Slashdot Mirror


Activist Starts a Campaign To Buy and Publish Browsing Histories of Politicians Who Passed Anti-Privacy Law (searchinternethistory.com)

On Tuesday, Congress sent proposed legislation to President Trump that wipes away landmark online privacy protections. In a party-line vote, House Republicans freed Internet service providers such as AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast of protections approved just last year that had sought to limit what companies could do with information such as customer browsing habits, app usage history, location data and Social Security numbers. Now call it a poetic justice, online privacy activist Adam McElhaney has launched an initiative called Search Internet History, with an objective of raising funds to buy browsing history of each politician and official who voted in favor of S.J.Res 34. On the site, he has also put up a poll asking people whose internet history they would like to see first.

Update: The campaign, which was seeking $10,000, has already raised over $55,000.

9 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Every politician, all the time, in real time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just like every other law congress passes, it doesn't apply to them.

    they'll justify it because of terrorism. you're all idiots.

  2. I Fucking LOVE IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God damn politicians need a taste of their own medicine.

  3. How? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because a company CAN sell something does not mean they will.

    I think it will be pretty interesting to see what they can actually end up buying.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:My prediction by beelsebob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My prediction - the telecoms companies won't be willing to sell the data, because it's worth more to them to keep it, and not have the Obama era law reinstated.

  5. Re:The gov is just trying to level the field by cyberchondriac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's what they say, but it's misguided..you can block data from Google or Facebook. You can't from your ISP.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  6. Re:Okay. by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I'm still waiting on someone to tell my why I should care about someone purchasing my browsing history.

    Yes, you're so very open with everyone that you post as Anonymous Coward instead of even a pseudonym. Your super openness doesn't merely not track back to your real name, it doesn't even track back to a fake name.

    AC claiming privacy doesn't matter. Sheesh.

  7. Re:Okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • - Someone you know develops rare disease X.
    • - Curious about what that disease entails, you google "Symptoms of rare disease X"
    • - Insurance company Y purchases your browsing history.
    • - Good luck ever getting health/life insurance again.
  8. Re:FACTS MATTER - This was NOT a party line vote! by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    215 Republicans voted yes. 0 Democrats voted yes. I'm sorry, but this is absolutely a party line vote, regardless of the 15 exceptions out of 230. Yes, it's nice some Republicans apparently have the ability to think, but it's too little. Much too little.

  9. Re:Okay. by PoopJuggler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WTF do you think people are going to do with your browsing history??

    The potential for predatory marketing practices and discrimination is huge. Your search for "funerals" and then "airfares", and presto! airline tickets just got more expensive for you, and you alone. You visit an Alcoholics Anonymous site and then GEICO and presto! car insurance rates just went up for you, and you alone. You visit the DNC website and then presto! your favorite news site can tailor the news it delivers to you to maximize manipulation. The possibilities are horrifying and endless.