Slashdot Mirror


New Solar-Powered Device Can Pull Water Straight From the Desert Air (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit quotes a report from Science Magazine: You can't squeeze blood from a stone, but wringing water from the desert sky is now possible, thanks to a new spongelike device that uses sunlight to suck water vapor from air, even in low humidity. The device can produce nearly 3 liters of water per day, and researchers say future versions will be even better. That means homes in the driest parts of the world could soon have a solar-powered appliance capable of delivering all the water they need, offering relief to billions of people. To find an all-purpose solution, researchers led by Omar Yaghi, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley, turned to a family of crystalline powders called metal organic frameworks, or MOFs. Yaghi developed the first MOFs -- porous crystals that form continuous 3D networks -- more than 20 years ago. The networks assemble in a Tinkertoy-like fashion from metal atoms that act as the hubs and sticklike organic compounds that link the hubs together. By choosing different metals and organics, chemists can dial in the properties of each MOF, controlling what gases bind to them, and how strongly they hold on. The system Wang and her students designed consists of a kilogram of dust-sized MOF crystals pressed into a thin sheet of porous copper metal. That sheet is placed between a solar absorber and a condenser plate and positioned inside a chamber. At night the chamber is opened, allowing ambient air to diffuse through the porous MOF and water molecules to stick to its interior surfaces, gathering in groups of eight to form tiny cubic droplets. In the morning, the chamber is closed, and sunlight entering through a window on top of the device then heats up the MOF, which liberates the water droplets and drives them -- as vapor -- toward the cooler condenser. The temperature difference, as well as the high humidity inside the chamber, causes the vapor to condense as liquid water, which drips into a collector. The findings were published in the journal Science.

32 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds a bit like a windtrap. Can sietchs and spice-harvesting be far off?

    1. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If nothing else, it has the advantage over vaporators in that Imperial stormtroopers won't kill your family.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But are they easier to maintain? Can you use a droid that's worked with binary loadlifters like you can with vaporators, or do you need a specialized droid? Those can get expensive out in the desert.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Daemonik · · Score: 2

      Who needs a droid? Now put on your stillsuit and get out to the condensers.

    4. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you walk without rhythm, you won't attract the worm.

      White privilege!

    5. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      >> Imperial stormtroopers won't kill your family

      Said no one actually living in the Middle East in 2017.

      True enough, I guess. So, +1 Informative, -1 Whoosh?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  2. Some other projects by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There have been a few, let's say, shady promises about extracting water from air, mostly coupled with crowdfunding campaigns (gee, why could that be?). Those that actually delivered a product were mostly ridiculous, provided you were not one of those duped into backing it. Then it was more a reason for anger and disappointment.

    Most actually never delivered. Which reminds me, wasn't Fontus due to deliver right now in April? Any backers here, did they actually deliver? Because, let's put it careful, I'd really, really love to see that!

    So don't get me wrong when I don't hold my breath. I have been promised easy water from thin air before. And what has been delivered so far, if anything, was ridiculous. Either it didn't work, didn't scale past proof-of-concept scale or only worked if the humidity was high enough that rain was more the rule than the exception, rendering a system that extracts water from the air redundant: A bucket would do.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The crowdfunded examples all had glaring issues that they needed to break the laws of physics to work as stated, had no working prototype, and made excessive claims

      This has the advantage of not breaking any laws of physics, having a working prototype, and making claims that are reasonable

      3 liters of water in 12 hours is not excessive for either humid air or a lot of energy, all they have done is use a new (but already tried method) of doing this, the airflow is low, and the energy usage looks reasonable

      It is likely to be bulky and expensive, but so are all prototypes ...

    2. Re: Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      A liter a day is your "invisible" water loss, due to respiration and perspiration. If it's not too hot and you're sweating like a pig.

      Urine accounts for 1.5 - 2.5 liters a day, depending on circumstances. If you're dehydrated and your body notices it should be conserving fluids, you're closer to 1.5, but that's not good for your kidneys if carried on for too long.

      So we're closer to 2-3 liters a day that you need to survive. And your didn't brush your teeth, wash yourself or cook food yet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Seeing is believing by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      IT can, and quite easily. 1000 watts of solar is not that hard to achieve

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Seeing is believing by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Not really a window airconditioner running on a 15 amp(generally 12 amp) and 120 volts has a max 1200watt draw.

      1000w of solar panels is roughly the same size as a typical mid sized window in a home. so 1x2 meters or 3x 6 foot.

      5000w can power something like 60-90% of a given home depending on if it is gas or electric heat gas or electric hot water and size of air conditioner. That is why solar panels are popping up around the world on houses. for $20-$30k you can get basically free electricity. at $100 a month ($1200 a year that pays for itself in the life of the panels) faster if your government gives rebates and subsidies.

      Bonus the more places that have solar grid tie ins the more stable to overall grid will be.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Seeing is believing by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If solar panel lifetime is shorter than 15-20 years like you say, why do solar manufacturers offer warrantees for 25 years or more? For example, here is LG's warranty page for their solar panels, they guarantee that their panels will produce at least 80.2% of their rated output at the end of the 25th year. Panel lifetimes are certainly better than the "few years" that you claim.

      --

      Enigma

    6. Re:Seeing is believing by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Im averaging 14kw per day from a 2kw system with micro inverters. Thats averaging around 1kw. Your system must suck bad.

  4. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes no, it is bad if you dont have a source of salts.

    Thats why the sami here drinks coffe with salt in it. When they are going in the moantins and only get water from snow you ad salt the same applies here

  5. Yes billions by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who on earth is so stupid to believe that "a billion" people live in "deserts"?

    How about the United Nations? Strictly speaking it isn't all desert but apparently well north of a billion people live in water stressed parts of the world or areas threatened by desertification.

    Nevertheless a device like this might be useful in all warm/humid areas.

    Maybe. The real question is how much does it cost per unit of water generated. To be useful it would have to generate a rather sizeable amount of water even to just cover drinking and basic cleaning needs.

    1. Re:Yes billions by houghi · · Score: 2

      Another question is how it will effect the enviroment. These places are, as you say, already threatened by desertification. Removing humidity from the air might even enhance that. The little bit of dez that is just enough to keep a few plants alive might be gone.

      Also it will let move more people to thse areas and this increase the impact.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Yes billions by njvack · · Score: 2

      Maybe. The real question is how much does it cost per unit of water generated. To be useful it would have to generate a rather sizeable amount of water even to just cover drinking and basic cleaning needs.

      Well, here's the instructions to synthesize MOF-801-P and it doesn't look super complicated. The solar input is used both for heat (to desorb the water in the MOF) and electricity (to condense the vapor), so it probably doesn't need to be a super-high-efficiency panel. The MOF contains zirconium, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, so it's not like we're dealing with platinum or rare earth elements... so, I dunno. I suspect the system wouldn't be outrageously expensive when produced at volume.

  6. Cost per unit of water? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    What is the cost per unit of water generated? It doesn't matter if it works if it is prohibitively expensive per unit of water generated. If the economics of it don't make sense it will never be used at scale.

  7. Solar Powered Refrigerator by randomErr · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, they hooked a solar cell to a thermoelectric cooling cell. Its the same tech as those USB refrigerators. You can build a basic a basic unit for $30-40.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are doing some sort of magic with exotic materials that concentrate water vapor in the air prior to the condensation.

  8. Vapor-ware by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that really is VAPOR ware. ;)

  9. Re: A few questions by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    It's a prototype and TFA says it only has 1kg of material so it would be fairly small. This thing is producing a lot of water for 1kg.

  10. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you give a man a fish- he can eat for a day. If you teach a man to fish, better hope he doesn't live in the desert.

    I don't know where you're getting the cost of $1000 solar panel. For one appliance it's not going to cost that much. It's probably not going to cost anything in the same range as that. Even if it did. Yes, $1000 can buy a lot of water if you live near a water source. If you have to keep shipping water hundreds of miles then the costs are going to go up.

    Wouldn't it be better to ship one time to a location rather than having to ship continuously for years? Also, if you have your own means of getting water you don't have to worry about- what if guerrillas take out the delivery man and steal my water? What if the shipment never arrives? You're more independent. In the end, we all want our fate and future as much in our own hands as possible.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  11. Human water needs by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

    You will respirate and pee away well more than 1 liter per day under normal circumstances even if you aren't in a desert and are doing nothing active. Water requirements can easily exceed that substantially if you are sweating significantly or if it is very hot.

  12. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    you don't have to worry about- what if guerrillas take out the delivery man and steal my water?

    No, you have to worry about "what if the guerrillas take my water-making gadget?"

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  13. Re:A few questions by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > I assume the water it produces is akin to distilled water. Isn't that bad to drink?

    Yes. A lot of the human digestive tract works by osmosis. Putting distilled water through it means it's going to reverse, and rather than your body absorbing a lot of important things, it's going to be dumping them - presumably into your stool.

    I don't imagine hardening water to healthy levels will be all that difficult... the question is, can you make it inexpensive, robust, and foolproof enough for the type of applications this device (if it works and is practical) would see.

    Continual consumption of distilled water is bad for your heart, nervous system, and immune system - but it takes fair while, and there are other ways to get minerals and other things you might normally get from water... mainly *eating* them. Still, it would be an additional concern that you otherwise wouldn't even have to think about.

  14. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the first Google search result: "The relative humidity in the Sahara Desert is 25%"

    Along with this result: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-vapor-air-d_854.html - suggests that there is actually MORE TOTAL WATER in the air over the Sahara Desert than there is in the air in most of the continental US at any time of the year.

  15. Re:A few questions by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

    I remember reading about how the Sauds and other countries in that region take relatively deionized water that was distilled or from their desalination plants, and add the needed trace amounts of minerals fo it, so it would be suitable and healthy for drinking.

    If distilled water becomes common, I can see a company like Nuun making fizzy tablets which dissolve in water to give the needed minerals, and perhaps some useful vitamins as well.

  16. Re:300L is total western water usage by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    average water usage in the usa is 525L
    Water usage for several european countries and mexico are over 300L per day by the same measure.

    This sounds crazy high since my water usage is under 1000G per month or under 126 liters per day. I don't know how much under because that's the minimum bill.

    http://www.data360.org/dsg.asp...

    A huge factor would be more lawns in the U.S. since we still have low population density. If our population was as dense as europe, then our water usage per citizen would be way lower because more people would not have lawns.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  17. Thunderf00t does the math on this by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 3, Informative
  18. Re: A few questions by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

    I am more worried about the idea that "billions of people" are living in uninhabitable areas!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII