Slashdot Mirror


Burglars Can Easily Make Google Nest Security Cameras Stop Recording (helpnetsecurity.com)

Orome1 quotes a report from Help Net Security: Google Nest's Dropcam, Dropcam Pro, Nest Cam Outdoor and Nest Cam Indoor security cameras can be easily disabled by an attacker that's in their Bluetooth range. The vulnerabilities are present in the latest firmware version running on the devices (v5.2.1). They were discovered by researcher Jason Doyle last fall, and their existence responsibly disclosed to Google, but have still not been patched. The first two flaws can be triggered and lead to a buffer overflow condition if the attacker sends to the camera a too-long Wi-Fi SSID parameter or a long encrypted password parameter, respectively. Triggering one of these flaws will make the devices crash and reboot. The third flaw is a bit more serious, as it allows the attacker to force the camera to temporarily disconnect from the wireless network to which it is connected by supplying it a new SSID to connect to. If that particular SSID does not exist, the camera drops its attempt to associate with it and return to the original Wi-Fi network, but the whole process can last from 60 to 90 seconds, during which the camera won't be recording. Nest has apparently already prepared a patch but hasn't pushed it out yet. (It should be rolling out "in the coming days.")

71 comments

  1. Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another piece of surveillance technology that will happily send what you're doing to whomever asks, but will also never protect you from any actual threats.

    1. Re: Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nest is shit. They refuse to allow api access for outside services. Useless garbage.

    2. Re: Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security is not protection.

    3. Re: Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flame thrower

  2. By smashing them by WolfgangVL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    with the same blunt instrument they used to break in your windows/doors.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re: By smashing them by slazzy · · Score: 2

      Or covering their faces -makes them pretty much pointless. Personally I hide all my cameras quite well so they're not noticeable. I've caught some copulation in my side yard, no breakins however.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    2. Re: By smashing them by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Or covering their faces -makes them pretty much pointless. Personally I hide all my cameras quite well so they're not noticeable. I've caught some copulation in my side yard, no breakins however.

      Damn racoons anyhow!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re: By smashing them by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Deer actually :)

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re: By smashing them by davester666 · · Score: 2

      or you can just overload/jam the wifi network, or have a router that broadcasts with a more powerful signal, or cut the cable/telephone lines going into the building...

      Using Wireless devices for home security is...stupid. You at least have to run a wire to avoid the most basic attack, loss of a network connection.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:By smashing them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wifi cameras are little more than toys. It's trivial to jam a local signal, no need to locate them and break them. This is why all serious security remains wired.

    6. Re:By smashing them by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      If someone walks up to one of my windows and smashes it, there's a very good chance that one of my neighbors will hear it (one advantage of not having a huge property out of earshot of the neighbors). There's also a good chance I will hear it.

      My front door is not impenetrable but I'm certainly not going to make it vulnerable to yet another attack vector.

      I would hear someone taking a crowbar to it. I probably wouldn't hear someone unlocking it with an app.....but I see I've gotten off topic here. This is about security cameras not locks on doors or even the smashability of windows.

      Is your point that since we can't protect ourselves from every potential threat that we shouldn't bother protecting ourselves from any threat?

      But we're talking about security cameras. As I see it, cameras serve two purposes. As a deterrent and if that doesn't work potentially apprehending the culprit after the fact. If they can disable your cameras, neither of those are going to be effective and you've wasted your money.

      I still lock my doors despite my windows being very smashable.

    7. Re:By smashing them by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      Is your point that since we can't protect ourselves from every potential threat that we shouldn't bother protecting ourselves from any threat?

      Oh! Thank you for asking!

      If the heading was to read...

      Burglars Can Easily Make windows and doors stop being closed.

      And my comment was to read "With the same blunt instrument used to smash your stupid Nest thermostat"

      Would my point be clearer?

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  3. Impressive work. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aside from the egregious delay in fixing these things; does anyone else get a very, very, bad feeling about the expected quality of the firmware when 'supply a string longer than a normal user would type' is a successful attack?

    If you aren't sanitizing your inputs against that one; what are you sanitizing?

    1. Re: Impressive work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Google will happily pay for anything that is stolen, I assume. If not, this device sucks as much as any other Google crap.

    2. Re:Impressive work. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      Modern software is a joke. I'll bet that code to accept that input in the first place runs into the megabytes.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    3. Re: Impressive work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah man, there are more flaws for sure!

    4. Re:Impressive work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern software is a joke.

      The responsible code for the overflow is most likely written in C or in Googles backwards interpretation of C++ and hence subject to the same issues that were common in 1990.

      I'll bet that code to accept that input in the first place runs into the megabytes.

      That is just the cams webfrontend written in a mixture of Typescript and AngularJS ontop of a NodeJS instance executing on a Go server process. You might think that this is overkill, however most web (TM) developers will tell you that this is lightweight and anything less wouldn't be hype enougth to use.

    5. Re:Impressive work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we saved $100 by having an Indian firm write our firmware.

  4. Disable Nest Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a win-win for everyone.

  5. Smart Burglars by youngone · · Score: 1
    I my (limited) experience of burglars, they are way too stupid to know what an SSID is, let alone how to send one to a wireless camera.

    Having said that, it is probably not the common or garden variety burglar taking advantage of this kind of bug.

    1. Re:Smart Burglars by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But if you could package this attack into a smartphone app and sell it to a burglar... they wouldn't have to be all that bright, would they?

      You know the first way an experienced burglar used to check a house prior to encrypted radio being common? They broke in the back door then left to listen to their scanner for alarm company or police dispatch radio traffic.

      If somebody else packages up the tools, they're quite capable of using them.

    2. Re:Smart Burglars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trip the circuit breaker before going in, disconnect phone and cable from outside the home before going in... idk they already do some of this for alarm systems.

    3. Re:Smart Burglars by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      That's mostly movie stuff, and most of that cabling is underground (at least any place I've seen built in the last 40 years or so).

      I suppose you could go all Hollywood and get a fake maintenance vans and uniforms and disconnect the house from the local nodes... (you know, after learning how to trace the lines or figuring out the local telco/cable company labeling system) but these days you have to do phone, cable, power, plus jam wireless signals.

      Nobody's doing that for what they'd score from the average home. Simple smash-and-grab is where it's at. The real thieves are con artists who convince you to hand over your money willingly.

    4. Re:Smart Burglars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While the cabling might be mostly underground, most main breaker switches are outside your house on the box where the main comes up from underground. Fire codes require this so the fire department can shut off electricity to your house.

      Also the cable and telephone boxes are located outside either on your house or at a common location for multiple houses.

      It is trivial to rob a house anyway. You won't stop a dedicated thief. Buy insurance instead.

    5. Re:Smart Burglars by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Even inexpensive home alarm kits have batteries and cellular now.

    6. Re:Smart Burglars by bool2 · · Score: 1

      "you know, after learning how to trace the lines or figuring out the local telco/cable company labeling system)"

      Or you could do what they used to do around our way... go to the local distribution cabinet and cut all of the wires. No tracing required!

    7. Re:Smart Burglars by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      But if you could package this attack into a smartphone app and sell it to a burglar... they wouldn't have to be all that bright, would they?

      It is not that simple... I can easily counter your statement using simple logics.

      If you were the app developer, then you would know that you have to live in the dark world all the time; besides, you must have very good knowledge of being rogue. If you don't, you can be caught and sued (and could go to jail for this activity). Besides, this type of vulnerability could be found and patched in a short period of time, which in turn renders the app useless for patched devices. Then you would have to update the app which may work a little longer. If you don't update your app, then your reputation will go way down and you won't be able to sell anything later. The buyers also have to be knowledgeable enough to know where to get your app for installation.

      To me, at the current time, no experienced hacker would care to do it because of selling/up keeping the app just for measly revenues. In other words, it is not worth the effort...

    8. Re:Smart Burglars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the first way an experienced burglar used to check a house prior to encrypted radio being common? They broke in the back door then left to listen to their scanner for alarm company or police dispatch radio traffic.

      Only in the paranoid delusions of police who want to hide their communications from the public with encryption. The reality is a burglar can do the same test by breaking in and watching for a police response. No need for bad evil scanner.

  6. Nothing to worry about by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Judging from footage, burglars seem to fall into two categories: the amateur criminals of opportunity who simply smash a window and make off with whatever they can get, or fail comically. And the more professional burglars who take a few very simple precautions, come in wearing hoodies and gloves, and leave in minutes. They are professional in the sense that they know how to enter a home quickly without making too much noise, spot homes where the owners are absent and the take is likely to be high, and know which valuables to grab and where they are usually "hidden". But they certainly do not employ any sophisticated methods to bypass alarms or defeat security cameras. They simply skip homes with alarms or ignore their presence depending on how long they are expecting to hang around, and make sure they cannot be recognized with the aforementioned hoodies.

    And over here, most burglars don't give a rat's arse about being caught: sentences are low, there's little additional punishment for repeat offenders (the other day they caught a burglar with 33 prior convictions, think he's going to reform much?), and if the police actually do turn up the heat a bit too much for comfort, one simply relocates to the next EU country.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      It seems to be the same in the the USA (Arizona at least). The police seem to view burglary as an unavoidable fact of life, and burglars seem to never get caught and even if they are, hardly prosecuted (presumably because most of them are actually druggies that just need to steal something to sell, in order to get their next fix).

      In many cases the cops won't even make an effort to come out even if your alarm is going off, especially if they think your insurance will cover it,

    2. Re:Nothing to worry about by youngone · · Score: 2
      I think that must be common. I don't live in the US but we have the same attitude from the Police, from what I gather.

      Fun fact: Years ands years ago my flatmate (room mate) caught a burglar climbing in our window. He beat the guy so badly the Police had to take him to hospital for treatment before charging him.

      The burglar yelled about having my flatmate charged with assault, so the cops threatened to charge with every burglary in our area that month. Turns out there were more than 150, they had solved none of them.

      My flatmate was not too worried about being charged with anything, his Father was a QC (extremely senior lawyer) there was no way he was winding up in court.

    3. Re:Nothing to worry about by timholman · · Score: 2

      It seems to be the same in the the USA (Arizona at least). The police seem to view burglary as an unavoidable fact of life, and burglars seem to never get caught and even if they are, hardly prosecuted (presumably because most of them are actually druggies that just need to steal something to sell, in order to get their next fix).

      It's the same in every medium to large city in the entire U.S. Past a certain population size, the police cease to treat property crime as a crime anymore. Burglars have broken into homes in my neighborhood and taken thousands of dollars worth of items, and the police only show up long enough to give the homeowner a report to file with his insurance company. Your stuff is gone, and you'll never see it again. There are well-known serial burglars (generally vagrants and druggies) wandering around my neighborhood who have been arrested dozens of times, and residents are helpless to stop them. Their descriptions and names are common knowledge - nothing is done. They know that as long as they don't assault a resident or use a weapon, they are untouchable. It is a constant source of frustrated discussion on the neighborhood Nextdoor site.

      But the problem with tolerating property crime as part of the "cost of living" is that occasionally it leads to something far worse. Case in point: about three weeks ago, a woman living in a recently gentrified neighborhood was stabbed to death by a homeless guy when she woke up to find him burglarizing her condo (she had forgotten to lock her door). Security footage showed the guy looking for unlocked car doors along the street, and then trying out doors in the condo complex. A police precinct station was less than half a mile away, but it might as well have been 50 miles away as far as police patrols were concerned.

    4. Re:Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit waiting for the corrupt/impotent legal system to undo bad things that have already happened and nip future problems in the bud yourself. Some people just don't deserve to stay alive and they can always escape imprisonment if the sentence is even long enough to necessitate it in the first place.

      If you find your neighborhood being hit house by house, take some vacation days before your place is targeted. Stay home but make the place look vacant and murder the faggot in cold blood when he gets in. Bring some (determined and coordinated) friends to overpower him if you don't have any firearms. Use a "dumb" camera to film the intrusion to justify your self-defense. Restrain and incapacitate the piece of shit first. Try to look up who it is and see if they have a long record. If so or if you just can't find any info (because he was "seasoned" enough not to carry any ID) finish the job. The government might not be happy with you but every single neighbor will be, and they might twist the local gov's arm enough to give you a pass.

      Or just stay bent over like a good bitch.

      CAPTCHA: protects

    5. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      Yeah. If you live in a state that hasn't already taken your 2nd amendment rights away, Its definitely worth being properly prepared (both informed and equipped) to handle such incidents.
      The reality is that you may only have seconds to defend yourself. Expecting the Police to always be there to defend you is naive at best.

    6. Re: Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. The police arrive in time to draw the chalk outline around the body.

    7. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Thats awesome, both because he taught that parasite a lesson he won't soon forget, and because they didn't arrest your flatmate.
      In states that respect freedom like here in AZ, we can pretty much just shoot the fuckers like the vermin they are, but in liberal states like Californistan, if you defend yourself or your property there's a more than equal chance that it will actually be you not the burglar that will be arrested/punished.
      BTW I'm guessing you must be a Brit like me (originally at least) since you mentioned "QC".

    8. Re:Nothing to worry about by youngone · · Score: 1
      No, New Zealand, so yes, Britain but with better weather.

      I have no doubt the burglar learnt no lessons at all, he was a career criminal, and is probably in jail right now.

    9. Re:Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting anon for obvious reasons.

      Around here (South Africa) the danger is never from criminals who break in when the owners are absent, the danger is from criminals who break in when the owners are asleep. They do this specifically because there is more money to be made from squeezing the homeowner for their bank card, login details, etc and cleaning out the account. The family living in the home frequently do not survive this process.

      They can do this because police, when requested, have an average response time of 2 hours. So even if the homeowner has pretty good security (electric fencing, bars on windows and doors), the invaders simply take their time getting through even as the occupants watch in horror as they know that the cops, when called, are still over an hour or more away.

      Add to this the Govt policy that firearms are evil and upon taking power disarmed almost all citizens, and you have a recipe for disaster. They haven't yet outlawed crossbows (yet) and so that's what I used when those five armed fuckers spent 13 minutes (after being told that the cops were on the way) simply walking around the house. They then pulled out some battery operated grinder and started removing bars while we watched them from inside.

      I shot the guy grinding the bars with the crossbow (broadhead) before they got the message. They fired back while I reloaded under cover, and then ran off before I could take a second shot (crossbows take ages to reload!).

      Want to see where liberalism ends? Come to South Africa. I hear that Venezuela is pretty similar, with the same policies. Once the economy gets fucked with more welfare recipients than taxpayers, everyone turns to crime. There's a reason that most homeowners have a private security firm as the first responder for emergencies.

    10. Re:Nothing to worry about by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Alot of this is tied to substance abuse or other desperation, if only there were some source of assistance or legal inexpensive way to get your fix.

    11. Re:Nothing to worry about by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Sure, welfare spending is the problem, not rampant corruption.

    12. Re:Nothing to worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, welfare spending is the problem, not rampant corruption.

      You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you? South Africa has 18m-21m welfare recipients (figure varies depending on who you ask) who live off around 6m taxpayers.

      Do you know why the corrupt government is always re-elected? It's because those 18m-21m recipients vote for more welfare. The corrupt government doesn't even bother to hide their corrupt activities any more, because the welfare recipients keep it in power.

      Let South Africa be a lesson to the world - if the majority of the population live off of welfare payments, then only a corrupt government with no interest in improving things will gain (and retain) power.

      Taxpayers are overwhelmingly rejecting the current administration (see the voting patterns in areas populated by taxpayers), but because there are so few of them compared to the welfare recipients they are unable to elect a different government as the welfare recipients are more numerous. A quick analysis of the voting patterns in the last election display this quite nicely.

      Society stops being viable when each taxpayer is tasked with supporting him/herself as well as 3-4 other adults.

    13. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      At least here in AZ there are already plenty of methadone clinics and other free (paid for by the government) programs for drug users trying to get clean.

      I suspect the real problem is that most of them have zero self-control and/or don't actually want to change.
       

    14. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      At least he's locked up and probably getting much man love from Bubba.

    15. Re:Nothing to worry about by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      I know I shouldn't feed trolls, but having someone yell insults from the short bus is irritating. I can understand that without the brainpower to metephorically turn on an LED, it might seem like South Africa is a failed socialist state, especially if you rabidly consume the alt-right dogma.
      However, it might be that there is more to the story.
      A history of colonialism, apartheid, restricted access to education and all the other shit that South Africa has dealt with... This makes for a poorly prepared electorate and tends to allow dysfunction and corruption.
      But I guess that doesn't play as well to your base.

    16. Re:Nothing to worry about by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Do you know how much Methdone costs? Do you think these treatments are well covered in our current system? They are not.

    17. Re:Nothing to worry about by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      At least here in AZ, you have to offend and be caught first for it to be free, since (especially with a first offence) the court usually gives you the option to attend (affordable/free) treatment in lieu of punishment.

  7. Cut the power by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Or they could just as easily cut the power to the house. Who here actually remembers to put their home alarms on a UPS?

    1. Re:Cut the power by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      How does a burglar without bulky tools quickly, safely and inconspicuously cut power to a house? Other than the occasional low hanging fruit (meter box, with mains switch, is on exterior of the house) I can't think of a way, but IANAB, so maybe ways exist.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    2. Re:Cut the power by Nonesuch · · Score: 1

      Or they could just as easily cut the power to the house. Who here actually remembers to put their home alarms on a UPS?

      Higher end home alarms (systems which are installed by a technician, and monitored by a central station) include a hefty lead-acid backup battery good for at least half a day, and often with immediate reporting to both the panel and monitoring station when the alarm switches to battery power, and also when battery charge runs low.

    3. Re:Cut the power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toggle the mains isolation switch. In some countries it is outside the house. You may need to buy the key required to open the box online first.

    4. Re:Cut the power by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Or they could just as easily cut the power to the house. Who here actually remembers to put their home alarms on a UPS?

      Mine came with the battery built in. The battery has recently lasted through an eight hour outage, so I've got no worries.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:Cut the power by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      In many houses, there is a switch right under the power meter. Years ago, someone flipped mine and I couldn't figure out what happened until the power company guy came out.

  8. Uh... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Burglars couldn't care less about your Bluetooth vulnerabilities when they can use a mask and be quick about it. :P

  9. Wireless by silas_moeckel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because a burglar would never use a cheap RF jammer they can get for 50 bucks. If your security relies on wireless continuing to function it's broken by design.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because your average burglar's are smart enough to use RF jammers and bluetooth hack cameras.
      If one comes along that is smart enough to know how and where to use one, rather than pass your house to one that's more easily to burgle, then you're likely fucked no matter what security you have.

    2. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just making yourself a juicier target, someone dumb enough to have an expensive smart home security system likely also has a ton of other expensive things sitting around the house.

      A real security system makes you less of a target, a crappy one makes you more of one to thieves capable of buying tools off of ebay.

  10. Nest is such shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nest is such shit anyway. Spies on you from the get-go. Everything that's wrong with tech. "Energy saving" shit that vampires so much it doesn't really save anything. Then when it breaks it'll be eWaste anyway, so if you wanna save energy you're better off just getting some LED bulbs and better insulation. If you want security cameras, there's no guarantee you won't have issues with other companies; but Nest is a stupid choice for anything and you get what you deserve.

  11. Patch all you want. It won't help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need to exploit your device to make it stop recording. I can just boot it from your network with a deauth. Then smash it.

    2.4Ghz jammers are a dime a dozen, too.

  12. Slow News Day? by brian.stinar · · Score: 2

    So what?

    The crackhead that burgled one of my tenants did it with a vice grips after leaving their window open an a Macbook visible from the window. The bars weren't attached with security bolts (one way) but rather regular bolts (two ways.) That burglar didn't even bother bring a ratchet to make removing the bolts happen quicker. Do you think he's going to be able to make security cameras stop responding with his in-depth knowledge of the BlueTooth protocol and years of experience working cyber security at a National Laboratory? I don't. The other time my tenant was burgled they left a bicycle locked to a wooden structure, which was ripped apart with a chain tied to a truck. The other other time a different (not the same) tenant was burgled they left a GPS, binoculars, and some other valuable thing visible in their car. That burglar used a cinder block.

    Don't leave your valuables visible when you're not around to back them up with your 2nd amendment rights.

    Seriously, this entire posting is retarded. Try and keep a shotgun handy (no aiming!) a big dog, and friends/tenants/roommates around to keep the diversity of the city outside your domicile. Nest security cameras aren't going to do anything against the nondescript minority/white guy in a hoodie that's ready to throw the dice and jack your shit with a brick.

    This is why Albuquerque can't have nice things, and Breaking Bad was filmed here.

    1. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't that it'll make existing avenues of attack any easier, it's that it could potentially open up whole new methods for a house to be targeted.

      You could, for instance, work as a house keeper and if you know of this vulnerability use it to pilfer items without fear of detection, or a repairman could remotely disable a customer's cameras and swipe something of value while in the middle of doing their job. Is this likely? I doubt it, but it's still a potential risk. If we can't trust our security cameras, then what's the point in even using them?

    2. Re: Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the bigger point is that more and more of these kinds of IoT devices are being adopted and trusted by thousands of people into our everyday lives. We should be able to have a reasonable peace of mind that basic security concerns were addressed. If issues such as those published here were never talked about then why should companies spend more time and money to ensure their security?

    3. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I live in a generally low crime area (plenty of guns & dogs and very little diversity) but there has been an increase in the number of burglaries in recent years, primarily attributed to the rise in heroin addiction. The average burglar around here is a junkie looking for a quick smash & grab opportunity. Anyone with the skills to exploit a security vulnerability in a camera is probably employed somewhere.

    4. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theres a world of difference between the opportunist crackheads grabbing something they can carry and the guys that will roll up to your door with what looks like a work van and clean out your entire house.

  13. Easier way. by Quarters · · Score: 1

    Are they talking about these (https://nest.com/camera/meet-nest-cam-outdoor/)? The exterior security cameras with very long and noticeable power cords? Screw Bluetooth hacks, just walk obliquely up to it and unplug the darned thing.

  14. Probably many others too. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Like Netgear Arlo. :/

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  15. Surfing through the camera by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Some years ago I was in a hotel, and the WiFI was very slow. I went to the front office to find out what I was doing wrong. I found out I was surfing the Internet through a security camera!

    1. Re:Surfing through the camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip, friend. Sounds easier than the usual wifi hacking tools to use hotel wifi without paying. Now if only there were some way to sleep in a hotel for free without paying in blowjobs.

  16. Dog stuff by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    What about the neighbors who drop their dog waste in your can, after garbage pickup and before you return home from work, that you have to store that dog waste in your garage until the next week? If it rained there is water in the bottom of the can in which the plastic baggie is swimming (we have robotic-arm collection trucks, and the lid is often open after a collection). Ewww!

    That's the need for that Nest device.

  17. buffer overflow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flaw that keeps on giving. Don't you love it when drive-by security researchers audit your code without understanding it, and their patches insert more buffer overflows than they fix? Many eyes, zero brains, infosec bro!

  18. OK! by kig8472 · · Score: 0

    OK, google. Stop recording!

  19. Say no to unicode by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Blame unicode. It needs to accept Bungobungian metarunes or the SJWs will complain that it's RAAAAASCIST.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."