before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... "shed its discrete title bar and one pixel border"... "content ... to the very edge of the window"... "search text field no longer has a box". Sounds (and looks) to me like they've just regressed still further into the tiled layout, hey let's just make everything look like a congealed mess of applications and graphics with no visual cues as to which app belongs to what style of design. Just what the world needs (or not). Oh, and "hint of translucency to it" just to add some vista bleh to the mix (though to be honest I don't mind translucency and a bit of window animation so long as it doesn't hurt performance too much).

    Clearly we've moved from the innovation and real development stage of UI design to stagnation and deck-chair shuffling phase.

    1. Re:So even worse than before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somebody needs to take today's UI "design language" designers out back and smack them around a little. No need to break any bones, but bruises and a little blood wouldn't be amiss. Then introduce them to the likes of Motif. Make it clear that they understand that window borders should be discernible; that control elements like buttons and checkboxes should be unmistakably identifiable; that there should be reasonable contrast between text elements and background. The UI doesn't necessarily need to be as sharply boxy and as blandly-colored as Motif, but until they can explain, in clear, simple terms, why why today's fugly, flat, bland (iOS/Android)/gaudy (Windows) UIs suck in their "design language" by comparison, they should be beaten^W interrogated with enthusiastic enhancement.

      Motif and UIs from that era may look old and boring today, but at least you knew exactly what UI elements you were dealing with. I'll take that over the gaudy, boxy crap Microsoft puked up with Window 8/10 or the low-contrast, flat blandness that iOS, Android, and to a large degree macOS have become.

  2. Removal of visual cues by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The search text field no longer has a box around it, and the left hand pane has a hint of translucency to it.

    In other words, making it more difficult for people to figure out where the box is located to do anything. What next, will the search box be made 90% translucent and float around your screen?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  3. Windows classic by Toshito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love window borders, title bars, scroll bars, and I want text boxes and clickable buttons to look like they're not part of the background please.

    Design over function is never good for a tool. But if you want your OS to look like a toy, go ahead.

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel
  4. The designers have taken over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everything is tone in tone, low contrast and flat and there are huge amounts of empty space. FFS, send these idiots home and give them a modern art museum to play in. The computer is a tool, not a fashion accessory.

  5. Two questions by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, can it be disabled?

    Second, when are you going to fix the spying?

    Everything else, please talk it into the box over there, I'll ignore later.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. not useless, but not revolutionary. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's just a move towards back to windows 2000 gui rules.

    you know, like input text boxes looking like input text boxes and buttons being distinctly buttons.

    they make it sound all fancy and all that, but thats what it is. basically they're reinventing the wheel they spent tens of millions dollars to research in mid and early '90s.

    a good example of how the current metro design language is fucked up is just the windows 10 installer. you have _choices_ where the other choice is a distinct box and the another choice is something that looks like a hyperlink buried in the text - both of these behave the same (take you to the next screen with the choice you made) but look totally different to the point that most users aren't even aware there is a choice to install it without a microsoft account.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Re:Windows 10 by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hey Microsoft, here's an idea: How about a Project Make It Look Like Windows Again, as opposed to your ongoing series of Project Graphics Arts Students Final Assignment that you've been doing since Windows 7?