Slashdot Mirror
HTC Introduces Eye-Tracking 'VR Ad Service' (pcgamer.com)
We all knew this day would come: HTC has introduced a "VR Ad Service" that knows when viewers are actively looking at ads. "Ads that appear in immersive VR environments can not only provide more effective impressions, they can also track whether the users have viewed them or have turned away their gaze. Accordingly, the multiplied effect of effective impressions and verified viewings will bring you higher advertising revenue!" HTC explains. PC Gamer reports: Advertisers will only pay for ads after they've been viewed, according to Business Insider. Some of the formats they will use include loading scenes, 2D and 3D in-app placements, app recommendation banners, and big screen video. This will be an opt-in ad service for developers. HTC notes that by opting in, "all of your free apps would be automatically put on the list which can be used to integrate VR Ads." News of in-game ads coming to VR isn't exactly the sort of thing that will excite gamers. If there's a silver lining here, it's that ads are more likely to be relevant to the viewer's interests over time, at least in theory. "Compared to ordinary ad impressions, ads that are seen by users in a immersive VR environment can not only meet the user's needs by means of precise re-targeting, but can also be detected if they are viewed effectively by users," HTC states. "Therefore, promotion of your applications would have much more effective impression, which not only arouses the attention of potential users and enhance brand image, but further attracts interested users directly to download your apps in the VR environment!"
"If there's a silver lining here" no there isn't any. Advertiser knowing more about us is not a silver lining it is an invasion of our privacy. But then again I am actively trying to block all ads and actively trying to make my browser less track-able, so my opinion on that probably does not count. But boy, if this is not a 1st april news prank, this is not a good new and this came to be faaaaar quicker than I estimated. I thought they would have waited that VR has a stronger hold before making it toxic.
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
Remember when this sort of thing would be considered an april fool's joke? Now it's just too realistic.
S01E02.
One of the things they had were these weird cubes people lived in where all the walls and ceiling were basically LCD panels. Occasionally they'd get blasted by advertisements, and when the protagonist closed his eyes or averted his gaze, all the screens would lock down with this red warning that said "RESUME VIEWING" while a high pitched alternating tone filled the room.
Here's one of the scenes in question:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5eGo1vE41w
I was wondering how long it'd take before some company implemented something exactly like that. Looks like we're already there...
>Some of the formats they will use include loading scenes, 2D and 3D in-app placements, app recommendation banners, and big screen video
oh good, just what we all want...: ...and more innovative ways to annoy you than ever!
-VR punch the monkey banners ("punch it for real this time!... oops, don't hit grandma walking past you!")
-commercial breaks before the boss fights ("this boss fight brought to you by..." or "buy our game guide to find out the secrets of this boss fight! beat it on the first try!")
-pop-ups over everything you're trying to do (probably with easily-accidentally clicked buttons to buy/view-more-info/approve-tracking).
>arouses the attention of potential users and enhance brand image
let me fix that for you: "arouses the disgust of the potential users and degrades the brand image".
you better hope something like Ublock Origin VR, Ghostery VR, NoScript VR, etc. are gonna be available if you want to wade into the sewage VR is going to become if advertisers get their way.
I really think advertisements are a curse upon humanity. Surely HTC and app developers can survive without VR ads -- and, yet, HTC wants to tap in to the same revenue stream which made Google huge. I know companies with shareholders are driven to seek profit almost anywhere within legal limits, but I wish we lived in a world where consideration of the experiences of fellow humans had a higher priority than profit.
Well, does anyone have an advice on how to stop spammer from reaching me? Not because I hate it, not because their products are bad, but because I am broke. I owe about one million dollars, I dont have a job, I dont have a girlfrien, I dont need a bigger dick, I am not fat or bald, and I dont want neither do I need to look at their ads, Please, is there some way io can inform these spammers that I am broke? They are wasting their time, please bother someone else who has money.
Nothing about this is good. More tracking, less privacy, but the worst, worst part in all this? We're going to be punished for this crap.
We're going to be told "you don't look at ads enough, we have to charge you more now". We're going to be told "not enough of the data plans you pay for are being wasted on complete trash, and you're going to pay for this". Double-dipping will rise to new heights.
This is the kind of "service" for which everyone who proudly presented and developed it should be 'removed' for crimes against humanity.
don't I get a say in this ?
Yeah, that was exactly what I thought of. Of course right now they are mostly thinking about ads on loading screens and about product placement: they put a can of Slurm in your VR scene, and get paid if your eyes linger long enough on that can. But I can also imagine how tempting it must be to resume the advertising arms race, and require viewing of the ad. Or, since the revenue stream requires you to at least glance at the ad, make it as obnoxious as possible: think bouncing buttons and flashing colors.
Because that's all this is: an arms race. Companies aren't magically going to increase their advertising budgets; they might spend more on one particular platform if it proves to be more effective, but it most likely means they are spending less elsewhere. And can we please kill this lie about "targeted, engaging" ads? No one wants ads when they interrupt or interfere with the viewing experience. Not even when it's a single, relevant ad, let alone the customary scattershot of crap this will inevitably devolve into.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
My first thought was the scene in futurama where they first go online and get attacked by a swarm of adverts. I don't think it was trying to be prescient but looks like they may have been.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlGklt4BSQ8
While cheapy smartphone games may be so plentiful and cheap that they can be used for cannon fodder, VR games are still relatively few in number and costly. Nobody is going to pay for $60 game to get blasted by ads. If the games were free, people would put up with it but VR games are costly to develop and ads easily spoil any type of emotional environment they work at constructing. I don't foresee this getting any traction.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Logan Abbott\whipslash why hide what your JUDEN sponsors believe in you fucking crony traitor bastard?
Not eye-tracking ads, that's totally plausible. The idea that you're not going to have to pay for ad impressions unless someone looks at your ad is the joke. They might give you some eye-tracking information if someone looks at your ad, though, and maybe you'll pay more.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Never play their game.
On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
"If there's a silver lining here" no there isn't any. Advertiser knowing more about us is not a silver lining it is an invasion of our privacy.
It's an invasion of privacy if your attention is being tracked by their software.
And if you're wearing one of their VR helmets.
And if anybody bothers to create any content for their VR system.
And if people actually buy it.
And if they aren't using a cracked version that has the ad-tracking software disabled, or fudged to make their software think you have an unnatural obsession with one particular advertisement.
That's a lot of ifs.
For the rest of us in the mundane quotidian real world, it's not so much a privacy issue as something to laugh at.
Dear advertising customers. Yes, you out there who fall for the lie that ad companies tell you. That you can actually "engage" or otherwise get anyone interested in your ad by making it topical, or making it about something the person is actually interested in. The sad truth is that your ad can be as topical and engaging as could be about something I want and still it would be considered a nuisance. Allow me to inform you why.
Take YouTube. You know, that online TV-Replacement. Where I, as a user, can decide that "hey, I want to see a video". Now, let's imagine I want to see a video of my favorite music band. I type in the name of the band and the name of the song, expecting to watch the video to said song.
Now you could come with the most on-topic ad one could imagine: Imagine you're a music promoter and you'd want to promote a gig of that band in my home town. It does not get any more on-topic, engaging and interesting to the customer than this. And STILL I would not even see what you are promoting but rather annoyed click on the 5 second ticker that ticks down to "skip". Because at that very moment, my expectation and my "want" was to see that video. Not your ad, not anything else, I want that video. Anything that stands between me and that video is a nuisance, distraction and generally something I do NOT want.
You see the problem? When people are actively trying to get something specific, anything that blocks their access to it is seen as an interruption and nuisance that they want to get rid of. No matter what it is.
What does work a lot better is when people watch some videos of one of their YouTube favorites and you can get them to endorse your product, especially if they have the skill to weave that in an interesting way into their presentation. Because more often than not they watch the channel for the person and his or her presenting style, not exclusively for the content presented, so the person they like presenting your product in an engaging way can actually work. Provided your product is in any way sensibly connected with the show at hand.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Shitty ads with shitty VR. I can't wait. Really, I'm not waiting. Also, Samsung Gear VR sucks noobs. What a waste of money.
Sounds like you need a beer, BUY CHEAP BEER ONLINE...
Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
To whomever keeps posting this shit. You are giving Donald Trump a run for his money in the douchebag category. Nobody is reading your drivel, so kindly FOAD. Thanks!
See above for why I advocate for the elimination of AC posts, and the addition of an ignore option.
At best, one good thing that could come out of this, is if a majority of people are explicitly not looking at the ads; after all, even when I don't have adblock running, I still automatically filter banner ads as noise outside of my view.
If advertisers had the objective proof that 99% of people actively avoid looking at their crap, and thus wasted money, maybe they would stop.
(But I don't really believe it...)
Funnily enough, we may not "RESUME VIEWING" as channel 4 has taken that clip down...
They spammed throughout this thread and spam this in any thread that they think is in any way related to their insane Jewish conspiracy. Look at at the disgusting replies as well. I think people like this should be banned. They are just using /. to spread their hate propaganda, probably because they can do so anonymously, though setting up an account using a fake email likely won't deter them much, and are not engaging in any constructive discussion.
See above for why I advocate for the elimination of AC posts, and the addition of an ignore option.
I support your suggestion. I appreciate the idea behind anonymous posting, but I think the disadvantages outweigh the benefits.
Also some keyword and phrase filters might not hurt. I don't see many places where the words "JUDEN SLIME!!!" would be a valid part of the legitimate discussions here (yes, there may be a few corner cases, but they'd be far and few between).
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Who knew we Jews were so powerful? Bow before us, gentile scum!
The fact that you have to post this kind of hate screed means that we Jews have won, and all you can do is whine about it. Ha ha ha!
its an ad. run an ad blocker. quit whining like some child.
That's right, we Jews have taken control of everything, which shows that you are not the "master race". Ha ha ha, suck it, loser!
Why do companies insist that things like this... are somehow a service?
serv.ice: noun:
1. the action of helping someone.
2. a system supplying a public need such as transport, communications, or utilities such as electricity and water.
The people who make the biggest deal about it would go nuts if the spam and hate trolling were Marxist/far left related. They just want to be able to push hate and far right propaganda with no repercussions and use fear of big brother censorship to scare people into letting them continue. We wouldn't put up with this shit if they were screaming hate at and attacking people IRL, which is why most of them resort to doing it through the Internet these days.
Did you reply to the wrong person? It's not an ad, it's hate spam, and ad blockers don't have a "block hate speech" option.
Their helping the Advertisers lol. All the while trying to convince the end user they are being served ..somehow..con artist do what they do best believe their own lies lol
Jack of all trades,master of none
Why minusmod hide it if you're so proud Jew? All you won was getting broiled in Hitler's oven! You got banished nation after nation over history and couldn't even hold onto any land of your own you thieving little ugly hook nose weaklings! Everyone hates your kind and you know it. You hate yourselves. It's why you try fix those horrible beaks of yours with rhinoplasty.
Why minusmod hide it if you're so proud Jew? You got banished nation after nation over history and can't even hold any land of your own you thieving little ugly hook nose weaklings! Everyone hates your kind and you know it. You hate yourselves. It's why you try fix those horrible beaks of yours with rhinoplasty. Hitler fixed you with gas chambers and ovens set to broil hahaha.
How can a user NOT see the ads? No shit the gamer will see the ad they cant help but see the ad its in the game..it will be placed in a place you cant NOT see it.I see ads all the time cant get away from them they are everywhere. the real question is is the adverting generating product sales to ad dollar spent. would love to hear from an insider who would tell the truth..unless theirs a sale or coupon i cant believe adverting works that good.
Jack of all trades,master of none
Jews believe this about others they call goyim/gentiles: Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Spain (1492), France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No:
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it."
22. Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean."
23. Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid."
Really nice people guess all nations are nazis (egypt "despoiling" robbing it, Romans under titus, russian pogroms, arab nations post 1948, england (1330) and more ki
You post ac too and bitch he did posting jew talmudic law quotes you can't prove false that show jews rape babies, steal, murder, lie and worse? Unbelievable hypocrite or is your demand your jew laws not be shown and ac which you use yourself too should be banished because you are exposed jew as in 3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death" and from what I have seen when you can't win an argument against verifiable facts like those you bring on the banhammer. Is it guilt, jew guilt that you try on everyone else and yet you're the biggest racists of all shown in your own laws?
Jews believe this about others they call goyim/gentiles: Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Spain (1492), France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No:
1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."
2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."
3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."
4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."
5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."
6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."
7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."
8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth."
9. Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people."
10. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them."
11. Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts."
12. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."
13. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."
14. Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated."
15. Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl."
16. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible."
17. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."
18. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples."
19. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."
20. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations."
21. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it."
22. Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean."
23. Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid."
Really nice people guess all nations are nazis (egypt "despoiling" robbing it, Romans under titus, russian pogroms, arab nations post 1948, england (1330) and more ki
Before HTC starts talking about using eye-tracking in VR to measure ad-views, they need to actually add eye-tracking to the Vive first (there is a 3rd party working on this, but not HTC itself)
We had a good run before fucking advertising ruined this part of technology too.
I can't wait to be caught in a giant tsunami of fizzy pepsi!
These misquotes and fabrications come straight from the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan web site. Some cannot be explained simply because the quotes do not exist in the Talmud. Some references are to a book that does not exist in Talmud or any Jewish literature. Others are taken seriously out of context, or add words or thoughts that are not in the original.
1. Sanhedrin 59a says nothing about murdering the heathen, nor does it relate the death of a gentile to the death of a wild animal. It says "R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses command us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs." The tractate goes on to refute this statement by discussing the laws about eating blood. Even in this statement, if accepted, there is no mention of murdering the heathen. "Worthy of death" implies a judicial sentence, not murder.
2. Abodah Zara 26b is taken seriously out of context. What the original says is "but minim [idolatrous priests, whether Jewish or gentile], informers, and apostates [specifically Jewish] may be cast in [a pit], and need not be brought up." This says nothing about killing, and much less about killing gentiles. If it says anything about killing, Jews are included. The discussion, however, is whether a gentile may circumcise a Jew. The argument about who may be thrown into a put, pulled out but not thrown in, etc., concludes by saying that the pit should be covered so that nobody goes in.
3. Sanhedrin 59a does say, recording a conversation between two teachers, that one of them zealously said that a heathen who looks into the Law (the Torah, not the Talmud) should be guilty of death. It goes on to say, however, that the other teacher destroyed his argument, showing instead that a heathen who pries into the Law becomes as a High Priest. So this quote is taken out of context, just like some political candidates take their opponentâ(TM)s comments out of context for their own ads.
4. Libbre David 37 is a pure fabrication. There is no such tractate in Talmud, nor any such book or portion of a book in all of Jewish literature.
5. Yebhamoth 11b says nothing about intercourse with a little girl. Actually, the reference should be Kethuboth 11b, concerning betrothals. "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye." A footnote to that passage says that if a man were to have intercourse with a three year old she should not suffer the consequences of loss of virginity when she become eligible for marriage. The comment is actually a defense of victimâ(TM)s rights. The man who did such thing would be punished, but the victim shouldnâ(TM)t be.
6. Sanhedrin 105a talks about Balaam (of talking donkey fame), and does claim that he fornicated with his ass (presumably a Jenny Ass, not a jackass). "Balaam was blind in one eye, as it is said, [and the man] whose eye is open . . .45 He practised enchantment by means of his membrum. For here it is written, falling, but having his eyes open; whilst elsewhere is written, And Haman was fallen on the bed whereon Esther was. It was stated, Mar Zutra said: He practised enchantment by means of his membrum. Mar the son of Rabina said: He committed bestiality with his ass. The view that he practised enchantment by means of his membrum is as was stated. The view that he committed bestiality with his ass is because here it is written, He bowed, he lay down as a lion and as a great lion." It says absolutely nothing about Jesus. In fact, nothing is said about Jesus in the entire Talmud, much of which was written before Jesus was born or during his lifetime.
7. Gittin 57a tells of Balaam and some Jewish heretics suffering such fates. "He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity a
See above for why I advocate for the elimination of AC posts, and the addition of an ignore option.
Yes sadly I think the time has come. There should be a requirement to register an account to be able to post, but then an option to hide your id should be available, so you can state your mind without drawing too much hate-back from nutters, while if you become a nutter yourself then the Slashdot management should be able to take action and use their discretion about allowing you to post again or create new accounts in the future.
Yep. I actually seached cuz I figured someone would have posted it before me.
And don't close your eyes!
At that point what is it if not a form of torture? At the very least, it's not gauging the audience's response if you force them to watch the advertisements.
As to tfa, all I can say is: "Welp, that took longer than expected." Yes, I fully believed that was going to happen in some form or another at some point. VR gives absolute control over the user's environment. Did you honestly think that there wouldn't be people who would seek to abuse that power? If you did, then I'm going to feel real bad for you when they get full dive tech working....
...so good luck with that.
One of the reasons I opted for the HTC Vive back then, was the promise of Oculus users being tracked by facebook at any time, whatever you watched and did.
Sounds like you wish VR an early death. We don't even have proper AAA titles for it yet, just tons of weird "Look ma! I can create an Unity VR game in less than a day!" games.
What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
If I'm playing a car racing game, I won't think it out of place to see billboards on the side of the road. If they advertise Coke/Pepsi, and the developer makes some money, that's fine.
So long as the ads are no more intrusive than the real world, and actually add to the game world, I'd be ok with this.
I'm a fruit pirate. I bought a watermelon once, and spat the seeds in the back yard. They grew into another watermelon,
op lung iphone 6 , Hello every body . Nice to meet all .