Slashdot Mirror


3D-Printed House Constructed On-Site In One Day (treehugger.com)

Heffenfeffer writes: Russian company Apis Cor has manufactured a 3D printed concrete house on-site in 24 hours in Stupino Town, Russia. Using a tower crane-shaped concrete extruder that can rotate 360 degrees, the 38 square meter (408.88 square foot) rotor-shaped home walls were constructed in one day. Voids left in the manufacturing process were filled by hand, installing windows, doors, and adding polyurethane and fiber insulation to the hollow concrete walls. The roof was also constructed by hand using polymer membranes, welded together using hot air and special equipment. Total construction costs were $10,134 (USD), approximately $266.66 per square meter ($24.78 per square foot). They also constructed a temporary protective heated tent to surround the house as they constructed the house during winter. Though the printer can be used at temperatures down to -35C, concrete has to be at least +5C to cure. Further reading: Designboom Magazine

6 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. I call BS, misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A proper constructions needs at least the following: Foundations, sewer lines, water, and electricity.
    You cannot 3d print those nor get them done in a day
    Yes, it's cool to have a concrete printer. But there's no house built in one day.

    1. Re:I call BS, misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no reason a foundation or plumbing could not be 3D printed. Wiring can be embedded by a 3D printer.

  2. Interesting proof of concept by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the construction costs cited are true, even given the small size of the demonstration house, this seems a very viable approach. One would imagine most of the human labor could ultimately be replaced by robots, and (although 24 hour completion is impressive) taking a whole week would not alter the economics significantly. (I guess that might not be true if the capital cost of the printer makes the investment uneconomic at, say, 20 to 30 houses a year, but I doubt that is the case.)

  3. A little overly optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its a nice step towards 3d printed homes, but details on all of the finishing work required for house are a little sparse. Video from the printing process suggests that the walls were quite a bit more rough that displayed in the final product. There is also little on set times how it was wired, roofed, etc.

  4. Re:WOW! by Eloking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That wood flooring was 3D printed?! Cool!

    How did they 3D extrude the wiring and meet code? I'd love to hear more!

    Concrete is a good insulator for russian winters, right? Amazing! How good was the R-value? How was the rebar extruded?

    Love how the paint was 3D printed too!

    I could go on. The frame of most houses is NOT where the majority of the expense is. I hate seeing these wild claims about 3D printing, which wile cool are disingenuous and skip over so many important details that turn out to be real buzz kills.

    Ha come on!

    Nobody got "fooled" by the headline thinking the "whole" house (appliance included) was 3D printed. Don't be silly.

    This is an incredible achievement for what it seem to be the first affordable 3D house. It's incredible and it's good for must of us.

    Or didn't you see how insanely expensive house are nowadays? If anything, this technology will bring back their price to our grandparents's days. And one the plus side, I can't way too see what crazy concept will emerge from the capability to print anything in 3D with concrete. Slide from bed to hot tub? Tunnel to wire everything in our house easily? Fire-proof house? House that transform in a trailer?

    I can't wait.

    --
    Elok
  5. Re:WOW! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well... the "wood" floor is probably linoleum. My friends dining room has that. It's pretty cheap and is softer than wood or wood texture tile and is almost as durable (20-30 years- you need to refinish wood more often).

    Electrical you got a point- but the cost of that is in the house. A house that size probably has extremely simple wiring.
    Russian electricians appear to make 1/4 to 1/3 of what U.S. electricians make. I was suprised how low average russian salaries are!

    Concrete with a huge dead air space (clearly visible in the photos) is probably a pretty good start. It sounds like it was trivial to fill the voids with sprayin insulation and that's included in the cost.

    I think you are being overly negative.

    At the least, it's probably a good option for 4 billion people on the planet so that's a large market.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.