Slashdot Mirror


Oculus Co-Founder and Rift Creator Palmer Luckey Leaves Facebook (uploadvr.com)

bongey writes: Palmer Lucky has left Facebook, which bought Oculus for $2 billion. The anti-Hillary memes controversy led to the resignation. UploadVR reports: "According to Oculus, this will be Palmer's last week with Friday marking his official last day as an employee of Facebook. In an official statement, the company said that: 'Palmer will be dearly missed. Palmer's legacy extends far beyond Oculus. His inventive spirit helped kickstart the modern VR revolution and helped build an industry. We're thankful for everything he did for Oculus and VR, and we wish him all the best.' When asked if Luckey's departure was voluntary, Facebook representatives declined to comment, citing a policy of not discussing internal personnel matters. This revelation comes around one year after Luckey himself hand-delivered the first consumer Oculus Rift to a pre-order customer in Alaska. In just over 12 months, the 24-year-old transformed from the face of one of the tech world's most well-known teams into a bit of a recluse, disappearing from public view during the 2016 US presidential election and emerging only for an appearance in court." UploadVR has provided a timeline of events leading up to Luckey's departure in their report.

66 comments

  1. Win for SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's right girls and boys, we have beaten back the patriarchy once again!

    1. Re:Win for SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Silicon Valley you're free to espouse your political views...just so long as they are the same ones that everybody else has, otherwise you'll get lynch mobbed.

    2. Re:Win for SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. If someone's political views are racist, homophobic, and extremely nationalistic... they kind of deserve to be treated like an asshat because they are an asshat.

  2. How to block these half page ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    half page ads!!, your site runs even slower and shittier than before

    1. Re:How to block these half page ads? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Some kind of browser plug-in? I wouldn't know, as I block them.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  3. Lucky or Luckey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, editors.

    Spend two fucking seconds to proofread your shit.

  4. Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, still waiting for V2 or even V3 of VR headsets before buying into them. With Palmer leaving, what does this means for oculus...

    1. Re:Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess Oculus isn't very Lucky! Da-da-da-dum-tshhh! :-D

      (No seriously though. If you're doing VR, do it right with a Vive.)

    2. Re:Still waiting... by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      Well how much power do you really think a 24 year old wielded at a large division of Facebook? I would guess somewhere between "nothing" and "not quite nothing."

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re: Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, get a Valve/HTC Vive.

    4. Re: Still waiting... by loufoque · · Score: 2

      Didn't Oculus die when Facebook bought it?

    5. Re: Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already took an explosive dump this morning. Please stop feeding me laxative chocolates!

    6. Re:Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They death spiral, since the Vive and OpenVR is so much better.

  5. Sucks, but hopefully he starts something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    There are plenty of libertarian, conservative, and just anti-political people in tech. Hopefully he can find a good team and start something away from douche bags like Fuckerberg and his attempts to become a politician.

    1. Re:Sucks, but hopefully he starts something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you he didn't actually leave. I'm starting to see bleed-over of April Fools day jokes from other time zones. I so hope actually did leave though!!!

    2. Re:Sucks, but hopefully he starts something new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palmer runs a shitposting cult, he is a loon on his way to the asylum!

    3. Re:Sucks, but hopefully he starts something new by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Hopefully he can find a good team and start something away from douche bags like Fuckerberg and his attempts to become a politician.

      Yeah, loud mouth billionaires with political ambitions are the worst! It must be why he made all those anti-Hillary memes. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  6. Nazi Germany by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Silicon Valley you're free to espouse your political views...just so long as they are the same ones that everybody else has, otherwise you'll get lynch mobbed.

    Tim Allen commented that living in Hollywood is like being in 30's Germany.

    “You know, you get beat up if you don’t believe what everybody believes,” [...] “This is like ’30s Germany.”

    It seems like you can't publicly state an opinion without getting fired by your company, or having a mob ask your company to let you go, or having the mob ask your company to stop selling your products, or... pretty much anything to hurt, disable, and incapacitate anyone who disagrees with the groupthink. During the election, 4Combinator was asked by one of their customers to get rid of Peter Thiel, due to his support for Trump.

    One would *expect* political donations to be publicly recorded to prevent conflict of interest and such, but if making a donation would get you publicly outed and shamed, hurt, or threatened, it seems like this is become political extortion by violence.

    Did conservatives do all that when Obama was elected?

    1. Re:Nazi Germany by kamapuaa · · Score: 0

      Holly shit, somebody *asked* 4Combinator to get rid of Peter Thiel? That is like Kristallnacht #2! It's lucky we have such erudites as Tim Allen (former star of "Home Improvement," a 90s sitcom) to keep us vigilant.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re: Nazi Germany by PoopJuggler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you kidding? Conservatives have been oppressing and discriminating against gays, minorities and women since forever. Don't pretend like the right is some holy beacon of truth and fairness and love and compassion and tolerance. Quite the opposite. Palmer Luckey decided to support a misogynistic xenophobic piece of crap and surprise! people don't respect that. Nobody's forcing anyone to act a certain way but don't act like an asshole or support oppressive politicians if you can't take getting called out on it. The world doesn't need that shit anymore.

    3. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And I suspect you're playing some stupid disingenuous verbal game that doesn't reflect your beliefs and really doesn't make sense. Why would that be oppression? Was MLK Jr. careful never to say the words "black" or "African-American" in case he might become the oppressor?

    4. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Holocaust Museum demanded that Tim Allen apologize to them. This is a real thing that happened.

      PC culture is really about forcing everyone to bow down to you using faux anger.

    5. Re: Nazi Germany by ooloorie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Conservatives have been oppressing and discriminating against gays, minorities and women since forever.

      You don't know your history. It was progressives that frequently declared homosexuals, minorities, and women to be inferior, and they justified it with science. Democrats and progressives justified the oppression, segregation, and sterilization of blacks and homosexuals.

      Oh, sure, there was homophobia and racism among conservatives and some Christians, but nowhere near as virulent and institutionalized as it was under progressives and Democrats. Conservatives largely just want to be left alone.

      The world doesn't need that shit anymore.

      Correct, which is why hopefully progressivism has gasped its last gasp with Hillary.

    6. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should go back to school and study your history. Republican led north was fighting to abolish slavery while Democratic south was fighting to keep it. Even I know this and I am a naturalized citizen. No wonder Democrats lost this election, seems like democratic populace is more ignorant than ever.

    7. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the fact that Luckey was financing a troll army also part of the reason he's a hateful person? Tactics like that are despicable and anti-democratic no matter right or left.

    8. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservatives largely just want to be left alone.

      Yes, just a little breathing room to practice their peculiar institution.

      That's what was behind HB2, SB 1070, SQ 755, Prop 8 and others?

    9. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the Reps were liberal, then, and the Dems conservative. The parties have flipped more than once since then. Learn some history.

    10. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does one distinguish between faux anger and fox anger?

    11. Re:Nazi Germany by shocking · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Nazi Germany stood up to Russia....

    12. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the 1930s.

    13. Re: Nazi Germany by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Anyone who doesn't respect someone else's opinions is a biggot.

    14. Re: Nazi Germany by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Anyone who doesn't respect someone else's opinions is a biggot.

      There's a difference between respecting someone's right to an opinion and respecting their opinion. I do not respect the opinions of flat earthers. Most likely, neither do you, not really.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re: Nazi Germany by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      That's what was behind HB2, SB 1070, SQ 755, Prop 8 and others?

      Yes, those laws are about wanting to be left alone. And let me say, as a gay immigrant, I have no significant problem with any of them. And all those laws are pretty much the norm everywhere else in the world.

    16. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want to best high protein breakfast ideas must read it
      https://dailybreakfastideas.blogspot.com/2017/04/best-high-protein-breakfast-ideas.html

    17. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what was behind HB2, SB 1070, SQ 755, Prop 8 and others?

      Yes, those laws are about wanting to be left alone.

      How so? How did HB2 help people get left alone? It didn't even respect the rights of local communities to handle their own business directly. How did SB 1070 leave people alone? It even required the police to make specific intrusive action upon individuals who did not fulfill certain arbitrary requirements. HB 56 was even worse, it even prevented applying for jobs. How did SQ 755 not interfere in people's lives? It prevented people from making the choices they wanted without regard to any particulars or details. And Prop 8 couldn't leave people alone. Marriage almost never can, but a law created to prevent legal marriages was a singular problem. And versions like Amendment 774 and KA 1 went even further. They prevented any similar arrangement.

      And let me say, as a gay immigrant, I have no significant problem with any of them.

      That's fine, lots of other people did. Your indifference is irrelevant. For 3 out of 4, actual court cases demonstrated their interference in an unconstitutional fashion in the lives of others. And HB 2 would as well, but it became obviated due to its partial repeal.

      Not to mention the actual discussion of the origins of the bills was examined, and revealed a deliberate, conscious, intent to interfere in the lives of others, in a manner that was unconstitutional.

      And all those laws are pretty much the norm everywhere else in the world.

      The world is full of bigotry and coercion, yes, they are not exceptional. But we weren't discussing that issue.

      Did you want to discuss that, instead of the actual character and behavior of the professed conservatives as exemplified by their patterns and practices?

    18. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call today's democrat 'liberal' either. They're anti-first, second, fourth, and fifth amendments. They support systemically bigoted concepts like 'affirmative action' as solutions to end supposed systemic bigotry, and they routinely clamor for institutions to take life destroying actions on those who dare openly question their policies and doctrine. How is this not like nazi germany or soviet russia? Their tinpot dictators made the same kinds of statements to justify their tyranny. From fake 'grassroots' activism (a favorite of the Bolsheviks) on college campuses ("we have nothing to lose but our chains"), to outright crony capitalism, it's dirty, corrupt politics to a T.

      There isn't much liberal in today's republican either. In fact, the only way they really differ from democrats is in their social policies which are dominated by the religious right. Instead of 'hate speech' bans it's blasphemy laws and sexual entrapment (for both sexes). Instead of confession it's "check your privilege" and political correctness. Both spend too much time denying reality for the sake of feelings. I just want my liberty back please.

      Liberals traditionally stood for western values like free speech, civil rights, and equality before the law. Today's public officials do not. They only appropriated the name. Whether it's the religious right or the SJW left, neither are liberal whatsoever. America is in a real fix right now. I hope people wake up and oust these losers from DC, but I suspect that we'll have to relearn why liberty is important the hard way.

    19. Re:Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :Tim Allen commented that living in Hollywood is like being in 30's Germany"

      If Tim Allen made this comment, and was serious, he' showed extremely poor judgement. Analogizing Nazi Germany to any region in America (whether coming from the left or right) is the call sign of someone with extreme political biases. Hitler absurdium.

    20. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stopped calling them SJWs, and talked to them like you were listening to their issues too, they'd probably listen to you more.

    21. Re: Nazi Germany by Brulath · · Score: 1

      Nobody is entitled to an opinion they cannot defend, and anyone who respects someone else's indefensible opinion is an idiot for doing so. If they cannot – or will not – defend an opinion, they are not entitled to spout it into public discourse.

    22. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all those laws are pretty much the norm everywhere else in the world.

      That is a repugnant reason to allow injustice to continue. At one point segregating people of colour was the norm everywhere else in the world.

    23. Re:Nazi Germany by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually you don't even need to get that far. I personally know somebody who for some godawful reason decided to move to the Hollywood area, and she even agreed with their politics. The problem however was that her mother was more conservative, which her connections (crappy as they were) found out via facebook. Needless to say, this created a drama situation that worsened her career chances, and those connections essentially told her to never talk with her mother again, because apparently having those viewpoints is some kind of deadly sin there.

    24. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was because the mother was a crazy, controllingâ, manipulator, and the advice was well-intentioned to get out of an abusive situation.

    25. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They support systemically bigoted concepts like 'affirmative action' as solutions to end supposed systemic bigotry

      Nope, affirmative action is systemically being aware of the potential for even inadvertent discrimination. The only thing it doesn't tolerate is ignorance.

      How is this not like nazi germany or soviet russia?

      No Gestapo or Cheka for a start.

      Both spend too much time denying reality for the sake of feelings.

      Nope, Republicans spend too much time denying feelings for the sake of logic, and reason, even when they don't support it.

      They're wannabe Vulcans, which is probably one of the more annoying traits of theirs.

    26. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Gestapo, just.."17" agencies that work towards constant war and suppression around the world while racking up a debt the entire world couldn't cover. But no, no Gestapo. That would be redundant.

    27. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did HB2 help people get left alone?

      HB2 addresses men imposing their presence on women in bathrooms; SB 1070 and HB 56 addresses foreigners coercing Americans to support them financially and associate with them; Prop 8 addresses gay men and women being able to coerce other Americans to do business with them against their moral convictions. All these laws were in response to coercive laws and practices in the US. Now, they were flawed responses, but they were the best people could do under the circumstances.

      Did you want to discuss that, instead of the actual character and behavior of the professed conservatives as exemplified by their patterns and practices?

      On the whole, I have no complaint with the character or behavior of conservatives. I do have a big problem with the bigotry, intolerance, and greed of progressives and Democrats, which is why I left the Democratic party recently.

    28. Re: Nazi Germany by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      At one point segregating people of colour was the norm everywhere else in the world.

      No, actually it was not. Segregation was limited to only a few countries, foremost the US. And in the US, it was Democrats and progressives who were responsible for it.

      That is a repugnant reason to allow injustice to continue.

      I'm sorry, you misunderstood. I pointed that out to remind you that sane people around the world don't consider these to be injustices.

      Do you see a pattern there? US Democrats and progressives come up with hare-brained, unjust, racist policies, and US conservatives along with most of the rest of the world oppose them.

    29. Re: Nazi Germany by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was because the mother was a crazy, controllingâ, manipulator, and the advice was well-intentioned to get out of an abusive situation.

      Nope, it's very much the other way around, actually.

    30. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I saw her on that show, those were crocodile tears, it felt like I was watching Nancy Grace interview Sarah Palin.

    31. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did HB2 help people get left alone?

      HB2 addresses men imposing their presence on women in bathrooms;

      No, it doesn't. It actually contains zero content relevant to criminal harassment, though as North Carolina already had such laws, it had no need to impose further upon people by forcing them to undergo genital inspections before entering a bathroom facility. Why lie? Did you think I hadn't read them?

      SB 1070 and HB 56 addresses foreigners coercing Americans to support them financially and associate with them;

      Nope. SB 1070 did nothing for that, as its provisions were directed at Law Enforcement, instructing them to impose themselves on individuals to determine their immigration status REGARDLESS of any other status. It had nothing to do with welfare.

      Now HB 56did impact public benefits, however, that was not its exclusive content, sorry. By some arguments, it even criminalized giving an illegal immigrant a cup of coffee. It was very broadly written. It also forbade contracts and agreements, in some cases.

      And in fact, some of the individuals investigated under the law had valid passports, international driver's licenses, and work permits.

      I'm going to suspect that neither of those individuals was on welfare.

      Prop 8 addresses gay men and women being able to coerce other Americans to do business with them against their moral conviction.

      No, it didn't. It denied people's right to marry. Marriage is inherently a sanctioned practice by the state, and yes, it is coercive. Given the vast majority of marriages that remained in effect, its only result was discriminatory upon a particular group.

      How exactly does that serve in the interests stated above? I might respect such an argument if it were repudiating all marriage as a state-practice, but nope, that's not going to happen.

      All these laws were in response to coercive laws and practices in the US. Now, they were flawed responses, but they were the best people could do under the circumstances.

      Seems they did poorly. All of them were almost completely overturned. Others were heavily challenged. And their effectiveness was less than salutary.

      Did you want to discuss that, instead of the actual character and behavior of the professed conservatives as exemplified by their patterns and practices?

      On the whole, I have no complaint with the character or behavior of conservatives. I do have a big problem with the bigotry, intolerance, and greed of progressives and Democrats, which is why I left the Democratic party recently.

      Oh? Well, I suggest you examine the character and behavior of conservatives, or self-proclaimed conservatives, especially the ones claiming Republican Party membership.

      Wasn't what we we discussing before, though.

    32. Re: Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point segregating people of colour was the norm everywhere else in the world.

      No, actually it was not. Segregation was limited to only a few countries, foremost the US.

      Nope!. It widespread.

      And in the US, it was Democrats and progressives who were responsible for it.

      Ok, sure, since progressives (Democrats and Republicans) abolished slavery, so the conservatives (Who were Democrats by name, but share little to nothing in common with the Democrats of today) left in power in the Southern States continued to find ways to impose their will, , and the weak-willed progressives (both Democrat and Republican) failed to stand up against it, because they didn't crush those conservatives like they deserved.

      Of course, like most frauds, you seem to think nobody knows that the Democrats of the 1880s are dead. For some reason. What, is the party run by vampires?

      That is a repugnant reason to allow injustice to continue.

      I'm sorry, you misunderstood. I pointed that out to remind you that sane people around the world don't consider these to be injustices.

      Do you see a pattern there? US Democrats and progressives come up with hare-brained, unjust, racist policies, and US conservatives along with most of the rest of the world oppose them.

      The only pattern I see if your rampant hysteria against Democrats and Progressives. It's a pretty common one. Been done by Ted Cruz, Anne Coulter, Rushbo, Breitbart, and others. Sadly, you haven't learned it is bogus, or you have, but have to repeat your indoctrination. Have you seen the list that tries to claim all sorts of people like John Wilkes Booth, Charles Guiteau and Leon Leon Czolgosz were Democrats? Booth's only political membership was in the former Know-Nothing Party, Guiteau was a Stalwart, and Czolgosz was an Anarchist.

      But it's ok, you are probably also willing to fume to the high heavens over Byrd, but silent on Strom Thurmond. Conspicuously so.

      Sorry dude, but you've got a lot of poop in your house. Clean it up. Conservatives have actually supported hare-brained, unjust, racist policies, rather than oppose them.

      Like HB 56, SB 1070, and even the government of South Africa. Seriously, Reagan HATED the apartheid embargo. He falsely had to resort to claiming it harmed the black majority, but he cared not one bit about them. Not in South Africa, nor in the US of A.

      And he was a Conservative Conservative, who like you, left the Democratic Party. Within living memory.

  7. You don't see the similarity? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Holly shit, somebody *asked* 4Combinator to get rid of Peter Thiel? That is like Kristallnacht #2! It's lucky we have such erudites as Tim Allen (former star of "Home Improvement," a 90s sitcom) to keep us vigilant.

    I was being generous. To the left.

    One of Y-Combinator's partners cut ties because of Thiel. Not mentioned in the quote below, is that they "asked" Y-Combinator to let him go, else they would cut ties.

    On Monday, Project Include, an organization aimed at increasing diversity in Silicon Valley, said it was cutting ties with Y Combinator because of its continued connection to Thiel.

    "Thiel's actions are in direct conflict with our values at Project Include," read a post from Ellen Pao, who cofounded Project Include. "Giving more power to someone whose ascension and behavior strike fear into so many people is unacceptable. His attacks on black, Mexican, Asian, Muslim and Jewish people, on women, and on others are more than just political speech; fueled by hate and encouraging violence, they make each of us feel unsafe."

    Those people on the Left, the ones who voted Democrat and riot when a conservative speaker is on campus - you're the people who keep pointing out similarities between Trump and Nazi Germany.

    You don't see the similarities?

    1. Re:You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thiel's actions are in direct conflict with our values at Project Include," read a post from Ellen Pao, who cofounded Project Include. "Giving more power to someone whose ascension and behavior strike fear into so many people is unacceptable.

      Ellen Pao strikes fear into me: a rich, self-righteous b*tch with a penchant for lawsuits.

    2. Re:You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Thiel's beliefs are pretty scary in and of themselves. So even if we can agree that being too hot for snowflakes is *not* a bad or punishable thing, the jerk deserves everything he gets anyhow.

    3. Re: You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How so? I agree with many of Thiel's views. Yet I find the average Democrat's views to be downright horrifying.

    4. Re: You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, people tried to oppress Hitler too, just like Trump.

      He just wanted to make Germany great again.

    5. Re: You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thiel is a vampire in training who literally wants to make himself young by stealing the blood of young virgins.

    6. Re:You don't see the similarity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone talks about Nazis. Nazi Obama, Nazi Trump, Nazi that coming. Yet, no one really espouses on the fact that Nazis were in charge of NASA. Those belief systems, values, ARE incorporated into our government and have been for quite some time.

  8. Re: Nazi German by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did conservatives do all that when Obama was elected?

    Conservatives like Papa John proclaimedâ a lot of doom and gloom when Obama was elected. Trump even c

  9. About time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good riddance.

  10. Alternate facts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows it was Carmack who developed (and ultimately _stole_) the code guts and made the fake startup happen. "Lucky's" political agenda was an out for facebook to fuck him off because Carmacks cat was out of the bag after being dragged down the street.
    Isn't this obvious?!

  11. Money! by FryingLizard · · Score: 1

    When did FB announce purchase Oculus? End of March 2014. It's now just turned April 2017.
    Three years pretty much on the nail. The nearly-exact number of elapsed years very likely isn't a coincidence; one can guess that there was a financially-related three-year clause in his contract. He probably wanted out and this was the most lucrative time to leave.

    --
    [FrLz]