Slashdot Mirror
Spotify Executive Chris Bevington Dies In Stockholm Attack (variety.com)
"On Friday, four people were killed and about 15 more were injured when a truck plowed through a shopping area in the heart of Sweden's capital," reports Variety. One of the four victims was Chris Bevington, an executive at Spotify. An anonymous reader writes:
"The British 41-year-old had served as Spotify's director of global partnerships/business development, working from Stockholm," reports Variety. The streaming service's founder, Daniel Ek, confirmed the news with a Facebook post on Sunday. "Chris has been a member of our band for over five years. He has had a great impact on not just the business but on everyone who had the privilege to know and work with him. There are no words for how missed he will be or for how sad we all are to have lost him like this."
Ex-USSR uneducated, radicalized, revanshistic scum is killing people producing innovations in the heart of progressive, liberal Europe.
Given the tragedy that occurred comments like yours are juts appalling!
People died here!
The only purpose of solemnity is control.
Once you get people to be solemn in extreme cases, over time you can slowly get people to agree in less compelling situations.
Eventually, everything becomes serious, everything is "not a joking matter".
DOES THIS SEEM FUNNY TO YOU? HUH? HUH? DOES IT?
Well... yes it does, actually.
Don't see how this counts as an Assange apology. I consider him an asswipe but not much of a rapist. Just states the facts of the case as I understand them. If anything this makes him burrowing in that embassy even more ridiculous.
The main point was to explain why the statics is so skewed.
There are plenty of evidence that some genetic marker are present in certain population, marking certain population to a greater weakness (or sometime strength) against some sickness. But it is disputable that they mark what you would call biological race, as they lack the physical isolation, do not have very specific karyotyp (even the melanine one) in human it is only a more likelyness to have such karyotyp or even a continuum of various karyotyp. The only subset you may do is possibly morphological, but even for that and for the karyotyp, you do not have specific identifier you can assign 100%, you have a continuum. That is why even if you look at various biological book or source, they usually sidestep the issue of human race, not because of the sociological indication, but simply because there is no easy way to separate and quantify those. And no, even skin color do not work that well (morphological races - would put for example part of india with africa).
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
You seem to regularly fall for the extremist left wing nutbag douchebag comments every time to take the advantage of writing an otherwise excellent post but using it as a vehicle to basically shit on "liberals".
Do you think that this is helping? Because to me (as a non-American who, like most of the rest of the world, are just baffled by almost everything that happens there) it seems posts like this just exacerbate the divide and try to frame everything in black and white issues.
I agree that there are "liberal" nutjobs who are offended by everything. There are also "conservative" wackjobs that do the same. This problem is massively blown out of scale by a) the shitty echo chamber filter bubble of social media and b) the feckless media who thrive on such black-vs-white dissent because it is amazing clickbait.
To drop a footnote like this, specifically to cast every liberal (or conservative) with a broad brush, in what is otherwise an insightful and important topic makes it look like you're not really interested in a discussion, but just scoring points against people on the "Other Side".
Anyway. I think those three questions are interesting. But otherwise this post is kind of flamebait.