Slashdot Mirror


Underwater Pumped-Storage Hydroelectric Project Completes Its First Practical Test (forschung-energiespeicher.info)

What if you built massive concrete spheres -- 98 feet in diameter, with 10-foot walls -- under the ocean to help generate electricity during peak periods? Slashdot reader nachtkap reports that German researchers just finished testing their 1:10-scale prototype StEnSEA: It was retrieved from Lake Constance, where it was submerged at a depth of 100 meters [328-feet] since November. The system was developed by the Fraunhofer-Institut IWES in Kassel, Germany in collaboration with its inventors... The German Trade Department and Department of Education and Research as well as the German construction company Hochtief are also involved with the project.

The system's hollow concrete spheres are intended to be used in conjunction with off-shore wind-farms to serve as energy storage for peak hours. The spheres are ultimately supposed to be submerged near off-shore wind-farms and pumped free of water with excess energy. When additional energy is needed during peak hours the system goes into reverse and water rushes in, driving a turbine... At 700 meters the system has a capacity of 20MWh, with a linear capacity increase as depth increases.

5 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. implosion sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When it implodes it goes MOOB!

    1. Re:implosion sound by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      It also takes some serious balls to try a system like this.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Re:Why? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Advantages that I can see;
    More places they can go, and the places they go (off the coast) are usually closer to places that want the electricity.
    If it works, you can scale it by building more spheres.
    A change in height of 700m is easy to obtain in the ocean. On land, not so much.
    Out of sight, out of mind - Since fewer people will see it, fewer will complain about it.
    If a sphere fails, it's far less catastrophic than a dam failing.

  3. Re:Seems like using buoyancy would be more efficie by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pumps are very inefficient. I wonder why they wouldn't just use the excess energy to drive a motor/generator to pull an empty sphere towards the bottom with a cable and then generate energy in reverse as it rises up?

    Conventional pumped storage systems have about 75-80% round trip efficiency, which is not that bad. One reason for the loss is evaporation from the upper reservoir, which would not be a problem for this system, so round trip efficiency in the 80+% range is realistic. That is not to bad if you have free electricity to begin with.

    --

    Stephan

  4. Re:Why? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if - and stay with me here for a second, but what if we pumped the water into the clouds? It works for data, surely it would work with water.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook