Slashdot Mirror


Developer Proclaims Death of Cyberfox Web Browser (ghacks.net)

In a forum entitled "Cyberfox and its future direction," the lead developer of Cyberfox proclaimed the death of their web browser. The lead developer, Toady, writes: "Over the years the Cyberfox project has grown immensely and its thanks to all the amazing support of our users and has been an amazing couple of years this however has demanded far more of my time causing me to drop allot of projects and passions id like to pursue, the time factor this project has demanded has also take a toll lifestyle wise as have the changes made by Mozilla requiring more and more time to maintain so its come to a point where i recently had to assess the direction of this project and the direction i wish to head for the future. This has being no easy choice and the last few months allot of thinking about the direction of this project has taken place." He continues, "This project has been amazing no one could ask for a better project or community sadly as much as i love this project my heart is no longer fully in it, dreams of pursuing game development were pushed aside and lifestyle steadily declined ultimately slowly coming to this point where changes and choices have to be made ones that will affect this project and the future of what i have spent all these years building." Ghacks Technology News reports: The death of Cyberfox, or more precisely, the announcement of end of life for the web browser may come as a shock to users who run it. It should not be too much of a surprise though for users who keep an eye on the browser world and especially Mozilla and Firefox. Mozilla announced major changes to Firefox, some of which landed already, some are in process, and others are announced for 2017. [Some of the critical changes:] Multi-process Firefox is almost done, plugins are out except for Flash and Firefox ESR, Windows XP and Vista users are switched to Firefox ESR so that the operating systems are supported for eight additional releases, and WebExtensions will replace all other add-on systems of the browser. That's a lot of change, especially for projects that are maintained by a small but dedicated group of developers such as Cyberfox. The author of Cyberfox made the decision to switch the browser's release channel to Firefox 52.0 ESR. This means that Cyberfox will be supported with security updates for the next eight release cycles, but new features that Mozilla introduces in Firefox Stable won't find their way into the browser anymore. UPDATE 3/07/17: We have updated the headline to clarify that Cyberfox, specifically, is the browser that will be coming to an end. We have also added an excerpt from the developer's post. Toady clarified at the end of his post: "The largest factor was lifestyle a nicer way of saying health issues without making it to personalized."

52 comments

  1. Well, sort of by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    They're half-right, anyway - Cyberfox IS based on a dead web browser. /ducks

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Well, sort of by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      Illiterate /. editor strikes again. "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Web Browser" should read "Developer Proclaims Death of Cyberfox Web Browser."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Well, sort of by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      Illiterate /. editor strikes again. "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Web Browser" should read "Developer Proclaims Death of Cyberfox Web Browser." Reply to This

      Oh, you think this was accidental?
      What if said "Your browser trying to kill you, here's one weird trick to stay alive"?

    3. Re:Well, sort of by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Not a failure.
      Using your accurate headline would severely reduce the number of clicks as it narrows the subject. If you didn't use Cyberfox, you would likely skim past it. But THE HEAT DEATH OF WEB BROWSERS IS UPON US! gets a helluva lot more clicks!

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    4. Re:Well, sort of by msauve · · Score: 1

      Editor fail X2 (/. editor changed the headline after the fact). Why do the senators get to modify their work, when all of us proles can't? At least enable Unicode support for proper quotes and apostrophes as a consolation prize.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Well, sort of by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well, while the edit did turn my attempted joke into a "WTF?" non-sequitur... the editors here can't win, either way. When they don't update the stories after the fact, people complain. When they do update the stories after the fact, people complain (and early comments become bizarre tangents).

      Back to the story - in all seriousness, I do hope the cyberfox developer is able to look after his health and recover from whatever his affliction is.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Well, sort of by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Illiterate /. editor strikes again. "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Web Browser" should read "Developer Proclaims Death of Cyberfox Web Browser." Reply to This

      Oh, you think this was accidental? What if said "Your browser trying to kill you, here's one weird trick to stay alive"?

      If it said that, it would already have 2 million shares on facebook.

  2. Last line in TFA by waspleg · · Score: 1

    Now You: What's your take on the death of Cyberfox?

    Who cares? I have used Firefox a very long time (Netscape Gold anyone?) and never heard of this.

    Firefox has the plug-ins and configuration options I want (like turning off the malware that is Web RTC and bullshit like pocket).

    I'm not going anywhere and (even IT) people are consistently amazed when I show them a website they're used to being spammed mercilessly on without the ads.

    1. Re:Last line in TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox has the plug-ins

      Not for long.

  3. Death of *A* web browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardly "death of *the* web browser", just "end of a particular Firefox fork that only about three people ever cared about anyway".

    1. Re:Death of *A* web browser by lucm · · Score: 1

      That's like when people announce the Death of PC. Originally the story was about the death of a journalist's PC following a coffee spill. But fake news take a life of their own.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Death of *A* web browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a mighty generous use of the "fake news" term you've taken there. What's up with that? Is that the new thing?

    3. Re:Death of *A* web browser by lucm · · Score: 1

      That's a mighty generous use of the "fake news" term you've taken there. What's up with that? Is that the new thing?

      That was so yesterday. Now it's "alternative facts".

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  4. New low in editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title would have been corrected if BeauHD wasn't so busy trying to download as much transsexual porn as he could before the death of the web browser.

  5. tl;dr by Hylandr · · Score: 1, Informative

    Cyberfox is a Firefox-based browser

    Stopped reading.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    1. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You read further than me.

    2. Re:tl;dr by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I read "cyber" and got, uh... distracted.

    3. Re:tl;dr by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 2

      I stopped reading at "allot".

    4. Re:tl;dr by PReDiToR · · Score: 2

      At least allot is a real word, unlike alot.

      The world is in dire need of alittle[sic] more literacy.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    5. Re:tl;dr by kriston · · Score: 1

      I like their forum entitled "Announcement's."

      Ahem.

      --

      Kriston

    6. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always the other alot...

    7. Re:tl;dr by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Hah! You spelled allittle wrong!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  6. Interesting despite misleading title by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I've been impressed with the pioneering work done by Cyberfox and Pale Moon in terms of helping to get Firefox (and probably other browsers) moving forwards by showing that what people are asking for are valuable for the user community at large.

    I'm sure the workload for supporting a modern browser (even if it based on a code base like WebKit and/or Firefox) must be incredible and thanx must go out to Toady and the team.

    Hopefully additional non-corporate browsers will continue to proliferate to help show the big guys where things should be going.

    1. Re:Interesting despite misleading title by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      The problem is, XUL has been retired and old forks can't just make patches from firefox anymore. Expect more to come

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  7. I used to use it. No point with native 64-bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Cyberfox for years. The second that Mozilla started there own native 64-bit I saw little point.

  8. Misleading Title Proclaims Death of Knowledge by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they meant, "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Their Web Browser"? Still... it's a bit melodramatic, don't you think?

    1. Re:Misleading Title Proclaims Death of Knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Clickbait title is clickbait.

      Better headline: Browser that nobody ever heard of and nobody uses is announcing that it won't exist anymore.

      IMO, nothing of value was lost. (Nothing to see here; move along.)

    2. Re:Misleading Title Proclaims Death of Knowledge by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Maybe they meant, "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Their Web Browser"? Still... it's a bit melodramatic, don't you think?

      Yea, but it makes for a great "Who on /. only reads the title and doesn't even bother with the summary" test, so at least we get something amusing out of it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  9. Death of a Developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he was 22 the future looked bright
    But he's nearly 30 now and he's coding every night
    I see that look in his face he's got that look in his eye
    He's thinking how did I get here and wondering why

    It's sad but it's true tech society says
    His life is already over
    There's nothing to do and there's nothing to say
    Til the company of his dreams comes along picks him up and pays him a salary
    It seems so unlikely in this day and age

    He's got an alright job but it's not a career
    Whenever he thinks about it, it brings him to tears
    Cause all he wants is a stable income
    He gets one-night gigs
    He's thinking how did I get here
    I'm doing all that I can

  10. New Cloud Browser by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    The browser will only run in the cloud but you will need Internet Explorer installed to access it.

    1. Re:New Cloud Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Remote Desktop Connection.

  11. apps and the filter bubble by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    The web browsers are under attack. Whether or not they will survive is a valid discussion. As the Internet moves more and more towards mobile, the web browser seems to be replaced by apps for one's favorite sites. The encapsulation of the experience.

    .
    This concept has been noted and written about for a few years that I know about. It is good to see a more mainstream site like /. piling on th eissue of the closing of the Internet.

    1. Re:apps and the filter bubble by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      You haven't been paying attention. People have complained loudly that aps are mostly just watered down version of websites. When on a mobile I *hate* being forced into some damn app rather than go through a browser. I want to find what I am looking for, not be forced through a ui 'funnel'.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    2. Re:apps and the filter bubble by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Which is what I miss from Firefox OS. Traditional web pages blend seamlessly and there's no 'native' toolkit layer to get in the way.

  12. What? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Cyberfox is a Firefox-based browser..."

    Guy who builds browsers says "browsers are dead!"

    Okaaaaaaaaaay.....

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  13. Edited headline by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Original:
    "Cyberfox Developer Proclaims Death of Web Browser "

    After editing:
    "Developer Proclaims Death of Cyberfox Web Browser "

    Change the position of one word to achieve truthiness.

  14. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FF has been sucking more and more so I switched to CF. Its sad to see it go. Looks like its palemoon or waterfox if you don't want a chrome based browser. Cyberfox was the closest you could get to regular firefox without the extra baggage.

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the first person in comments to have actually used it...
      you win a free unicorn or a unicron whichever makes you feel better.

  15. Don't scare me like that. by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    What is Cyberfox? How is it different than Firefox? The summary mentions Mozilla, and I know that Mozilla makes Firefox, but I have used Mozilla products for about 15 years, and I have never even heard of Cyberfox. Did someone just have a stroke and replace all occurrences of "fire" with "cyber"?

    Your submission should answer more questions than it raises!

    1. Re:Don't scare me like that. by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      What is Cyberfox? How is it different than Firefox? The summary mentions Mozilla, and I know that Mozilla makes Firefox, but I have used Mozilla products for about 15 years, and I have never even heard of Cyberfox. Did someone just have a stroke and replace all occurrences of "fire" with "cyber"? Your submission should answer more questions than it raises!

      Same. First thing I did was go to Wikipedia to read the page on Cyberfox, guess what? There IS NO PAGE on Cyberfox! Can't be a very well known browser.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:Don't scare me like that. by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      I ran it briefly (also Waterfox), back before I found that Firefox had native x64 builds for both Firefox Aurora (Developer) and Nightly. Why use slower-updated forks?

    3. Re:Don't scare me like that. by WallyL · · Score: 1

      s/fire/cyber/g

      Is that what you're looking for?

  16. The Editor is not the only one by s.petry · · Score: 0

    I realize this is pedantic, but how can the lead developer not know the difference between "a lot" and "allot". I don't see him divvying up the software to give chunks out, I see him disbanding the project..

    /end_pendantic

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:The Editor is not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on his very poor English, his health problems may be mental. Or perhaps English is his second language. Or he didn't pass High School English. If he actually "loved" the project, he would have tried to find a team to take over his part. Did he? It's just poor management to burn out rather than delegate - or just say "no". Of course, the project has to be popular enough to have enough "true believers" to take over the load.

  17. Bah!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still using Cyberdog...

  18. Firefox is right behind Cyberfox and IE by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    How is this news? It's very clear from that data what's going on. And it's just one Google search away from your finger tips. Game over, thanks for playing. Chrome FTW.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  19. allot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    allot?

    Once that idiot is done with his browser, he can tackle the English language.

  20. Cyberfox Revived Thanks to Slashdot by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

    Cyberfox usage has now doubled from 6 users to 12. Plans for more releases in the works!

    --
    It started back in Team Fortress Classic
  21. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where we come to read about newly dead products that we never knew existed in the first place.

    What was this "Radio Shack" thing, anyway?

  22. Cyberfox? by mccrew · · Score: 1
    Cyberfox? Never heard of it.

    Also... "allot".

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  23. English classes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now he'll have time to take some English classes. Yikes.

  24. So where will Cyberfox go? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    To the old forks home?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com