One Bitcoin Is Now Worth More Than One Ounce of Gold (techcrunch.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: For the first time ever, the price of one bitcoin has surpassed the price of one ounce of gold. While today's swap can be attributed to a good day for bitcoin (up ~3%) and a bad day for gold (down ~1.3%), the big picture is that bitcoin has more than doubled in the last year (up ~185% from a year ago) while gold is essentially trading exactly at the price it was a year ago. Even though bitcoin and gold are both thought of as alternative assets, they don't usually trade in correlation. Still, it's notable that bitcoin has (at least temporally) surpassed the price of gold. Gold is quite literally the "gold standard" of alternative assets, often used by investors to hedge against potential losses in more traditional assets like real estate and the stock market.
The power goes out. How much is your bitcoin worth then?
What can you sell it for? That's what it's worth on planet earth.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Still, it's notable that bitcoin has (at least temporally) surpassed the price of gold.
No, that's not notable. The only notable thing is that bitcoin is at an all-time high.
Comparing a piece of mathematical information to an arbitrary amount of an arbitrary substance is not in any way notable.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Bitcoin is worth whatever people are willing to pay for it. The same is true of gold. Today, people are buying and selling bitcoin at this valuation at any given moment, whether you believe it or not.
If you want a good laugh, go read through all the old /. articles on Bitcoin, particularly around when it was reaching $1 in value.
So many naysayers. Well they're not laughing now!
It's interesting that the title of this piece is 'One Bitcoin is Now Worth More Than One Ounce of Gold'. I have some gold, I would not exchange it for BitCoins regardless of what they are 'worth'. The sense of worth is a funny thing, I don't feel that Bitcoins are worth anything, they are valueless from my point of view.
If a war started today and there was a shortage of food, if somebody gave me a USB stick with 10 Bitcoins on it I would not exchange it for food I think. I might exchange it for gold though. What is 'worth' and how do you figure that a Bitcoin is actually 'worth' anything? It is a unique electronic number.... to me it is worth 0. Sure, I can make or lose money buying Bitcoin and reselling it at some point later as a speculative vehicle but to say that I would store some 'worth' in them... I would not.
You can't handle the truth.
While that's a great definition of how much money it's worth, that's not a fair assessment of how much it's actually worth. You can't plate electrical connectors or graven images with bitcoin.
Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
Correlation ... I don't think you know what that word means.
There is only one reason that bitcoin is so high in value right now, ransomware
Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
A "golden frying pan" in the video game "team fortress 2" sells for $5k. Why can bitcoin not be qorth anything?
to produce this one bitcoin.
The intrinsic value of bitcoin is zero, same as paper money. Yet I'd still stop to pick up a €10 bill.
A more interesting question is what you can actually use BTC for. Not too long ago it was mostly useful to buy illegal drugs or guns online. These days you can also use it to pay for pizza; some online stores have begun accepting BTC but you get utterly raped on the exchange rate. The same more or less applies to transfering money: how often is it that people need to send money where more convenient and/or cheaper alternatives are not available? Very rarely I suspect. You can use it to pay ransomware operators (and I suspect some companies keep a few BTC on hand just for that). And it appears to be slowly adopted as a store of wealth; the long term price is still trending upwards, giving confidence in its longer term value. Demand for a safe haven might be what is actually driving the exchange rate upwards, but keep in mind that when conditions change and people start to liquidate their BTC, the price will plummet and your holdings will be wiped out in no time. By the way, the same is true for gold although to a lesser extent, but whether that is due to the nature of gold or simply the larger volume of the market I don't know.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
I don't think of gold as a hedge. It is more of a speculation. Like other precious metals its value is pretty volatile.
There are people out there that will pay real money for a virtual shield in a video game, a garden gnome for their virtual garden, etc.
There's a sucker born every minute.
Bitcoin has zero value unless you're the electricity utility company. I find the entire virtual currency ecosystem to be laughable.
Food,water and ammunition are worth more then both !!!
Since 97% of past 6 month trading volume in Bitcoin took place in China, we might as well call it Chinacoin.
And as soon China introduces some form of regulation or restriction it's going to be bye bye Bitcoin price.
> Still, it's notable that bitcoin has (at least temporally) surpassed the price of gold.
Bullshit, it has not.
There's a cap of 21 million bitcoins. Of this, over three quarters have already been mined. It is supposed to get progressively harder to mine bitcoins, with the intention that the huge numbers of bitcoins that are sitting fallow will eventually appreciate in value, that it will still be worth mining them even as they get harder, etc. Regardless of your views on this, or cryptocurrencies: there's only 21 million bitcoins total.
1 bitcoin is one twenty-millionth of all bitcoins. It is about .000005% of the total blob of bitcoins that will ever be. .000005% of all the gold mined to date- which is definitely not all the gold ever- is around 300 ounces of gold. And that's a very low estimate for the total gold available- some sources have it at over ten times that in available gold. The fact that no one has it pinned down to at least a solid order of magnitude is depressing, but the point is that even the low estimates, the percentage of one bitcoin compared to all the bitcoin, versus that same percentage of gold compared to all the gold, is nowhere close in bitcoins favor.
What absolute bollocks. Replace the word "gold" with any other element and your entire 'justification' remains just as valid. Not to mention the fact that an 'ounce' is an arbitrary measure of anything. That the price of 'one' (an arbitrary amount) bitcoin has surpassed the price of one ounce (arbitrary measure) of gold (arbitrary element, one of many that we consider 'valuable') is even less notable than the clock ticking over from one year to another, in our arbitrarily decided calendar.
Some things are more arbitrary than others.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
From TFS: Even though bitcoin and gold are both thought of as alternative assets
Um, no. Gold is nearly universally regarded as an asset, a hedge against inflation, and a store of value. Bitcoin are only regarded as 'alternative assets' by Bitcoin fanboys.
Cast iron is as effective at the end of a spear and a bit cheaper. Heck, people will pay you to take away an old cast iron tub.
Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
How do you compare $/oz with $ ?
Here are the trading volumes on the different exchanges over the last 24h. I'm quoting only the top tree between BTC and local currencies - there are many many more.
Bitfinex $39,590,400 (BTC and US dollars)
bitFlyer $37,823,900 (BTC and Japanese Yen)
OKCoin.cn $16,917,200 (BTC and Chinese Yuan)
https://coinmarketcap.com/curr...
A few hundred million dollars over a single day is not likely considered "low trade volume".
it's in my head
In a scenario where your bitcoin is inaccessible due to the massive long term loss of all our electrical infrastructure, I would suggest a pile of bullets would be a whole lot more valuable to you than some pieces of shiny yellow metal.
Gold is Gold. In the future you may be able to create gold with extreme nuclear reactions. But the price of the energy required will be high. Gold has allot of industry aplications and can be stored and protected. Can be tranfered with little cost. Cripto coins are bits of information that can be copied, broken, stolen. It cant be used as material for any industry. It requires resources to do operations with it. In fact, the only thing setting the price is the amount of energy required to process a block of operations... And you have the addictive factor: every bitcoin transfer requires more energy, making bitcoin more costly. But is it worth more just because it costs more? What will happen when brokers say: we wont buy bitcoins anymore, we changed to another crypto coin?
Cool story, Bro. Since we're talking about archaic formats, was that information stored on 5¼-inch floppy drives?
While that's a great definition of how much money it's worth, that's not a fair assessment of how much it's actually worth. You can't plate electrical connectors or graven images with bitcoin.
No, but you can use it to buy gold to do that. You can't eat gold, but you can exchange it for food.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
Uhm. I wrote the post you're referring to, and it was positively a reply to a post about Beanie Babies:
"The key element left out of this comparison is trading volume. At one point, certain Beanie Babies were worth more than gold, but the trade volume was low, and the Beanie Baby economy never took off. It's trivial to drive up the price of a commodity on low trade volume."
My post countered the covert claim about the price of Bitcoin being a result of low trade volumes with the fact that hundreds of millions of dollars in no way makes the price artificially high because of movements on an illiquid market.
it's in my head