Slashdot Mirror


US Ordered 'Mandatory Social Media Check' For Visa Applicants Who Visited ISIS Territory (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has ordered a "mandatory social media check" on all visa applicants who have ever visited ISIS-controlled territory, according to diplomatic cables obtained by Reuters. The four memos were sent to American diplomatic missions over the past two weeks, with the most recent issued on March 17th. According to Reuters, they provide details into a revised screening process that President Donald Trump has described as "extreme vetting." A memo sent on March 16th rescinds some of the instructions that Tillerson outlined in the previous cables, including an order that would have required visa applicants to hand over all phone numbers, email addresses, and social media accounts that they have used in the past. The secretary of state issued the memo after a Hawaii judge blocked the Trump administration's revised travel ban on citizens from six predominantly Muslim countries. In addition to the social media check, the most recent memo calls for consular officials to identify "populations warranting increased scrutiny." Two former government officials tell Reuters that the social media order could lead to delays in processing visa applications, with one saying that such checks were previously carried out on rare occasions.

13 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. I don't have any you insensitive clod! by amxcoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if I don't have any social media accounts. And what constitutes a "Social Media Account"? Is this just the big ones like Facebook and Twitter? Or does it include all of the off-shoots that tweens are into these days like Instagram, SnapChat, etc.? How about defunct Social Media Accounts like MySpace?

    Does it include ANY website that you communicate, like our very own Slashdot, and any random forum you belong too for hobbies, and GitHub and other sites that facilitate communicating with others over certain topics?

    The reason for this is to find "terrorists", but how many terrorists are dumb enough to give over their accounts that they use to actively proclaim jihad on the world with? I understand you have to vet people for certain things, but I'm not sure how this will really help, being that it sounds like it's on the "honor" system that you are being truthful and turning all of your accounts over. It also has the flaw in that it assumes that you have Social Media accounts to begin with which many people do not.

    1. Re:I don't have any you insensitive clod! by rtb61 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So your assumption is that Facebook et al demand birth certificates, picture id, fingerprints and DNA prior to opening an account in any particular name. There is real insanity in using something like social media at borders where the validity of any social media account ie what is you name, John Smith, provide social media account details and passwords, I have none, liar John Smith is all over the place, prepare to be strip searched and anal probed and be held in custody until you provide details for all social media accounts tied to John Smith or variants of John Smith. So basically guilty for the entirety of social media until you can prove which accounts are not your account.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:I don't have any you insensitive clod! by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but it would at least flag some of them.

      I doubt it. This is just another example of "something must be done" - spinning wheels to show that there is action but not actually going anywhere.
      It's just going to piss off a lot of people and make Bin Laden's ghost laugh at how even the people who like the USA enough to actually want to visit are being encouraged to hate it by little Hitlers on border duty.

    3. Re:I don't have any you insensitive clod! by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy, if you don't have a social media account, your visa is denied. No skin off our asses.

      Ah, yet another 'easy solution'. Yes, I suppose you can be an idiot about if you like, but the thing is, if you consistently behave like an idiot, you will end up being considered an idiot. I can sort of follow the thinking behind this sort of rule, but it is just so heart-breakingly naive. What will happen is that good, honest, well-intentioned people will, as always, be the ones that lose out; the ones that genuinely don't use social media will be under suspicion, whereas if you are an extremist with a busy life on social media, you will just extend the double-life you are probably already living, and have a social media persona that is all about "America is the greatest, Amen, I love democracy, ain't Trump just great?" which they and their pals can laugh themselves silly about, while they continue their real activities under an assumed name. No sweat. And on top of this, the good, patriotic people that make up the majority of the security establishments in the US will loathe being made to act like stupid bullies, so after some time they will probably want to leave - and then all you'll have is the leftovers, the ones that enjoy bullying. How is that good for America?

  2. Uh.... what? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...required visa applicants to hand over all phone numbers, email addresses, and social media accounts that they have used in the past

    *ever*???

    Personally, I know I wouldn't even be able to begin to comply with this kind of demand. I don't remember all of the old phone numbers I've had. All social media accounts? Does that include aliases on bulletin board systems from the 1980's? Again, I couldn't comply because I don't remember them all. I probably have about a half dozen expired email accounts at old internet service providers, some of which don't even exist anymore, where I can maybe remember half of them.

  3. Not from "predominantly Muslim countries" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The secretary of state issued the memo after a Hawaii judge blocked the Trump administration's revised travel ban on citizens from six predominantly Muslim countries.

    The ban is for six predominately islamic extremist countries. Are you bigoted against Muslims or something?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:"vacation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    People don't vacation in those areas. This is part of a sustained attack on journalism by the Trump administration. The only people this requirement will apply to are journalists and refugees trying to escape from those areas. If you have any journalists within a couple of degrees of separation on any social network, expect to find yourself on a TSA list by association, and enjoy the full enhanced patdown experience next time you travel.

  5. Re:Here's the actual problem, by ooloorie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any information you hand over is you consenting to a search. They will make feel like you can't get into the country without a social media account. That's not true. It's just a scare tactic.

    Admission of non-citizens into the US is not a right and is not subject to due process. Non-citizens can be denied entry for arbitrary reasons, not just in the US but also in all other countries on the planet. How do I know? I have lived in half a dozen countries and immigrated to the US.

    Even as a citizen, you can be searched at the border.

    It's just 9/11 united in hatred and ignorance bullshit group think all over again.

    The "ignorance and group think" is people like you who confuse legal protections of citizens with immigration procedures.

    I wanna know where are all the NAACP related groups and protestors on this?

    Quite apart from the legal issues, the NAACP stands up for the rights and advancement of a population that suffers from, on average, lower education, lower skills, and lower incomes. What possible reason would the NAACP have to advocate the admission into the US of even more people who compete for already scarce low skill jobs?

  6. I keep hearing this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But shouldn't Saudi Arabia top that list, followed by Turkey and only then Iran and any other 'extremist' countries?

    America's bedfellows are the biggest terrorist supporters in the Middle East, bar none.

  7. Re:"vacation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >What journalists are going to need a visa to come to the US?

    Every non-US national who wants to do journalism work in the US, no matter the duration of the stay. So this would include non-US journalists from many respected publications and agencies including AFP, the BBC, Al Jazeera (the English-language branch of which is stuffed with former BBC World Service talent), Der Spiegel, Le Monde, Financial Times, etc, etc, etc, not to mention non-US nationals who work for US-based services like the AP, Reuters, Bloomberg, etc, etc, etc.

  8. Re:"vacation" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been over a decade since the US tightened the visa restrictions so that everyone wanting to come into the country as a practicing journalist must have a visa, even if they're from one of the visa-waiver countries. You can bet that if you tick that box, you're already going to come under a lot of extra scrutiny (and if you don't, but then publish anything written about your time in the USA, expect to be denied entry the next time).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Re: So now Trump controls where we vacation by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I admire billionaires. I seek to be rich like they are. Why wouldn't you? Do you like being a poor chump?

    Personally, it's because I believe that behind every great fortune is a great crime. You can't accumulate money at that scale without fucking people over in some way.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  10. Re: Telephone Game: Racist Edition by b0bby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're literally worse than the stinking Communists that actually let me visit my West German grandfather.

    Why would communists prevent you from visiting your West German grandfather? West Germany was never run by communists.

    I know nothing about K. S. Kyosuke, but I interpreted that to mean he (she?) had grown up in East Germany or at least the Eastern bloc, but had been able to travel to West Germany.