Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Will Explore Mobile-Specific Cuts of Its Original Series (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article: Netflix chief product officer Neil Hunt said in a briefing today with journalists in San Francisco that the company plans to explore streaming mobile-specific cuts of its original movies and TV shows, to satisfy what he said was a growing audience of mobile Netflix watchers. "It's not inconceivable that you could take a master [copy] and make a different cut for mobile," Hunt said. To date, Netflix hasn't been delivering different cuts for different viewing platforms, Hunt said, but "it's something we will explore over the next few years." The idea would be to create a version of the content with scenes or shots that are more easily visible or immersive on a mobile phone, since certain shots can be hard to see or can appear diminished on a relatively small phone screen.

8 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you want to lose subscribers? Because that's how you lose subscribers.

    1. Re:Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bullshit. Everyone had a collection of VHS movies.

      Maybe the neighborhood AV snob would insist on laser disc, but everyone else went with the basics. They bought into the technology that gave them a decent experience at an affordable price. For 10-20 years, that was VHS.

  2. Opt out option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They better have a opt out option!

  3. My cell phone is "larger" than my TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My TV is on the other side of the room. My cell phone I hold close to my head when watching TV. Guess which fills more of my vision?

  4. Re:Dumb.... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree. Imagine if Amazon removed paragraphs from the eBook versions to make it easier/faster to read? Different cuts of TV shows and movies that depends on the viewing device is a bad idea.

    However, if all they're talking about is different cropping for smaller devices, i.e. to make it easier to see details/action/characters on the small screen, then it's not really that different from a 16:9 movie cropped to 4:3. Sure you're missing parts of the image, but it's not a different cut.

    I'm 40 and the only time I've noticed cropping removed important information was the ending scene of The Fifth Element, where you see the moon in the 16:9 version but not in the 4:3 version. The implied information was that our current moon was another evil sphere that was stopped thousands of years ago and the new now-also-dead evil sphere became a second moon. Removing that bit of information kind of ruined the ending for those who watched in 4:3.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. Out of context? by macwhiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Buried in the original article is a mention that these statements were made during a two-day event Netflix held together with Dolby Laboratories, centered around High Dynamic Range video (e.g., Dolby Vision).

    Maybe these out-of-context statements really mean "If we're filming a show in Dolby Vision and it has a lot of really dark scenes, maybe we should make a mobile version that brightens up the shadows a bit so that it's not a murky mess on a glossy mobile-phone screen under who-knows-what lighting conditions?" The Dolby Vision spec can adjust the dynamic range to meet the capabilities of the viewing device... if the device has a Dolby-manufactured ASIC. It sounds like Netflix is considering how to offer mobile users the option of a server-side tweak to do something similar.

    That would actually be a good thing, especially if the user had the option to select "normal" or "mobile optimized" versions.

    I have a Dolby Vision-equipped TV. Netflix has several shows filmed in Dolby Vision. Many, like Daredevil, have very dark cinematography. It looks incredible on a Dolby Vision TV under controlled lighting... but you're definitely missing stuff on an iPhone under commercial lighting. Bumping the darks up a notch or two to compensate would not be a terrible thing.

  6. Re:This would upset me... by Maritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anything else you don't care about you'd like to tell us all about?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  7. Re:Dumb.... by sims+2 · · Score: 2

    I see it like the mobile optimised versions of websites.
    When they make something for mobile it's way butchered and has way less functionality than the full site.

    While device manufacturers and mobile browser programmers are going in the opposite direction entirely (with exception of plugin support like flash and java) trying to make their browsers work with the desktop version of websites and most of the time /. included the desktop version works way better on mobile than the "mobile" version does.

    What will likely happen is your friends will see a different version of the movie you saw so both of you will be out of the loop "what did you think of the scene were they flew the car into the bank?" and you get to say something like "that wasn't a bank it was a dry cleaner you were looking at it from the wrong angle"

    I already have this problem with the multiple editions of movies

    Lets see you've got the 2017 1989 remastered edition, the 1989 directors edition, the 2014 25th anniversary edition with 15 minutes of never before scene content, the 1989 unrated edition, the 1990 the cast wanted to have another edition edition, the 1989 theatrical edition, the 1992 US release (25 minutes shorter) and the 2007 smoky bacon edition.

    This would just be a new edition that's exclusive to netflix and then exclusive to netflix users watching on mobile devices.

    Again if we are given the ability to chose which version to watch i'd be fine with it but what will likely happen is you will get to watch the version netflix wants you to or not watch it at all like we have now.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!