Slashdot Mirror


Spotify Executive Chris Bevington Dies In Stockholm Attack (variety.com)

"On Friday, four people were killed and about 15 more were injured when a truck plowed through a shopping area in the heart of Sweden's capital," reports Variety. One of the four victims was Chris Bevington, an executive at Spotify. An anonymous reader writes: "The British 41-year-old had served as Spotify's director of global partnerships/business development, working from Stockholm," reports Variety. The streaming service's founder, Daniel Ek, confirmed the news with a Facebook post on Sunday. "Chris has been a member of our band for over five years. He has had a great impact on not just the business but on everyone who had the privilege to know and work with him. There are no words for how missed he will be or for how sad we all are to have lost him like this."

3 of 366 comments (clear)

  1. Racism is something different by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are claiming this to justify their anti-Islam positions. Talking about this is racist.

    No, it's not. Liberals need to stop name calling and get a clue:

    RACISM IS NOT DEFINED AS "SOMETHING THAT DISAGREES WITH THE LEFT!"

    We CAN talk about issues without being racist, holding racist beliefs, or being prejudiced.

    Grow the fuck up and have adult conversations.

    It seems that many terrorist attacks in recent years have come from Muslims. This might be a false perception because of media bias, so

    1) Does anyone have strong statistical evidence that the problem is Islam, and not a different common feature?

    2) Would it make sense to bar entry to the US from certain world areas?

    3) Would it make sense to put Muslims under enhanced scrutiny domestically?

    As an anecdote to #3, I heard news articles saying that the local Imam in Florida was calling for death to gays before the nightclub attack. Are such overt calls for violence protected as free speech or freedom of religion, or should we make certain exceptions?

    Discuss. None of these questions is racist, or indicate inherent racism to an intelligent person. (But it might to liberals.)

  2. And what about the other three? by piojo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do care more for this guy than the others because he worked for a tech company? The other three had hobbies, relationships, careers (except the eleven year-old).

    I get that this is a tech news site, but the fact that he worked for a company we've heard of (or that he made a lot of money) does not seem like sufficient cause to care about his death so much more than the other victims.

    --
    A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
  3. Re:Racist by Shinobi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, Homo Sapiens is a species. There are multiple races, that is, various biological adaptations to different environments etc. Claiming anything else is just ideological indoctrination, no matter if you claim that there's only one race, or that some race is worth more than others.

    There's plenty of evidence for it, like how some races are more or less susceptible to certain health issues, like say being less likely to suffer from Malaria but instead having an 8 times higher risk of contracting diabetes. Or, for another race, increased susceptibility to Malaria and more likely to suffer from clinical depression, but less susceptible to diabetes. There is plenty of biological evidence that proves your ideological imperative wrong.

    As for your statement regarding breeding, you clearly show that you are quite ignorant about biology: Races can interbreed and produce viable offspring. Hell, in some families, you can even have cross-species breeding, though the offspring becomes either completely(Liger, male Mules), or mostly sterile(female mules).