Slashdot Mirror


FBI Director Comey Confirms Investigation Into Trump Campaign (reuters.com)

FBI Director James Comey confirmed during testimony before Congress Monday that the FBI is investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with a covert Russian campaign to interfere with the election. From a report on Reuters: Comey told a congressional hearing on Russian activities that the probe "includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia's efforts. Because it is an open, ongoing investigation and is classified, I cannot say more about what we are doing and whose conduct we are examining," Comey said. Earlier, the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, Republican Representative Devin Nunes, told the same hearing that the panel had seen no evidence of collusion between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign. Nunes also denied an unsubstantiated claim from Trump that there had been a wiretap on his Trump Tower in New York but said it was possible other surveillance was used against the Republican.

8 of 537 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The guy who cleared clinton ? by Duds · · Score: 5, Informative

    So the Guy who cleared Clinton of all charges even after she had classified material on a home computer is now feeding the rumor mill again.

    The globalists are so afraid of Trump they are pushing any agenda to remove him before he can repeal Nafta and H1b visa laws.

    Comney needs to get fired.

    He could probably repeal them a little quicker if he played a little less golf or spend less time getting into twitter feuds with celebrities.

  2. Re:Comey? by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    claimed Hillary didn't violate any laws

    Incorrect. He said she did break the law, but he didn't recommend prosecuting her for it.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  3. Re:Comey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.

    Wrong. He said they didn't find any intent to commit criminal activities, which was previously not a requirement for prosecuting mishandling of classified materials.

  4. Re:Comey? by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong, they said they didn't find any evidence of criminal activities, and recommended closing the investigation.

    No, he said she violated the law surrounding the handling of classified materials, but that the punishment for the manner in which she did so would be administrative, like getting fired or having your security clearance revoked. Since she was no longer employed by the government, firing her isn't really an option.

    But he absolutely did not say she did nothing wrong. He said she did do something wrong, just not wrong enough to go to jail. If the cop catches you jaywalking and lets you off with a warning instead of a ticket, that doesn't mean you didn't do anything against the law. You did do something against the law: jaywalking. The cop is just choosing not to punish you for the illegal thing you did. Comey and Lynch chose not to pursue punishment against Hillary for the illegal thing she did.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  5. Re:bloviated shit gibbon by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

    you have evidence current plays golf more often than Obama did; also we paid for Obama's Hawaii vacations including 2008 vacations before he became president. so, do you really have a point?

    It's been well documented that Trump is spending public tax dollars at rate well over double what Obama did, in order to fund his trips to his private club.

    All the time while Camp David stands empty.

    And then you have secret service costs for Melanie in NYC, and the secret service costs for his sons as the fly all over the world undertaking private business dealings.

    This from a guy who basically campaigned on fiscal conservancy.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  6. Re:FAKE NEWS! by gnick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just because Trvor Noah and Rachel Maddow didnt bother to tell you that doesnt mean it didnt happen.

    I'd expand that to Trevor Noah, Rachel Maddow, or anyone else. Nobody has presented any convincing evidence of Trump Tower wiretaps. What "NSA documents" are you referring to - Do you have some kind of special access that the media doesn't?

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  7. Re:FAKE NEWS! by Ksevio · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't believe anyone is suggesting that actual votes were changed (as in voting machine hacked or something), the accusation is that Russia influenced the election through the slow release of hacked emails and spreading anti-Clinton propaganda. The "Russia changed votes" theory is just a straw-man.

    The Benghazi hearings were proven to be a political charade anyways where even after months of investigations the Republicans couldn't find any wrong-doings.

    But speaking of asking questions unrelated issues, you should listen to some of the Republicans asking questions. They're more concerned with whether the freedom of press applies to news organizations publishing classified leaks than the actual issue of Russian meddling with the election.

  8. Re:bloviated shit gibbon by D00MSlayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Meals on Wheels receives federal grants, so yes, he can cut it.