Slashdot Mirror


Online Piracy Can Boost Comic Book Sales, Research Finds (torrentfreak.com)

A number of studies show that piracy helps movies, TV shows, and music albums find a much wider audience, which in turn, often times, help in boosting their revenue. But what about comic books? A new academic study shows that piracy can have a positive effect on comic book sales, too, albeit under certain conditions. From a report on TorrentFreak: Manga, in particular, has traditionally been very popular on file-sharing networks and sites. These are dozens of large sites dedicated to the comics, which are downloaded in their millions. According to the anti-piracy group CODA, which represents Japanese comic publishers, piracy losses overseas are estimated to be double the size of overseas legal revenue. With this in mind, Professor Tatsuo Tanaka of the Faculty of Economics at Keio University decided to look more closely at how piracy interacts with legal sales. In a natural experiment, he examined how the availability of pirated comic books affected revenue. Interestingly, the results show that decreased availability of pirated comics doesn't always help sales. In fact, for comics that no longer release new volumes, the effect is reversed. "Piracy decreases sales of ongoing comics, but it increases sales of completed comics," Professor Tanaka writes. "To put this another way, displacement effect is dominant for ongoing comics, and advertisement effect is dominant for completed comics," he adds.

11 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. That's obvious as hell for Japanese stuff by FireballX301 · · Score: 1

    Manga in particular doesn't get published in the US until large groups of fans and translation groups put together their own scanlations and publish them. As with the old piracy nonsense, the 'pirated sales' are nonexistent because the sales would never have happened anyway - what random US fan that isn't JP-literate would buy a JP published manga unless they had read at least some of it first? How do they read it prior to it being scanned and translated ("pirated")?

    If it weren't for the original pirates passing around photocopied manga and horrible quality 5-time-copied TV rips of shows on VHS way back in the 80s and 90s, the market would barely exist in the US.

    1. Re:That's obvious as hell for Japanese stuff by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      It seems that a digital format standard allowing overlay, and then giving free licence to produce those overlays would be a good idea.

      For video, I guess that's SRTs (maybe with improved handling so you can provide suggested positioning, color, and contrast along with the text?) and overdubbing, but really what you want to do is give people access to the editor's timestamp and an easy method for adding subs or SAP keyed to it.

      Sell the original, fans produce and distribute the translation files. Seems kind of win-win...

    2. Re:That's obvious as hell for Japanese stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Manga in particular doesn't get published in the US until large groups of fans and translation groups put together their own scanlations and publish them

      Not actually true. The English-language manga publishers such as Seven Seas make educated guesses based on the source material and content and whether the story will sell in Western markets and roll the dice. I've got the first few volumes of one licenced manga series that never made it all the way to the end with two different publishers because they guessed wrong about markets and sales. That series was completely translated by fans beforehand but that piracy wasn't what caused the licenced versions to be cancelled.

      Popularity in Japan sometimes translates to Western markets (Naruto, Bleach) but more often not (Doraemon). They're very different kinds of stories though.

      I'm posting anonymous since I actually scanlate manga and publish it for free on certain websites. I, like many other manga scanlators, ask the readers to try and buy the originals if they like a series to thank and reward the artists and publishers. If a series is licenced for English-language publication via Crunchyroll or a paper distributor like Seven Seas I stop doing them for the same reasons. It helps me sleep at night.

    3. Re:That's obvious as hell for Japanese stuff by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      What would help sales of manga is making more of it available in an open digital format. Physical manga takes up a lot of space given its entertainment value/time to read. The larger format, superior contrast to standard pulp paper, and higher portability (without a proprietary "reader" application or constant internet connection to read on a website) makes the scannlator's "product" superior.

      I recently contributed to a Kickstarter for a certain manga title that has had trouble getting an official English release because it has met some controversy in the West. I'm getting a digital edition. I already have a fully scannlated copy of the original work, so the almost $100 I spent to get this officially-licensed translation wasn't really needed. What's more, the official licensee hired the original scannlator to handle the localization -- so the old argument about "inferior fan translation vs. professional" is bupkis. I'm buying a "version 2" of the same guy's work.

      What made me contribute was 1) I could get it digital 2) It's an open format (no DRM). The title uses stenography or some other watermarking to tie my personal copy to my purchase in case I should share it. I can use any normal comic reader app to view it.

      This unfortunately is a minority of English-language manga release. Most require online web-viewing or only come in dead-tree edition.

  2. Re:Sure by TWX · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure that I agree when you say it doesn't apply to all media.

    First, when I own physical media I know that I'll have permanent access to the contents, within the scope of my player working and my display and sound system working. Given that I've got VHS and Laserdisc still functioning in the mix I don't think this is all that big of a problem. Online content providers, both properly licensed and unlicensed have shown themselves to be unreliable for a number of reasons. Sometimes a provider closes down. Sometimes a provider is closed down. Sometimes a provider thinks that they have the licensing worked out and it turns out they're wrong so the title is pulled. Sometimes the provider has only licensed the work for a limited duration, or has licensed the work when it's off-season (thinking of christmas specials that are not accessible during christmas except from the one excluslve provider but are available everywhere off-season). Rates change. Even with the attacks on net-neutrality, being able to access may change.

    Second, people like to collect things. People like having sets. There's a certain satisfatction in it. Obviously not everyone has this penchant, but that's ok.

    Third, going through the motions can be a means to determine if one really wants to watch something, or if one is just doing it as the path of least resistance. Personally I feel I watch too much TV and spend too much time on the Internet already, without having a streaming service and without having cable or other pay-TV. It makes it a lot easier to actually go do something else besides vegetate on the couch if I find myself not able to make a choice for what to watch.

    If some of these aspects apply to comic books or graphic novels or manga or whatever you want to call them, then I can see why people want phyiscal media and why they want sets.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  3. But... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    But... but... the MAFIAA have told us that that is TEH 3VIL!!!!!!!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  4. They'd never believe it by neghvar1 · · Score: 1

    Big Media would never believe such a study. Even if Einstein, Hawking, Newton, da Vinci, Galileo, Tesla, Faraday, Keynes, Friedman, and Marx all participated in the study.

    1. Re:They'd never believe it by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, they believe it.
      But they will never admit it publicly. Why should they? No matter how much piracy benefits them (if it does), they still want you to pay.

      And I'd love to see all these people you mentioned work together. I am not sure that putting so many strong personalities together will go anywhere but it will be quite fun to watch.

  5. Re:Piracy has cost me plenty by neghvar1 · · Score: 1

    Piracy has saved me plenty. I try to try before I buy. Last time I got burned was Doom 3. Played about 4 hours and hated it. Have not played it since. I downloaded Civilization 6 and what not pleased with it. Deleted the game and saved myself $59.99.

    Though consumers want demos, it is not financially wise for publishers to release them. If a consumer tries a demo and dose not like the games, then that is a lost sale. If the consumer has to buy to try and the consumer hates it, then the publisher got their money and another pissed off customer

  6. Re:Piracy has cost me plenty by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    On Steam, you can ask for refunds on games you played for less than 2 hours.

    In fact I sincerely think that Steam did more against piracy than any DRM scheme. They actually responded to many arguments made by pirates :
    - You can get refunds (no need to pirate to try)
    - You can get games really cheap if you wait (you can still play if you are poor)
    - It is convenient : you can play all games you purchased on any PC with Steam installed, and provided you have a good internet connection, once you decide to buy a game, you can typically play it within minutes (downloading from a pirate site / torrent is not faster)

    There are of course things that steam don't offer that piracy do, such as being free, less risk of losing the game (account ban, shutdown, ...) and no internet requirement. However, the advantages of piracy are not worth it anymore for many players, even for single player games.

  7. Re:Sure by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    Third, going through the motions can be a means to determine if one really wants to watch something, or if one is just doing it as the path of least resistance. Personally I feel I watch too much TV and spend too much time on the Internet already, without having a streaming service and without having cable or other pay-TV. It makes it a lot easier to actually go do something else besides vegetate on the couch if I find myself not able to make a choice for what to watch.

    So your logic is you deny yourself of the obviously better streaming service because it's "too good" and would compel you to use it? I would suggest you apply that thinking to other aspects of your life and see how it goes. E.g., wife too good looking? Trade down to an uglier wife, because after all, you'll be less apt to waste time pursuing sex with her all the time.