Slashdot Mirror


Apple Paid $0 In Taxes To New Zealand, Despite Sales of $4.2 Billion (nzherald.co.nz)

Apple paid no income tax to New Zealand's Inland Revenue Department for the last 10 years, according to an article shared by sit1963nz, prompting calls for the company to "do the right thing" even from some American-based Apple users. From the New Zealand Herald: Bryan Chaffin of The Mac Observer, an Apple community blog site founded in 1998...wrote that Apple was the largest taxpayer in the United States, but 'pays next to nothing in most parts of the world... [L]ocal taxes matter. Roads matter. Schools matter. Housing authorities matter. Health care matters. Regulation enforcement matters. All of the things that support civil society matter. Apple's profits are made possible by that civil society, and the company should contribute its fair share.'"
Apple's accounts "show apparent income tax payments of $37 million," according to an earlier article, "but a close reading shows this sum was actually sent abroad to the Australian Tax Office, an arrangement that has been in place since at least 2007. Had Apple reported the same healthy profit margin in New Zealand as it did for its operations globally it would have paid $356 million in taxes over the period."

"It is absolutely extraordinary that they are able to get away with paying zero tax in this country," said Green Party co-leader James Shaw. "I really like Apple products -- they're incredibly innovative -- but it looks like their tax department is even more innovative than their product designers."

1 of 448 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They do contribute by psmoot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh that's a wonderful deal! So any company that produces fabulous products at prices customers are very willing to pay is now exempt of tax? Please tell that to every other company, because it looks as if only Apple is taking advantage of this New Zealand law.

    Actually, yeah I'd prefer we eliminated all corporate taxes and only taxed individuals. I think taxing corporations obscures who is actually paying the tax.

    The more I think about it, taxes ultimately fall on people. You and I have to decide we're not going to spend money on things we'd prefer because some of our cash went to a government. Some of that was channeled through higher prices at the store, some was carved off our income, some was lower returns on our investments. But in the end, you and I feel the effects of the tax, not a company. I think it would be clearer and more honest to avoid the middle man.