Slashdot Mirror


Uber Tried To Hide Its Secret IPhone Fingerprinting From Apple (cnbc.com)

theodp quotes today's New York Times profile of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick: For months, Mr. Kalanick had pulled a fast one on Apple by directing his employees to help camouflage the ride-hailing app from Apple's engineers. The reason? So Apple would not find out that Uber had secretly been tracking iPhones even after its app had been deleted from the devices, violating Apple's privacy guidelines.
Uber told TechCrunch this afternoon that it still uses a form of this device fingerprinting, saying they need a way to identify those devices which committed fraud in the past -- especially in China, where Uber drivers used stolen iPhones to request dozens of rides from themselves to increase their pay rate. It's been modified to comply with Apple's rules, and "We absolutely do not track individual users or their location if they've deleted the app..." an Uber spokesperson said. "Being able to recognize known bad actors when they try to get back onto our network is an important security measure for both Uber and our users."

The article offers a longer biography of Kalanick, who dropped out of UCLA in 1998 to start a peer-to-peer music-sharing service named Scour. (The service eventually declared bankruptcy after being sued for $250 billion for alleged copyright infringement.) Desperately trying to save his next company, Kalanick "took the tax dollars from employee paychecks -- which are supposed to be withheld and sent to the Internal Revenue Service," according to the Times, "and reinvested the money into the start-up, even as friends and advisers warned him the action was potentially illegal." The money eventually reached the IRS as he "staved off bankruptcy for a second time by raising another round of funding." But the article ultimately argues that Kalanick's drive to win in life "has led to a pattern of risk-taking that has put his ride-hailing company on the brink of implosion."

115 comments

  1. This article would have been nice two days ago by HBI · · Score: 1

    I was checking price on an Uber and installed the app for the first time. I ended up using a regular car service because the price differential wasn't enough to overcome the "who knows who is coming to pick me up" issue. So now my phone is fingerprinted, great.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't already assume your smartphone is being fingerprinted and tracked?! That's the first thing anyone using such a device should assume.

    2. Re:This article would have been nice two days ago by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Worried about what they are seeing you do, then let them see a whole bunch of stuff you do not do, why try to steam the flow of your privacy when you can deluge them with a flood http://www.cs.nyu.edu/trackmen... and https://adnauseam.io/. I am also thinking email games might be interesting to floor every possible channel with useless information, even all the spy vs spy stuff. Say an email game where one side plots to assassinate the president of Ameriganislav and the other plays as agents, trading emails with plots and encryption for the other side break, when side plotting the assasination and the other side trying to foil the plot a game to punish the professionally paranoid illegally spying on everyone with a flood of suggestive data to poison spy data bases, the game run from a web site.

      So as many way as possible to generate false data at many, many mutliples of real data generated. A personal profile made totally meaningness and as a bonus the more you generate the more they must spend to store it. Double their data storage bill, triple it, how about increasing storage requirements hundreds of times over. Think of all the time, you are not on there internet but your computer could be, generating volumes of false empty data, hundreds of thousands of web visits you never went to, hundred of thousands of searches you never did, emails you never sent, your computer and software flooding marketers with empty data they have to pay to store.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Settings --> Privacy --> Location Services --> System Services --> Status Bar Icon. It may work or it may not, but you could also turn off location services. If you're jailbroken, you could also run a tcpdump on your phone when not using the Internet to see if it communicates with Uber ("Whois" the IP address). You'll probably just find a bunch of Facebook stuff going on that should concern you more. There may be a way to grep for Uber's "fingerprinting," but I don't know nor am I ever downloading it to find out.

    4. Re:This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me, I just installed Uber for the first time a few days myself.

      I know they're evil, but fuck, so's a forty five minute trip between the city and the airport. Thanks, Denver.

    5. Re:This article would have been nice two days ago by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's too bad, there is a first-time Uber promo code that is worth about $20 that you can google for, but the app won't accept it now that you've already registered. They probably remember a hashed version of your phone number, credit card number, and the id of your phone.

      There is probably still the $50 promo code from Lyft, but unlike Uber's promo code, the Lyft promo code can only be used $5 at a time (in other words, you have to use it 10 times if you want to use it all). The Uber code, on the other hand, could have been used all at once, or until the money ran out.

    6. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put the phone under a car tire. problem solved.

    7. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      45 minutes from the airport will take you all the way through, and well beyond, the actual city of Denver.

    8. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that uninstalling the app removes said options that you specified.

      They're using a different way of figuring things out.

    9. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no. Maybe while everyone is sleeping, but good luck with that 2-3 hours before and after rush hour.

    10. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      put the phone under a car tire. problem solved.

      Just book a 12 inch journey on Uber

    11. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's the first thing anyone using such a device should assume.

      Most Americans fail this 'should' test. Methinks you might want your 'rule' to have a larger pool of evidence.

    12. Re:This article would have been nice two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a cab driver? Uber/Lyft tend to be vastly cheaper and vastly easier to procure a ride then a call on the phone taxi. When you call for a taxi, do you ask for bob? otherwise its the same who knows who is coming.

    13. Re: This article would have been nice two days ago by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      assume your smartphone is being fingerprinted and tracked

      It's totally wrong. I do not think Uber should be allowed a free pass just because you say we should assume everybody else it doing it. Anybody who does this is wrong. It's wrong and Uber is wrong.

      Uber stepped in it and you want me to think: "oh well. that's the way life is".

      Uber is trying to enter my city. If they do, I will not use their service because their app is intentionally broken. I will advise people I know not to use Uber until they answer to how they will fix this and remove all the silent tracking of their customers. Uber app is just creepy.

  2. CEO needs to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Uber CEO needs to go. He's what's keeping Uber from being great.

    1. Re:CEO needs to go by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, Larry Ellison is a bastard. So was Steve Jobs. Being a bastard surely doesn't make you successful, but it probably helps some times. I'm guessing the trick is knowing when not to be yourself.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:CEO needs to go by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Uber's CEO was replaced a couple of weeks ago. This is old news.

      This particular incident was actually in 2015.

    3. Re:CEO needs to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uber's CEO was replaced a couple of weeks ago.

      Kalanick named himself as his replacement. You had to read the stories really carefully.

    4. Re:CEO needs to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uber's CEO was replaced a couple of weeks ago. This is old news.

      This particular incident was actually in 2015.

      Uber has NOT replaced their CEO. This is patently false.

    5. Re:CEO needs to go by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Uber CEO needs to go. He's what's keeping Uber from being great.

      From what I hear about Uber, it seems they in so many ways act and think like criminals, but manage to keep just on the legal side of the law. Mostly. That said, though, they are just an extreme example of all the worst aspects of capitalism: the underhandedness, the ethos that says 'if we can get away with it, it must be OK', the lack of genuine care and consideration for their employees, customers and society, the sense of entitlement take what they want no matter what.

      It is really sad, I think - there is a good kind of capitalism, where a clever, hardworking man or woman can grow a business from little more than their own abilities and determination, but the whole concept gets a grubby taint from the likes of Uber.

    6. Re:CEO needs to go by Bongo · · Score: 1

      The Uber CEO needs to go. He's what's keeping Uber from being great.

      From what I hear about Uber, it seems they in so many ways act and think like criminals, but manage to keep just on the legal side of the law. Mostly. That said, though, they are just an extreme example of all the worst aspects of capitalism: the underhandedness, the ethos that says 'if we can get away with it, it must be OK', the lack of genuine care and consideration for their employees, customers and society, the sense of entitlement take what they want no matter what.

      It is really sad, I think - there is a good kind of capitalism, where a clever, hardworking man or woman can grow a business from little more than their own abilities and determination, but the whole concept gets a grubby taint from the likes of Uber.

      Well said.

      And in future people may more often look to work for their sense of purpose in life, the place where they can build their character and compassion along with building their career. So "play fair" will be all the more important.

  3. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "has led to a pattern of risk-taking that has put his taxi company on the brink of implosion."

    There. FTFY.

    1. Re:FTFY by KiloByte · · Score: 1, Insightful

      taxi company

      There. FTFY.

      Nope. Uber is very scummy, but still worlds above any taxi company. Those bastards need to die.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:FTFY by Uberbah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, the horrors of having professional drivers who make a living wage, don't have to pay for maintenance on the cars they drive, and who carry hundreds of thousands in passenger insurance as opposed to the $25,000 you can count on from your Uber driver's All State policy. Horrors, I tell you!

    3. Re:FTFY by gsslay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being, in your estimation, above other taxi companies does not change the fact that Uber is still a taxi company. Uber have obvious interests in claiming they are not a taxi company. But if you provide a service like a taxi company, in vehicles like a taxi company, with drivers like a taxi company, charging a fare like a taxi company, then there's no denying you are a taxi company. The addition of an app doesn't change that.

    4. Re:FTFY by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      What $25k All State policy? You mean the one that doesn't cover commercial activities and so wont pay out?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    5. Re:FTFY by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      No traditional taxi I've ever been in had a driver to whom the term "professional" could even loosely apply. They've tried to physically steal my credit card, thrown a fit when I don't pay cash, are often unlicensed, and drive recklessly like they picked the wrong week to start amphetamines. At an airport one is compelled to take the first in line, whether they are legitimate or not. On the street, they routinely ignore hails. My Uber/Lyft experiences have varied, but none have even come close to the nasty shit from taxi drivers.

    6. Re:FTFY by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You could have said "I have anecdotes and suffer from confirmation bias" and made the same point with fewer words. Efficiency man, efficiency...

  4. Uber tries to hide just about everything by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    there must be a Clinton angle somewhere

    1. Re:Uber tries to hide just about everything by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      . . . they are certainly doing extremely well at hiding their profit.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Uber tries to hide just about everything by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Troll

      Really? I was going to say that hearing Uber is doing something unethical is like hearing that Trump is doing something that contracts a promise he previously made -- not newsworthy anymore.

    3. Re:Uber tries to hide just about everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is like hearing that Trump is doing something that contracts a promise he previously made -- not newsworthy anymore.

      That's how Trump will win. He'll just wear down the rational people.

    4. Re:Uber tries to hide just about everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump already won. Try running a non-Clinton next time.

    5. Re:Uber tries to hide just about everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We tried, Clinton took the primary from him via underhanded means.

      Trust us, we don't like the clintons either.

  5. That's why I keep getting refused service I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a used iPhone :/ Guess it was owned by a "bad actor"

  6. They simply remember your UDID by ugen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The *tracking* is based on Uber saving device UDID, so that they know who you are even if you later reinstall the app and use a different account. While Uber is evil in many ways, this UDID "tracking" is not what the article makes it appear - Uber certainly cannot "track" anyone in any way once their app has been removed.
    In fact, I am not sure why go to such great lengths to obtain UDID when device MAC address is readily available (and must be for variety of software to work) and globally unique.
    This also smacks of those scaremongering sites that start with a banner like "Your computer is broadcasting a unique IP address" and lead to hard sell of overpriced VPN service or bs apps to "hide your IP".

    1. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And if you install the app on a used/resold device?

    2. Re:They simply remember your UDID by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

      Does iOS make the actual MAC address readily available to the application layer?

      Knowing Apple I would have thought the MAC address would be abstracted, with iOS providing apps access to the TCP/IP stack a lot closer to the top. I haven't programmed an iOS app though so I wouldn't know for sure.

      --
      Sigger than your average
    3. Re: They simply remember your UDID by Fusen · · Score: 1

      Yeah the NY times article was scaremongering and partially wrong but the 'bad' thing Uber did here was break the Apple TOS which say developers should not be fingerprinting users devices.

      You're supposed to be able to install an app, uninstall it and then the next time you install the same app the company has no idea it is a second installation.

      Apple have tried to give each app a new unique udid, unlike the old days of iOS where everyone read the same UDID

    4. Re: They simply remember your UDID by sphealey · · Score: 4, Funny

      = = = eah the NY times article was scaremongering and partially wrong but the 'bad' thing Uber did here was break the Apple TOS which say developers should not be fingerprinting users devices.= = =

      Who would have ever thought that a company founded on the principle [sic] of breaking the law in multiple jurisdictions would ignore and circumvent the terms and conditions, to which they agreed, of an entity with which they do business. Whodathunkait.

    5. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      I'm sure they do - this minute's MAC anyways. IIRC, they started randomizing MACs in iOS 9 to prevent wifi spots from tracking you as you moved about town.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re: They simply remember your UDID by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Per the randomizing MAC comment, I was under the impression you could no longer access the real UDID from an app since iOS 9

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:They simply remember your UDID by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

      OK, the randomised MAC is what's presented to a wifi hotspot: a layer 2 device which definitely won't work without a MAC address to send traffic to.

      Assuming the randomised MAC is also being sent to layer 7 / the application layer of actual apps on your phone, it's not the hardware MAC address of the phone and isn't traceable is it?

      --
      Sigger than your average
    8. Re: They simply remember your UDID by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >Who would have ever thought that a company founded on the principle [sic] of breaking the law in multiple jurisdictions would ignore and circumvent the terms and conditions, to which they agreed, of an entity with which they do business. Whodathunkait.

      They're adding functionality that Apple refuses to do. If you cheat in a Steam game, your device and account gets banned. On iOS, apparently, you just uninstall and reinstall and then you can fraudlently order cars all over again.

      Might violate the Apple TOS, but they're in the ethical right on this one.

    9. Re:They simply remember your UDID by santiago · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, I am not sure why go to such great lengths to obtain UDID when device MAC address is readily available (and must be for variety of software to work) and globally unique.

      MAC Address is no longer available since iOS 7. You can request it, but you'll get the same fake value of 02:00:00:00:00:00 on every iPhone. UDID is not available, either.

      There's IDFV, the Identifier For Vendors, which is different for each vendor on the phone, and gets reset if you remove all the apps from that vendor on the phone. (That is, two apps from Google will see the same IDFV, but a different one from the one Facebook sees.)

      Then there's IDFA, the Identifier for Advertisers, which the user can reset at any time via system settings, and which Apple will reject your app for if they catch you using it for anything other than ad-tracking.

      The end result is that there is no longer any stable cross-app identifier that survives app uninstalls and user attempts to avoid tracking, by explicit design.

    10. Re:They simply remember your UDID by ugen · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. It's a basic Unix API, and it must be present because plenty of things need it to work.

    11. Re: They simply remember your UDID by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're adding functionality that Apple refuses to do.

      Apple refuses to do it for a valid reason, and I see Apple as the ethical winners here. If Uber is experiencing a high rate of fraud, that's a business process problem that needs to be addressed within Uber's own internal systems. Considering Uber can afford a "competitive intelligence" team that buys and crunches data about Lyft, and they can afford to develop "Greyball" deception tools to evade law enforcement, they should also be able to afford a couple of employees to build some better fraud detection into their signup process. A little less offense and a little more defense might be a rewarding strategy.

      Thousands of other companies conduct business via iOS apps without resorting to breaking the rules. Uber is showing once again that they don't give a fuck about the rules, and that puts them squarely outside of the "ethical right."

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    12. Re:They simply remember your UDID by ugen · · Score: 1

      They randomize only the MAC address that is used on beacon frames. Once connection is established, the MAC address is the actual permanent address of the device. Users would not be able to use most WiFi hotspots that authenticate them based on the device MAC, if it changed every time.

    13. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you are talking about.
      Basic Unix API. LOL.

    14. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Very informative.

      As anyone can see, Apple products are clearly superior to Google spyware Android OS.

    15. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he knows how to write a GUI interface using visual basic to track the killers IP address.

    16. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Obama.

    17. Re: They simply remember your UDID by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      They're adding functionality that Apple refuses to do. If you cheat in a Steam game, your device and account gets banned. On iOS, apparently, you just uninstall and reinstall and then you can fraudlently order cars all over again.

      Actually Apple had that ability. The removed it in iOS7 because developers were abusing it for... tracking purposes. They were sending the device unique IDs to advertisers and giving advertisers a per-device view into everything - location information (if allowed), system information, etc.

      Apple removed the ability to get that information because it was abused - they now present different forms of unique IDs to apps for various purposes. They have an advertising ID, resettable on user's command and a few others. It is no longer possible to track an individual device because users privacy was being compromised.

      So it's not likely it's coming back - developers have shown they cannot be trusted with it.

      And if Steam can ban an email and user from their network, so can Uber. Of course, I'm presuming you need an Uber account in order to hail a taxi from them, because they need to charge your credit card for the trip, then there are plenty of ways to track that. Unless a freshly installed Uber only needs a credit card, but I'm sure Uber can track those as well.

      And if Uber is using iTunes account balances, then they easy way is to just stop doing that.

    18. Re:They simply remember your UDID by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      And for many years now, long before 2005, Apple removed the ability to request the UDID of a phone, and didn't allow anyone on the app store who would try to identify your iPhone. So very clearly against the app store rules. And they knew that, so this wouldn't happen if the app was run near Cupertino, where presumably the testers were located who checked for this.

      There is a new thing - a device specific identifier for a vendor. That is a unique code identifying your phone _to one application_. And this identifier is destroyed when you delete the application. So various vendors cannot identify whether you used two or three of their applications, because the vender identifiers are different, and they can't keep track of anything when you delete the app.

    19. Re:They simply remember your UDID by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Then there's IDFA, the Identifier for Advertisers, which the user can reset at any time via system settings, and which Apple will reject your app for if they catch you using it for anything other than ad-tracking.

      And every time I submit an app, they threaten me personally with all kinds of nastiness if the app does anything with the IDFA that it shouldn't. I'd say they take this seriously. And I'd say that if I worked for Uber (which I probably wouldn't), I would _not_ be the one submitting apps.

    20. Re: They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple refuses to do it so there is a market for stolen iPhones. Apple makes a significant fraction of their hardware profit on replacing stolen phones. They, of all companies, have e ability to brick stolen phones, but absolutely no desire, whatsoever, to do so.

    21. Re: They simply remember your UDID by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      I don't get it! Why should they? Isn't it up to the owner of the phone to protect their property, not the property's manufacturer?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    22. Re:They simply remember your UDID by ugen · · Score: 1

      This is not correct - getifaddrs() is available and works. As a case in point, an app I am familiar with that is still used on current versions of iOS (though no longer in appstore) is able to get MAC address on current devices.

    23. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 2

      Some posts really make me wish Slashdot had a "-1 factually incorrect" moderation. As a professional developer in iOS I can tell you that Uber's app is most definitely not saving the device UDID. For years, app developers were using the system-provided Unique Device Identifier (UDID) to track individual users, even though the identifier is really supposed to permanently relate to the device and isn't a good way to track a user who may sell or give away that device. Since iOS 6, Apple starting removing any software access to unique hardware identifiers such as UDID and MAC address by apps published on the App Store. Higher level APIs that would return said identifiers either provide randomized data that is specific to each app sandbox or are explicitly forbidden from use. Lower level APIs, such as network driver stuff will return 00:00:00:00:00:00 for MAC address and the like.

      Occasionally, an app developer has found a new way to identify specific hardware models and Apple patches it. While Uber may have figured out another identifier or pattern of identifiers that happens to remain unique to a piece of hardware over its lifetime, I promise you they are not simply "saving device UDID."

    24. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 2

      The "basic UNIX API" in iOS returns 00:00:00:00:00:00 for non-system apps. iOS has a kernel-level sandbox that lets them do cool things like prevent lowly app developers from circumventing user data protection policies.

    25. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      All bets are off if it's not on the App Store anymore. I've seen getifaddrs() return data structures with blanked out MAC addresses on iOS devices. The sandbox enforced at the kernel level probably hooks the system calls that are being used for any network interface data. Way easier than making patches for each type of network stack API in iOS.

    26. Re:They simply remember your UDID by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      I suspect you don't mean 2005. The first iPhone was released in 2007.

    27. Re:They simply remember your UDID by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why go to such great lengths to obtain UDID when device MAC address is readily available (and must be for variety of software to work) and globally unique.

      MAC address are easy to change, and don't actually have to be globally unique. That may be why they don't want to use them -- too easy to to bypass that sort of check.

      MAC addresses only have to be unique at layer 2 of the OSI model (essentially, this means they only have to be unique on your local ethernet or wifi network). You and I can have the exact same MAC on our devices without causing any problem at all as long as we don't both directly connect to the same LAN at the same time.

    28. Re:They simply remember your UDID by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      Does iOS make the actual MAC address readily available to the application layer?

      You can read it here on the "Deprecated APIs" section.

      In iOS 7 and later, if you ask for the MAC address of an iOS device, the system returns the value 02:00:00:00:00:00. If you need to identify the device, use the identifierForVendor property of UIDevice instead. (Apps that need an identifier for their own advertising purposes should consider using the advertisingIdentifier property of ASIdentifierManager instead.)

    29. Re: They simply remember your UDID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple refuses to do it so there is a market for stolen iPhones. Apple makes a significant fraction of their hardware profit on replacing stolen phones. They, of all companies, have e ability to brick stolen phones, but absolutely no desire, whatsoever, to do so.

      Bullshit. You don't need an app-level GUID to do that. You can use both the built-in theft protection of iOS as well as block the SIM card and/or the IMEI of the phone.

    30. Re:They simply remember your UDID by CatchyNickname · · Score: 1

      No points to upmod, but thanks for that bit of info. That makes much more sense to me. The first that that occurred to me was the small chance that MACs would conflict, although I guess there could be ways to avoid that in theory.

  7. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Good observation... but why do you post as anonymous coward, you coward. Please tell us where you live so we could come emasculate you, stick your dick in your throat, cut you open, pull your guts out and fry it in a pen.

  8. I still LOVE Uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Example news stories about Uber in the past year:

    * Some workplace culture problems within Uber (sexual harassment).
    * Uber took measures to detect if some ride requests were actually from government employees attempting to entrap drivers who are not allowed to drive in a particular area.
    * Uber CEO takes Uber ride and berates driver who criticized payment terms.
    * Uber acquired real-time map of drivers for a competing service by tricky data mining.

    And, now this latest story about a mechanism to fingerprint iPhones to detect fraud.

    I have taken Uber dozens of times, and I LOVE all aspects of the service!

    I'm glad that the vigilance of the media compels Uber to work harder to be a scrupulous and ethical company, but the series of critical stories seems a bit like a negative campaign or mob mentality dog-piling, without noting how Uber continues to improve the lives of millions (by increasing the efficiency of people traveling between places, and improving rider experience (with driver ratings, and full routes and driver info indicated in receipts, and tracking drivers for accurate pick-up estimation), reducing drunk-driving rates because of truly convenient service).

    I feel like the overwhelmingly positive aspects of Uber are not often part of the commentary, and so these revelations often seems to be considered without a reasonable sense of overall perspective.

    1. Re:I still LOVE Uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of this stuff is pushed by Lyft, which has a large PR machine behind it sponsored by GM.

    2. Re:I still LOVE Uber by sphealey · · Score: 1

      If Uber breaks the law, and only Lyft hears it, has it made a sound?

    3. Re:I still LOVE Uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for taking the time to post, Travis. But shouldn't you be trying to figure out how to get your company to turn a profit?

    4. Re:I still LOVE Uber by quantaman · · Score: 2

      I'm glad that the vigilance of the media compels Uber to work harder to be a scrupulous and ethical company, but the series of critical stories seems a bit like a negative campaign or mob mentality dog-piling, without noting how Uber continues to improve the lives of millions (by increasing the efficiency of people traveling between places, and improving rider experience (with driver ratings, and full routes and driver info indicated in receipts, and tracking drivers for accurate pick-up estimation), reducing drunk-driving rates because of truly convenient service).

      I feel like the overwhelmingly positive aspects of Uber are not often part of the commentary, and so these revelations often seems to be considered without a reasonable sense of overall perspective.

      I'm sure there's some level of astroturfing going on, after all Uber does have enemies, but I think there's also a lot of fire to go with this smoke.

      The thing to realize with Uber is that their business is built on breaking the law, specifically Taxi regulations. Now you can make defences for their strategy and the unethical nature of taxi regs, but when your business is built around breaking rules it gets baked into your company's DNA.

      Uber is going to keep committing ethical missteps because it's a company that's learned that breaking rules is fine as long as the reward exceeds the penalty.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:I still LOVE Uber by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      breaking rules is fine as long as the reward exceeds the penalty.

      The word you're looking for is 'capitalism'.

    6. Re:I still LOVE Uber by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      breaking rules is fine as long as the reward exceeds the penalty.

      The word you're looking for is 'capitalism'.

      I guess so, though I think the real issue is that business people basically think of these laws the same way a hockey player thinks about the rules of hockey. Sure, you're not supposed to hook another player, but you're going to end up hooking sometimes because that's how the game goes, and sometimes even if you're caught the reward is big enough that it's considered a "good penalty". In this context people like Kalanick are basically hockey pests, people who succeed by their ability to skirt as close to the edge of the rules as possible.

      Or perhaps they think about things like fraud, false advertising, and ripping off employees the way we think of traffic violations. You're not supposed to speed, but everyone does it to some extent.

      I'm not sure what has to be done to make politicians and companies take law-breaking companies seriously, but it doesn't seem to be happening.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:I still LOVE Uber by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that the vigilance of the media compels Uber to work harder to be a scrupulous and ethical company

      Uber has exactly the same interest in being a scrupulous and ethical company as it has always had: zero. The only ethical way to deal with a company like Uber is to refuse to do business with them.

  9. Re: Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's where they pick up capital letters. You know, because they aren't red neck pieces of shit who cannot understand how fucking English is written after at least two decades of daily exposure.

    It's not just rednecks who can't speak or write English well. Plenty of supposedly educated people can't write English
    well. I see it every day on Slashdot, and in many other places which supposedly are frequented by "intelligent"
    people.

    Aside from that, there's plenty you don't know. Rednecks are not all stupid whether they can use English properly or not. Spend some time around them and you will realize this is true. If civilization collapses many ( most ) rednecks will know how to hunt for food and thus be able to feed themselves. Whereas a punk like you will be starving or begging those rednecks to share some of their food.

    Some day ( if you ever grow up ) you may come to discover that everyone knows something you don't know, and that your
    knowledge set doesn't make you superior in all frames of reference.

    Oh, and you calling white people rednecks is fundamentally no different than someone else calling a black person a n___r.
    The only difference is that you mistakenly believe you hold a morally superior position, in the manner of so many social justice
    warrior idiots who could not think in an independent critical manner if their lives depended on it.

  10. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by hey! · · Score: 1

    what is it with black people and the bus stop?

    It's a convenient way to avoid people like you.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  11. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If you want to spew hate, then be man enough to put your name behind it.

  12. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good observation... but why do you post as anonymous coward, you coward. Please tell us where you live so we could come emasculate you, stick your dick in your throat, cut you open, pull your guts out and fry it in a pen.

    You should be more careful who you threaten.

  13. Re: Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hear hear! I could not have said it better myself. Let's grab a drink sometime when you're in Seattle -- I'm surrounded by haughty SJW zombies just like that idiot "kid".

  14. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by sphealey · · Score: 1

    Donald Trump? Is that you?

  15. Who is surprised by this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A taxi company, whose business model is entirely based on breaking laws, violate the rules of another company. Is anyone surprised?

    Next up: Drug traffickers speed and run red lights.

    1. Re:Who is surprised by this? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I get that it happens often enough. However, generally speaking, isn't that a terrible idea? Last thing they would want is to draw attention.

    2. Re:Who is surprised by this? by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Next up: Drug traffickers speed and run red lights.

      Only if they are stupid or want to get caught.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  16. The Uber shills are much quieter these days! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  17. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If you want to virtue signal furiously, then be man enough to put your name behind it, you pathetic cuck.

  18. Re: Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    SJW. .. for the longest time i thought this was Single Jewish Woman , like in the personals at the back of NYRB.
    Now I find it's Social Justice Warrior, derogative ironically?

  19. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Fuck you RWNJ. Racist cunts are fucking dumfucks, every time I see the rantings of the racist, I read it as They have a very small dick and are desperatly overcompensatiing.
    Poor widdle micro dick snowflake, awwwww.

  20. Re: Still better than taking the bus! by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Anybody who played Wolfenstein 3D and Doom knows that BFG stands for 'big fucking gun.' Amazing that Disney made a whole movie about those guns, and for a childrens audience, too!

  21. Couldn't Apple remove the Uber App as a response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying. It sends a huge message that it values user privacy.

  22. Re:Couldn't Apple remove the Uber App as a respons by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

    This is what should have happened when cook met with him. Cook should have said, you broke the rules, the app is no longer on iphone. The problem with the uber guy is his go to method is break the law. Be it taxi regs, IRS regs... Lately he has enhanced his methods to actively avoid detection. In apple's case, he used geofencing so apple corp did not see the code, which sounds a little like the VW thing on emissions testing. Uber also was detecting when law enforcement was requesting rides, don't remember why. It makes one wonder, what other laws is uber successfully evading?

  23. example by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Uber is actually a good example of what's going wrong with the world: They are openly criminal and it works. It's Al Capone all over again. Everyone knows what they are doing, but they're too slippery to be nailed.

    Same with the tax evasion of multinational cooperation, wars based on invented bullshit, election frauds done almost openly (like in Turkey), and so on.

    Minority Report may have been on to something: The legal system working after the fact, and with a delay often measured in years, does not deter criminals. If you can take over a country, or become a billionaire, the threat that ten years from now they might file charges which your $1000/h lawyers will then simply drag through the courts for twenty years - well, that is not a very threatening thing especially for people trained to think primarily about next quarter.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to go to prison when you dream about strangling a coworker? :P

    2. Re:example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want apple charged too?

    3. Re:example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So you want to go to prison when you dream about strangling a coworker? :P

      I want people who dreamt about that and didn't go to get psychiatric treatment to be imprisoned and treated in prison hospital.

    4. Re:example by Tom · · Score: 1

      Which part of "charging them in a legal system that operates on the timescale of years when their personal success depends on quarterly results" wasn't clear ?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:example by Tom · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was right, I said it was on to something.

      When prosecution doesn't work as a deterence - and it obviously doesn't in high-stakes white collar crimes - then prevention needs the be stronger.

      This could very well take the form of pre-crime investigations. I'm against imprisoning someone for something they didn't (yet) do. But why is it that police has to wait until a crime has been committed before they can even begin looking?

      I was in this position once. Someone tried to run a common scam on me and I went to the police so that they could catch them in flagranti. The answer pretty much was "well, no crime has been committed so far, so we can do nothing".

      A bigger stress on the part where in many crimes the attempt is a crime would help out a lot, especially with corporate crime.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  24. So that is what winning looks like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bigly winning?

  25. Re:Couldn't Apple remove the Uber App as a respons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uber is trying to set itself up to be the evil corporation that owns everything 100 years from now, but they've got a long way to go to catch the front runners, so they're cheating as hard as they can to make up ground.

  26. Re: This article would have been nice two days ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to use Google maps to measure Denver instead of a car. Took me 45 minutes to get from E470 to 144th this weekend.

  27. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this Fox News or Info Wars? No, so no it isn't Trump.
    p.s. The fact that this site has text on it should have given it away as well.

  28. Re:Couldn't Apple remove the Uber App as a respons by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    This is what should have happened when Cook met with him.

    Actually, what should have happened is that Cook said: Look, not only did you break our app store rules, but you actively added code to keep is from detecting it. So your app is rejected, will be removed from everyone's phone, your developer account is closed, and you won't be allowed to create a new one.

  29. Re:Still better than taking the bus! by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this Fox News or Info Wars? No, so no it isn't Trump. p.s. The fact that this site has text on it should have given it away as well.

    It's Mike Pence. He's worked out that Slashdot is the one part of the internet where he can guarantee he won't end up talking to a woman.

  30. Re: This article would have been nice two days ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 years ago, you could get from the airport to evergreen in 45 minutes. Now? Every fuckhead escaping SoCal is driving slowly in the left lane, fucking up traffic.

  31. Re: Couldn't Apple remove the Uber App as a respon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... And Apple doesn't want the competition. Apple doesn't want competition on tracking users. Apple doesn't want competition on mindshare. Apple doesn't allow competition for developers. Hell, all of Apple's "security" is merely protection of the walled garden. You feel,safe in their prison, but that's an illusion. It's to keep you in.

  32. What! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Kalanick sounds like a real winner: "took the tax dollars from employee paychecks -- which are supposed to be withheld and sent to the Internal Revenue Service," ... , "and reinvested the money into the start-up, even as friends and advisers warned him the action was potentially illegal."

    Stop fucking with people's lives asshole.

  33. Red Swoosh is Bittorrent with its own trackers by kriston · · Score: 1

    Red Swoosh is just Bittorrent with its own, private trackers.

    $19M was a really low price. Akamai got a great deal on that technology.

    --

    Kriston