Slashdot Mirror


Google Looks at People As it Pledges To Fight Fake News and 'Offensive' Content (betanews.com)

Google said today it is taking its first attempt to combat the circulation of "fake news" on its search engine. The company is offering new tools that will allow users to report misleading or offensive content, and it also pledged to improve results generated by its algorithm. From a report: While the algorithm tweaks should impact on general search results, the reporting tools have been designed for Google's Autocomplete predictions and Featured Snippets which have been problematic in recent months. Updated algorithms should help to ensure more authoritative pages receive greater prominence, while low-quality content is demoted. Vice president of engineering at Google Search, Ben Gomes, admits that people have been trying to "game" the system -- working against the spirit of the purpose of algorithms -- to push poor-quality content and fake news higher up search results. He says that the problem now is the "spread of blatantly misleading, low quality, offensive or downright false information."

10 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Users can report? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, it's a democratic process to determine what news is fake? Ah yes, the "if we all agree it's not true then it isn't" method of understanding the universe.

    Let's go burn down the observatory so this can never happen again!

  2. Better idea by OYAHHH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google needs to quit pretending and just limit it's search results to NPR, the New York Times, and the Washington Post.

    That would fix it.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  3. Google is evil right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect so, and I don't trust Google, or, Alphabet.

    I never asked for censorship on the internet. And an algorithm? A freaking experiment on society.

  4. Re:Aka "The Trump Muzzle" by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    better off banning slate, salon, msnbc, foxnews, cnn, breitbart. that would clean up a good 80% of fake news

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  5. *licks finger, sticks it in the air* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's Offensive today?

  6. This is bullshit by JWW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either all speech is protected or none of it is.

  7. Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The underlying problem is Google is supposed to be a *search engine* It's supposed to show you where to find stuff on the internet. At some point in time they decided to complete with Ask Jeeves and become an "answer engine." Good luck with that.
     

    1. Re:Truth by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The underlying problem is Google is supposed to be a *search engine* It's supposed to show you where to find stuff on the internet. At some point in time they decided to complete with Ask Jeeves and become an "answer engine." Good luck with that.

      It has always been an answer engine, and that's the reason it became popular.

      Back in the day (mid 90s) most everyone was certain that search engines could never be very useful. Lycos, Altavista, etc. weren't terrible, but they also weren't very good, because although they could effectively spider the whole web that just meant that any search matched thousands or millions of pages, and they had no way to determine which of those were the best answers for the query. The "smart money" was betting on Yahoo!'s approach of manually curating enormous lists of links.

      Then Larry Page's pagerank algorithm found an excellent (not perfect, but excellent) way to figure out which of all of those answers were likely to be the best ones. That insight launched Google. It took off precisely because it provided better answers, rather than just returning a list of everything that was on the Internet. A list of everything on the Internet is not useful.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  8. Re: Aka "The Trump Muzzle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have leftists ever thought about why so many average people are turning away from so-called "mainstream" news sources, and instead choosing to get their news from alternate sources?

    Yes, over three hundred years ago:

    Besides, as the vilest Writer has his Readers, so the greatest Liar has his Believers; and it often happens, that if a Lie be believâ(TM)d only for an Hour, it has done its Work, and there is no farther occasion for it. Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it; so that when Men come to be undeceivâ(TM)d, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effectâ¦

    Seriously, look at your own recitation and find the lies and falsehoods in them. There are plenty.

    And yours aren't even new. The anti-immigrant Know-Nothing party was preaching its hysteria before the American Civil War. Civil War secessionists built their cause on a house of lies. Anti-Indian, Anti-Irish, Anti-Chinese, Anti-German, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Russian sentiment was similarly fostered with fraud.

    The question you should ask, is why you think leftists don't know, while you seemingly demonstrate great depths ignorance yourself.

    Or rather, you should answer it.

  9. Re:Aka "The Trump Muzzle" by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone can gin up nonsense to fit a curve. That's what fake news largely is. The biggest error I see in most mainstream media is the assumption that details and context can be omitted. It is far easier to digest a simpleton falsehood compared to reality when the audience lacks the foundational information to understand it. You cannot communicate the complexities and nuance of reality in 30 second sound bites.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.