Slashdot Mirror


The Cost of Drugs For Rare Diseases Is Threatening the US Health Care System (hbr.org)

An anonymous reader shares an article: There are 7,000 rare diseases affecting 25 million to 30 million Americans. The average drug approved under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 (ODA), which governs rare disease approval, costs $118,820 per year. Assuming a similar cost, if a single drug were approved under the ODA for 10% of rare diseases, the total would exceed $350 billion annually -- more than 10 percent of the total amount that America spends on health care and much more than the health care costs attributable to either diabetes or Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. If this seems far-fetched, consider the two drugs for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy that the FDA approved in the last six months: eteplirsen, which is sold by Sarepta Therapeutics and costs $300,000 annually per patient, and deflazacort, which is sold by Marathon Pharmaceuticals and costs $89,000 annually per patient. However, approval of such costly drugs exposes an uncomfortable truth: scientific discovery has outpaced health care economics. [...] In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) determines the cost effectiveness, or value, of newly approved drugs based on their impact on quality-adjusted life years. These determinations inform the National Health System's (NHS) treatment-coverage decisions. In contrast, the FDA is prohibited from considering cost or value in its decision making, and there is no U.S. governmental equivalent of NICE.

2 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. 75% Margins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bristol-Meyers Squib has a 75% margin on their drugs. And almost 30% return on equity.

    They like to blame R&D but one Summer I worked at one of their research labs. It was a very very nice place. Parts could have been from a country club. The head of the place helicoptered in from NY every morning - which is all considered R&D "costs". The cafeteria food was 5-star but cost as much as a McDonald's meal.

    The only sucky part was the animal section.

    I miss that place.

  2. Re: Wait! by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The various drug companies spend 3 1/2 x as much on advertising and marketing as research, with MOST basic research paid for by governments and sold for pennies or given away for free
    Welfare starts at the top