Slashdot Mirror


World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive Next Year, Says WHO (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The world's first vaccine against malaria will be introduced in three countries -- Ghana, Kenya and Malawi -- starting in 2018. The RTS,S vaccine trains the immune system to attack the malaria parasite, which is spread by mosquito bites. The World Health Organization (WHO) said the jab had the potential to save tens of thousands of lives. But it is not yet clear if it will be feasible to use in the poorest parts of the world. The vaccine needs to be given four times -- once a month for three months and then a fourth dose 18 months later.

36 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Says WHO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    - Michael Cohen

    1. Re:Says WHO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually he's just "The Doctor".

    2. Re:Says WHO? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      That's because he hasn't picked a name yet.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Says WHO? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Says WHO? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ... is on first

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive Ne by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    "World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive Next Year, Says WHO "

    Well aren't they going to answer that question?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

    I don't know!

  4. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by clovis · · Score: 1

    "World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive Next Year, Says WHO "

    Well aren't they going to answer that question?

    Betteridge's law suggests the answer would be "no one".

  5. deja vu by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on. we all know how this is going to go. The "leaders" of these countries will protest and stop the vaccinations, claiming they are an American plot to harm the poor African children. Somehow they will enrich themselves over this but still few if any will be vaccinated. A few volunteer aid workers will be killed. Billions in U.S aid will flow to the countries, but the common people will not get it.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re: deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to forget they eradicated small pox and polio even though the same corrupt leadership was there.

    2. Re:deja vu by sartwell · · Score: 1

      The EXACT thing happened in Memphis about 20 years ago.

    3. Re:deja vu by imidan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "leaders" of these countries will protest and stop the vaccinations, claiming they are an American plot to harm the poor African children

      This sort of resistance to humanitarian efforts has been going on for years, but we unfortunately validated it to some extent by using a sham vaccination campaign to try to track down bin Laden: How the CIA’s Fake Vaccination Campaign Endangers Us All. The ruse failed to provide useful intelligence and the CIA promised never to do it again, but trust is easier to destroy than it is to build.

    4. Re: deja vu by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      They were pressured by both USA and USSR to do that and were provided with vaccines by both as well. One of these countries doesn't exist anymore and the other doesn't give a shit.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:deja vu by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Your hatred seems pretty extreme. Which African nation are you the warlord of?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    6. Re:deja vu by Agripa · · Score: 1

      You left out the part about the US sending CIA doctors to provide the vaccinations.

      http://news.nationalgeographic...

    7. Re:deja vu by Agripa · · Score: 1

      ... and the CIA promised never to do it again, ...

      Oh, well, if they *promised* ...

  6. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by TWX · · Score: 2

    Third base.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. Re:Right by TWX · · Score: 2

    Funny, it appears that decent life-expectancy and quality of life seems to go a long way toward fighting birthrate.

    Perhaps if people don't expect their children to die young they don't feel a need to have so many of them.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  8. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow... you must be Malawian. That's some wishful thinking calling it a "great big welfare state."

    Do we call the US a great big welfare state when someone in New York tosses change in a panhandler's cup? Has about as much to do with the US government as social programs in Malawi, being funded with donor money and all. And indeed, it's fairly well accepted that fecundity drops when GDP rises and/or child mortality drops- maybe if they didn't suffer from endemic malaria, they wouldn't produce "so many babies." It certainly wouldn't hurt if their per capita GDP could break $1k.

  9. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by dudacgf · · Score: 1
  10. Network effect by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But even if only foreigner and rich citizens get vaccinated :

    - By being vaccinated, there's a bit less risk that they (or more correctly: their mosquitoes) will transmit malaria to somebody else.
    (Which would other wise would happen in the time frame between the parasite entering the body and the disease being cured by antimalaric drugs).

    It won't be enough to develop herd immunity (see children viruses in developed world - at least until anti-vaxxer started messing around), but it's a tiny bit help in reducing propagation (see influenza virus in the developed world) - even if only a drop in the bucket.

    - Also prevention based on vaccination of travelling foreigner, is a lot less likely than the current prevention (dosing traveller with anti-malaric drug in advance) to overload the environment with drug to the point that the parasite has pressure to mutate and develop resistance.

    And this has very important long-term ecological benefits. (Less risks of drugs stopping to work eventually)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  11. Re: World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arriv by sexconker · · Score: 1

    It's like Jeopardy, you have to say the answer in the form of a question.

    You must phrase your response in the form a question.
    The clue is the answer.

  12. Re:Right by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2

    A lot of ignorant people say this (from their cushy first world armchairs) but it is a lot easier for people to improve their countries when they're not sick all the time.

  13. Remote Vaccinations by mentil · · Score: 2

    My understanding is that malaria is mostly life-threatening in remote parts of Africa that don't have a resident doctor or access to quinine. It seems improbable these remote areas will have access to this vaccine if they don't have access to quinine. I imagine the vaccine needs refrigeration, which may not be available. Requiring 3 jabs a month apart and a 4th 18 months later means a traveling doctor/missionary won't be able to come through the village once and successfully vaccinate people.
    I'm aware there is a strain of malaria that is becoming increasingly common, that is deadlier and resistant to quinine, maybe that's what the vaccine will be most effective in preventing.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Remote Vaccinations by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      A vaccine that protects developed areas or non-locals in remote areas such as doctors from charities or workers building infrastructure is still immensely valuable. While they would likely survive malaria, it is not exactly a walk in the park, and some die anyway.

  14. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by Falos · · Score: 1

    I asked about second, you clod!

  15. Re:you want save starving by famebait · · Score: 1

    Do your own homework.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  16. Good bye jungles? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

    I always think of Douglas Adams calling the mosquito "Nature's Viet Cong" for making it much more expensive to cut down all the rain forests. I hope the laudable goal of saving people doesn't have the negative side effect of accelerated jungle destruction.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Good bye jungles? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I always think of Douglas Adams calling the mosquito "Nature's Viet Cong" for making it much more expensive to cut down all the rain forests. I hope the laudable goal of saving people doesn't have the negative side effect of accelerated jungle destruction.

      Note that a Malaria vaccine means we don't have to cut down the rain forests to protect people from malaria. So, this particular way of saving people can also save the rain forest....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  17. B&M Gates foundation partially funded by kwerle · · Score: 1

    Missing from the summary (and of possible intereste here), it seems that some of the funding was by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

    http://www.afro.who.int/en/med...

  18. Re:But.... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    what if it causes autism?

    We had malaria on the ropes and nearly wiped out. Then the propaganda piece "Silent Spring" with a bunch of bad science, bad data, outright lies, and heartstring-plucking was published and picked up by environmental groups who screamed at the government to "do something!", and so they did. They worked to ban the use of DDT as widely as possible and gave malaria a reprieve. The DDT ban was based on lies and those lies and the ones who knowingly used those lies in their political/ideological causes anyway are responsible for all the deaths, suffering, and economic losses from malaria since then.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  19. Re:But.... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... Blue Strat is lying and blustering again ...

    Blue Strat is dead-on correct on this one.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  20. Re:Right by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Level of female education is the strongest predictor of birth rate. But educational attainment in general is limited by conditions of extreme poverty.

  21. Re:But.... by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    I used to do R&D on insecticides. Blue Strat is completely full of crap. DDT was banned for use as an insecticide in agricultural use in the USA and in many other countries, as it should have been given its propensity for bioaccumulation and broad target spectrum. DDT continues to be used for combating mosquitoes that are malarial vectors and vectors for other diseases. However the only locations that successfully used DDT to eradicate malaria were wealthy, had well-developed public health programs, and had only seasonal malarial outbreaks or lower rates of malaria. Mosquito resistance to DDT was noted back in the 50's and today is a significant problem, unsurprising since mosquitoes have enormous populations that can go through over 40 generations in a year providing ample opportunity for the evolution of resistance. The need for rationally designed insecticides specific to mosquito species of interest is dire but funding simply is not there...and about to get worse if Trump and the Republicans cut even more funding from the already resource-starved NIH and USDA.

  22. Re:World's First Vaccine Against Malaria To Arrive by TWX · · Score: 1

    I DON'T KNOW!

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  23. Good by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Now also explain and make available effective contraception, or each person saved will spawn a few more to die from hunger and war two decades down the road. Messing with natural population control mechanisms is dangerous and tricky. Not saying it should not be done, but it needs to be done right or catastrophes will ensue.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.