Slashdot Mirror


Stylebooks Finally Embrace the Single 'They' (cjr.org)

Two major style manuals are now allowing the singular use of "they" in certain circumstances. While this is a victory for common sense, the paths taken are unusual in the evolution of usage. From a report on Columbia Journal Review: Both manuals, the Associated Press Stylebook and the Chicago Manual of Style, emphasize that "they" cannot be used with abandon. Even so, it's the middle of the end for the insistence that "they" can be only a plural pronoun. To recap: In English, there is no gender-neutral pronoun for a single person. In French, for example, the pronoun on can stand in for "he" or "she." English has no such equivalent; "it" is our singular pronoun, so devoid of gender that calling a person "it" is often considered insulting. We could use "one," but that is a very impersonal pronoun. Consider this sentence, for instance. "Everyone needs to be sure to tighten ____ safety belt before approaching the cliff." The article adds: For hundreds of years, anyone writing formally would default to "he." Advances in women's rights led to the clumsy "he or she." Many writers alternate "he" or "she." This twisting and turning is because what's known as "the epicene they" has been considered incorrect. [...] But that's not the "they" the style guides have let loose. Simply, the singular "they" will be allowed if someone prefers that pronoun.

5 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. Shows the arbitrariness of style books by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. Re:I don't see it by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunate that the two words have almost nothing in common then, right? "One" comes from the Germanic ancestry of English which itself took it from Latin and it meant "one" the whole way through. The French "On" actually comes from the Latin "homo", or human being.

    What's more, even ignoring etymology, the two words have basically opposed uses: "One" is very formal and impersonal, whereas "On" tends to be favored in informal speech. It also really is not a good gender-neutral pronoun and is basically never used as such in French, which still favors the masculine form as the gender-neutral form.

  3. Yeesh by markdavis · · Score: 4, Informative

    >"Consider this sentence, for instance. "Everyone needs to be sure to tighten ____ safety belt before approaching the cliff."

    Sorry, that is easy and was solved hundreds of years ago and without using "his". The answer is "one's".

    "Everyone needs to be sure to tighten one's safety belt before approaching the cliff."

  4. Stylemanual... by Bartles · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...is newspeak for the word newspeak.

  5. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, English already had / has a genger nuetral (compound) pronoun.
    We like to keep it secret 'cause, when the time arrives, that's how we'll tell them from us;
    but I digress. Anyway the word is "ir" and it's generally used with a definite article.
    You gots air, right? And you have their, such that the sentence would read -

    "Everyone needs to be sure to tighten their safety belt before approaching the cliff."

    Something that is taught to the "right" people as early as second grade, if you get my drift.
    Anyway, that's the secret. Please don't discuss it with them; they certainly do the same with U.S.

    CAP === 'playtime'