Slashdot Mirror


American Farmers Are Still Fighting Tractor Software Locks (npr.org)

Manufacturers lock consumers into restrictive "user agreements," and inside "there's things like you won't open the case, you won't repair," complains a U.S. advocacy group called The Repair Association. But now the issue is getting some more attention in the American press. An anonymous reader quotes NPR: Modern tractors, essentially, have two keys to make the engine work. One key starts the engine. But because today's tractors are high-tech machines that can steer themselves by GPS, you also need a software key -- to fix the programs that make a tractor run properly. And farmers don't get that key.

"You're paying for the metal but the electronic parts technically you don't own it. They do," says Kyle Schwarting, who plants and harvests fields in southeast Nebraska... "Maybe a gasket or something you can fix, but everything else is computer controlled and so if it breaks down I'm really in a bad spot," Schwarting says. He has to call the dealer. Only dealerships have the software to make those parts work, and it costs hundreds of dollars just to get a service call. Schwarting worries about being broken down in a field, waiting for a dealer to show up with a software key.

The article points out that equipment dealers are using those expensive repair calls to offset slumping tractor sales. But it also reports that eight U.S. states, including Nebraska, Illinois and New York, are still considering bills requiring manufacturers to sell repair software, adding that after Massachusetts passed a similar lar, "car makers started selling repair software."

15 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. Positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's a great thing that people who typically vote for more corporate freedom finally get to see the price of unrestrained corporatism.

    1. Re: Positive by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This would happen, if it were not for manufacturers' intellectual property control over their software. Just like pharma companies, the manufacturers have imposed socialism for themselves by having protectionism written into the law. Capitalism is for the customers.

      We need to define 'right to repair' as an extension of fair use.

    2. Re:Positive by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trump said he was going to drain that swamp, all he's done so far is sign bills that deregulate business to let them screw over customers/the planet in any way they like.

      Corporate profits now come first, priority is given to the companies Trump has shares in.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re: Positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing to do with socialism, but everything with good old abuse of market power by a private monopoly facilitated by US IP law.

    4. Re: Positive by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Words mean things. Socialism isn't just a word meaning "bad things I don't like". Why not just have done with it and call them "SJWs"?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re: Positive by judoguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What you're looking at is monopolistic competition; it's a routine outcome of an underregulated capitalist system.

      Wrong. What you're looking at is called Fascism. Or what Mussolini called Corporatism. The unholy alliance of anti free market big business and the coercive power of the State.

      ObamaCare is an excellent example, if you need another.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    6. Re: Positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      In this case it is, but a completely "free" market has no anti-trust protections so you get the same result there... eventually one player manages to figure out how to destroy their competitors' businesses, or just lucks out when disaster befalls them, and then they embark on a campaign to buy and/or squash any little startups that threaten to eat into their market. Without institutional regulation, the winner of the capitalist game becomes the institution.

    7. Re: Positive by judoguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But remember Mitt Romney said, "corporations are people" and the Citizens United ruling basically asserts the same thing. I don't agree with either of those, but that's the way it is.

      Well, corporations sort of *are* people. To "incorporate" is literally to "embody".

      No person, business, town (incorporated) or anything else comprising one or more people can exist, i.e., do business, with anyone else without having a "body". So yes, a corporation has rights. Just like your body. Corporations are born and die every day.

      Sometimes they are powerful "people" and get by with stuff that a smaller, less powerful "person" can't. But a "corporation" isn't a bad thing in itself. It's merely a legal entity that can continue if one or more members leave.

      So, they are "people", in many important ways.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    8. Re: Positive by Baleet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not according to the history I have read about Rockefeller and Standard Oil. There are government-regulated monopolies, for sure, such as the old telephone company or utilities companies. But monopolies such as Standard Oil occur through aggressive business practices.

  2. No need to fight by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The farmers have voted for the candidate that will be all for the farmers and will be doing what is needed for the farmers. Right?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  3. Re:How long by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Try, just TRY to get around John Deere. It's not like you have a lot of options.

    John Deere, ~67% market share followed by Case IH at ~17% and New Holland at ~9%, that's perilously close to a monopoly. You could try to give big old JD some hard competition by importing tractors from places where they don't try to rape you over software updates but if you do 'The Donald' will slap a 30% import tariff on you so farmers are now literally fucked in every possible way.

  4. Re:Farmers usually vote Republican by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only real farming left in the US are large industrial farms.

    Quit parroting that left wing lie. It's total bullshit that one 5 second Google query absolutely disproves.

  5. RE:"The article points out that equipment dealers" by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "using those expensive repair calls to offset slumping tractor sales."

    maybe people dont want to buy new tractors with this new "tractor with expensive propitiatory software, so they are keeping their old tractors, and even buying old tractors because they can fix them their selves without some greedy corporate tractor dealer scalping their pocketbooks every time they need work done on their tractor

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  6. re: devil's advocate about farming by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not going to say I have strong evidence to disagree with your observations about farmers. But I do live in an area that's still largely rural, in Western Maryland. And my interactions with them (including doing some computer service work for a couple of them) tells me they're not very different from anyone else trying to remain successful, running their own small business.

    Last I checked on tractor pricing, John Deere products suitable for farm use weren't exactly inexpensive, as it is. You really believe they're selling all of these tractors at or below their cost to build them? I'd like to see some evidence to back that claim up.....

    I'm sure that this is just an attempt for the industry to find a new avenue to monetize its products -- seeing how far they can push the boundaries before the law pushes back. The auto industry would *love* to impose the same rules on every car and truck it sells -- but that change would impact so many people (including hundreds of thousands of independent garages, auto parts dealers, etc.) - it can't realistically enforce it right now.

    Picking a relative niche market like farm tractor sales is a better strategy. John Deere knows that #1. it has enough market share so farmers can't go to that many alternatives to avoid them, and #2. it sells a product that's not just purchased for pleasure or convenience. The success of an entire season's crop is at stake.

    Besides, it wasn't always this way. Not all that long ago, a John Deere tractor had no such software lock because the technology to implement it didn't even exist yet. Did you suddenly see tractor prices drop sharply when they decided to start subsidizing them with this forced maintenance?

  7. Re:Expense ratio and hollow compliants? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is it cost the farmer $500 to do the repair on the previous model themselves, in an hour. The new model also costs the farmer $500 to do the repair themselves, in an hour; however, the tractor won't "go" until they pay a technician an additional $1,500 to drive out, wave their badge at the device, and whisper the secret word into its ear.

    Part of the complaint is they can't fix their tractor and get back to work; they have to take a relatively-significant hit to productivity and put their farm at risk waiting for a service call.