Slashdot Mirror


The First Manned Space Flight Was the Rocket Designer's Victory as Much as Yuri Gagarin's (smithsonianmag.com)

From an article on the Smithsonian magazine: On this day in 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the first person in space. And given the risks inherent to early spaceflight, he certainly deserves his place in history. But what about the man who designed the rocket that got Gagarin there? His name was Sergei Korolev, and his influence on the Soviet space program stretched much farther than Gagarin's 108 minutes of fame -- the time it took to make a single orbit of Earth. The flight of Vostok 1, Gagarin's craft, "was a defining moment of the 20th century and opened up the prospect of interplanetary travel for our species," writes Robin McKie for The Guardian. For Gagarin, it was the moment that made him a famous figurehead for the Soviet Union. As Gagarin toured the globe, the space program's chief designer remained at home and unknown. That Sergei Korolev ran the Soviet Union's rocket program wasn't revealed until after his death. "Gagarin became the face of Soviet space supremacy," McKie writes, "while Korolev was the brains. The pair made a potent team and their success brought fame to one and immense power to the other. Neither lived long enough to enjoy those rewards, however."

78 comments

  1. Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Riding tons and tons of flaming high explosives is dangerous.

    When non-engineers or politics get into rocketry decisions, bad things tend to happen.

    Think Challenger and Columbia

    1. Re:Well duh by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think Soyuz 1.

      At least with Challenger and Columbia you could say it was an accident, it did work before and it was some freak problems that occurred that should not, and the design itself was at least mostly ok.

      Soyuz 1 was murder. Plain and simple.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Riding tons and tons of flaming high explosives is dangerous"

      I'll keep that in mind next time I'm on a Boeing 747.

    3. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know real rocket engineers that would disagree with you, but I suppose you know more than they do.

    4. Re:Well duh by segedunum · · Score: 2

      Challenger and Columbia were not dissimilar. Like Soyuz 1 a lot of people were very well aware of the problems that could occur, and had in the case of Columbia, and they chose to do nothing. You then got a lot of virtue signalling about space exploration being 'worth the risk' and every moon shot being a triumph of technology, and other such crap from people who have no clue whatsoever.

      Soyuz 1 did show how vital Korolev was. Not only was he a brilliant technologist but he also needed to be an exceptional politician when dealing with the Kremlin.

    5. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "could say it was an accident"

      Say what? "Accidents" usually entail that you didn't know there was a problem, both shuttle losses were from well known but ignored issues. With Challenger engineers were shouting at the top of their lungs that launching in those conditions (cold weather) was idiotic, NASA management and the . Several shuttles had sustained significant damage due to foam strikes before Columbia, but management decided to ignore the problem. Saying that they were "accidents" is a little like a bridge inspector saying that the bridge was up to code despite knowing that it would fail if two average weighted semis happened to go over it at the same time.

    6. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that every single person who died while attempting to reach orbit or beyond would say everything they did was 'worth the risk'. And every moon shot was a triumph of technology and a triumph of what can be accomplished when everyone is pulling in the same direction.

      "people were very well aware of the problems that could occur, and had in the case of Columbia, and they chose to do nothing"
      Nobody has ever claimed to know every single that could go wrong on a manned space flight. Going to the stars will cost lives but every accident or mishap can be used to prevent the same thing happening in the future.

      "needed to be an exceptional politician when dealing with the Kremlin"
      There was no "dealing" with the Kremlin. Scientists and engineers were given a task and if they valued their lives and the lives of their families they would build what ever the Kremlin wanted them to build. They were fortunate enough to have all of the confiscated German rocket technology and the German engineers to go with it. The USSR and US space programs were both built on German technology. The US was even lucky enough to have Germanys lead rocket scientist running the NASA rocket technology programs. I am sure the Russians also had a few German scientists operating in the background. No way in hell the USSR was going to acknowledge they had German's working for them.

    7. Re: Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think about where we would be today if the Nazies had won. We'd probably have colonies on Europa by now. Instead, we got diversity.

    8. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jet fuel is not a high explosive...

    9. Re:Well duh by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It turns out that large parachutes are not so simple.
      in hindsight there should have been more unmanned tests but there was far less value put on the life of the crew than would be expected.
      Of all things the Anime "Space Brothers" had a side story told in flashback based on what happened to Soyuz 1.

    10. Re:Well duh by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      You can't blame Korolyev for that though the mission failed over 2 years after Korolyev's death and most of the faults were in systems that had been redesigned after his death. Many of those redesigns were reverted back to Korolyev's original and are still there on Soyuz capsules to this day. The loss of all three Cosmonauts in Soyus 11 was again due to a redesigned element of the space craft. If you take those two out of the equation Soyuz has an excellent track record if you keep them in the equation Soyuz is on a par with NASA on safety (Remembering that the Nedelin Disaster was an experimental ICBM and nothing to do with Korolyev or Soyuz)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    11. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jet fuel is not a high explosive...

      Neither is the kerosene used to fuel rockets...

  2. Or Was He? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    On this day in 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the first person in space.

    Well, the first person to survive being in space, if you believe the conspiracy theory.

    1. Re:Or Was He? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. The U.S. definitively won the space race when we put Sputnik on the moon.

    2. Re:Or Was He? by segedunum · · Score: 1

      I don't know why it would be a conspiracy theory. The Soviet Union was a totally closed society, especially around that time, the space programme was very important in terms of prestige and propaganda and they weren't going to, and didn't, tell anyone about their failures. Gagarin was just the success we heard about, and given its importance in history I doubt we will ever know if they had tried and failed before.

    3. Re:Or Was He? by PPH · · Score: 2

      We won it with the manhole cover.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Or Was He? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Get your facts straight.

      Despite what you may have read in your so-called history books, Yuri Gargarin's trip was a total failure. He was tasked with planting quatrotriticale on the moon because of the agreement between the USSR and USA that the satellite would be awarded to the first country able to establish agriculture there.

      While it's true that, several years later, Neil Armstrong also failed to establish a planting... the original agreement was abrogated after Buzz Aldrin inadvertently released General Zod and his two cohorts from the Phantom Zone.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Or Was He? by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Knowing what soviet union was like I would say its probable that there were prior failures that were not talked about. Firstly, first attempts were definitely more likely to fail than succeed, secondly, there is no way soviet union would have admitted it if such a thing did happen. However, if prior failures did happen, nobody who knew about it has talked so far and probably never will, so its unlikely we will ever know for sure. Example of how things worked in soviet union - Nedelin catastrophe, they didn't own up for 29 years even tho the information about it was widely known outside cccp, had secrecy orders been successful or body count lesser its unlikely they ever would have owned up.

    6. Re:Or Was He? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Think for a moment. The USSR is gone and there's probably some people who grew up in it in your street. With the number of people involved in such projects there is no way to keep such secrets to the present day. Also the USSR was very keen on documentation and many historians have been through the information on the space program.
      Also we already know about many of their failures. They may not have ended up in the newspapers of the day but they ended up many books, tv programs etc. Deborah Cadbury's "The Space Race" (book and BBC tv series) has many examples.

    7. Re:Or Was He? by Opyros · · Score: 1

      Proving a negative is of course always difficult outside of pure mathematics. The research which debunked the "dead cosmonauts" legend to most people's satisfaction was by James Oberg, and here is the relevant chapter from one of his books.

  3. No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless Yuri took a far more active role in the launch than seems likely, Yuri was basically payload.

  4. in soviet russia we rocket you! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    in soviet russia we rocket you!

  5. BBC's 2005 Space Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's on Netflix and does well explaining Korolev's role.

    1. Re:BBC's 2005 Space Race by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Very good series. This is also a very good watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  6. It has always bothered me by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that we celebrate the astronaut and hardly notice the rocket scientist and the engineers.

    Yes, it takes impressive balls/ovaries to get into a small tin can mounted on top of a giant tube of explosives and ride that into space. (Though this could also be stupidity or insanity..)

    Yes, it takes an impressive amount of composure, skill, and training to handle a trip into space, especially if anything goes off-plan. More than I'll ever have.

    But NONE of that would be useful or necessary at all if someone hadn't conceived of and built the hardware, and there are a lot fewer people capable of designing an orbit (or beyond) capable rocket than there are people of capable of riding one. And that was even more true in the early days when a lot of the theory and best practice wasn't available with a Google search.

    It's nice when you read about the astronauts acknowledging that. Outside of astronauts and space enthusiasts, you find a lot more people who know an astronaut's name than that of the engineer behind the equipment that made them an astronaut...

    1. Re:It has always bothered me by Spy+Handler · · Score: 0

      Yeah it's been bothering me for 500 years, how the shipbuilders and designers are never acknowledged, only guys who ride the ships like Columbus and Pizarro.

    2. Re:It has always bothered me by PPH · · Score: 2

      500 years

      More like 5000 years. Back then, the first person to sail or paddle a boat was probably also it's builder. And it probably took guts to venture out further than you could wade or swim back to shore. By 500 years ago, shipbuilding was old hat. So was sailing. But navigating out of sight of land was still an accomplishment. That's why people like John Harrison were the heros.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:It has always bothered me by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The engineers certainly get plenty of attention. For example: when one of them donned a somewhat odd t-shirt, the entire world took notice (and offense)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:It has always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prince Henry, The Navigator, is very acknowledged in the former Portugal colony I live in.

    5. Re:It has always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point of order: The engineer didn't have to ride to his most certain doom aboard a contraption that could explode at any moment.

    6. Re:It has always bothered me by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      I'm also thinking what is remarkable is how someone like Korolev managed to get a good education, learn management skills, live through Stalin abuses, able to get Politburo to provide him resources... What if he died in the gulags? Did USSR have others with the engineer/manager talent but perished in purges, what if they lived?

      US managed to get talent that excelled like Goddard, Ames, Glenn, Dryden (these four guys with others laid the groundwork for the space age), Von Braun, Kraft, Low, Gilruth, etc. also lots of engineers from Germany (Operation Paperclip) and Canada (cancellation of Avro Arrow and Avrocar) though lately it seems talent has become bogged down unless they have a few billion of their own to kick around (Musk, Bezos). However, as you mentioned astronauts/cosmonauts are talented, however, first need someone to build the rocket (hard as they have to battle bureaucracies, egos, do engineering tradeoffs, etc.) then find someone to ride it (easy as seen when lots of highly qualified people apply for astronaut positions).

      Someone from Ukraine pointed out this guy, Mikhail Yangel, which he said was more brilliant and instrumental in Soviet rocket development programs. On subject of avoiding death before his time, a rocket prototype blew up on the pad in 1960 killing Nedelin, the Chief of the rocket forces, and nearly 100 others. Yangel was only saved because he had gone into a bunker for a smoke just before the explosion. Also from the link, "Korolev works for Tass, Chelomei works on crap, Yangel works for us." http://www.astronautix.com/y/y...

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    7. Re:It has always bothered me by chispito · · Score: 1

      The only reason Korolev was not more widely celebrated is that the Soviet leadership kept his identity secret for fear of assassination/abduction/etc. Von Braun never faced the same limitations and was much more of a celebrity.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    8. Re:It has always bothered me by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Nobody who's ever played Kerbal Space Program has anything but utter respect for actual rocket scientists.

      Yes, I get it, astronauts are highly trained and it takes a particular sort of bravery to strap yourself atop 100t of (basically) explosives....but in terms of the rocket going where it's supposed to, and coming back safe: it's not like the astronauts are anything but spectators to a programmed series of events.

      --
      -Styopa
    9. Re:It has always bothered me by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The Chicken is involved, but the Pig is committed

    10. Re:It has always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His real name is KHAN!

    11. Re:It has always bothered me by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      but in terms of the rocket going where it's supposed to, and coming back safe: it's not like the astronauts are anything but spectators to a programmed series of events.

      Apollo 13. Yeah, the real heroes were the guys on the ground, but as I recall, one of the astronauts had to actually pilot the thing in a completely unplanned maneuver or three.

      For that matter, Apollo 11 LM had to do an unplanned manuever or two, when they realized it was coming down onto a boulder field....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    12. Re:It has always bothered me by dbIII · · Score: 2

      What if he died in the gulags

      He died because of his time in a prison camp. Because of the way his jaw had been broken and healed without splinting in the camp a doctor, years later, could not get a tube down his throat in time when he was undergoing surgery.

      Did USSR have others with the engineer/manager talent but perished in purges

      Yes.

  7. What about Wan Hu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Early in the sixteenth century, Wan decided to take advantage of China's advanced rocket and fireworks technology to launch himself into outer space. He supposedly had a chair built with forty-seven rockets attached. On the day of lift-off, Wan, splendidly attired, climbed into his rocket chair and forty seven servants lit the fuses and then hastily ran for cover. There was a huge explosion. When the smoke cleared, Wan and the chair were gone, and was said never to have been seen again."

    1. Re:What about Wan Hu? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Hu was first?

    2. Re:What about Wan Hu? by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, Hu was ON first.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:What about Wan Hu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he didn't wan to be on second?

    4. Re:What about Wan Hu? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

  8. Soviet Rocket Design by segedunum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The history of Soviet and Russian rocket design beyond just the headlines is really interesting. The closed cycle rockets that we have today, that at one point no one thought possible, came about from the Soviet moon programme. Korolev realised that they simply didn't have the time or resources to design a new engine comparable to the F-1 so he had to cluster together thirty smaller rocket engines. Even then, to get the lift necessary the cycle had to be closed, so the Soviets embarked on a long trial and error research and development project (and some massive explosions) which resulted in the NK-33.

    On face value the Soviet moon programme was a failure, but this was arguably its greatest contribution. It's all the more remarkable since the Soviet leadership wanted to hide any notion they had ever had a moon programme so ordered everything scrapped. Soviet engineers hid around sixty NK-33 engines in a warehouse until they were re-discovered over twenty years later.

    1. Re: Soviet Rocket Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the nk33 is now the rd180 which powers the Atlas V.

    2. Re:Soviet Rocket Design by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      You know the SpaceX Falcon 9 "Octaweb" engine layout in the base of the 1st stage? Look at the base of the first stage of the N1 rocket sometime.

  9. Re:No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuri had an extremely active role. In fact he was essential in the role of ballast.

  10. Re:No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. Astronauts are pretty much payload with PR. As much as I idolized astronauts when I was a kid, now I just see them as almost useless.

  11. Not "the rocket designer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, Korolev was not "THE rocket designer." He was the boss. He probably contributed lots of ideas, maybe the main ones, but the rockets were designed by hundreds of individuals. News media still live in the 1910's, where a single guy is the one who "did it" like say Marconi. It takes a village, er, I mean a team. Often, a very large team.

    1. Re:Not "the rocket designer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Korolev was not "THE rocket designer." He was the boss. He probably contributed lots of ideas, maybe the main ones, but the rockets were designed by hundreds of individuals. News media still live in the 1910's, where a single guy is the one who "did it" like say Marconi. It takes a village, er, I mean a team. Often, a very large team.

      He was called "Chief Designer", the man who gave poor little Kudriavka the name "Laika", in her last weeks of life.

    2. Re:Not "the rocket designer" by superwiz · · Score: 1

      "designed" is a strong word. This was done at the time when all calculations were done by hand. So most people on the team were doing verifying arithmetic. But there was, of course, a large group of designers. Korolev created both the original rocket concept and the political savvy to get the government to approve and get behind the project. But without his rocket design, there would be no project.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:Not "the rocket designer" by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

      Yuri Gagarin wasn't even the first man in space. Vladimir Ilyushin landed in the wrong county and lost the title.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  12. Re:Wankers like Musk stand on the shoulders of gia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.distancetomars.com

    Space is mostly empty, deadly, and hostile. We didn't go "backward", we grew up. So should you.

  13. I get it now by paiute · · Score: 1

    They were the Brady and Belichick of spaceflight.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:I get it now by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      someone on slashdot using a sports analogy? I thought we used car analogies here?

  14. "As Much As" by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Yuri just the next step up from animal testing? Seems him, Armstrong, etc deserve the same respect one would give a person testing pharmaceuticals in a phase III trial.

  15. As much as? by hackel · · Score: 1

    Yuri did the same thing as a monkey. I know it's an honour to be "the first" and all that, but he definitely doesn't deserve any of the acclaim for the accomplishment. Glad to see this, even if the accolades are coming a little late.

    1. Re:As much as? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yuri did the same thing as a monkey

      Among other things he had to eject and parachute from outside of the capsule. That design would have killed a monkey. It wasn't built for a monkey.

  16. Re:No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Stop moving Yuri, you're shifting the capsule!"

  17. Another unsung hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another unsung hero of the Soviet space program is Boris Chertok. He was one of the main designers of much of their technology.

  18. Yuri was NOT the first human in space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That honor belongs to Major General Vladimir Sergeyevich Ilyushin

    1. Re:Yuri was NOT the first human in space! by jsm300 · · Score: 1

      That is pure space conspiracy lies, on about the same level as the US moon landings being faked.

  19. BBC Documentary: Space Race by jsm300 · · Score: 2

    The BBC produced a documentary called "Space Race" in 2005 that covered both the US and USSR space programs. Sergei Korolev and Werner Von Braun were main characters in the documentary. Many people in the US didn't like it because they felt it was overcritical of Werner Von Braun. Since I was already aware of the controversy regarding Werner Von Braun's nazi past, it wasn't surprising to me, and I thought it was reasonably balanced in its approach. Note that the subject is fairly controversial, so opinions span the spectrum from he should have been sentenced to life imprisonment for war crimes, to he was completely innocent. I believe that he did get a pass on a thorough investigation of his involvement due to his value to the U.S., and it is not clear from the details (biographies and documentaries tend to spin the facts differently) what the true story is. Anyway, if you want to learn more about Korolev you can search for "BBC space race" on youtube. The entire four part series is still available for viewing, and I thought it was well done.

  20. Re:No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I know. Your life didn't turn out as you thought it should be, and you need to put down people above you to feel better. I can't blame you, nerds are mediocre pieces of shit at best. They just can't realize it.

  21. Re:No, it was the rocket designers' more than Yuri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how does that change that astronauts are basically PR? They perform stunts. Evel Knievel with a degree. So what?

  22. Did Gargarin orbit the earth? by hduff · · Score: 1

    Did Gargarin actually orbit the earth in 108 minutes, or did his craft follow a ballistic profile, like Alan Shepard?

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:Did Gargarin orbit the earth? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Did Gargarin actually orbit the earth

      Yes.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  23. HA? by superwiz · · Score: 2

    Korolev remained unknown? Who is writing this tripe? He was a much more celebrated figure in the Soviet culture. It could be because Gagarin died in an while flying an experimental aircraft a few years later, but there were movies made about Korolev. Not even documentaries. They were full-feature movies glamorizing his life. Soviet Union featured distinguished scientists in movies roughly at the same rate as Hollywood features stock brokers. It's not surprising, either. Both do something esoteric to most people while it is something that the society-at-large views as its archetype.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  24. Korolyov by avgapon · · Score: 0

    https://www.google.com/search?...: He and us are lucky that he was able to survive the Soviet imprisonment camps.

  25. Korolev was purged by aberglas · · Score: 2

    He had been denounced by his colleagues who wanted his job, nearly died in the Gulags, then released under Khrushchev.

    He was completely unknown during the space race. His identity hidden.

    He was resurrected during Glasnost, and only recently became a public hero. I spoke to a Russian back packer recently who was very proud of Korolev but completely unaware of the purging.

    Ultimately this cost them the race to the moon. Korolev's mistreatment in the Gulags lead to his early death, after which their space program collapsed. A very Soviet story.

    Personally, I always wondered why the Soviets did not just send a cosmonaut to moon one way. Much, much easier than the return. And they had already successfully landed a probe on the moon, just put a body inside and repeat. Cosmonauts are cheap.

    1. Re:Korolev was purged by superwiz · · Score: 1

      He was completely unknown during the space race. His identity hidden.

      Yeah, top secret is more like it.

      then released under Khrushchev.

      And that's when the space race actually started. Many members of the Politburo did a stint at the Gulag under Stalin. Including some of the top brass of the army, if my memory is not failing. In itself, it's not very telling. Any slight disagreement with those high-enough in power was enough to get a few years in the Gulag's (if one was lucky).

      Ultimately this cost them the race to the moon. Korolev's mistreatment in the Gulags lead to his early death, after which their space program collapsed. A very Soviet story.

      Oy! This is just not even connected to reality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Korolev was released in 1944 (still during WWII and long before Stalin's death).

      Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... Baikonur was founded in 1955, which was after Stalin's death. The first launch of a dog was in 1957: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... See how the timeline just doesn't add up to the whole idea that he was stopped by the Gulag? Soviet Union was still rebuilding from WWII under Stalin. The space program didn't start until Korolev started it. Gulag was hardly the reason for his death. He had multiple heart attacks by then and died at 59. Soviet life expectancy for men was just slightly over 60 (62 or so). For someone in a job with as much stress as he had this was actually pretty good. Soviet Union had famous actors (more than one) die on stage in their 40s.

      Personally, I always wondered why the Soviets did not just send a cosmonaut to moon one way.

      They abandoned the program as unworkable. Which is to say they didn't have anyone who could produce a design.

      Btw, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... was released 1972 -- only 6 years after Korolev's death. He was already a well-known larger-than-life figure at that point (eg, he was already on a postage stamp in 1969). His identity was not declassified for obvious security reasons until his obituary was published. His ashes were laid next to those of all top Communist leaders. He had a private plane and all the accommodations of top military brass in the last 10 years of his life. The radio station they built in Evpatoria was most likely not for technical reasons sited in the Wikipedia. Evpatoria was the top vacation destination in the Soviet Union. The radio station was most likely built to make it more convenient for Korolev.

      To sum up: he had all the accommodations of top Soviet brass without the burden of having to play an action hero for public consumption. Not quite a victim this "article" makes him out to be.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.