New Bill Would Allow Employers To Demand Genetic Testing From Workers (businessinsider.com)
capedgirardeau quotes a report from Business Insider: A little-noticed bill moving through the U.S. Congress would allow companies to require employees to undergo genetic testing or risk paying a penalty of thousands of dollars, and would let employers see that genetic and other health information. Giving employers such power is now prohibited by U.S. law, including the 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA. The new bill gets around that landmark law by stating explicitly that GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a "workplace wellness" program. The bill, HR 1313, was approved by a House committee on Wednesday, with all 22 Republicans supporting it and all 17 Democrats opposed. The 2008 genetic law prohibits a group health plan -- the kind employers have -- from asking, let alone requiring, someone to undergo a genetic test. It also prohibits that specifically for "underwriting purposes," which is where wellness programs come in. "Underwriting purposes" includes basing insurance deductibles, rebates, rewards, or other financial incentives on completing a health risk assessment or health screenings. In addition, any genetic information can be provided to the employer only in a de-identified, aggregated form, rather than in a way that reveals which individual has which genetic profile. There is a big exception, however: As long as employers make providing genetic information "voluntary," they can ask employees for it. Under the House bill, none of the protections for health and genetic information provided by GINA or the disabilities law would apply to workplace wellness programs as long as they complied with the ACA's very limited requirements for the programs. As a result, employers could demand that employees undergo genetic testing and health screenings.
The emails were a felony only in your imagination. If the Republicans keep pulling shit like this they will become even more irrelevant in reality than you imagine the other party is.
More irrelevant? Oh you mean having both houses, the presidency and almost 2/3rds of the governorships is irrelevant? Idiots like you are why the democratic party is dead. You live in fucking la la land. If you had an honest bone in your body we wouldn't be stuck with a one party system but no, you have to be a lying partisan pile of shit and ruin a once great republic with your severe lack of integrity.
The emails were a felony only in your imagination
No, the emails would be a felony for anyone else but Hillary Clinton. For anyone whose politically connected (at the time), presumed-about-to-be-back-in-the-White-House husband didn't have a friendly, spontaneous visit with the country's chief law enforcement officer on her private plane while his wife was the subject of a federal criminal investigation by her. If anyone else with the Secretary of State's level of access to sensitive material acted in as cavalier a way and then deliberately, knowingly, and repeatedly lied about essentially every aspect of their conduct, as Clinton did - they'd lose their job, any prospect for future federal employment, and quite possibly their liberty. You know this, but you're pretending you don't so you can cling to the myth that Clinton was just ... what, misunderstood? As she and Bill made personal millions as they sold political access to foreign dictators for cold cash? Yeah, keep wishing she had the power she craved.
Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
Hillary deliberately set up a private email server to evade FOIA demands, which would have exposed her soliciting bribes and other felonies.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
No, Democrats are responsible for Trump being in the White House. If they had not re-elected Obama after he had demonstrated that he had no respect for the rule of law the Republican voters would not have felt it necessary to vote for someone who would do the same thing in their interest.
That is really what the last election was about: whose interest would the President break the law in order to promote. Hillary, who stood foursquare for the political establishment, or Trump, who proclaimed himself as opposed to it. It was really a shame it came down to that with no good candidates, but at least the American voters chose the least bad choice.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison