Slashdot Mirror


Iconic Feature Phone Nokia 3310 Coming Back this Month, VentureBeat Says (venturebeat.com)

The iconic Nokia 3310 feature phone is all set for a return, according to a report. VentureBeat adds: HMD Global Oy, the Finnish manufacturer with exclusive rights to market phones under the storied Nokia brand, is planning to announce four such handsets at Mobile World Congress later this month, according to a person briefed on the company's plans. Known primarily for its plentiful battery life and nearly indestructible build, the 3310 was released at the turn of the millennium as a replacement to the also-popular 3210.

95 comments

  1. Not Even Kidding by joshtops · · Score: 2

    I'm gonna buy two-three of these phones. Could come in handy every once in a while, especially when I am on a trip.

    1. Re:Not Even Kidding by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I can see having one of these in the car or RV, with a cheapie prepaid SIM card that might need a small top-off every few months. Definitely worth having.

      I do miss the $15 prepaid candybar Nokia phone. Only did basic texts and phone... but it worked well, and Nokia's UI for the feature phones is unmatched.

    2. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can already get $9 phones if you want:

      https://www.walmart.com/ip/Tra...

    3. Re:Not Even Kidding by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basic text and phone and nothing else is EXACTLY what I want for the phone that is used for text message verification in online banking. Zero chance of catching any malware.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Not Even Kidding by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      I do miss the $15 prepaid candybar Nokia phone. Only did basic texts and phone... but it worked well, and Nokia's UI for the feature phones is unmatched.

      Cheap prepaid plans at $3/month or less can still be found: http://www.cellguru.net/prepai...
      There are even some cheap unlimited plans without data for $20 or less: http://www.prepaidphonenews.co...

    5. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Zero chance of catching any malware."

      I had an old Nokia 3310, bought at an auction for $3. Did a ROM dump, it's got gov't loaded firmware on it, it used to belong to a well-known Memphis drug dealer.

      So much for that zero chance.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Not Even Kidding by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Good way to keep the TSA out of your email and Facebook I guess.

    7. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perfect for taking into the USA. No 'SmartPhone' features for the DHS etc goons to demand passwords to Facebook etc.

    8. Re:Not Even Kidding by ewibble · · Score: 1

      I have a $20 a year plan, not in the US, I can't use it much but don't want too either, it just lets me be contactable, and make the occasional phone call. 1 minute a month is enough for anybody right? ok it enough for me but I am strange.

    9. Re:Not Even Kidding by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      The cheapest we have in the USA from a major carrier (t-mobile) is $36 a year and includes 30 minutes a month. There are a few cheaper options from resellers if you never actually use your phone. We also have an interesting feature that even a "disconnected" phone can still call 911, our police/fire/emergency number. Not sure if other countries do something like that or not.

    10. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you know it belonged to a well-known Memphis drug-dealer? Law enforcement auction? Also...Craig Petties?

    11. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you lie so much about everything?

      Seriously mods, take a look at this loser's posting history. He claims to be an expert at practically everything and makes all sorts of ridiculous comments without any proof.

    12. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also have an interesting feature that even a "disconnected" phone can still call 911, our police/fire/emergency number. Not sure if other countries do something like that or not.

      Every country I have ever been to also has laws that require emergency functionality of mobile phones.

      Further, here in Europe, you can still receive normal calls and SMS from anyone even if your phone is "disconnected", but the number has not yet been reassigned, which is usually about a year from the time you last paid your bill/topped-up. That is because receiving a call or SMS doesn't cost anything, unlike in the US where they try to double dip and charge both parties.

    13. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could just have their own computers and demand your login credentials anyway.

    14. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no wish to go to the US for any reason, but If I had, I still wouldn't dare since I don't *have* a twitter or a FB account.. There simply is no telling how that would go down.

    15. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 2

      Police auction. You learn who had what and where it came from, as required by law.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      And yet I'm going to become VP of one of California's oldest non-profits within a year. *yawn*

      Go play with yourself some more. Real people are talking and discussing things.

      Bet you didn't know shit about the hidden debug feature in the 3310, did you?

      Shit's been known about since like 2003, too.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:Not Even Kidding by lifeisshort · · Score: 1

      All GSM mobile stations in europe can dial 112 even without sim card

    18. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you aren't. You have zero influence and a shitty job, if you even have a job, junior.

    19. Re: Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are so backwards.

      I had some visiting back in the 2000's that were amazed phones had caller ID and could send pictures !

      They also couldnt understand why a phone could receive texts/calls even when disconnected.

      Still, its to be expected considering the punitive system they live under.

    20. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true in America. You don't need a SIM for 911.

    21. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm pretty interested, care to share links ?

    22. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I'm going to become VP of one of California's oldest non-profits within a year. *yawn*

      Oh well everything you say *must* be true then.

    23. Re:Not Even Kidding by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used one of those? I have. Never again.

      The Noka 3310 (although the 1100 is superior) is the most usable cellphone ever made.

    24. Re: Not Even Kidding by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Americans are so backwards.

      I had some visiting back in the 2000's that were amazed phones had caller ID and could send pictures !

      They also couldnt understand why a phone could receive texts/calls even when disconnected.

      Still, its to be expected considering the punitive system they live under.

      A lot of our problems come from our shear size and our low population density in some areas and even though people rarely leave their home town, they expect their phone to work flawlessly in an area larger than Europe. Our 911 system for instance are all mostly independent system in each city. Our carriers have to spend a tremendous amount of money building out towers and then upgrading those towers and interfacing with the local system. Our other issue is that our landline system was so good. A lot of countries skipped over landlines and went straight to cellular and in many cases even skipped over first generation technologies like cdma and went straight to gsm. You combine those and you have a lot more cost per customer than most countries do.

    25. Re: Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name the company of stfu.

      In other news, when Santa Clause dies this month, I will be taking over his duties. Make me...Pope Sir Santa Clause VI

    26. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Shitty job that pays on average $250/hr and where my office is primarily mother nature?

      You must not do a lot of mining, let alone leave your desk chair enough to have even come up with such a thought.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Got a 3310?

      1. Turn the phones power on and get to the normal screen where you can enter phone numbers.

      2. Enter into the phone the following sequence:

      " *3001#12345# "

      You're now in your phone's debug mode. You can turn on the Field Test function, which will give you all the data from cell towers nearby, including the ones police use to spy on you or surreptitiously update your phone firmware.

      Which is how I found out it was backdoored by the gov't. You learn pretty quickly what the carrier tower names are, and which signals are re-broadcasts, and more just with that one debug option.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re: Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe is geographically larger than the US.

      GSM predates CDMA for mobiles phones by about a decade.

    29. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you seem to misunderstand, we're talking about real life not your daydream fantasy land.

    30. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you said you found government loaded firmware by doing a ROM dump.

      You know when you lie, it's best to be consistent.

    31. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to this thread http://forum.gsmhosting.com/vbb/f131/code-3001-12345-a-96476 that code does not work for the Nokia 3310 and in fact only works for certain CDMA phones. The Nokia 3310 only came as a GSM phone.

      I encourage everyone to do their own searches for:

      Nokia 3310 *3001#12345#

      to see how much of a liar Khyber is.

    32. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Too bad you hae no ability to discern real life from your own fantasy of me having no life.

      Meanwhile, as I hold a $30,000 ruby in my fucking hands...

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    33. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I thought you said you found government loaded firmware by doing a ROM dump."

      Wouldn't have known to do the ROM dump until I learned that the phone was not connecting to a Cricket tower when it's on a Cricket service.

      Nice to know your logic is a failure like most everyone else around here.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    34. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They released a CDMA test version in 2003 for the American market, and it failed because of the Sprint PCS network being so dominant at the time. I worked at Radio Shack during that time, when all we were doing was moving from selling parts to selling phone plans. We tried making loads of money from that cheap brick but Sprint made that a futile attempt.

    35. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hold nothing but your own virgin penis in your hands, loser.

    36. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They released a CDMA test version in 2003 for the American market, and it failed because of the Sprint PCS network being so dominant at the time.

      Yeah, sure they did. LOL.

      I worked at Radio Shack during that time

      So you are a real rags to riches story I guess. Radio Shack plebe becomes rich expert at everything, HAHAHAHAHA!

      You're burying yourself better than anyone else could. This is genuine entertainment.

    37. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure. Change your story some more why don't you? The more you say, the more you expose yourself as a liar.

      Cricket was started as a subsidiary of Leap, an all CDMA provider. The Nokia 3310 was a GSM-only phone.

    38. Re:Not Even Kidding by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone below just busted your ass wide open. Another AC, at that.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    39. Re:Not Even Kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You posting as AC isn't someone else, it's still you and you're still a liar.

  2. Re:Iconic feature! by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

    A phone with pussy and tits would sell so well!

    Also it's only fair - the women have had vibration in theirs for decades!

  3. Hmm by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    I wish they'd do something with the older 21xx series. Those were beautiful phones, again almost indestructible, part of the golden age of Nokia design. I'd want it slightly modernized, specifically with Bluetooth audio. They could probably actually fit a semi-integrated Android tablet on the back if they wanted to ensure people buying it didn't feel like they had to give one up to have the other.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Hmm by billyswong · · Score: 2

      Talking of modernization, I wonder if they will add 3G network connectivity, as 2G mobile network is on the edge of phasing-out. (Asking 4G VoLTE is too much so I won't)

    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The modern functional equivalents of the Nokia 3310 (2G Nokia 22Xs and similar built on the MAUI Runtime Environment) worked well in the US until the AT&T 2G sunset last month https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVh9wDBtf6w . Battery life pushing two weeks.

    3. Re:Hmm by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't really have a choice on now on many carriers...AT&T's 2G is gone as of Jan 1 this year. I'm not sure the situation in Europe.

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as 2G mobile network is on the edge of phasing-out

      I see what you did there.

    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just a little after 1 January as it turned out --- see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVh9wDBtf6w for details.

    6. Re:Hmm by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      Unverified info from a smaller European operator: transition to LTE is the goal, 3G will be gone mid-term. 2G will stay for a long time because too much deployed (mainly IoT, phones don't live very long anyway) equipment is not LTE-capable.

  4. Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 3310 barely fits in a pocket. Nokia had a bunch of just as tough and good but smaller candybar phones like the 2610.

    To this day I still use my 2610 when my phone will be at high risk of being damaged. For example when doing anything water related (beach, pool, boating, fishing, etc). That way I don't risk dropping my expensive smart phone in the ocean.

    1. Re:Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by skids · · Score: 1

      Really what they need to do is make it look as much as possible like a TV remote, because ass-dials just aren't funny enough anymore.

    2. Re:Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A massive smartphone fits into your pockets but not a slightly thicker candybar phone?

      Personally I prefer the 3510.

    3. Re:Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The candy bar may be 1/2 the width, but it's 3x thicker. It's a much bigger bulge.

    4. Re:Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an issue

    5. Re:Nokia had a lot of better candybar phones by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Hey there are people who resort to packing in order to get a bigger bulge.

  5. Updated? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully these will have something better than a WAP browser? maybe a 3390 version for the US?

    Oh, probably not intended for the US.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  6. Re:Trump's wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is only one reason that I will not be buying one of these. That is because, when they were out originally I bought several and they still work fine including most of the original batteries (though the life isn't so good any more). Would recommend to a friend. I used to use them as sports phones so it's not like they didn't regularly get dropped and abused.

  7. Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The indestructableness of Nokia 3310 is a myth. I was repairing mobile phones back then when 3310 was considered a modern phone. The 3310 have small and weak tabs on the side that keeps the shell in place. They get chipped easily and the sliding rear panel also is prone to sliding off. The battery holding plastic spring breaks easily. The keypad foil as well as keys themselves are subpar when compared to other phones of same era.

    The indestuctableness comes from time period when 3310 was cheap phone and it was intentionally abused. Despite damage to outer shell and keys, it could be held together by duct tape and it continued to function after being smashed against pavement and so on. Still, most Siemens phones fared much better in this regard.

    1. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cover shell isn't really important, also siemens interface sucked.

    2. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have my old Siemens A55. That thing has been dropped and had beer spilled on it numerous times. It once even laid buried in the snow overnight and it still works just fine all of these years later.

    3. Re:Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were working with repairing mobile phones, and guess what you saw..? Did you ever consider how many 3310's you never saw, because they didn't break?

  8. In the USA? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Just asking because the specs on this say its a GSM phone. And my poor old Motorola Razr V3 was recently abandoned by AT&T. Because it's not 3G or better.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. I miss my old Nokia by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had a 7110. Great phone, eternal standby (seriously, you charged it once a week and it had no problem retaining that power) and back then that spring-mechanism was just way too cool.

    Only thing that bothered me, and that eventually broke, was that antenna stub. Without that it would have been the perfect phone. Very rugged, near indestructible (except for that damn antenna) and that spring mechanism worked for a surprisingly long time...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I miss my old Nokia by robinsc · · Score: 1

      I had the 5110... everything you love about the 7110 but no spring so even less failure chances and the standby/talktime was unbelivable.

      --
      Linkedin http://in.linkedin.com/in/robinsaikatchatterjee
  10. I have always wished... by loranger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone. --Bjarne Stroustrup

    1. Re:I have always wished... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone. --Bjarne Stroustrup

      On behalf of all C++ developers past, present and future it's called karma. And you have a very long way to go to break even.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:I have always wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we really blame BS for the community add-ons over the years? The committee tries to satisfy many communities at once, while being backwards compatible and implementable by the compiler manufacturers. The result is naturally a complex tool.

    3. Re:I have always wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you haven't followed c++ evolution in recent years. It's a rather nice language now.

  11. Modern Feature Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love a modernized Nokia 6500. It was a well-designed, solid feature phone, one of the first with a micro-USB charger. Modern chipsets are coming down in price and power consumption, and carriers are trying to free up 2G/2.5G/3G spectrum.

    Here's a quick feature wishlist: VoLTE, USB-C charger, 5+MP camera, flashlight, 3.5mm audio jack, and GPS. Apps / applets for functionality, such as TTS, auto uploading photos, or Spotify. For a higher end model, maybe add in a voice assistant a la Alexa, Siri, Hound, Google Assistant.

    I'm not the only one who wants this. See Louis CK's story where his daughter writes him a thank you note for giving up his smart phone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Df4xdr_5pk

    1. Re:Modern Feature Phone by billyswong · · Score: 1

      Apps / applets for functionality? They are killing "feature-phone" (read: non-android/apple phone) with app functionality. The whatsapp installed in my lovely nokia 301 nagged me all the time last year that it will go out of support. *Luckily* its earpiece has been broken already (relying headset/loudspeaker) so buying a replacing "smart" phone is not too heart-breaking.

  12. Re:Iconic feature! by nicholasjamesreid · · Score: 0

    God. Has Slashdot descended to this? Get a life.

  13. perfect for protesters! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    The cops can't take your info from it (because it holds none) and it's great for breaking windows! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:perfect for protesters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still holds information about your contacts, who you called, and who called you. That can be extremely helpful.

  14. tethering by noahm · · Score: 1

    A dumb phone with 4G wifi hotspot functionality may be my ideal device. It's not clear from the article if that'll be supported, but I'd be pleasantly surprised if it was.

    1. Re:tethering by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      A dumb phone with 4G wifi hotspot functionality may be my ideal device. It's not clear from the article if that'll be supported, but I'd be pleasantly surprised if it was.

      I asked for this years ago. When they first started coming out with smart phones, I was annoyed that I couldn't just pick my tablet/ipod of choice and tether it to my phone of choice. A smartphone is still inferior to a dumb phone for placing calls. There are obviously people that want an all in one so they don't have to carry two devices but having the flexibility of detaching your cellular service from your screen of choice would be awesome.

    2. Re:tethering by nasch · · Score: 1

      Maybe you have a different definition of dumb phone than I do but what good is 4G on a dumb phone?

    3. Re:tethering by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      It's good for providing a wifi hotspot, while still being an actual phone to boot.

    4. Re:tethering by Slayer · · Score: 1

      While we take networking and wifi as more or less granted on new devices, these services are quite computationally expensive and draw a lot of battery. If you want this feature, you pretty much have to go the whole way to smart phone, except for maybe the display. But honestly: once you have the clunky size and crappy battery life of a smart phone, you may as well get that large display screen, too.

  15. Re:Gay sex making a cum-back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being obsessed with that doesn't reflect favourably on you.

  16. Had its predecessor the 6010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost identical to the 3310. Bullet proof, legendary battery life. Wish I still had it. I dropped that onto concrete from 10 to 15 feet high many times when I was up on a ladder checking APs. Never a problem. Got totally soaked in water more than once and dried out fine. Symbian was a reasonable OS too.

  17. No need to come back. Old one is stills works fine by papa_san · · Score: 1

    OK, there are a few scratches but it works like it did when I bought it.

  18. RTFA? no - AdBlock blocking blocking by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    No thanks.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:RTFA? no - AdBlock blocking blocking by werepants · · Score: 1

      Is it blocking the ad blocking that AdBlock tries to implement? So you have ads? Or is it blocking people who were trying to block AdBlock? Which means you are back to no ads? Too many negations, cannot parse!

    2. Re:RTFA? no - AdBlock blocking blocking by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Is it blocking the ad blocking that AdBlock tries to implement? So you have ads? Or is it blocking people who were trying to block AdBlock? Which means you are back to no ads? Too many negations, cannot parse!

      Careful - App guy will show up!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  19. n900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Ok.. how about a updated version of this? :)

  20. Re:Iconic feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grow up and find a sense of humour.

  21. How about a 6820 instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That T9 texting was for the birds. The 6820 had the flip out QWERTY keyboard. Kick ass! Probably my favorite phone of all time.

    1. Re:How about a 6820 instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T9 is faster than thumbing QWERTY if you are used to it.

  22. Re:Iconic feature! by aliquis · · Score: 2

    God. Has Slashdot descended to this? Get a life.

    I'm nothing but a man; no matter how brilliant my ideas may be.

    Anyway, I assume what you mean is to "get a wife", I've tried but they don't want me!!

    (I even got stuff which vibrates for the object in question but of course I should had understand that in this day and age with smartphones and learning machines even that is too simple.)