Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Have Found a Way To Rapidly Thaw Cryopreserved Tissue Without Damage (sciencealert.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from ScienceAlert: Researchers have developed a technique that allows them to rapidly thaw cryopreserved human and pig samples without damaging the tissue -- a development that could help get rid of organ transplant waiting lists. Cryopreservation is the ability to preserve tissues at liquid nitrogen temperatures for long periods of time and bring them back without damage, and it's something scientists have been dreaming about achieving with large tissue samples and organs for decades. Instead of using convection, the team used nanoparticles to heat tissues at the same rate all at once, which means ice crystals can't form, so they don't get damaged. To do this, the researchers mixed silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles into a solution and generated uniform heat by applying an external magnetic field. They then warmed up several human and pig tissue samples ranging between 1 and 50 mL, using either their new nanowarming technique and traditional slow warming over ice. Each time, the tissues warmed up with nanoparticles displayed no signs of harm, unlike the control samples. Afterwards, they were able to successfully wash the nanoparticles away from the sample after thawing. The team also tested out the heating in an 80 mL system -- without tissue this time -- and showed that it achieved the same critical warming rates as in the smaller sample sizes, suggesting that the technique is scalable. You can view a video of tissue being thawed out in less than a minute here. The research has been published in Science Translational Medicine.

94 comments

  1. Frozen Riddick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So the technique shown in the documentary Chronicles of Riddick was indeed accurate.

    1. Re:Frozen Riddick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Buck Rogers

    2. Re: Frozen Riddick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or demolition man

    3. Re:Frozen Riddick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Space; The Final Frontier.

    4. Re:Frozen Riddick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They say most of your brain shuts down during cryo-sleep. All but the primitive side..."

  2. Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    How does this work for organs that need to have their centre part thawed at the same rate?

    1. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! I'm calling BS on this research right now.

    2. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If only there was something you could click on that would take you somewhere else that had more information.

      "The team admits that larger tissue - and even whole organs - will need to have the nanoparticles injected into them, rather than just sitting around them, to achieve the same uniform heating, but it's something they want to try next."

    3. Re: Marinade by thePig · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't microwave (RF dielectric) heating work in this case? That also is uniform, right? And can thaw even bigger organs better. Am I missing something?

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    4. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it isn't "uniform", it is shaped something like A*sin(kx)*B*cos(my), that's why you have the rotating tray. Also, your ice crystal distribution is likely not very isotropic. Nanoparticles, on the other hand, may by magic or otherwise not form such clumps.

    5. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RF heats water a lot faster than ice, so as soon as one spot thaws, it will likely cook before thawing much else.

    6. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And how do they "successfully wash the nanoparticles away from the sample after thawing" if it's injected throughout the whole tissue?

    7. Re: Marinade by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Microwave heating isn't uniform. It's like how your mobile phone signal gets worse the deeper you go into a building. The energy is reflected or absorbed by the walls and other stuff between you and the transmitter.

      Food designed for microwave heating is designed to allow circulation of water and steam, and the microwave usually rotates the whole thing too. If you just take something out of the freezer, heat it without the rotating tray for a bit, you will find that the outside is warm and the inside is still cold.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want uniform heat out of a microwave, you have to lower the power setting and increase the time. Which is a huge problem if you're doing this to thaw out organs that you want to implant rather than eat.

    9. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      presumably they would be injected into the major arteries during the cryopreservation process. They could then be (largely) washed out the same way they were put in. Some would likely be left behind, but hemosiderin deposits are found in all kinds of tissues without obvious problem.

    10. Re:Marinade by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I think the key would be to add the nanoparticles before freezing for larger organs (such as a heart or liver) that way they can be evenly distributed throughout easily, and are in place for quick thawing.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    11. Re: Marinade by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I say add the particles before freezing. If you simply added the particles and froze every donor organ available, you would quickly develop a library of 'spare parts' that could be thawed at a moments notice and implanted into recipients.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    12. Re: Marinade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, microwave Heisenberg.

  3. Freezing damage by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    Thawing is great. How are you going to freeze the tissue without damage?

    1. Re:Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thawing is great. How are you going to freeze the tissue without damage?

      There are a few ways of freezing samples without creating ice crystals. Part of the trick is to freeze it *fast*. But water is still a problem, becuase even with super rapid freezing, overtime the crystals will restructure into sharp ice. Bad. Nitrogen would seem the obvious, but it tends to boil at the contact point leaving pockets of gaseous nitrogen to slow down the penetration of cold leaving the centres of samples to slowly ice and form crystals. Isopentane doesnt have the low boiling point issue so it works a lot better Glycerine is often used in storing cell cultures. And so on.

    2. Re:Freezing damage by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      The claims they're making implies that's a solved problem. /me shrugs

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    3. Re:Freezing damage by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Most liquids shrink when they freeze, though all Earthly life depends on water being the exception. Could we perfuse organ tissue with one of those blood substitute liquids before freezing, if we can choose one that does not expand when frozen? As a bonus, could we add the thawing nanoparticles to the fluid before perfusing the organ?

    4. Re:Freezing damage by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is in the freezing, fractures happen to samples bigger than 3cm across. It's why cryopreservation of dead humans is a farce, they're made into a mass of meat nuggets by the process.

      Not a solved problem at all.

    5. Re:Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Current cryogenic techniques actually keep tissues just above freezing to prevent ice crystals, but cold enough to preserve, using something functionally equivalent to anti-freeze pumped into the bloodstream. I was a skeptic before learning this. I suppose I still am, but now I don't have any specific problems to point to.

    6. Re: Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they tasty?

    7. Re: Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could burn the sample first to remove all water?

    8. Re:Freezing damage by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actually, the damage is not caused by expansion, but by crystallization. So you need to add something that creates an amorphous solid ice when mixed with water, or at least far smaller ice crystals.

    9. Re:Freezing damage by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is in the freezing, fractures happen to samples bigger than 3cm across. It's why cryopreservation of dead humans is a farce

      So.... How about putting the samples in a vacuum chamber, and reduce the air pressure in order to Make the freezing point of water lower,
      then super-chill the tissue under lower and lower pressures, until it is cold enough to preserve the tissue without freezing the water, causing it to become solid crystals.

    10. Re:Freezing damage by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thawing is great. How are you going to freeze the tissue without damage?

      Become an Alaska Wood Frog (alternate article). They survive being frozen almost completely solid for 7 months at a time.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re: Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human flesh tastes like beef. If you like beef, they are tasty.

    12. Re:Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the freezing point at 1 atm is 273.15 K, and the triple point is 273.16 K at 0.006 atm, lowering the pressure would increase the freezing point by an insignificant amount. If you increase the pressure, the freezing point lowers, but very slowly until you get to a couple hundred atmospheres. Still, the lowest you can get it is 251 K at 2000 atmospheres of pressure, then the freezing point starts increasing with pressure. Playing with pressure won't let you lower the freezing point of water anywhere near as much as simply putting in additives, which have the extra benefit of changing the shape of ice crystals.

    13. Re: Freezing damage by meerling · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually all the reports are that it tastes like pork, which is also rather explains why the attempts to wean cannibals off of eating humans worked when they provided them with pigs to raise and eat.

    14. Re:Freezing damage by meerling · · Score: 1

      Both vacuum and high pressures have other problems when dealing with cells essentially calibrated for about 1 atmosphere of pressure.

    15. Re:Freezing damage by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Right so... they've solved it, or the news is faked? The demo is thawing meat without damage.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    16. Re:Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most liquids shrink when they freeze, though all Earthly life depends on water being the exception. Could we perfuse organ tissue with one of those blood substitute liquids before freezing, if we can choose one that does not expand when frozen? As a bonus, could we add the thawing nanoparticles to the fluid before perfusing the organ?

      You have to somehow inject the nanoparticles into the cells in the first place, prior to freezing. How do you do it?

      This technique won't work for people now frozen in cryotanks. They are dead.

    17. Re:Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diffusion would handle that with some work. The bigger issue is removing the crystals afterwards without exploding the cells.

      Still this is a huge step forward.

    18. Re: Freezing damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it doesn't. It tastes like pork, hence the name for it used by some cannibals, "long pig".

    19. Re:Freezing damage by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you saw the size of the sample in the article, 50 mL? what I said is still very much a problem.

    20. Re: Freezing damage by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      The MÄori did call roasted human "the long pig" after all. But they insisted on fresh, never frozen.

  4. Walt Disney by moofo · · Score: 2

    So Walt is coming back ?

    --
    "I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary." Through the looking glass and what
    1. Re:Walt Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just in time!

    2. Re:Walt Disney by CanEHdian · · Score: 2

      Don't let DisneyCorp or the MPAA hear about this, they will claim Walt Disney is technically still 'alive' so the copyrights do not expire.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    3. Re:Walt Disney by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      No walt isn't, after he and his film crew tossed us off the cliff, we located him and I gnawed thru his left kidney and thyroid.

      Worst two week ice cream headache ever. But he's gonna be real surprised.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    4. Re:Walt Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submitting my request for +1 Depressing mod again.

  5. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    freeze me now, grandma!

  6. Organ Black Market Crash coming soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that the underground organ trafficking black market will collapse very soon?

    1. Re:Organ Black Market Crash coming soon? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Does this mean that the underground organ trafficking black market will collapse very soon?

      No, it means that packinghouses in China will cash in by freezing prisoners' organs so they can be stored and then flown anywhere for transplant.

    2. Re:Organ Black Market Crash coming soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool!

      (pun intended)

  7. Restoring tissues and organs by jdavidb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know it was demonstrated awhile back that a rabbit kidney could be cryopreserved and then restored to function.

    Seriously, the longer I live, the more it seems plausible that one day it will be possible to cryopreserve a human brain and restore it to function later. One day human lifespan may be greatly extended in a way that looks like this:

    McCoy: "He's dead, Jim."

    Kirk: "Bones, do something!"

    McCoy: "Sorry, Jim, there isn't anything I can do."

    KirK: "Why?"

    McCoy: "Because he's dead."

    Kirk: "How do you know he's dead?"

    McCoy: "Because there's nothing I can do."

    Kirk: "Because he's dead?"

    McCoy: "That's right."

    Kirk: "But I was talking to him just one minute ago!"

    McCoy: "Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor not a spiritual medium! I can't bring back the dead anymore than I can cure a common cold."

    Spock: "Doctor, we could take him back to the ship, dissolve any blood clots, restore circulation, and restore homeostasis by molecular repair. He could fully resume duty within days."

    McCoy: "Spock, leave doctoring to doctors! What this man needs is a decent burial."

    1. Re:Restoring tissues and organs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, the longer I live, the more it seems plausible that one day it will be possible to cryopreserve a human brain and restore it to function later.

      Well cryo preservation was never an issue. Problem is preserving large organs safely over extended periods of time. Most importantly brain. Alcor uses if I remember right something called glassification. A method of rapidly freezing tissue in a way that formation of water crystals that cause tissue damage is minimized. I think that has been a study that glassification over extended periods of time causes small fractures to form due to micro vibrations and thermal stress. Of course that is nowhere near as bad as water crystal formation damage and I wouldn't be worried too much for about 500 years. Of course if you are stuck in cryostasis for that long it might be the least of your problems.

      Bringing large complicated organism or organ back from cryostasis though? Now that is way cool. I mean if you think about it funerals are crazy expensive. Sure, not $60K or whatever they charge nowadays. Personally, if my family can save 8K, I would be totaly ok with "dig a ditch light a match" kind of funeral. I am dead, what do I care. Cryostasis though? Something to think about.

  8. So.... by radish · · Score: 2

    I can use this to thaw my steaks without accidentally cooking the edges in the microwave? Nice!

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  9. unless... by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Unless this proves Futurama is a documentary, I am not impressed.

    1. Re:unless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying you are your own grandfather or that you want to be your own grandfather?

  10. A human brain mass is not the gold standard! by SlashGodet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The photos are legit. 50 ml is a sizeable thaw sample. My biochem circuits assesses this as a considerable advance for cryogenics. YES The trials stop at 50 ml, which these days means larger volumes failed. NO It does not allow a human brain mass to be thawed. But, smaller thaws are still great news. Basic research would see a tremendous boon if experiments can be performed with larger frozen sample sizes. A great number of potential medical treatments would become feasible with a 50x advance in cryogenic thawing. Some people here need an opinion reboot. This is exciting news!

    1. Re:A human brain mass is not the gold standard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this have anything to do with the large current needed to generate a magnetic field large enough to penetrate the tissue?

      Would there be a benefit to dehydrating the tissue as much as possible (some arbitrary point of viability) to allow greater penetration and (no idea if it would make a difference) less possibility of ice crystal formation? Could a better custom particle be designed to respond to a different method or energy delivery, or be a better at responding to the magnetic field? Microwaves at a specific frequency?

      In terms of injecting the nano-particles... could they use vacuum injection? I'd imagine there are dissolved gasses and whatnot in the organ tissue - would sucking them out, while immersing the tissue in the particle-juice ruin the organ tissue? Like doing sous vide cooking with a chamber sealer.

      You're smarter than me, and I'm genuinely curious.

    2. Re:A human brain mass is not the gold standard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To answer all your questions: no.

      Except for your last one. there the answer is yes.

    3. Re:A human brain mass is not the gold standard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this have anything to do with the large current needed to generate a magnetic field large enough to penetrate the tissue?

      My thoughts were around the magnetic field as well but for another reason. The strength of the field varies with distance. That means in large tissue samples one side will have a stronger field than the other. This would translate to unequal heating.

    4. Re:A human brain mass is not the gold standard! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      perhaps Multiple magnetic fields?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  11. Obvious deep space travel use by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    Ok, even if this only becomes partially successful, you could imagine it being used for an attempt by desperate individuals (or a desperate world) to send people to another star.

    If only 25% of the individuals frozen, revived successfully after a centuries long trip, would it be worth it? And this is assuming the nanoparticles infected into them were non-toxic. I guess if the literal survival of the human race depended on it (I believe a third of the colonists at Plymouth didn't make it through the first winter).

    Would be kinda creepy going into crysosleep knowing only a few would wake up (undamaged).

  12. I'd do it right now by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In fact I'd happily pay for the privilege to go...

    There are quite a lot of people who would be willing to do the same thing today. Maybe get the process a bit more stable but a 25% chance sounds fine to me.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Wha ... where ... wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's this computing device of which you speak?
    It's damn cold here.

  14. TV dinners thin because microwaves don't heat deep by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If you put a large potato in the microwave for two minutes, then cut it open, you'll find that the surface is hot and core is cool. The microwaves penetrate about 1/4th to 1/2 inch into the food. (More at the surface, reducing with depth). That's one reason TV dinners have the food spread out so thin - for even heating. That 1/2" of microwave heating is *more* even than a conventional oven, which heats only the surface.

  15. great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can we thaw out Walt Disney?

    1. Re: great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will reanimate Lenin and Mao. Stalin has already been mulched.

  16. When do ice crystals form? by sweet+'n+sour · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "...the team used nanoparticles to heat tissues at the same rate all at once, which means ice crystals can't form..."

    I thought ice crystals form during freezing -- how do they form when thawing?

    1. Re:When do ice crystals form? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      At a certain temperature water freezes solid almost instantly, which means its molecules don't have time to rearrange themselves into a crystal lattice. This kinda makes it more fragile but that's not part of this answer. What is part of it is that as the boundary of heat penetrates the frozen object, there is a small war of temperatures. One side is hot fading to cold, the other is cold slowly warming. On the cold side of the boundary ice turns to water, expanding the boundary enough that the water next to the much colder than normal ice can then turn back into ice, much more slowly (comparative to the flash freezing process from before), and form crystals. They aren't large crystals, but human cells aren't large either.

      An example of this is having damp fingers after refilling an ice tray and using a paper towel to dry your hand, then grabbing an ice cube and finding that it freezes to your fingertip. Your finger is warm, the thin coating of water on it is at skin temperature, between 65-75 degrees F, but the ice is cold enough to freeze the water on your skin almost instantly and stick to you for a few moments before your body's heat overcomes it and melts the water again.

      What the nanoparticles here are doing is warming the entire object at once, rather than heating it from the inside out or outside in. Since there is no temperature boundary, there is no chance for the water to re-freeze.

  17. Well how cool would this be.. by drewsup · · Score: 1

    -Ok, samples 1-50 show perfect integrity after thawing...

    * Well now what can we test this on?

    -Dave, BRING ME THE HEAD OF WALT DISNEY!!!!

    1. Re:Well how cool would this be.. by tlambert · · Score: 2

      Common misconception. Disney was not cryopreserved. Or if he was, it was not by some big company, it was done by some Mickey Mouse operation...

  18. will it work on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trump's heart and brain? or are they too far gone to even try?

  19. In nature... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Informative

    So you need to add something that creates an amorphous solid ice when mixed with water, or at least far smaller ice crystals.

    Which is exactly the technique used by some fishes that can survive in the ice :
    they secrete some sort of anti-freeze in their bloodstream which prevent big ice crystals to form.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  20. As an expert in this field by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
    ... I can say that on multiple occasions have tried defrosting my ex-GF.

    That was not without damage, though.

  21. Barring Liquid Crystals by meerling · · Score: 2

    I've never heard of crystals forming when you warm a solid up to it's melting point.
    Rather liquids are kind of the opposite of a crystaline structure last time I checked.
    But they do form when freezing, and that's why they try to do the really rapid glassification as it is an attempt to stop all crystal formation, or at least limit their size to very small. Those crystals can and do puncture cell walls, which means that cell is a goner. Lose enough of those, or some really critical ones, and the creature is toast, end of game, don't even bother to thaw it out.
    Now we do have some creatures that can survive freezing conditions, but they've got some tricks that aren't applicable to humans without some serious genetic modifications we don't even know how to do. The short version is they tend to flood their blood and cells with a type of antifreeze so there are less or smaller ice crystals so more of their tissue survives. Still, they can be killed by freezing. When you get to the single cell or other very simple types, it's a lot easier for them to survive since their structures are simpler and their cells less specialized.

    I do find the idea of using induction to warm the material interesting, but having that material appropriately spread out in a living creature before freezing seems to be a rather difficult proposition. That's assuming those nano particles don't themselves cause an issue. I don't see it being done after freezing anymore than I see someone distributing sugar into an ice cube without pulverizing it. That would rather defeat the point.

    Anyhow, interesting idea, but still, WTF

    1. Re:Barring Liquid Crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, crystal do form when freezing. The crystals are not forming as the liquid heats up. They are forming when the water barrier between the hot and cold sources expands slightly, just enough that the water is greater insulation than the transfer of heat from outside can move through and is able to re-freeze. Since the ice on one side of that barrier is actually much colder than 32F, much much colder, water against it re-freezes at normal freezing speeds and forms crystals. This is why we can't defrost our people-sicles and cure them.

      Probably ever.

      One side pours heat in, the other side is pulling it away. Make the water barrier too thick between them and the side being pulled from turns to ice again. Since its not as cold as the primary ice, it does turn back to liquid faster, but the damage is done at that point since crystals will have formed.

  22. Bummer, Bob. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Bummer, Bob.

    Yeah, sorry; we were unable to get you out of the red light ticket. So one of your kidneys? Yeah, it's going to the organ bank.

  23. This give new meaning to by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Freeze a jolly good fellow!

  24. All potential recipients, put on your ski gear ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a development that could help get rid of organ transplant waiting lists

    Waiting lists are the result of a shortage of organs, so there are no organs
    in need to freeze and quick-thaw. That must mean potential recipients on the
    waiting list will be frozen and the the quick-thaw technology will be applied to
    them once a donor organ is available. Wonder if 'all-in-one' packages, which
    include ski gear and body storage will become available...

  25. Transplants by 4im · · Score: 1

    It seems that most commenters think about the scifi theme of thawing entire human bodies after cryo-preservation.

    To me, it rather seems that a first application would concern transplants - more organs could be collected, and be kept around much longer than presently possible, to be transplanted later into patients really needing them (as opposed to being able to pay for them).

    It could help with reducing waiting lists, enable more people in need to survive, with less crime revolving about collection of organs.

    1. Re:Transplants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, it's almost like it talks about transplants in the fucking summary.

  26. You Better hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those people who has their bodies frozen... better hope somebodyvdoesn't thaw them out just to harvest their organs.

    Go ahead.. sit there in that freezer and hope the world doesn't change so much that your body isn's salvaged by a scrapper.

  27. Re: Magic by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    Magic is only unexplained technology.

  28. Re:Into vs around by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    No. It just needs to be in close proximity to the cells in order to provide thr benefit, not in. As for cryogenically preserved dead people, while this will not bring them back to life, it will minimize tissue damahge so that whatever process might be used to bring them back to life would have a better chance of working over previous thawing techniques.

  29. Nanoparticles not needed for stronger magnet? by doug141 · · Score: 1

    With a switchable magnet orders of magnitude stronger, you should be able to heat the hydrogen atoms directly, should you not? Here's a pic of a live frog levitating in a 16 Tesla magnetic field.
    http://www.ru.nl/hfml/research...

  30. Awesome! We can bring back Walt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and make Disney great again!

  31. So does this mean no more freezer burn on my steak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean no more freezer burn on my steak?

  32. Great news for the Red Sox! by jpellino · · Score: 1

    So how soon can we see Ted Williams as skipper?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  33. Hitler by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    You knew he was going to be brought up sooner or later

  34. But not "time travel" by slew · · Score: 1

    The X-Files had an episode where a rapid freezing agent was the key enabler to allow people to time travel, but of course that means a future self will come back to kill you because time travel is so messed up, so it never really happens... Or does it?

  35. Re: Magic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, smartypants.