Slashdot Mirror


Maybe Don't Manually Install Windows 10 Creators Update, Says Microsoft (betanews.com)

Two weeks after Microsoft started rolling out Windows 10 Creators Update, the company has asked the users to avoid manually installing the major update. A report adds: But why? Because the update is causing problems for users. The first phase of the rollout targeted newer devices -- those most likely to be able to run the OS update with the minimum of problems -- and Microsoft is using the feedback from that first batch of updated systems to decide when to begin the next phase of the rollout. "For example, our feedback process identified a Bluetooth accessory connectivity issue with PCs that use a specific series of Broadcom radios," an executive said.

114 comments

  1. Lame by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why can't Microsoft test the trillions of hardware configurations before releasing an OS update?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank you, Pradeep. $5 has been credited to your Bing Rewards account.

    2. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in one case I know of, it's because Nvidia broke their drivers four days before the Creators Update launched. The 381.65 version of the Nvidia drivers will BSOD under the Creators Update. Not earlier versions of Windows 10, just the Creators Update. They were released April 6th. The big new feature according to their changelog was "Creators Update support."

      However, they BSOD under Windows 10 Creators Update. In some cases they cause a BSOD loop during boot. In other cases they merely BSOD when playing games. But the bottom line is that when installed on the Creators Update, they cause the system to become unstable and were released too close to the Creators Update for Microsoft to have reasonably tested them.

      So it's not just Microsoft being unable to test every hardware configuration, it's also vendors breaking things at the last minute.

    3. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5? He can live like a king in India with that much money! My guy Sajeeb will post positive Microsoft things all day for 5 cents.

    4. Re: Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We didn't know you had a guy. How sensational for you!

    5. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, with the amount of data they collect from my computer, they should be able to easily simulate every possible hardware configuration prior to the update!

    6. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But do they cause a BSOD?

      Well, in one case I know of, it's because Nvidia broke their drivers four days before the Creators Update launched. The 381.65 version of the Nvidia drivers will BSOD under the Creators Update. Not earlier versions of Windows 10, just the Creators Update. They were released April 6th. The big new feature according to their changelog was "Creators Update support."

      However, they BSOD under Windows 10 Creators Update. In some cases they cause a BSOD loop during boot. In other cases they merely BSOD when playing games. But the bottom line is that when installed on the Creators Update, they cause the system to become unstable and were released too close to the Creators Update for Microsoft to have reasonably tested them.

      So it's not just Microsoft being unable to test every hardware configuration, it's also vendors breaking things at the last minute.

    7. Re:Lame by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      WTF is "Bing Rewards"?

      Forget that - WTF is "Bing"?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:Lame by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      That's why I use linux, therefore I am not surprised when half the shit in my computer either doesnt work or works so poorly I might as well not have it

    9. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The caveat is that he can only use it on Microsoft-branded merchandise.

    10. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing is a second rate search engine and Bing Rewards are $5 gift cards Microsoft will give you after a million or so searches using Bing. It's all really quite pathetic.

    11. Re:Lame by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      What a PR lie, there are not trillions of hardware combinations. You have hardware and you have drivers for that hardware, they actually charge for testing. All that is happening is the incredibly cheap arse holes are using customers as crash test dummies, not even bloody pretending any more. Doing an absolute minimal amount of testing based upon using their customers to do it for free. They are just getting worse and worse, truly disgusting. Compulsary software installs of buggy software before daring to force that shit on corporate customers, what a pack of arse holes.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Lame by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You joke, but I remember the last Windows 10 update having issues on a bloody Surface Pro 3. The most popular of the very few products that MS should properly support.

    13. Re:Lame by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Which makes a SUPER-good reason to dump the MS habit.. Ubuntu is patiently waiting for you....

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    14. Re:Lame by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 1

      Good question. I don't believe the concept was stated clearly enough.

    15. Re:Lame by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The big new feature according to their changelog was "Creators Update support."

      Which means they tested a preview build and Microsoft must have changed a lot after that.

    16. Re:Lame by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      yeah great, 3 times when upgraded my Linux it broke and I had to completely reinstall it (didn't have the patience to actually find out how to fix it after a bunch of tries didn't work), so don't go telling me that upgrading Linux is always without a problem.. I only started having problems with upgrading windows from 10 to anniversary update, and it just crapped out after upgrading to creator (reverted back to anniversary update)..

    17. Re:Lame by chipschap · · Score: 1

      I won't claim updating Linux is "always without a problem." There are often some issues.

      The big difference is that everything is completely under my control. If an update breaks something, I'm very confident that I'll be able to fix it, and 99 times out of 100 there is already a solution posted on-line. And I'm not forced to take updates if I don't want to.

      Linux does require some patience and some learning. I and many others believe it's worth it. Over many years, Linux has been a positive productivity aid for me, providing far more working solutions for my needs than Windows ever could. YMMV. Do whatever works best for you.

    18. Re:Lame by drewsup · · Score: 1

      WTF really???
      Have installed Mint on 3 old laptops, no probs WHATSOEVER!
      Oh and the old scanner Wndows and Canon stopped supporting years ago, no probs with Linux! same with any printer . I call BS on your install!

    19. Re:Lame by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      I had no problem installing Linux, it was the upgrades (which I even mistook for regular updates as there really wasn't much difference in the announcement) which fubarred the installations.. Yeah you can call BS on my install, but it's just a fact... And a lot of people also never had any problems with installing/upgrading windows. There is NO OS that is free of problems, that just doesn't exist.

    20. Re:Lame by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the sarcasm of my post

      im not surprised when half my shit doesn't work with linux, unlike windows where I actually do get surprised cause it happens so rarely

    21. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had the same experience as you. Install the OS. Love it, use it for a few weeks/months upgrade comes out. I loose my gui.

      Fud through trying to fix things.

      Can't find a fix that relates to MY version, desktop version, hardware. Reinstall fresh over the OS partition. Everything works. Until the next kernel is released.

      It did this to me on Fedora, on Opensuse, and Mint. It did this to me on both my desktop and laptop at times. And sometimes it wasnt my GUI, it would bork audio or wifi. But nonetheless a fresh install always worked best.

      Sure I may have screwed up every install I ever did of Linux, but considering I have installed Windows thousands of times with no issues like this then there must be something not user friendly in the install/update/upgrade process that Linux uses.

    22. Re: Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bing rewards are US only

    23. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're full of bs, since I've been building windows and Linux systems for people for 15 years and by far and away the windows systems give my clients more issues than the linux systems.

    24. Re: Lame by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Don't be retarded. Linux updates from one major release to another often requires reinstall. At least on EVERY Ubuntu server we ever installed at work. My home machine went from 7 to 8 to 8.1 to 10 and the only broken thing is my File Explorer pin list (some permission shit). No reinstall. Whereas Mint failed to install on a Dell laptop because an ntp server went off line part way through install. That was fucking retarded. That same laptop failed to install lxle with unhelpful crash. Next version installed correctly, but after 15 minutes of idle, the screen shits the bed and needs reboot. No issues with Windows on it. You can say you have less problems, but to say no problems in 15 years, you have no credibility.

    25. Re: Lame by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      How is that a SUPER good idea? There's far more paid hardware testing on Windows platform than Ubuntu. If anything, Ubuntu has been using the unpaid users to test and fix their own hardware than Microsoft.

    26. Re:Lame by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. OS upgrades used to be a total crapshoot of your computer even booting. I've only had one failure in over a dozen Windows upgrades (my home machine is on Insider beta builds). What they're doing now is avoiding the heartburn and pain of upgrading and finding some random driver isn't compatible. "Hey, we see people have reported that your WiFi card has issues. Don't upgrade yet." Instead of the very real experience I had several times updating an OS only to find that I couldn't connect to the internet anymore and there was no solution ready yet.

      I don't know what rose tinted world you used to live in where every update was smooth and trouble free but I don't think you're describing most people's experiences.

    27. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an anecdote, not a fact.

  2. Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always Broadcom.

    1. Re:Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Broadcom is a high quality company that is very OSS friendly.

    2. Re:Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Found the guy who's never dealt with the cursed b43 in any OS that isn't sold by Microsoft.

    3. Re:Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the guy who's never dealt with the cursed b43 in any OS that isn't sold by Microsoft.

      Seriously. I remember having to set hundreds and hundreds of broadcom cards to 100FDX instead of auto-detect because the driver would cause group policy to be skipped at boot and never run. Then they had to be set to 100FDX because they would frequently lose connectivity with the switch or have terrible ping times and packet loss...unless you specified the link speed. Granted, that was 7-10 years ago and then we never touched them again...maybe they've improved?

    4. Re:Broadcom... by varag · · Score: 1

      Found the guy who's never dealt with the cursed b43 in any OS that isn't sold by Microsoft.

      Yes, a truly horrible piece of hardware. I've vowed never to buy anything that has Broadcom in it.

    5. Re:Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also suffer with the inability to use hardware NAT acceleration in my DD-WRT router because Broadcom doesn't offer an OSS CTF driver. So I wouldn't peg Broadcom as an OSS champion.

    6. Re:Broadcom... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Dunno what you're doing wrong, but lately with Ubuntu (14.04 and 16.04) and Debian 8 and Broadcom B43, I've had absolutely ZERO problems on several systems I've installed on other than the minor need to add non-free to the sources.list on Debian 8 to get the b43 firmware.. ... I recall WELL when using Broadcom wifi on Linux WAS a big pain in the ass... it isn't anymore.. at least on Ubuntu and Debian

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    7. Re:Broadcom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > other than the minor need to add non-free to the sources.list on Debian 8 to get the b43 firmware

      I guess you missed the post that claimed that Broadcom supports open source.

  3. this mufugga borked my start menu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not like made it stupid looking and less usable like every other windows update
    just completely wiped anything not a stupid windows store app
    turned out it was a godmode shortcut
    thanks for your time this morning

  4. Windows 10 Updates Are Always Crap by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    I have a couple of home computers that I still can't upgrade to "Windows 10 Anniversary Edition" - total bluescreen every time after reboot. I'm not the only one with the problem, either. I fully expect Windows 10 Creators Update to be on a similar level of crap software.

    1. Re:Windows 10 Updates Are Always Crap by knope · · Score: 1

      ... ubuntu.... ? ...

    2. Re:Windows 10 Updates Are Always Crap by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You need to backup your data and do a clean install of the Anniversary Update. I did that for my Dell laptop.

    3. Re:Windows 10 Updates Are Always Crap by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Asus motherboards? I so there's a BIOS update to fix that.

    4. Re: Windows 10 Updates Are Always Crap by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      The blue screen tells you the problem and there's a log. Do some basic troubleshooting for fuck sakes. Most likely, you have bad hardware.

  5. Maybe dont EVER install it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Media Creator ... anyone check the EULA to make sure MS doesn't automatically acquire the copyright?

    1. Re:Maybe dont EVER install it? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. SERIOUSLY... I'd check that REAL closely if you are going to actually *use* Windows to create media... I trust MS as far as I can throw them.... (hint: not very far at ALL...)

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  6. If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much data by aliquis · · Score: 2

    .. they could had gotten my usage data.

    Why can't Microsoft test the trillions of hardware configurations before releasing an OS update?

    I'd totally be willing to let them collect SOME data to improve their product assuming they wouldn't pass it on-wards but when they want to log the keyboard and shit (and likely see visited urls, ran programs, get identification data, ..) then no.

  7. Defer Upgrades by Tukz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do yourself a favor and enable "Deferred updates".
    That way, you won't be in the "open beta test" pool and won't receive feature updates until some time after release.

    Security updates will still go through.

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    1. Re:Defer Upgrades by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately that won't stop MS keeping broken drivers in their update db or trying to install them every time they 'accidentally' reset your preferences during an update (assuming you even found the 'don't update anything' option).

      Until I built a dedicated PVR backend and locked it down, Win8 then 10 persistently tried installing broken 64bit DVB-T drivers for 3 of my tuners. On a good day they threw warnings, a mediocre one I found out when recordings failed. On a bad day it blue screened booting. WHQL certified drivers every time.

      The correct settings: defer updates, disable driver updates, image the drive before any update. The install any other OS.

    2. Re:Defer Upgrades by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Time to give Mythbuntu a chance? Or any distro with MythTV, but I think that gives you the most out of box help. I've been using MythTV for almost a decade now, and it definitely requires tweaking - but probably less so than blocking driver updates constantly.

  8. Why can't they just improve Windows by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    instead of adding useless features such as a 3D paint

  9. Fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't get it to install on Slackware anyways. Which Linux distribution am I supposed to use to install Windows 10 Creators Update?

    1. Re:Fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux distribution that works flawlessly on any combination of hardware.

    2. Re: Fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So most of them?

  10. Uh, seriously, Microsoft? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I had to do a manual install on my Dell laptop because Windows 10 wouldn't properly install the Anniversary Update. I rather not do that for every update.

  11. Title should have ended shorter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe Don't Manually Install Windows..."

    1. Re:Title should have ended shorter... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Maybe dont install Windows PERIOD.. Then you won't get all the abuse that MS heaps on you... Just sayin'

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    2. Re:Title should have ended shorter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, I just stick with Windows 8.1 Pro with Classic Shell and a custom visual style.

  12. How about not install windows 10...period by evolutionary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows 7 is a better, has more user control, and no ad servers, with less privacy invasion. You can get Windows 7 on Lenovo laptops as well as Fujitsu and Toshiba business laptops. Or if you get a desktop/tower, insist on Windows 7 from your builder (or do it yourself..it's not that hard). You could also get Linux Mint. Free, easy, privacy and no bloatware. Windows 10 not only reduces (nearly eliminates) the ability to stop updates (you can shut the service down I believe in the "Services" screen) windows updates are not reliable, some descriptions are disturbingly vague, and others are strictly to add things of no use to use, but are in the business interests of MS. Of save yourself a lot of pain..try Linux Mint. :D

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 is a better

      Grammatical issues aside, better in what regard? Under the hood Windows 10 runs rings around Windows 7. Better memory management, lower footprint, better security features, newer APIs, better UI, easier to use system etc. The privacy issues and update control are the only thing keeping me on Windows 7, but otherwise I desire to switch to Windows 10.

    2. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, the remaining lifespan of windows 7 is far shorter than the expected lifetime of a new system -- less than three years remain for windows 7. it is already off the market at retail and the only ones of those or dsp/oem packs remaining are those still in the supply chain; and microsoft is leveraging, hard, to get the major builders to not downgrade a 10 to 7 at the factory anymore (you could still do it yourself, but that shuts out the majority of customers who don't realize that).

      windows 8 retail. get it. now, while it's cheap and on closeout everywhere. toss a classic shell start menu on it, and you're good til 2023. (while you can still downgrade 10 to 8, microsoft has made it nearly impossible to do so, and the major oems don't do it anymore either as both 10 and 8 use hardware product keys, which are different, and you can only have *one* - and they ship win 10 keys and won't deliver an 8/8.1 with 10 upgrade media and key)

    3. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no shit?
      I can use a older version of windows or I can get linux for free! Thanks for this important update ... I would have never known

    4. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both 7 and 10 are shit.
      If you take out all the telemetry and disable Windows Update and Defender then 7 and 10 are about the same.
      7 can run with less RAM than 10 will.
      Under the hood are few differences. Most of the new stuff in Win10 are new assemblies, and not fixes or improvements to existing code..

      And, its still C++ and COM under all the APIs and languages as it has been for the last 17 years.

    5. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 2

      Not a good solution if you just bought a new Kabylake system; MS has disabled Windows Update for Win7&8 installations running on them. There are workarounds, but it remains to be seen whether they're worth the hassle.

      I've been running Windows on my HTPC for years, mostly for the ease of playing games and Blu-Rays, but I finally got fed-up with Win10; my new HTPC runs Fedora. MakeMKV handles Blu-Rays great so far, and the games I've been playing lately either have Linux-native versions or work in WINE. So far so good.

      It's a pity, because Win10 does a lot of things right. But I just couldn't take the spyware and the tough-sell anymore.

    6. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't try Mint, it's shit. Try Fedora.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:How about not install windows 10...period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost me at "better UI".

  13. Auto Updated for Me by btroy · · Score: 1

    It auto-updated on one of my older machines and it came back with no issues, as I suspect hundreds of thousands or millions of other machines have done.

    I'm curious if the manual install is bypassing some checks that the automated is performing, thus the alert.

    1. Re:Auto Updated for Me by thsths · · Score: 1

      I updated manually, and I like it. Some small improvements here and there, and the night light mode is very soothing.

      But I have to admit that I have not tried bluetooth. Most bluetooth gadgets are for my phone anyway.

    2. Re:Auto Updated for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also manually updated on my personal laptop and two work computers, a week or so ago. No issues, and I can hide the giant pile of shit on the left of the start menu again, so it was a good update overall.

  14. Well OK, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, sure, I can understand the "maybe don't manually upgrade". But then just today, I checked for updates and Microsoft said I was up to date but then shows me a message saying the Creators Update is coming and I can "click here" to get it now. If they don't want me to manually install it, maybe don't give me a link inviting me to manually install it?

  15. Not touching 10 by ArchieBunker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have a few 10 desktops here and every update seems to break something new with our software. That or the update process takes an entire morning sucking ram and thrashing the hard drive. Try running a resource intensive application while this is going on... Maybe when support for 7 ends we will switch to Mac.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Not touching 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't do that. No, you wont switch.

      Instead of throwing a tantrum, maybe you should spend more time answering the hundreds of daily Linux support forum threads.

    2. Re:Not touching 10 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      every update seems to break something new with our software

      If that's the case it's time you checked your software.

    3. Re:Not touching 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had one break a couple of days ago because the Windows 10 update changed the hostname. Boo.

    4. Re:Not touching 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe its your software, cause its working fine for almost everyone else

    5. Re:Not touching 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "everyone else" you mean children like you who do nothing but use Facebook and play video games. He's talking computers that are used to actually do stuff.

  16. No Problems Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I currently have the Windows 10 Creator's Update installed on 5 of the computers at my house and have not experienced any issues what so ever.
    3 of them also dual boot the the latest version of Linux Mint.
    2 Dells (one is fairly old), 2 Lenovos (one is moderately old), and one I built ASUS motherboard and Intel processor. (practically new).

  17. Yeah, I've experienced the pain. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    The very first thing I noticed after booting for the first time: they forgot how to draw boxes.

    Something I've run into since - I can't "run as a different user" properly anymore. My company has a rule for admins - you can't work from your admin account, so I've been right-clicking my Microsoft Management Console link and choosing "run as a different user". That quit working - now it says the super user doesn't have access to the management console, but if I actually do login with my admin account - like I'm not supposed - it works fine, just like it did before the update. I can probably figure out some rights changes and work arounds to make it work - but is that what I should be spending my time on?

    I've been a Microsoft hater for close to two decades - I've recently softened up on them because Windows 8 and 10 really did introduce a bloat reduction, stability, and performance severely lacking in previous versions, but crap like this and less than ethical data collection and advertising in the system itself are keeping me from embracing it on my personal stuff.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:Yeah, I've experienced the pain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 Mb updates are reduced bloat?

    2. Re:Yeah, I've experienced the pain. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      In comparison to Windows XP and the 900 reboot install and update cycle and the Windows 7 "you need to update Internet Explorer constantly even if you don't use it" cycle - yes.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  18. Time of the incompetent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the era of the incompetent bungler.

    The first victim was the interface, but now it's apparent that the rot of incompetent bunglers trying to cover for the experienced and competent people who have quit, retired or been driven out has reached the deeper bowels of the system.

    People thought proprietary software was immune to this cancer that is slowly turning various FOSS systems into a mess. They blamed the development methodology, and assumed nothing would ever change.

    Turns out that it's not the methodology, it's the people. And it turns out that when the universities poop out "programmers" who can barely program, people who haven't got a clue about HCI but knows a bit of marketing gets to do the UI and the whole thing is run by MBA's who cares for nothing but their own bottom line, it all goes to shit. Add a toxic environment were ruthless office politics is more important than the product and presto, we have a loser. In this case an OS which is such a bungle it apparently needs a previous instance of itself to run.

    Well done.

  19. Failed for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried updating my Alienware desktop from Anniversary to Creators using the Upgrade assistant and it failed. It kept hanging at the boot screen. After about a dozen reboots it automatically rolled back to previous installation.

  20. Re:If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much d by repka · · Score: 1

    At least have an exhaustive list of what they collect and publish where they store the intermediate results locally, so public can keep that in check. Without this FUD starts about keyloggers and web tracking that may or may not be happening in reality.

    Instead they choose to dumb stuff down.

  21. Re:If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, the primary company that's known for dumbing stuff down is making billions from the people who collectively said "we don't give a fuck, give us our overpriced shinies". (I say overpriced because they're not the largest smartphone maker but still wind up with a good chunk).

    We don't matter. Almost nobody really gives a shit about privacy or even understands anything more than "don't have an easily guessed password". They don't want to know and don't care to know it.

    Thankfully the EU did something about it, but I can't imagine most other countires (US especially) following suit.

  22. microsoft specials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is like that special guy in that secure ward. He also thinks he knows the world. Only to be out of touch with everything really.

  23. List of data collected by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least have an exhaustive list of what they collect

    You mean something like this and this?

    More details at https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2017/04/05/windows-10-privacy-journey-continues-more-transparency-and-controls-for-you.

    Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft.

    1. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by zlives · · Score: 1

      thanks for providing proof
      "
      Browsing, Search and Query data
      Inking, Typing, and Speech Utterance data"

    2. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by LVSlushdat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft.

      Geez, I'm sorry for your loss.. Perhaps you might find a less obnoxious employer, like maybe the IRS??

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or a place with more joie-de-vivre, like the DMV?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can switch those off in the privacy settings. Or go through and do it more fine-grained: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/windows-10-telemetry

    5. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well that's completely different then. It only keylogs and harvests the browsing history from the 99.9% of the world who either don't know it's happening, don't know how to turn it off, or are scared to mess with control panel stuff generally so just leave it on.

    6. Re:List of data collected by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If users are that stupid then Microsoft collecting anonymized usage data is the absolute least of their worries, they should be much more worried about the "Your computer has a virus, click here to fix it" popups or the "This is Sanjay calling from Windows" phone calls.

      This assertion that the vast majority of users are stupid followed by the idea that everybody should then pander to these daft users is what leads to the stupidification of computers.

      Following your braindead logic Microsoft should just remove all the settings and do whatever they think is best because users are too stupid to know better anyway.

  24. Killed my VMPlayer by RevRagnarok · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I didn't notice at first because the VM booted just fine. But apparently, it nuked the network drivers somewhere along the way. I had to reinstall; I don't know if the reinstall or the upgrade to 12.5 fixed my problem because I didn't have the 12.0 installer sitting around.

    --
    I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
  25. Dont worry MS... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Don't you worry, MS, theres a growing number of us out here in the "real world" who won't EVER install your crap on *our* computers.. Since I gave up the "MS addiction" in 2010, I get endless entertainment from all the new ways MS finds to abuse those who still use MS products..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:Dont worry MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^!
      Exactly! Once upon a time I dual booted with XP PRO and Linux Mint, only using XP for a few things. Several years ago, I ditched Windows and have never looked back. Windows 10 will never get close to MY computers!

  26. New development model stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new development model that everyone is adopting these days causes so many problems. Yes, in the past there may be longer standing bugs but at least they were documented and well known so they could be worked around.

    These days you don't know from one week to the next if your formerly working computer will suddenly not be working due to no changes made by you.

  27. Bugs are just another way to enable MS spyware by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    You can't use the Feedback Hub app to reports issues unless you fully enable 'diagnostic reporting'. So unless you let MS take whatever they want from your computer, they don't really care about any issues you might have.

  28. uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 Uses more memory than 7. If you want better kernel and internals just use 8.1. They are pretty much the same OS otherwise.

  29. Maybe Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    install Windows 10.

  30. Who could have possibly imagined... by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 2

    ...that laying off your entire testing department could have negative consequences?

  31. yep big problems.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    I had to revert the update as it made my computer lock up every 10-15 minutes with only a hard reset as a solution. With the Anniversary update it 'only' happens once in 24 hours, before the anniversary update I didn't have any problems..

    1. Re: yep big problems.. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      You have hardware problems.

    2. Re: yep big problems.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      Yeah ofcourse, that's why I never had any problems before updating to the anniversary, or Creator.. so it's Microsoft who screwed something up why it's hanging.. I'm not the only one with the same problem, and I won't be the last.. But also a lot of people don't have any problems..

  32. My machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was selected for the creators update for some reason in the early roll-outs, i don't know how or why it was. I can say that i haven't been too impressed though, i have gotten several of the "new" frowny-face BSODs when i had never had one prior to the creator update.

  33. Re:If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much d by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Without this FUD starts about keyloggers and web tracking that may or may not be happening in reality.

    "Send Microsoft info about how I write to help us improve typing and writing in the future"
    (Sure, keyboard vs touch-screen possible.)
    May just be for dictionary, but anyway:
    "As part of that service, we also collect information from the user dictionary created on your device. This user dictionary stores unique words like names you write, which helps you type and ink more accurately. Both the voice data and the user dictionary are used in the aggregate to help improve our ability to correctly recognize all usersâ(TM) speech."
    https://privacy.microsoft.com/...

    From the same page:
    "If youâ(TM)ve allowed Cortana to do so, Microsoft also collects information about your Calendar and People (also known as contacts) to help personalize your speech experience, and to help Windows and Cortana better recognize people, events, places, and music when you dictate messages or documents. The information Cortana collects will help personalize your speech experience on all your Windows devices and Cortana apps when you sign in with the same Microsoft account."

    "Microsoft Edge saves your browsing history, which is made up of info about the websites you visit, on your device. If the Diagnostics and usage setting is set to Full, this browsing history is sent to Microsoft, which helps us find and fix problems and improve our products and services for all users."
    https://privacy.microsoft.com/...

  34. Sure, I'll take your word for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With no way to inspect what is being sent, I have no way of knowing if what you claim is true. I'm not even asking for the right to inspect source code, just some way to decrypt and inspect the packets of data being sent.

    We _know_ that they are advertising through the OS, therefore they have a powerful incentive to track basically everything everything their OS is used for. We _know_ that other companies with this capability have used it to monetize the most unexpected behaviors (tracking on the web used to be a pipe dream, now basically everybody does it).

    As it stands, Microsoft's claims are worthless.

  35. citrix receiver is broken with this update by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1
  36. You're the betatester by allo · · Score: 1

    you're the betatester for them. They force the updates on you, so they know if it will run for the business line.

  37. I pity the fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who still use windoze lol...

  38. QA Layoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, glad to see that massive QA layoff is working out so well for ya

  39. Re:If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, but this line:
    "Send Microsoft info about how I write to help us improve typing and writing in the future" specifically says "send information about how I write", not "send what I write" and while we could speculate on or argue the difference it's irrelevant because it appears next to a checkbox, so just turn it off.

  40. Re:If Microsoft didn't collected so fucking much d by aliquis · · Score: 1

    "Send Microsoft info about how I write to help us improve typing and writing in the future" specifically says "send information about how I write", not "send what I write" and while we could speculate on or argue the difference it's irrelevant because it appears next to a checkbox, so just turn it off.

    Yeah. I have turned it off.

    But then I also don't get an improving dictionary (maybe), Microsoft doesn't get information about issues with my setup (maybe), and so on.

  41. If it by n329619 · · Score: 1

    If it compiles... ship it?