Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Has Cancelled the Second-Gen HoloLens, Working on Third-Gen For 2019 Launch (thurrott.com)

Citing several unnamed sources, long-time blogger Brad Sams is reporting that Microsoft has canceled the second iteration of the HoloLens in an attempt to focus on even more advanced HoloLens. The company, he says, now plans to launch that third iteration of HoloLens in 2019. From the report: Back when the first version of HoloLens came out, Microsoft created a roadmap that highlighted several release points for the product. This isn't unusual, you start with the first device, second generation devices are typically smaller and more affordable and then with version three you introduce new technology that upgrades the experience; this is a standard process path in the technology sector. Microsoft, based on my sources, is sidelining what was going to be version two of HoloLens and is going straight to version three. By skipping what was version two on their roadmap, the company can accelerate version three which will be closer to a generational leap and help keep Microsoft ahead of the competition. My sources are telling me that this version of HoloLens will not arrive until 2019.

7 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. If Apple built a Hololens we'd never hear about it by RandyHill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until it was ready for release. It's just bad product management to tease products that aren't ready for release yet, solve the main problems behind locked doors first.

  2. Innovation by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ya gotta admit, it's pretty fucking innovative to cancel the product before it's even launched.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  3. Off topic about the Ad by fuzzyf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Could the intern who taped/stapled/glued the Ad on the top of slashdot (Classic view) please be given time to learn Javascript/css?

    Looks likes something from early dot-com. It makes the page behave oddly and annoyingly (on all my devices, but more so on iphone).

  4. I heard one guy made a deal with the Robot Devil by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    well to be fair, the hololens is such a difficult instrument, only a few people in the whole universe can master it.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  5. Re:If Apple built a Hololens we'd never hear about by Thruen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So much this. I was actually really excited for the HoloLens, then I got to try it at a trade show. Excitement gone. The concept is awesome, but the product itself just isn't there yet. The gesture recognition was good, but the viewing area was tiny and hard to see, not to mention the headpiece is unwieldy and almost painful to wear even for a few minutes. I really want to like the HoloLens, it's just so bad right now.

  6. Re:If Apple built a Hololens we'd never hear about by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Release? Who wants to release? We're just announcing something forever so nobody else bothers to build one or if they do, nobody buys it because they're waiting for the Microsoft one.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Perfect is the enemy of good by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the engineering improvement curve for stuff like this is really steep. What's practically impossible today, is practical but outrageously expensive in 9 months and commodity priced in 18 months.

    IMHO, all of the VR stuff is so bleeding edge that it's going to make the smartphone cycle look slow and methodical in 5 years. Meanwhile, do you rush out products that are expensive, quickly obsolete and don't grab many buyers in the name of "getting to market first"? Or do you iterate it internally and among select developers until your actual concept is practical and at prices that will gain a high volume of sales?

    I don't think they're out of line here, the technology in this stuff is advancing faster than they can integrate it into a coherent product and get it to manufacturing.