Slashdot Mirror


'Why The US Senate's Vote To Throw Out ISP Privacy Laws Isn't All Bad' (technologyreview.com)

"Nobody wants their data spread far and wide," write two associate editors at MIT Technology Review, "but the FCC's rules were an inconsistent solution to a much larger problem." An anonymous reader writes: They point out the rules passed in October "weren't even yet in effect," but more importantly -- they only would've applied to ISPs. "[T]he reality is that the U.S. doesn't have a baseline law that governs online privacy," and the truth is, it never did. "The FCC's new privacy rules would have been dramatic, to be sure -- but they would only have addressed one piece of the problem, leaving companies like Facebook and Google free to continue doing much the same thing.
While the repeal still needs approval in the U.S. House of Representatives and the president's signature, their article argues that what's really needed is "a more consistent approach to privacy."

3 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Now it's like telco selling me to advertisers by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think it makes sense for ad companies themselves to sell that kind of information. That kind of information is valuable to the ad company for their own purposes, and is devalued if they transfer it to a third party.

    For example, why would it make sense for Google to sell information it collects on you? Google sells ad placement services, and if this third party wants access to Google's users for marketing purposes, it will have to buy ad space from Google. So why on earth would Google sell this information to the third party? That would only give the third party the means to compete with them for either providing its own ad placement or selling its own ad placement services, thus eating into Google's ad revenue.

    Now if you're not in the business of selling ad space or producing ads, THEN it would make sense.

  2. Re:Enemy of the good by tomhath · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So instead of repealing the law, how about extending

    It wasn't a law. It was a regulation the FCC made up without the authority to do so. Congress slapped it down, now they will write a real law.

  3. Re:Enemy of the good by blahplusplus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "So instead of repealing the law, how about extending to also apply to Google and Facebook?"

    Not going to happen, I'll get to why in a moment... check out the links when you get the time. The brain doesn't see the world as it is, see the science on reasoning:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

    This is former national security advisor of the united states Zbigniew Brezinski, worried about the political awakening of the masses, the rich and corporations fear the political awakening of the masses of the globe, so see what they really think behind closed doors here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7ZyJw_cHJY

    On social media -- social media are connected to intelligence agencies... if you think you are going to get privacy it's all bs and optics for the masses.

    Reddit and intelligence agencies

    Wikileaks -- Reddit and intelligence agencies

    These links will take a while to digest, but if you want to understand what's going on in the world, you owe it to yourself to become informed about the true state of the world.

    "Intended as an internal document. Good reading to understand the nature of rich democracies and the fact that the common people are not allowed to play a role."

    Crisis of democracy

    Crisis of democracy - PDF

    http://www.amazon.com/Crisis-D... ">Crisis of democracy - BOOK

    Education as ignorance

    Education as ignorance

    Overthrowing other peoples governments

    Overthrowing other peoples governments, the master list

    Wikileaks on TTIP/TPP/ETC

    Wikileaks

    Energy subsidies

    https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm

    Interference in other states when the rich/corporations dont get their way

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxp_wgFWQo&feature=youtu.be&list=PLKR2GeygdHomOZeVKx3P0fqH58T3VghOj&t=724

    Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

    http://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-Consent-Political-Economy-Media/dp/0375714499/

    Manufacturing consent:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwU56Rv0OXM

    https://vimeo.com/39566117

    Manufacturing consent (book)

    http://www.amazon.com/Manufacturing-Consent-Political-Economy-Media/dp/0375714499/

    Testing theories of representative government

    https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

    Democracy Inc

    http://www.amazon.com/Democracy-Incorporated-Managed- Inverted-Totalitarianism/dp/069114589X

    From war is a racket:

    "I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil inter