Slashdot Mirror


The Quest To Crystallize Time - Previously Considered Impossible, Researchers Create Time Crystals (nature.com)

New submitter omaha393 writes: Researchers have addressed a perplexing issue in physics: the existence of time crystals. Time crystals, previously only hypothetical in nature, are structures that oscillate without any external energy supplied. The idea of time crystals set off a massive feud among physicists, arguing that such a state of matter could not exist. As leading time crystal proponent Frank Wilczek describes it: "conceptually, it is a clock that ticks forever without being wound." With the paper published in Nature Wednesday, researchers showed their method of production and the unusual nature of time crystals, which owe their oscillation properties to never achieving a state of equilibrium. From a report on Phys.org: Ordinary crystals such as diamonds, quartz or ice are made up of molecules that spontaneously arrange into orderly three-dimensional patterns. The sodium and chlorine atoms in a crystal of salt, for example, are spaced at regular intervals, forming a hexagonal lattice. In time crystals, however, atoms are arranged in patterns not only in space, but also in time. In addition to containing a pattern that repeats in space, time crystals contain a pattern that repeats over time. One way this could happen is that the atoms in the crystal move at a certain rate. Were a time crystal of ice to exist, all of the water molecules would vibrate at an identical frequency. What is more, the molecules would do this without any input from the outside world. [...] Shivaji Sondhi, a Princeton professor of physics said that the work addresses some of the most fundamental questions about the nature of matter. "It was thought that if a system doesn't settle down and come to equilibrium, you couldn't really say that it is in a phase. It is a big deal when you can give a definition of a phase of matter when the matter is not in equilibrium," he said.

129 comments

  1. I think I speak for everyone when I say... by hbean · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Physics...you crazy!

    --
    "Give someone a program, frustrate them for a day... Teach someone to program, frustrate them for a lifetime."
  2. What the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hexagonal lattice in NaCl?! NaCl forms a cubic lattice!

    Yes I'm a crystallographer!

    1. Re:What the... by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      A cube looks like a hexagon, looking down the long diagonal.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:What the... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hexagonal lattice in NaCl?! NaCl forms a cubic lattice!

      Yes I'm a crystallographer!

      A cube looks like a hexagon, looking down the long diagonal.

      The NaCl structure is two interpenetrating FCC lattices of A and X, offset by {1/4, 0, 0} relative to the NaCl cubic unit cell (but by {1/2, 0, 0} relatively between the FCC sub-cells. In space-group symmetry notation, it is F m 3-bar m, in terms of its fundamental (that is most-basically-expressible, reduced unit cell).

      In the same manner that an FCC atomic arrangement could be expressed as having a hexagonal unit cell, with it not being the fundamental cell, but instead a multiple formula-unit cell – a supercell – one could do the same with NaCl. I've not had my coffee, but intuitively a supercell double-sized this one could similarly be used to define the crystal structure of NaCl. Not optimal, but possible. Look in the front-matter section of your Space-Groups tome to look up the matrix conversion to transform the atomic positions from one fundamental lattice-type to another.

      Put more simply, while HEXAGONAL is ABABAB stacking, FCC is ABCABC stacking of close-packed layers of atoms.

      Yes, I am also a crystallographer.

    3. Re:What the... by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I wish I had mod points. This is exactly the kind of post I read slashdot for.

    4. Re:What the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A real 4 dimensional salt based TIMECUBE!

    5. Re:What the... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm a crystallographer!

      But do you use FORTRAN?

    6. Re:What the... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I wish I had mod points. This is exactly the kind of post I read slashdot for.

      Thx. I always wonder whether my posts get read by any people or not. It's good to hear that effort is not wasted.

      I, too, read Slashdot for the good Comments, specifically the detailed or highly insightful ones... voices I would not hear otherwise.

      (You can find this also in some FARK threads, although the lack of a mod system means that you have to sift through everything chronologically to find that occasional Comment "from a guy who was there during the ********* event", or "from readers with deep knowledge in a very specific hobby or interest".)

  3. The military Applications are endless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can we weaponize this, can we kill in the past or future?

    1. Re:The military Applications are endless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Rassilon.

    2. Re: The military Applications are endless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been available from ACME Inc. The coyote has been using it for years. Damn that roadrunner.

  4. Time Cube finally disproven? by sinij · · Score: 0

    Do these physicist get to collect some money from Ray?

    1. Re:Time Cube finally disproven? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I dunno, looks like their proving time cube, to me. They may owe him royalties.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Time Cube finally disproven? by youngone · · Score: 1

      That's what I read in the headline until I checked it again. I'm not sure it's possible to prove the Time Cube without daytime drinking.

    3. Re: Time Cube finally disproven? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any other kind of drinking? If so I probably don't want to know.

    4. Re: Time Cube finally disproven? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make that quadruple-parallel-day-time dtinking

  5. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL about 8 years too late there buddy!

  6. Resublimated Thiotimoline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was expecting them to have discover Resublimated Thiotimoline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiotimoline

  7. Time Crystal == Oscillator? by pz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read the linked article (which is a summary of the real report). It's not my field.

    How is what they describe anything other than just a stable oscillator? It consumes energy, since to run it requires regular (although perhaps not periodic?) pulses of light.

    How is this different from a macroscopic tuned circuit that also resists changes in driving force, and oscillates at a stable frequency? Because it's made with a handful of atoms instead of gazoober electrons streaming around a circuit? I'm (not intentionally) being snarky -- I'm curious because by the article the physicists are peeing all over themselves in excitement, so I'm guessing they think there's something to this that I don't see.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not different, modern physics is a shame because of people like these getting degrees and funding. Higher education wasn't made for everyone, it was just marketed to everyone.

    2. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nothing else, I guess there's a use for it in making really, really tiny circuits. If your CPU's clock consists of 4 atoms, and its logic gates are another 4 atoms each, that could push Moore's Law another step.

    3. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Thx. That was more explicit than the technobabble and platitude ridden "summary".

    4. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. The Great Oz has spoken.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also well outside my field but the breakthrough comes from "the experimental observation of discrete time translational symmetry breaking into" a time crystal, whereas traditional oscillating systems cannot break symmetry. The hype also surrounds its potential applications for quantum computing, b asically providing a potential path for quantum simulations without cryogenic (near absolute zero temperature) systems.
      Please, if any physicist can explain symmetry breaking that would be great.

    6. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It consumes energy, since to run it requires regular (although perhaps not periodic?) pulses of light.

      Exactly. How the heck is this supposedly a "time crystal", since it doesn't meet the criteria given ("without any external energy supplied")? To me, the gist of this submission seems like typical pseudo-scientific babble, attempting to pretend the phys.org paper says something it doesn't.

      BTW the real science is still pretty darn cool.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is this different from a macroscopic tuned circuit that also resists changes in driving force, and oscillates at a stable frequency?

      This oscillation seem to have no relation to the frequency of the driving force and happen in the same lattice (Look mommy, no capacitors!). It would be like a simple electric engine of which operating frequency can't be determined from the input. This is what I think I understood about the article.

    8. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by TooManyNames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's different from a macroscopic tuned circuit in that the driving energy is decoupled from the resulting oscillations. Basically, some energy is indeed required to maintain the crystalline (repeating pattern) structure in time, but that pattern is precise and does not depend on the energy supplied. In a typical oscillating circuit, on the other hand, you would indeed see recurring oscillations for a given supply voltage, for example, but if you vary that voltage, the oscillations settle to a quite significantly different frequency.

      This isn't a perpetual motion machine, but it does exhibit characteristics that are nonetheless really cool and potentially quite useful, and it does so by relying on what is essentially a new matter phase previously though to be impossible.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    9. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by TooManyNames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a "time crystal" in the sense that the quantum states of the structure exhibit a precisely recurring pattern in time. Some energy is required to maintain that pattern, but the pattern doesn't depend on specifics of that energy supply (i.e. one voltage produces the same oscillation frequency as a different voltage). That's enough to satisfy most definitions of "time crystal," though it falls well short of the much narrower definition that requires recurring oscillations without any energy input.

      This is indeed real science, though.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    10. Re: Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its perpetual motion. This is a women's day joke.

    11. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

      I read the linked article (which is a summary of the real report). It's not my field.

      How is what they describe anything other than just a stable oscillator? It consumes energy, since to run it requires regular (although perhaps not periodic?) pulses of light.

      The stable oscillation (in time) is not physical, but rather an oscillation of subatomic particle (electron?) spin-flipping.

      That is, it's not a 10-atom-long little guitar string oscillating at its (the object's) resonant frequency, with all other frequencies somehow quenched. (This was actually my first thought, too.) But, the linked Nature News article goes on to make it clear this is not a phonon-ralated nor atomic-motion-related phenomenon. Note where that first-described experiment describes the ytterbium atoms as being in a ground (non-vibrating) state.

      As for the diamond-defect experiment, I am still digesting that one. Can a quantum physicist chime in to address the diamonds?

    12. Re: Time Crystal == Oscillator? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It's an oscillator that flips particles spin value regardless of the external force. You can control particle spin one way or the other by exerting a certain power using a laser. In this instance they noticed that under specific circumstances they could make the particles flip its spin all on its own regardless of what direction the laser would typically force it to do at least if they didn't shine the laser hard enough to break the symmetry. In that way they behave like crystals, unless you smash the crystal hard enough that it breaks, the molecules line up in a particular order regardless of external forces, in this case the crystal is not formed in space but in time hence the word time crystal.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    13. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shame --> sham

    14. Re:Time Crystal == Oscillator? by pz · · Score: 1

      Ah, no. A stable oscillator can be easily constructed that fully resists changes in input (power supply) voltage. Your $5 quartz watch has one. From that perspective I really only see a difference being one of scale: this is a first only because it has been done on an atomic level.

      And now that I happened to use the word "atomic", that makes me question: what's the difference between this and the cesium oscillator in an atomic clock?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    15. Re: Time Crystal == Oscillator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is a poor summary.

  8. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you idiotic ramblings have to do with Time Crystals?

  9. Re:Sounds like absolute bollocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You say that now, but when Thanos uses them to complete his infinity gauntlet you'll realize their might.

  10. The Tardis... by sycodon · · Score: 1

    ...is now only 20 years away!

    Wait...it was 20 years ago!

    I'm confused.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:The Tardis... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's easy to get confused when dealing with wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:The Tardis... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      "Timey wimey"?? Is that how I speak now?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:The Tardis... by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mod parent Redundant. He told that same joke next week.

    4. Re:The Tardis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timecrystals clearly power the Never Ending Story.

  11. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by s.petry · · Score: 1

    What do you idiotic ramblings have to do with Time Crystals?

    Duh! He wants to go back using "Time Crystals" so he can answer his own question..

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  12. Slashdot Article Time Crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It must be true! This is a repeated article, and just like real time crystals, nothing beneficial can be derived from it!

    https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/01/28/2027253/scientist-investigate-a-brand-new-form-of-matter-time-crystals

    1. Re:Slashdot Article Time Crystals by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Until something useful can be made out of the many theoretical "things" proposed these days, likely to get grant money, I'll watch as more people begin to view science as either magic or just plain bullshit. We need to return to scientific rigor, not wild speculations.

    2. Re:Slashdot Article Time Crystals by TooManyNames · · Score: 2

      The actual experiment is scientifically rigorous, and it does yield something quite useful: namely, it yields an oscillator that will oscillate at the same frequency regardless of the supply energy. If you don't think there's a use for that, you've probably never contemplated how your CPU or memory system actually, you know, works.

      By the way, it'll probably be quite some time before this oscillator ends up on an SoC, but that's not the point; the point is that there are some immediately conceivable use cases for this thing. Just because you can't think of them doesn't mean it's useless or dependent on wild speculations.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
    3. Re:Slashdot Article Time Crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord you're an idiot.

  13. Call It What It Is...An Oscillator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The just of the experiment is: you actively pump something with a given RF signal, and it oscillates. There is nothing new, innovative or particularly cool about this. They're entangled oscillators. It's not breaking thermodynamics, it's not breaking equilibrium and it certainly isn't anything remotely close to "perpetual motion" as required by the idea of a "time crystal" - it's a system which consumes energy to maintain an oscillation. An ball spinning in space is more energy-efficient in terms of "repeating structure over time" and it's not even "a bunch of atoms spinning the same way flying in formation in space" - it's just a freaking oscillator. Physics hasn't had major new innovations because idiots like these get all the funding.

  14. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must be trapped in a time crystal.

  15. Conservation of energy by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Shouldn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy? Or is this literally the achievement of what would have normally been thought of as an asymptote to infinity, where no energy can be extracted from this closed system and it's perpetuating on merely perfect conservation of the energy that was introduced into the system when it was established?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Conservation of energy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I think of it like the moon rotating the earth......constant perpetual motion, but no energy input.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty much just what you say, a perfect in-equality that keeps it looping infinitely unless influenced.

      I assume some crystals will keep their infinite state as long as energy is added to it above a certain threshold, but when the energy of the system goes below a certain point, it will cease activity.
      There might also be states where it will speed up as more energy is added to the system.
      These could possibly end up being a stupidly good battery in the future.

      The mechanisms behind why this works should be an interesting research area.
      Hopefully it is weirder than just constant feedback loops.

    3. Re:Conservation of energy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy?

      No, since energy is repeatedly being added to the system (read the linked Nature news item and ignore what the Slashdot submitter wrote).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Conservation of energy by TWX · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an analogy to an infinite-loop game of Go, where the flipping begets more flipping to where previously flipped pieces are flipped again and continue spreading, so long as one keeps flipping the pieces...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, gravity is at play with these larger bodies orbiting one another so it's not perpetual motion. It's been set in motion by and maintained in motion by gravitational pulls from other bodies, which we may not even be fully aware of their sources.

    6. Re:Conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the moon's orbit is getting larger every year due to "drag" from tidal forces on our oceans (3cm/year rings a bell, but that's just from memory). Also TFA mentions pulses of light to keep the system oscillating, which seems awfully like an energy input into the system to me.

      (Note that I am not a physicist - my physics studies never got past uni honours).

    7. Re:Conservation of energy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Um, gravity is at play with these larger bodies orbiting one another so it's not perpetual motion.

      That entirely depends on what you mean by 'motion.' From our frame of reference, the moon is definitely moving.
      The point is, that something similar could be happening at the microscopic level of these particles, although the forces involved are not gravity.

      It's also worth remembering why a perpetual motion machine is impossible: because of friction. If you could get a frictionless surface (and remove air friction, etc), you could have a perpetual motion machine. My understanding is that super-conductors can be considered perpetual motion machines, with electrons flowing perpetually. However these things are not what people normally think of when they try to sell you a perpetual motion machine: they are hucksters with a completely different goal.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Conservation of energy by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy? Or is this literally the achievement of what would have normally been thought of as an asymptote to infinity, where no energy can be extracted from this closed system and it's perpetuating on merely perfect conservation of the energy that was introduced into the system when it was established?

      It's perpetual motion, yes. But, it costs a lot of energy to keep it in that state.

      Even within the time crystal, it is a zero-sum game, in the sense that no "excess" energy could be harvested from it.

      So, don't go running to the Patent Office.

    9. Re:Conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, don't go running to the Patent Office.

      Considering the state of the Patent Office these days submitting a perpetual motion machine should pass muster.

    10. Re:Conservation of energy by TWX · · Score: 1

      There are already several examples that claim to be perpetual motion machines under patent.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:Conservation of energy by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

      And harnessing/consuming the energy of the orbit wouldn't affect the orbit in any way?

    12. Re:Conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would take so long for the orbit to be noticeably affected, you would have the knowledge to build a better perpetual motion machine by then.

    13. Re:Conservation of energy by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Then you thought wrong, because these "time crystals" take an enormous amount of energy.

    14. Re:Conservation of energy by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

      The answer is still yes.

  16. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by TWX · · Score: 0

    You're just bitter because your candidate was so bad he lost to a black man named Hussein.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  17. Re: Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Holy Shit there buddy ... I believe you may have eaten too many "Time Crystals" if you get my reference.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  18. Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's flawed logic to assume that the lowest energy state in a universes so fluid and in motion would be absolute stillness.

    Perhaps it's oscillations due to the quantum foam, or space/time itself moves, and thus a lower energy particle would vibrate at some frequency rather than not.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    1. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I think it's flawed logic to assume that the lowest energy state in a universes so fluid and in motion would be absolute stillness. Perhaps it's oscillations due to the quantum foam, or space/time itself moves, and thus a lower energy particle would vibrate at some frequency rather than not.

      There's only one thing that's certain about quantum mechanics, when you finally think you've wrapped your brain around the concept you discover there's a whole new layer of weird. If it's really created by God this was his acid trip.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

      The 'bubbling' in the space-time fabric has to come from somewhere, maybe from dimensions we don't understand. Has anyone found an explanation for the source? Who knows it could be related...

    3. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      yeah, about that, i determined the momentum of where it was coming from exactly, so you're not going to find it.

    4. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the universe is simulated, then whole new layer of weird = more obfuscation.
      Either its purpose is to hide the limits of the simulation from us. Or that's just the way things look like when a computer program tries to 'see' the computer from inside out.

    5. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's flawed logic to assume that the lowest energy state in a universes so fluid and in motion would be absolute stillness.

      Yes. Take the atom - even in ground state, the electron orbit the nucleus forever. A perpetual motion machine, or "time crystal" if you like.

    6. Re:Why is it assumed this is related to Time? by Miamicoastguard · · Score: 0

      Drats.

  19. Just one question... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    If, as the summary quoted, "Time crystals,... are structures that oscillate without any external energy supplied", how did they come to be? Spontaneously? Apparently not.

    So these researchers "showed their method of production ", one that requires no external energy be applied to the time crystals, or their source materials?

    And this is why I am not a physicist.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Just one question... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If, as the summary quoted, "Time crystals,... are structures that oscillate without any external energy supplied", how did they come to be?

      If you read the linked news item in Nature, you'll see that the summary is incorrect - energy is being added to the system, repeatedly.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re: Just one question... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      That's two.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Just one question... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If, as the summary quoted, "Time crystals,... are structures that oscillate without any external energy supplied", how did they come to be?

      If you read the linked news item in Nature, you'll see that the summary is incorrect - energy is being added to the system, repeatedly.

      My faith in slashdot has been severely shaken by the news that the summary and editing of this story is not 100% accurate.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  20. So perpetual motion machines were possible by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    after all.

    All those physicists who rejected my permanent magnet wheel idea without even the courtesy of a reply will not be feeling so smug now. :-)

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:So perpetual motion machines were possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wessel di Wesseli, is that you?

    2. Re:So perpetual motion machines were possible by TooManyNames · · Score: 1

      The summary is pretty bad (shocking, I know). One type of time crystal would be like a perpetual motion machine, but that's not what the actual article claims was developed; instead, the time crystal developed requires energy to maintain its crystalline state, but the crystal structure itself is not dependent on specifics of the input energy.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
  21. I fucking invented Time Crystals, suck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-shape-and-volume-of-a-photon/answer/Piotr-S%C5%82upski

    https://www.quora.com/Can-you-explain-Wheeler%E2%80%93Feynman-absorber-theory-in-laymans-terms

    And more.

    I invented Patterns. You are all welcome.

  22. Oh and if you want to fucking see crystalline spac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.facebook.com/piotrslupski/posts/1479124985445116 Here is the mathematics of spacetime in a very nice wallpaper. Read my quoras above.

  23. Re: Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary loses to everyone so it's no surprise Obama won.

  24. Cannot be created on Earth --DANGER by tekrat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or anywhere else in the physical universe, unless some special laws apply. If you create a form of matter that is "stuck" in time, that matter will be locked in a spot in the physical universe.

    The problem we will have is that the Earth is spinning, the Earth is going around the Sun, the solar system is swirling within the Milky Way, and the Galaxy exists in a universe that is expanding. Once you remove a physical object from relativity, all hell will break loose. From our perspective, that material will rocket off into space (or burrow right through the planet).

    Essentially we will have left it behind, locked in the space-time it was created in.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Cannot be created on Earth --DANGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would disappear. "Stuck in time" and "constant through all time" are two different things.

    2. Re:Cannot be created on Earth --DANGER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever modded this up should be embarrassed

  25. Crap. And here I thought they found Thiotimoline. by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thiotimoline

    The major peculiarity of the chemical is its "endochronicity": when it is mixed with water, it starts dissolving before it makes contact with water. Two of the carbon's four chemical bonds lie in normal space and time, one of the bonds projects into the future and another into the past.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  26. Re: Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that you don't eat time crystals. You break them down into a powder and shove them up your butt in a semi-permeable bag.

  27. Bullshit by dschiptsov · · Score: 1

    Whatever they thing they have created, according to interpretation of their instruments, which uses statistics and probability, is not time. Time is a derived characteristic of an observed process and does not exist as an independent phenomena. Whatever they have convinced themselves it is, it is not time.

    1. Re:Bullshit by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

      they discovered how to make Ice-9?

      --
      Serenity now, insanity later.
  28. Thanks for removing a post for "bad language" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I invented patterns
    https://www.quora.com/Is-a-black-hole-just-empty-space-where-the-quantum-foam-has-been-sucked-in-by-the-same-mechanism-as-Hawking-radiation/answer/Piotr-S%C5%82upski

    https://www.quora.com/Can-you-explain-Wheeler%E2%80%93Feynman-absorber-theory-in-laymans-terms

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-shape-and-volume-of-a-photon/answer/Piotr-S%C5%82upski

    1. Re:Thanks for removing a post for "bad language" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody removed your shitty post. It's still there, leaking weapons-grade stupid all over the place. You're just bad at this.

  29. We've secretly replaced Barack's Meth Crystals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with Time Crystals. Let's see if he notices.

  30. Re: Nonequilibrium Phases by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

    How very cold you are.

  31. DILITHIUM !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't dilithium ordinary quartz but with a four-dimentional crystalline structure ?

  32. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been able to buy these at my local new age healing center for decades. Nothing to see here.

  33. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    Well obviously, it was by travelling back in time that Obama instigated the Great Recession before he took office.

    And by travelling forward in time, he set up the Trump wiretaps.

    Considering some of the conspiracy theories swirling around these days, that almost makes sense.

    Screw politics anyhow!

  34. Re: Nonequilibrium Phases by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Don't let the m0n1k3r obfuscate my true nature! ;-)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  35. Thiotimoline by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is nothing new. Thiotimoline was discovered in 1948. It has the property of "endochronicity": when it is mixed with water, it starts dissolving before it makes contact with water. This is because one of its carbon bonds projects slightly into the future, while another projects slightly into the past. There have been several papers on this substance published in the Journal of the American Chronochemical Society.

    1. Re:Thiotimoline by TuringTest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There will be several papers on this substance published in the Journal of the American Chronochemical Society.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    2. Re:Thiotimoline by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      At Home Depot you can find the thiotimoline right next to the gender fluid.

    3. Re:Thiotimoline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You blew my mind. Thank you kind stranger.

    4. Re:Thiotimoline by jsalbre · · Score: 1

      There will be several papers on this substance published in the Journal of the American Chronochemical Society.

      There, fixed that for you.

      Will have had been

    5. Re:Thiotimoline by mcswell · · Score: 1

      did you read the linked-to article? just the first line is good enough

  36. Good grief by s.petry · · Score: 2

    Way to take a bit of humor and turn it into a shitty political rant.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  37. Hmmmmm by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Time crystals, previously only hypothetical in nature, are structures that oscillate without any external energy supplied."

    That would seem to violate some pesky law of physics, but what do I know.

    If true, it has some staggering implications. Perhaps in 100 years their use will be so commonplace that they'll be regarded the same way electricity is today- as a basic part of the universe that is taken for granted.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Hmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's wrong? If the energy remains inside - like in a superconductor's internal current - then conservation of energy says it will oscillate until that energy is lost. If the energy isn't lost, it keeps going...

  38. Re: Nonequilibrium Phases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're learning to use "obfuscate"!

  39. Sensationalism, poorly executed by jandersen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Quest To Crystallize Time - Previously Considered Impossible... ...a massive feud among physicists...

    The combination of this kind of nonsense with big, glossy pictures does a huge disservice to science. On the one hand, it puts those of us who actually have even a basic knowledge about physics, off our lunch, because it is so, I don't know, either disingenious or perhaps written by idiots who don't understand what they are talking about. And on the other hand, it gives the more naive readers the impression that science is something remote and inaccessible; something that is out of this world and certainly out of ordinary people's league; IOW it discourages those who are interested, but not yet experienced enough from believing they could ever be clever enough to do science. I think it is shameful.

    Instead of reading this kind of crap, we should encourage people to take part in things like citizen science; real science and research are things that ordinary people can do, and have done in the past, producing important, real results.

  40. Finally by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I can have a Sonic Screwdriver and a Light Saber

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  41. I'm wondering by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    Reading TFA, these "time crystals" are hardly the everlasting clocks of the summary. They are defects in crystals that flip spins at a different frequency than the exciting energy would normally flip. Some consider them loopholes in the definition.

    Regardless, it's pretty interesting. I don't think I'll put in my order fr the eternal clock oscillator just yet though.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  42. Re: Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it will get modded down because it's both off topic and an obvious troll.

  43. Time crystals? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why call them something that sounds like it came out of a bad Doctor Who slash?

    Sounds like 'isentropic oscillators' would work better.

  44. Power source by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    If I understood correctly, this time crystal does not oscillate on its own, the researcher have to feed it with laser bursts.

  45. Entropy by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Did time crystals just make entropy irrelevant?

    1. Re: Entropy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      I bet you hoped for a better answer. Read more than the summary and the nomenclature is misleading.

  46. Teenage Crystals by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    They are just going through a phase and need some more time to settle down.

  47. Basically it's a ratchet??? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Consider those clocks that are powered just off air pressure fluctuations. The keep a regular Rhythm. The energy inputs are random not synchronized. But they gather energy from the fluctuations. You could say it's a maxwell's demon using a ratchet to capture the energy. And while such a ratchet can't work in equilibrium (see Feynman Lectures), it can work just fine when not in equilibrium.

    Thus there doesn't seem to be anything remarkable here.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  48. Same Hype gives Time Waves by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    It's a "time crystal" in the sense that the quantum states of the structure exhibit a precisely recurring pattern in time.

    So it is a crystal where the oscillations are synchronized, or at least that's how most physicists would describe it if they were not trying to hype it up and make it sound cool. Perhaps we could try this with 1st year physics: by the same logic we can describe waves on a string as "time waves" because each point on the string moves over time and is synchronized to each other point via a constant phase difference.

  49. Re:Barak HUSSEIN Obama by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    You're just bitter because your candidate was so bad he lost to a black man named Hussein.

    No he's not. He doesn't believe a word of it -- it's classic trolling, where a troll is just throwing out something he knows is nonsense for the sake of a reaction.

  50. Real time crystals by VAXcat · · Score: 1
    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:Real time crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would read the comments before posting. That article has been linked no less than three times already.

  51. Re:Crap. And here I thought they found Thiotimolin by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    I don't remember the specifics of Thiotimoline, but I think if it existed with the properties that Asimov invented, (and you were the only one who knew), you could make a ton of money on the stock market. If you set up a system to dump TTL into the solvent when a market trigger was hit, you could measure prices in the future and act on them in the present.

  52. Infinite Improbability Drive by blivit42 · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "... it would not be in its lowest energy state, and it would require a regular kick to pulse."

    and

    "The recipe was incredibly complex, but just three ingredients were essential: a force repeatedly disturbing the particles, a way to make the atoms interact with each other and an element of random disorder."

    So, no perpetual motion machine. However, maybe if they used a nice hot cup of tea to generate brownian motion as the source of random disorder, perhaps this could be a step towards inventing an infinite improbability drive?