Slashdot Mirror


Judge Rejects Google Deal Over Email Scanning (fortune.com)

A federal judge in San Francisco slammed a legal settlement that proposed to pay $2.2 million to lawyers, but nothing to consumers who had the contents of their email scanned by Google without their knowledge or permission. From a report: In a 6-page order, Judge Lucy Koh told Google and class action attorneys the proposed settlement was insufficient, in part because it failed to clearly tell consumers what the search giant had done. "This notice is difficult to understand and does not clearly disclose the fact that Google intercepts, scans and analyzes the content of emails sent by non-Gmail users to Gmail users for the purpose of creating user profiles of the Gmail users to create targeted advertising for the Gmail users," Koh wrote.

3 of 48 comments (clear)

  1. Lawyers get rich... by torkus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and only the lawyers get rich. When will people learn?

    Heck, they got themselves a pay day and didn't even get a clear ANSWER for the consumers.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  2. Class actions are scams by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The lawyers get paid, the company gets indemnified from future lawsuits, the victims get some shitty coupons.

    I strongly suspect that most class action suits are engineered by the companies themselves. They get free immunity for a relatively small payout to some lawyers.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Re:Give the consumers a refund on what they paid by Mikkeles · · Score: 4, Informative

    FTFS (emphasis added):

    This notice is difficult to understand and does not clearly disclose the fact that Google intercepts, scans and analyzes the content of emails sent by non-Gmail users to Gmail users...

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.