Slashdot Mirror


Sorry, Apple, the Headphone Jack Isn't Going Anywhere (yahoo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Rob Pegoraro via Yahoo Finance: Two things unite almost every phone on display here at Mobile World Congress 2017: Android and a headphone jack. Apple doesn't exhibit its wares at this trade show, so the domination of Google's operating system is predictable. But the headphone jack's persistence did not look so inevitable when Apple cut it from the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus last September. Lenovo's Motorola subsidiary had already shipped a phone without a headphone hack, the Moto Z, and Apple's influence over the rest of the smartphone industry remains formidable -- indeed, within months, the Chinese firm LeEco had debuted a lineup of Android phones devoid of headphone jacks. As my colleague David Pogue predicted in a post approving Apple's move: "Other brands worldwide will be following suit." The hardware on display here at the world's largest mobile tech conference, though, suggests otherwise. Two days of walking around the show floor showed companies expressing a consistent unwillingness to abandon the humble headphone jack, even on models as thin as, or thinner than, the iPhone 7. The MWC floor revealed only one company willing to do away with the headphone jack: HTC. The Taiwan-based firm, which has struggled financially for years despite shipping such well-reviewed models as the HTC 10, used its exhibit to showcase the U Ultra and the U Play, which rely on their USB-C ports for audio output. Unlike, Apple, though, the company didn't make the move to save space, but rather to incorporate its "USonic" feature, which lets the phones' headphones calibrate themselves to your ears and provide noise cancellation.

48 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. You obviously lack COURAGE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Weakling!

    1. Re:You obviously lack COURAGE! by Catharsis+Unhinged · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obligatory courage video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  2. HTC by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Unlike, Apple, though, the company didn't make the move to save space, but rather to incorporate its "USonic" feature, which lets the [USB] phones' headphones calibrate themselves to your ears and provide noise cancellation."

    Oh, bullshit. There's no reason the headphone jack has to be removed to support that. They're not mutually exclusive.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:HTC by Tx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's true that you need power for active noise cancellation, however it's pretty trivial to supply that power via a DC bias voltage over the regular audio signal on a headphone jack, and use any one of many trivial methods to detect supported headphone to switch that bias voltage on or off.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:HTC by ausekilis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hell, this feature was available on my Cyangen-Modded Galaxy S3 years ago. The Oneplus-1 was also able to do this with typical headphones.

      It was actually pretty neat, you listened to a series of pitches at different volumes with each ear and it was able to tell if you had some amount of loss in one ear and calibrate sound for it.

    3. Re:HTC by PostPhil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.

      Even for Apple we know that the argument for saving space is nonsense. USB-C is 8.4mm x 2.6mm.

      A typical 3.5mm analog headphone jack is not much thicker, but even if it is, there is a simple solution to the problem: a 2.5mm analog headphone jack which is even NARROWER and THINNER than USB-C. Headphones already exist for this, and even if they didn't, all existing 3.5mm analog headphones can use a simple adapter that's been around for decades. Plug it on the end of the cable. DONE.

      Now that we know the superiority of 2.5mm for solving the space issue, I'm sure a company as "courageous" as Apple will fix their mistake and use 2.5mm instead. Right?

    4. Re:HTC by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whoosh. Do you understand what "not mutually exclusive" means? It's exactly the opposite of your "either this or that." There's no reason a phone can't support both USB audio with advanced function and the ubiquitous 3.5 mm jack for near-universal connectivity without the power consumption required for noise cancellation and DSP tweaking. Contrary to the claim, there is no need to remove the jack in order to support USB audio, so the rationalization given in the summary is bullshit.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:HTC by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      "Unlike, Apple, though, the company didn't make the move to save space, but rather to incorporate its "USonic" feature, which lets the [USB] phones' headphones calibrate themselves to your ears and provide noise cancellation." Oh, bullshit. There's no reason the headphone jack has to be removed to support that. They're not mutually exclusive.

      I predict that with the seething anger some have over headphone jacks, gone missing, in 30 years, the headphone jack will be the only thing left on the phone as direct to optical nerve and auditory nerve projection is used, and the rest of the phone shrinks to the size of a dust mote.

      But it will have the mandatory headphone jack - now the largest part of the phone.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:HTC by supremebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where is the added profit in using an industry standard 2.5mm headphone jack? Apple wants you to buy their more expensive and proprietary Lightning port earbuds or wireless Airpods instead.

      Rumor has it that the next iPhone will be USB-C, but I wouldn't be suprised if they added some proprietary protocols that require Apple/Beats branded headphones or earbuds for that as well.

    7. Re:HTC by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      Even for Apple we know that the argument for saving space is nonsense. USB-C is 8.4mm x 2.6mm.

      My understanding is that is not the dimensions of the jack on the surface of the phone that is the problem, but the internal depth into the phone.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re:HTC by Maritz · · Score: 2

      Rumor has it that the next iPhone will be USB-C, but I wouldn't be suprised if they added some proprietary protocols that require Apple/Beats branded headphones or earbuds for that as well.

      Apple are not going to want people to use any old headphones they want, whereby Apple do not get a cut. Hence the ditched headphone jack in the first place.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    9. Re:HTC by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      I admit, got whooshed.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  3. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone honestly think that Apple cares whether other companies drop the headphone jack on their phones?

    1. Re:Really? by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bingo.

      The headline is stupid.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Really? by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They kinda do. Apple has be seen as a trendsetter. We were the FIRST to remove the old outdated headphone jack.

      If the other companies buck the trend, then there is the public perception to think of iPhones as "those stupid phones that don't even have a headphone jack" instead of "those cool phones that did away with that outdated tech".

      If they public's opinion doesn't sway I'd expect to see the headphone jack back on the iPhone by the time the iPhone 9 comes out.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Really? by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      And they'll somehow manage to sell it as a revolutionary invention when they bring it back too.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:Really? by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they public's opinion doesn't sway I'd expect to see the headphone jack back on the iPhone by the time the iPhone 9 comes out.

      It just struck me that this is not just about headphones, but also things like the Square reader that plugs into the headphone jack*. I'm sure Square would be thrilled to have re-design their hardware to incorporate it wirelessly (and what does that do to security of said devices?)

      * Although if Apple shifts to USB-C and softens its stance on the what can be physically connected to their products then it might be a win-win situation.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Really? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      And they will call it "The vintage trend". Maybe Apple will even start making turntables in 2019 and market them as the new trend in the audio market.

    6. Re:Really? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      * Although if Apple shifts to USB-C and softens its stance on the what can be physically connected to their products then it might be a win-win situation.

      Apple's shift to USB-C is a way to make you think it's going to open the market. In fact, they just have to put their frickin chip on the wire to exclude any non-Apple-approved hardware, which is most probably the way they will go. Their partnerships with other companies is a big revenue stream for them. You think they suddenly became a charity? #not

  4. Real reason for removal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to incorporate its "USonic" feature, which lets the phones' headphones

    ...Only work when authorized by a persistent online connection to the MAFIA.

    They want to "close" this analog hole just as much as the last one. No, "smaller phone OMG!?!?!?!" is not a good reason anymore. These days the damn things are so small, that if you want it to survive daily use, you need a clamshell that's typically 2x bigger than the phone itself to put the phone in. I'd argue that most phones are too small already. Waterproofing it, can also be done if the money is shelled out for it, and wasn't one of the selling points of buying an iPhone the whole: "I'm so rich, I can afford to wear this bling! Be jealous." thing? They could up the damn price for that, and then some by saying the extra costs are for protecting the consumer's investment.

    This has nothing to do with "better phone" it's all about control.

    1. Re:Real reason for removal by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      You say it won't be able to play arbitrary MP3s I sideload to the SD card?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Real reason for removal by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      ...Only work when authorized by a persistent online connection to the MAFIA.

      You got that wrong, it's the "MAFIAA" (two As on the end): Music And Film Industries Association of America. This comes from its two constituent organizations, the RIAA and the MPAA (Recording Industry Ass. of America, and Motion Picture Ass. of America).

  5. Remember when Apple went full USB? by pastafazou · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do, and I remember all the freakouts over the lack of SCSI and ADB ports, and on the Windows side of the aisle everyone insisting manufacturers NOT kill the PS/2 ports. Ultimately, the technology advances, and old ports aren't needed any more. You may very well find phones with headphone jacks for many years to come. But more and more, the industry will shift to wireless headphones, and those jacks will get less and less use. Kind of like those PS/2 ports that still ship on a few models of motherboards....

    1. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except bluetooth has so many drawbacks it isn't really a replacement for a headphone port. In fact in every account I have seen, the bluetooth version of a headphone is inferior to the wired version, especially if you take cost into account.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by evilbessie · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want full rollover support on your keyboard you need PS/2, USB will only allow 6 key rollover. This is an actual feature some people care about (mostly those who buy mechanical keyboards).

    3. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by gaiageek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the exact argument that I'm sure someone at Apple made -- and the exact argument that shows that some people just don't get it.

      Headphones are not SCSI hard drives. Headphones are not PS/2 mice. One of my favorite pairs of headphones was purchased around the same year I once bought a SCSI card (1996), and I still use them today.

      They're an item which is very personal. You don't wear a hard drive. You WEAR headphones. On walks to class or work, riding the subway, on transcontinental flights, lying in bed late at night. They may be pressed up against or even inside your ears for hours each day. When someone who uses headphones a lot finds a pair that they love, it's a bond that is not easily broken. And certainly not for something new that will either 1. easily get lost, 2. require recharging at some inconvenient time or 3. die a slow death as their rechargeable batteries wear out.

      Apple was the brand for many musicians and music producers. Taking away the audio jack was another big "fuck you" to that following who were long some of Apple's most ardent supporters.

    4. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by fermion · · Score: 2
      Or when Apple supported SCSI instead of parallel port. For me that was a good thing as SCSI was easier to set up for somethings rather than parallel. Even further back support of RS-422 made life easier. Firewire was faster for a long time than USB.

      The key with the headphone jack is the same as with legacy ports on MS Windows machines. Some ports cost more than others, so one fills up the computer with cheap ports to make people feel like they get a good deal. Ports cost money, so use cheap ports to allow cheap expansion. The only Android phone, as far as I know, that generates profit, are those from Samsung. Everything else is sold a very low margins to a cash strapped population, a population that has $5 to spend on legacy headphones, but often not $50 for wireless or USB headsets.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is no way to secure a USB port. Your USB keyboard or mouse can lie and claim it's also a HDD and auto-play a virus or it could type whatever it wanted into the computer. And as a previous poster said, you can actually press more keys on PS/2 than you can on USB. I'll assume PS/2 takes far fewer CPU cycles to process as well.

    6. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 2

      Not only are headphones more personal, but the fundamental purpose of them is output to our squishy, meaty, non-digital bodies.That's really the biggest part of the argument that's getting missed; the core function of headphones is to turn electrical impulses into analog sound. Sure, you can get into a debate about where you want to stick the DAC, but in the end you are going to end up with a nice, curvy waveform to interface with the membrane in your ear.

      --
      Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    7. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by edtice1559 · · Score: 4, Informative

      USB keyboards can support full rollover in HID "report protocol". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    8. Re:Remember when Apple went full USB? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      The bandwidth alone on A2DC makes BT lossy and horrible. I can't stand using BT on my BT headphones, and use the AUX-in cable port on them instead.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  6. Re:argument ab absurdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its not about the jack going away for everyone, but the how apple claimed to be progressive and having much courage to remove it. Which means apple as usual is being a dick about things. What about this is hard to understand?

  7. Re:Yes Apple cares... sort of by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

    . If Apple is wrong about their bet that people don't really care about the headphone jack then it will cost them business.

    They already know that they're right. They have the sales figures to prove it.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  8. Will take years to play out by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Two days of walking around the show floor showed companies expressing a consistent unwillingness to abandon the humble headphone jack, even on models as thin as, or thinner than, the iPhone 7.

    PCs held on to Dsub parallel and serial ports and PS/2 ports and floppy drives for many years after Apple kicked them to the curb. Blackberry kept making physical keyboards long after the market proved that most buyers don't care about them. Just because everyone else didn't follow Apple one year later doesn't really tell us much. It's going to take a few years for this to really play out. The other handset makers are going to be watching. If Apple sales remain strong you can bet that more of them will follow Apple's lead over time. No one should be surprised that there wasn't a stampede of removing the headphone jack in just one year.

  9. Re:argument ab absurdo by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    2) Because we don't want extra things to charge, because anything with a battery has a finite usable lifetime, because a wire doesn't get interference, COST, because I think the device with the bigger power source and more advanced circuitry should be the one driving the sound.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  10. Re:Coke Classic by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You really think that the headphone jack is the culprit in Apple's market loss? It's been 3 times they changed the freakin docking connector on their phone and other iShit. Those who did not understand when they went from 30pin to lightning connector will maybe understand this time, when they once again have to change all the audio / charging docks on which they paid the Apple premium (especially now that Apple has a trick to exclude non-Apple-royalty-paying builders).

    You think Apple is switching to USB-C to open to the rest of the World? Think again. They will certainly lock you once again in their fenced garden of Apple-approved stuff.

  11. Replaceable battery by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, but the death of the Replaceable Battery seems to be in evidence!

    I'm not talking about easy replacement like the Galaxy S5 has (although that's nice). I'd settle for being able to open the back and remove the battery on my workbench without a heatgun and surgical tools.

    Why do these phones have to be disposable?

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    1. Re:Replaceable battery by sl3xd · · Score: 2

      Um... replacing the battery on iPhones typically only requires three screwdrivers, and tweezers.

      Apple charges $100 to replace the battery - and there's a skilled technician to do the job, and it doesn't void warranties.

      The DIY route is about $50, may void your warranty, requires some basic skills and care.

      The extra $50 isn't exactly unreasonable for people who don't feel comfortable changing their battery; skilled labor isn't cheap.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  12. Very good by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Two days of walking around the show floor showed companies expressing a consistent unwillingness to abandon the humble headphone jack, even on models as thin as, or thinner than, the iPhone 7."

    Very good, and I'm glad to hear it. There is NO reason to let Apple set the standard, especially when the standard they set sucks or changes with every new model or just doesn't make any fucking sense. And don't give me that "courage" bullshit- I wasn't buying that line of crap then and I'm not buying it now.

    Long live the humble headphone jack- a simple, time-tested bit of tech that still has a lot of life left in it.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  13. Go ahead, get rid of the 'phone jack... by number6x · · Score: 2

    Then give me 2 or 3 usb-c jacks. I like to listen to music on my phone while sitting at my desk, and sometimes I plug in the phone to charge it while it is just sitting there playing music. Blue tooth and wifi headphones are a joke because now i just have more bulky items to constantly re-charge.

    I think Apple dropping the 3.5 mm jack is a great opportunity for android phones to promote their inclusion of the jack as a value added feature that their phones provide, but Apple phones lack. Poor iPhone users don't even get a headphone jack with their phones.

    1. Re:Go ahead, get rid of the 'phone jack... by BronsCon · · Score: 2
      And, lacking a second Lightning port, you can not charge the phone and listen to music at the same time while using that included adapter. The comment you were replying to was pretty clear on their complaint, but I'll pop it out for you:

      sometimes I plug in the phone to charge it while it is just sitting there playing music

      Can you buy a different adapter to enable that functionality for the iPhone? Sure. But, then, the included adapter is still irrelevant to this discussion. You might have had an argument if you had mentioned Apple's own solution to this problem, or any of the myriad solutions found on Kickstarter, Indiegogo, DX, AliExpress, eBay, Amazon... well... all over the place.

      Or, I can just have the port built into my phone.

      Yes, it's a problem. It's such a problem that an entire cottage industry sprung up, between the time the removal of the headphone port was announced and the time the phone was actually released, to address it. An industry built on selling "one more thing to remember to take up space, forget to bring with me, or lose". It's such problem that my wife, who has owned every model of iPhone since the 3Gs (save for the 5 series, she didn't like those for various reasons) chose to pass on the iPhone 7 and will likely make the same decision regarding the 7s, 8, 8s, and 9; at which point she'll basically be forced to switch to Android because her 6s Plus will no longer be a viable device.

      Or, maybe, Apple will bring back the headphone jack. I won't be holding my breath, though.

      It's not just my wife, either. I have a friend who buys everything Apple sells. If they sell it, he's bought at least one. He hasn't bought an iPhone 7. Yes, because of the jack. Hell, I was on the fence about switching from Android to iPhone, leaning toward the Apple side of the fence (I love my iPad and iOS has added some functionality that makes it more compatible with how I use my phone), until it was confirmed that the headphone jack was going away. I don't use it often, certainly not often enough to carry the dongle with me everywhere, or to remember to bring it when riding along in my buddy's car that has an AUX jack but no Bluetooth, or even to remember where the hell I stashed it so it wouldn't be needlessly taking up space on a shelf or my desktop. And yes, my friends usually rotate who controls the music, a different person for every leg of the trip. None of them have an iPhone, so it would be wasteful for everyone to keep a dongle in the car just for the one douchebag who bought the phone without a headphone jack.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  14. Re:Yes Apple cares... sort of by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or it could be that: 1) Many Apple customers don't care about a headphone jack

    That would be me. I have an iphone because I also have a Mac because I need to use software that does not exist on any other platform. So the iPhone fits seamlessly into the ecosystem.

    The headphone situation, such as it is, is that I can plug the supplied headphones directly into the phone, and if I wish to use the legendary 10 dollar headphones we hear about here in Slashdot, I just plug in the adapter. But since I rather enjoy the wireless aspect of wireless, I use Bluetooth.

    Maybe the bulk of the people that care enough about a headphone jack that it sways their purchasing decision wouldn't buy an Apple product anyway.

    Exactly. It's the old Ford vs Chevy argument, where eventually the antagonists get to arguing about colors and the shape of the accelerator pedal. If you hate Apple, its a dealbreaker so critical, so unconscionable so important that it will keep you from buying a phone you wouldn't ever buy anyway.

    If you like Apple, you plug in the earbuds, or the adapter and your 10 dollar headphones or BT and get on with life with no negative effect.

    I think it's immature to think that a single minor feature (I suggest that with Apple's continued sales, it is a minor feature) drives the majority of customer purchasing decisions.

    I like my iPhone 7. Works a trick. 0 problems so far. I've also spent exactly 0 seconds regretting the lack of a headphone jack.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  15. My guess: all ports and sockets will be gone soon by zerofoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just a wild ass guess, but I'll bet ALL ports and sockets will be gone soon.

    It's far easier to make a phone waterproof, if you don't have any ports and sockets to seal up.

    I suspect the rumors we've been hearing about Lighting being replaced by USB-C aren't accurate. I do think that we will see lightning converted to a mag-safe style flush mount connector.

    So my prediction for the next iPhone is no buttons, switches or socket style connectors.

  16. Which would you choose? by atrex · · Score: 2

    Given two hypothetical smartphones - all features identical, except:

    The first phone has no headphone jack, but has a higher water proofing rating.
    The second phone doesn't have as good of a water proofing rating, but has a 3mm headphone jack.

    Both sell for the same price.
    Which would you choose?

  17. Re:argument ab absurdo by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    Because the point of a mobile device is that it can be far away from a WALL, not far away from you. If I want sound to go from my device to my ears, a wire is the most efficient way of doing so. No fuss, no muss, no batteries, and typical repairs can be performed, if necessary, using century old tech.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  18. Re:Tje jack is not disappearing . . . by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Exactly. I have a couple of sets of Sennheiser noise-canceling headphones, and one of those sets is a very high-end set (PXC450). If I can't plug them into a phone, I'm not buying that phone. No, I'm not going to use Bluetooth headphones because BT audio sounds like shit. Of course, my headphones do use batteries, but they don't actually require them as they'll pass-through audio with the battery power off, you just don't get any noise-canceling. Try that with BT headphones.

  19. Re:Yes Apple cares... sort of by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    So the iPhone fits seamlessly into the ecosystem.

    Right until you buy and iPhone and buy a Macbook, get them home and realise you can't plug the one into the other without an adapter.

  20. Re:My guess: all ports and sockets will be gone so by jez9999 · · Score: 2

    Why the fuck do you people need the phone to be waterproof? What do you do, deep sea diving with it? While we're talking about "most people" (which is the only thing phone manufacturers care about), how about this: most people don't have any use for a waterproof phone.