Slashdot Mirror


Bose Headphones Secretly Collected User Data, Lawsuit Reveals (fortune.com)

The audio maker Bose, whose wireless headphones sell for up to $350, uses an app to collect the listening habits of its customers and provide that information to third parties -- all without the knowledge and permission of the users, according to a lawsuit filed in Chicago. From a report: The complaint accuses Boston-based Bose of violating the WireTap Act and a variety of state privacy laws, adding that a person's audio history can include a window into a person's life and views. "Indeed, one's personal audio selections -- including music, radio broadcast, Podcast, and lecture choices -- provide an incredible amount of insight into his or her personality, behavior, political views, and personal identity," says the complaint, noting a person's audio history may contain files like LGBT podcasts or Muslim call-to-prayer recordings.

5 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. You get what you pay for... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would anyone spend $350 on a pair of headphones? I typically spend $10 to $20 for headphones.

  2. Bad, but not as horrible as one would think. by Old97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the article it says you can use the headphones without the app. Bose "encourages" customers to download and use the app with the headphones. That should give it away. Why do you think they want you to use their app? You can adjust the app settings - presumably what it can and cannot do. It seems what Bose did wrong was not be clear up front as to what the default result of using the app would be. That's not quite as bad as your smart TV spying on you if you connect it to your internet connected LAN.

    I'm going to recheck my microwave now. I wonder if I should down this GE microwave app.

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
  3. Re:Your headphones are spying on you. by Mycroft-X · · Score: 3, Interesting

    noting a person's audio history may contain files like LGBT podcasts or Muslim call-to-prayer recordings.

    Why do people who, if you asked them, would say that things like the above shouldn't be stigmatized, then go out of their way to stigmatize them with an implication that content in those categories should be subject to some sort of special expectation of privacy?

  4. Re:Your headphones are spying on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh, I don't know, perhaps because dickheads persecute them for it?

  5. BOSE = terribly privacy policy by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My wife bought a Wave IV Soundtouch with a 30-day return policy - the only good policy they have and the one we exercised.

    Want to set the thing up and use the features you paid for like Internet radio? You have to use the app. The first thing the app requires to even start setup is access to your location. WTF? Then there is their so-called "privacy" policy (which is currently so private that they have broken links on their site so you can't even find it now) that allows them to track your listening (which could even include AM, FM, CD, etc), combine it with other info and sell or use it for marketing purposes.

    In the words of my sound engineer friend: BOSE stands for Bring Other Sound Equipment.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis