Slashdot Mirror


Uber Ex-engineer Who Alleged Sexism Retains Lawyer (usatoday.com)

Marco della Cava and Jessica Guynn, writing for USA Today: The former Uber engineer whose critical blog post has stirred a storm of controversy for the ride-hailing giant has retained an attorney, charging that her former employer is blaming her for a rash of app deletions. Susan Fowler, whose Feb. 19 essay detailed myriad examples of sexism, tweeted Thursday that "Uber names/blames me for account deletes, and has a different law firm - not Holders (sic) - investigating me."

5 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Re:... uh by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right... if she's just retaining a lawyer now after posting that shows some lack of planning on her part. Regardless of the truth of her claims, she had to figure that she would be charged with defamation based on the heavy claims she's made against a aggressive company.

    Why? She wasn't suing them and her claims were verifiable, the logical response from Uber was ignore or apologize. A smear campaign, if that is what's happening, would be a really stupid response on their part.

    It should be noted from the article that it's not even clear that someone is going after her, or if Uber is that someone. I wouldn't be surprised if some MRAs weren't taking it upon themselves to make an example of her.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  2. Re: Victim Blaming? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Victim blaming happens far less than false claims

    I don't know, I feel like it happens every single time one of these stories comes up. It's important to figure out the truth in these situations, but the rest of us who are not involved can calm down, step back, and wait until the truth actually comes out instead of trying to blame.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. Re: Victim Blaming? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It depends on how you phrase it. If you say, "She might be lying, I won't believe her until evidence comes up" then yeah, that's bad. If you say something like, "What an awful situation. I feel so sorry for her, and everyone involved. I will wait until the evidence comes out before judging" then you're good.

    If you lead with sympathy, you're good. If you lead with accusations, then you're bad.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  4. Re: Victim Blaming? by lactose99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >Victim blaming happens far less than false claims.

    This is the most demonstrably false statement I've read in quite a while.

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  5. Re:... uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Replace MRA with feminist. Your idiotic reply carries no weight.