Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Launches 'Town Hall' For Contacting Government Reps, Adds Local Election Reminders (techcrunch.com)

Facebook has officially launched their "Town Hall" feature that allows users to locate, follow and contact their local, state and federal government representatives. The social media company also announced that they will be launching local election reminders in an effort to get more users to vote in state, county, and municipal elections. TechCrunch reports: The feature was recently made available in the "More" menu on mobile and on desktop to a subset of users. When you launch it, you would be presented with a list of reps at the local, state and federal level, and you could click to visit their Facebook page or send them a message, call them, or email. Not all reps offer their contact information via Facebook, however. And Facebook doesn't yet pull in the missing phone numbers or emails from off-site sources, like official government websites, for example. The company tell us that's something it wants to address in time, though. Today, Town Hall is available to all U.S. Facebook users and some of its features will now be integrated in the News Feed. If you like or comment on a post made by one of your elected officials, a new feature below the comments will invite you to call, message or email the rep. After doing so, users will then be prompted to share a post saying that they contacted the rep, as a means of encouraging their friends to do the same. Facebook says that this Contact Your Rep post is not shown to everyone, but only to those who are also already engaging with an elected official's post, through a like or comment. Additionally, Facebook says it will now offer Election Reminders for local elections. The new, local election reminders will appear for all state, county, and municipal elections in the U.S. in areas with a population of over 10,000 people, and will include both primaries and general elections.

69 comments

  1. Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What is that? It'd be useful to put that in the summary as not everyone on here is 80 years old.
    As far as I can gather, it's a sort of social gathering online for bingo players?

    1. Re:Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the furries and bronies - what, are you racist?

    2. Re:Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the 32 'genders' check your fucking privilege

    3. Re:Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fakebook is for fags and lamers...

    4. Re:Facebook? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      come on mark, when can we vote online, you know, not having to leave my house, fight traffic, find a parking space, then...stand in line, smile like i really want to be here and have to actually talk to ID10Ts...this is the 21st Century and everyone lives online. don't cop out by saying it is a $ issue or and for the good of our online security, we save that for gov't people who don't care so they can use the excuse and get away with it. you and trump need to do lunch and leave fb out of it.

  2. Ulterior motive by Lordpidey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worry that facebook will use this to try to manipulate elections, by encouraging only people who are likely to vote for X party to vote. Or at least having the feature shown stronger to certain groups.

    --
    Some people encrypt by using rot-13 twice. I prefer the more secure method of using rot-1 a total of twenty six times.
    1. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006

    2. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will do that right up until the point where the 'other side' uses it against them. Suddenly they will not want it around anymore and will move the goal posts just like the good little narcissists they are.

    3. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1, Troll

      I worry that facebook will use this to try to manipulate elections

      Oh come on. We have a mango-in-chief leading the government, do you really think having fewer easily misled/dimwitted/single-issue voters participating in politics would make things worse?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gravis, Are you still putting mangos up your ass? Mango removal and ass-kegal surgery are not going to be covered under Obum-care for much longer...

    5. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to worry. They will try to do exactly that.
      That's why they're doing it.

    6. Re:Ulterior motive by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And if Facebook knows what issues you care about and what parties/politicians you support, they can easily put all that together in order to sell political advertising campaigns targeting you to specific politicians and give them the specific issues to put in the campaign.

      So really, this is about Facebook improving their product (you) for their advertisers (political buyers, in this case). Happy data collection. I'm sure Google and the other big advertising companies will follow suit if they can.

      The fact they can get additional less informed voters (those who don't vote currently are on average less informed than those who do vote) to show up at elections (which will make the average voter knowledge lower) is just the bonus cherry on top of their advertising Sundae. But hey, as long as that gets them more advertising money to propagandize those less informed voters, it's all good, right?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re: Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump brand supository?

    8. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Mango in chief? Since when is it okay to make fun of a President's skin color?

    9. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you know the mighty ocean? Can you lasso a star from the sky? Can you say to a rainbow... 'Hey, stop being a rainbow for a second'? No! Such is Mango!

    10. Re:Ulterior motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if a JEW would ever seek to influence an election. Or print billions of dollars out of thin air every day, or run the entire media, etc.etc.

    11. Re:Ulterior motive by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      And if Facebook knows what issues you care about and what parties/politicians you support, they can easily put all that together in order to sell political advertising campaigns targeting you to specific politicians and give them the specific issues to put in the campaign.

      Yes, that's obvious. Would you not expect they to leverage that data point? I don't think there is anything "ulterior" about it...

      I don't really see anything nefarious, other than the well known MO of Facebook. People use Facebook and know or should know that Facebook collects data on what goes on at Facebook... I mean "who knew!" ...

      Taking the standard "I can't believe [insert huge faceless corporation here] is spying on my yadda yadda yadda" out of the equation, like you suggest, I think anything to get people more involved in governance is not a bad thing.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    12. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Mango in chief? Since when is it okay to make fun of a President's skin color?

      December 15, 1791

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Hah! Okay, good reply.

      But that means it was okay between 2008 and last year as well. Which I'm not sure is actually the case, so there appears to be an ethical inconsistency when reason demands consistency from any ethical proposition. So it must either always be okay to mock a President's skin tone or it must never be okay. This is the dilemma. Upon which horn would you prefer to leap?

    14. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      So it must either always be okay to mock a President's skin tone or it must never be okay. This is the dilemma.

      No, it's not. It's always been okay for President's with bizarre skin tones, especially when they are bigots. I'm pretty sure someone has made fun of a president with excessively pale skin.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    15. Re:Ulterior motive by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Unless you can show that his orange skin is natural, the comparison is nowhere close to valid and you're just looking for an excuse to be racist.

      Or perhaps you can show that Trump's skin tone is natural? I mean if he came out with some (real, believable) evidence that the orange color is due to some sort of skin disease or birth defect or something, all of us mockers would have a large amount of egg on our faces. But as long as its just "uses way too much fake tan lotion," we're in a completely different realm.

      A stronger argument would be that there's no reason to take pot shots at Trump's skin color when he does so many more important things that are equally absurd.

    16. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Bizarre you say... So it's difference that it's okay to make fun of?

      That is a common, perhaps even natural, reaction to unfamiliar differences. That doesn't make it ethical.

    17. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Well, Trump is rich, right? More than enough to afford artificial tanning solutions that don't turn you orange. Nor do I see why such a public figure would intentionally use a product that made him look foolish on television. It is possible, but hardly a reasonable assumption.

      And no, I do not want "an excuse to be racist". I have no desire to engage in such irrational nonsense, but then I am not the one who said it was okay to make fun of skin tone. Not that a racists need an excuse - those who are ruled by hate will see anything as a reason to excuse the inexcusable.

    18. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Bizarre you say... So it's difference that it's okay to make fun of?

      That is a common, perhaps even natural, reaction to unfamiliar differences. That doesn't make it ethical.

      It also doesn't make it unethical which is to conclude that it's not a matter of ethics. However, I don't think anything in relation to president mango is ethical. He has clear conflicts of interest in business and now has invoked nepotism. And that's just the tip of the iceberg! If you think you are taking the high road, perhaps you should consider his attempts to ban muslims from the nation, his associations with neo-nazis, his baseless accusations, his attempt to take healthcare away from those who need it most, his complete and total disregard for the environment, mockery of a disabled person and sooo much more!

      Feel free to ignore all that and instead nitpick at everyone that isn't king mango.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    19. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Whether or not behavior is right or wrong is by definition a matter of ethics. That the rest of your post is nothing more than pure hypocrisy suggest to me that you might not be at all familiar with the topic so I recommend studying the works of Immanuel Kant. He is not known for being an easy read, but as they say, nothing important is easy.

      Here's some other things about which you seem to be unaware: Presidents have broad discretion over staffing decisions, including being exempt from nepotism rules. They have broad authority over immigration, and if you don't like their immigration policy that's a political disagreement, nothing more. Certainly not an excuse for bad behavior on your part. Ditto for healthcare and environmental policy - you disagree, that doesn't mean you're right or that he's bad. Having different priorities is normal, his won the election so you're going to have to live with them for now. Don't be a baby about it.

      Oh, and there is no "neo-nazi" connection. There was never any basis to that claim, just empty name calling by people who don't know what the words mean. So good job, you're guilty of something you have accused him of.

    20. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, you are in hardcore denial. I would show you the light with logical arguments and links to evidence but I'm pretty sure you're at the point where you would deny something was the color blue if it disagreed with your political ideology. As for "don't be a baby about it," when he begins acting like a respectable president rather than upset toddler crying "FAKE NEWS!" on twitter every time say something he doesn't like, I'll stop calling him a mango.

      one hour ago:

      Did Hillary Clinton ever apologize for receiving the answers to the debate? Just asking!

      Still talking about election campaigning? Wow, so presidential! ;)

      24 hours ago:

      Anybody (especially Fake News media)...

      LOL! He's so accommodating to my argument. ;)

      Enjoy your mango while you can sabbede.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    21. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      So, what you perceive as bad behavior on his part excuses what you know to be bad behavior on your part?

      Part of my ideology is that one should treat their political opponents fairly and honestly, to give them the same benefit of the doubt I would give to political allies. Never to assume that they are anything but sincere about the motives and goals of their policies no matter how strongly I disagree with those policies.

      And most importantly, that substantive debate is the heart of a healthy democracy, that vain mockery harms it, and that rhetorical demonization leads only to its demise and the damnation of us all.

      There's a lot about Trump I dislike or am not comfortable with. But he won the election and deserves the same respect as any other President. Substantive criticism is just and proper, and there is much to criticize. Calling him a mango is devoid of substance. It weakens the intellect and precludes understanding. It is a disgraceful misuse of use of our right to debate and criticize, shaming and discrediting our democracy.

      You have a brain, put it to use.

    22. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      he won the election and deserves the same respect as any other President.

      To get respect you must first act respectable.

      Enjoy your mango while you can.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    23. Re:Ulterior motive by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Then don't respect the man, respect the President.

      Even though we disagree, I do not wish to be your foe. Perhaps your opponent, because that allows argument without precluding friendship. I believe you to be an intelligent person, just one who might be too upset about some specific thing to keep thinking clearly. Something we all fall prey to at times. Perhaps that's because I'm accustomed to having people with radically opposing political views as my closest friends, but I hope that it isn't so contingent on my personal experience that everyone can't feel the same.

      I argue these matters because I think it's important we do so, not because it's personal or because I'm trying to make political converts. If it was personal, I'd either ignore you or get mean. I don't know what I'd do if I was trying to convert you, never tried.

      Democracy requires public debate. So we should engage, even if we two are the only ones who benefit. Name calling only gets in the way, so we should avoid it.

    24. Re:Ulterior motive by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Then don't respect the man, respect the President.

      Respect is earned, not gifted or required regardless of status. However, considering I've been civil (by not breaking laws) about him being in office, I think that's amount of respect earned. Frankly, I've thought he would be impeached since the day he was elected because I understand the kind of man that he is.

      Even though we disagree, I do not wish to be your foe.

      What good is an opponent that cannot recognize a joke for what it is and move on?

      Democracy requires public debate. So we should engage, even if we two are the only ones who benefit. Name calling only gets in the way, so we should avoid it.

      We're not actually debating anything to do with democracy. I called him Mango in Chief and you said I shouldn't for the most hypocritical of reasons.

      Consider this, if he was just a run of the mill republican or democrat, I wouldn't say anything bad about him (policies, sure but not him). Hell, he's the only president that I've ever made fun of and I've seen my share of presidents doing dumb and shameful things.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  3. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More ways for them to ignore you.

    1. Re: cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quicker form letters in return for voicing concerns.

  4. "We shouldn't tell people there's an election." by kronix1986 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Let's be honest - the argument against this is, "It's unfair, because telling people there's an election coming up will help the Democratic Party more than the Republican Party."

    In an age when Republicans are hell-bent on making it difficult for Democratic voters to actually cast a ballot, by...

    * Cutting voting hours on election day
    * Cutting early voting
    * Shutting down poll booths in heavily Democrat areas e.g. Indian reservations
    * Requiring voter ID in Democrat-leaning districts but not Republican-leaning districts
    * Falsely telling ethnic minorities they need a photo ID to vote when there is no such requirement in the state ...Facebook reminding people about local/city/state/national elections is a public service.

    1. Re:"We shouldn't tell people there's an election." by misexistentialist · · Score: 0, Troll

      You should start by being honest. It's about telling people who don't pay taxes that they can get away with taking from those who do.

    2. Re:"We shouldn't tell people there's an election." by kronix1986 · · Score: 1, Troll

      We should be grateful that you're at least honest in your desire to disenfranchise Democratic voters - Republican politicians aren't as candid, instead opting to blame non-existent polling day voter fraud or "lack of demand" in Democratic districts.

      I see from your other post you think reminding people to vote is "socialism" - I hope you don't make use of publicly funded roads, bridges, hospitals, schools or the internet, all of which are cornerstones of socialism.

      The stupidity of the alt-right never ceases to amaze. They post rants railing against socialism on the *internet*...which was designed and built by government, paid for by tax dollars. They also worship the military, but can't seem to comprehend that a publicly funded military where everybody gets "coverage" is socialist.

      Is it any wonder these people are shooting up pizza parlours?

    3. Re:"We shouldn't tell people there's an election." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shooting up pizza parlours?

      [citation needed]

    4. Re:"We shouldn't tell people there's an election." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Excellent - Kristoff Morgan approves this message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very important and socially concious feature. I could see this feature being expanded in future towards direct frictionless voting. Anything that can increase the participation rate towards higher voter turnout and create more social discussion on political issues. Excellent work this is a great development

  6. It's Just Facebook Data Mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I just went there to check it out. In order to see anything beyond your Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Senators and President, you have to enter your home address. This is just an attempt by Facebook to get you to reveal this information. They use the same technique to try to get your phone number.

    Sorry, Facebook, I don't want to give you that information. Instead, I should just be able to type in a zip code or state legislative district. But it doesn't work that way.

    Nice try, Facebook, but no dice.

    1. Re:It's Just Facebook Data Mining by kronix1986 · · Score: 1

      Ironically it'll be the EU who kick up a fuss about Facebook trying to harvest addresses, if they ever roll out election reminders in Europe. As you said, there's no reason why you couldn't simply enter a ZIP code which FB uses to determine which voting district you're in, with the possibility of manual override if you think you're wrong.

      It's not like they need your address anyway. They can already geolocate people on Android/iOS clients via GPS, and even without GPS they can fix your location to within a few miles using your IP address. The home address is useless to FB itself (what are they going to do, send you spam in the mail?) but I'm sure it'd be of interest to FB's advertising partners...

    2. Re:It's Just Facebook Data Mining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarantee you facebook already has your address. Someone, somewhere will have given you up unless you already have via other means.

    3. Re:It's Just Facebook Data Mining by Jayfar · · Score: 1

      I just entered my zip code and it accepted that. Of course that may give you a couple extraneous representatives, since zips don't exactly correspond to legislative boundaries.

  7. Sad to see they represent illegals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more than normal peoples. I want time off, but my company only lets illegals to get time off.

  8. Contacting your congressman should be difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contacting, and voting, should require an effort, but not a giant effort. Go to the state's website for a mailing address. Then, write the letter by hand, and send it the old fashioned way.

    1. Re:Contacting your congressman should be difficult by sabbede · · Score: 1

      I half-agree. Voting should take effort, because it's valuable and while people value convenience they don't value things that are. Our elected representatives, on the other hand, are our employees and at the top of their job description is availability and responsiveness.

  9. Yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    do you really think having fewer easily misled/dimwitted/single-issue voters participating in politics would make things worse?

    Well if enough of them had come out to vote Hillary would have been president for starters. We'd be eating the last of the canned beans in the shelters about now.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never got that reach-around from Vladimir, and you never will. How does it feel to have outlasted your usefulness?

    2. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Share blue must be mad they paid good money for that line. Try harder next time. Give the people there money's worth.

  10. History will repeat by s.petry · · Score: 1, Troll

    Facebook and Google already did that, trying to censor Republican concerns and promoting Hillary and the Progressive movement. I have zero faith that they will change their behavior, and believe they are part of the same leftist agenda as most media in the US.

    I'll also add that today most young people are not taught about the US Constitution or History in general that does not favor progressivism. They are not trained in rhetoric, and not trained in the Socratic method. (You may be, but the generalization is correct that a large percentage is not). This means that they fall prey to propaganda much easier than someone older who has some ability to recognize and ignore the propaganda. The least educated among us are not necessarily the best people to vote. Those type of person vote one way, and it is never Conservative/Republican.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  11. What an horrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It is bad enough people use facebook, but making it an official channel for government/citizen contact.... Terrible, just terrible. Imagine Facebook snooping even deeper into the affairs of the citizenry. I would like to have FB outlawed as a media through which government was allowed to conduct any business. All government business should happen over extremely secure and non commercial channels and through open technologies

    1. Re:What an horrible idea by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Well, elected representatives need to be available to their constituents,and that communication is inherently public. If representatives were only going to communinicate via facebook, that would be an issue, but making facebook one of the hundred other ways the people we elect interact with us, I don't see a problem. They're still going to take calls, letters, emails, read tweets, physically attend public forums, have office hours, live amongst their constituents, etc.

  12. Anyone ever read The Circle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuz seriously.

  13. This is great! by buss_error · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is absolutely fabulous! Yet another way for our unelected officials to totally ignore the electorate!

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  14. GaaS by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Well, it had to come, didn't? Government as a Service.

    1. Re:GaaS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In chambers.

  15. If they want to do good to communities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they just have to offer good working conditions and pay their taxes, like everyone civilized does.

    Until they take part in their responsibility I'll consider them as rogue parasites. The last thing I want from them is to mediate between me and politics (this goes for FB, Amazon, Google, Twitter and all those "extractive" enterprises).

    I mean "new economy" and that is all good and well, and things gotta change, but this doesn't justify being a robber baron (the real villains still being the corrupt politicians, but someone gotta buy them in the end).

  16. perhaps they want the 50% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know the half of people who don't use facebook, who are dwindling in terms of market-share.

    Maybe they are trying to commoditize them again. The carrot: government that is actually responsive. It is a hallucination, a mirage, but better to die in a mirage than to die alone in the desert, right?

    It almost makes me want to reconnect to my profile. I'm just too addicted to the extra 40 hours that not being on facebook adds to my life every week. I just love my kids knowing me, and being able to participate in their lives.

    And when the government sends the tanks, what then? When America gets its own Tienanmen square moments for their generation, what then? The mirage will have powered the tanks. It will have put bullets in those guns.

    I can't do it. I can't make myself do it. And that is probably a remarkably healthy think.

  17. Social Media Influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a big issue with how social media may or may not have influenced a recent election? My next question then would be whether this would help or hinder true neutrality. I fear it will only make it easier for those in control of a given social network to sway things their way.

  18. Mod censorship proves the point by s.petry · · Score: 1

    If you point out facts that harm leftism, you can only be a troll. The left is the group attempting to silence and censor speech. Please continue to prove the point so that your ideology dies a horrific death.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  19. No thanks by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

    Last year FB was caught red-handed censoring political news. They can no longer be trusted with political matters (or any news for that matter) and I have no intention of using any of their political features. What is to stop FB from disabling "town hall" notices from FB members affiliated with the political opposition? The liberals have gone too far in infiltrating news outlets, social media, "fact checkers", and other internet resources as well as rigging the elections. This chicanery must end.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  20. Closing the feedback loop by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    0. Promote political articles to your feed based on 'criteria'.
    1. Censor or demote (or delete) political articles based on content and decisions (aka someone's ideology).
    2. Offer a link to elected representatives to react based on promoted or censored articles, though not on deleted articles.
    3. Profit!

    What could be wrong with any of this?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  21. Re: "We shouldn't tell people there's an election. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come now let's be serious increased voting hours are about hyper partisans being able to cast a ballot without making an informed decision. We had states letting people do early voting before the debates even took place!

    Finally republicans demographically speaking don't have some major advantage when it comes to being able to go to polls between 6:30 and 8p on Election Day, quite possibly the opposit is true.

    The simple answer is everyone with few exceptions should vote in person on Election Day which should also be a federal holiday. Anyone who is arguing for anything to far outside that is up to something

  22. Good thing they're not Russian by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

    Or we'd have CNN claiming that Putin was hacking Democracy again.

  23. Fake News+Election Reminders? What could go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking the standard "I can't believe [insert huge faceless corporation here] is spying on my yadda yadda yadda" out of the equation, like you suggest, I think anything to get people more involved in governance is not a bad thing.

    Unless the same platform is feeding them a steady diet of fake news on top of everything else. Then it could be a Very Bad Thing(tm), for a functioning democracy at least. Not necessarily a bad thing for certain Billionaire factions who are currently leasing the presidency, or perhaps a new faction who will be taking over when the current group craters.

  24. and politicians the Owner doesn't like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will find "issues" with the system.

    Ironically Facebook gets more political the more it's owner gets involved in politics as well.

    Too much "guiding" and "monitoring" to be reliable.

  25. Re:Fake News+Election Reminders? What could go wro by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Elucidate, I'm interested in the downside...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.