Slashdot Mirror


Lawsuit: Fox News Group Hacked, Surveilled, and Stalked Ex-Host Andrea Tantaros (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Comparing their actions to the plot this season on the Showtime series Homeland, an attorney for former Fox News host Andrea Tantaros has filed a complaint in federal court against Fox News, current and former Fox executives, Peter Snyder and his financial firm Disruptor Inc., and 50 "John Doe" defendants. The suit alleges that collective participated in a hacking and surveillance campaign against her. Tantaros filed a sexual harassment suit against Roger Ailes and Fox News in August of 2016, after filing internal complaints with the company about harassment dating back to February of 2015. She was fired by the network in April of 2016, as Tantaros continued to press complaints against Fox News' then-Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly, and others. Tantaros had informed Fox that she would be filing a lawsuit over the alleged sexual harassment. Tantaros claims that as early as February of 2015, a group run out of a "black room" at Fox News engaged in surveillance and electronic harassment of her, including the use of "sock puppet" social media accounts to electronically stalk her. Tantaros' suit identifies Peter Snyder and Disruptor Inc. as the operators of a social influence operation using "sock puppet" accounts on Twitter and other social media.

100 comments

  1. Electronic stalking by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    Is electronic stalking illegal?

    1. Re:Electronic stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I WILL MAKE IT LEGAL

    2. Re:Electronic stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is electronic stalking illegal?

      Only if it is performed by someone other than the government or its designated surrogate.

    3. Re:Electronic stalking by silentcoder · · Score: 0

      Does that designation work retroactively ? Because while Fox News is most certainly a designated surrogate of the government they've only held this status since January 20th, and did not have it at the time of the alleged events.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    4. Re:Electronic stalking by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is electronic stalking illegal?

      If it's persistent and outrageous enough it can be harassment. But this stalking was done by Fox News while she was suing them, and the accounts were used to disseminate private information obtained through illegal hacking. If it can be proven I suspect a Judge will find something very illegal was going on.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Electronic stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do it to slashdot every day.

    6. Re:Electronic stalking by rgmoore · · Score: 4, Informative

      Retaliation for various kinds of employee whistleblowing, including complaints about sexual harassment, is illegal. If they really were electronically stalking her as retaliation for her sexual harassment complaint, that would be grounds for a lawsuit even if the same actions would otherwise be perfectly legal.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    7. Re:Electronic stalking by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Numerous court cases have set the precedent that "I did it on the Internet so it's not illegal" isn't usually a defense.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Electronic stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume her claims are true.

      Her "forensic expert" claims that there is a unique virus on her system connected to this surveillance. Do you really think someone would make a unique virus, blowing their currently unknown tricks to get trough IDPS and antimalware software to stalk one newsperson that overshares on social (and public) media anyway?

      Not even the people that claim Russia hacked the US elections are going that far.

    9. Re:Electronic stalking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suffering from Cognitive Dissonance, or just another right-wing shill?

    10. Re:Electronic stalking by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Do you really think someone would make a unique virus [...]

      Depending on what sort of AV software you're using, making it "unique" can be as simple as adding few dozen bytes to the end of a file.

    11. Re:Electronic stalking by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      They were also the designated surrogate from 20 January 2001 to 20 January 2009, but I guess that predates the current allegations.

  2. 'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by Maritz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone on slashdot should be familiar with sock puppets.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    1. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're so right buddy also you're awesome BTW.

    2. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scare quotes? No, those are normal quotation marks. Scare quotes would be if the writer was using them to suggest that those accounts being sock puppets is misinformation, which doesn't seem to be the case.

    3. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Aren't "normal quotation marks" used to show that they are the actual spoken or written words? That doesn't seem to apply in this case, as the original complaint also uses quotation marks in the manner of scare quotes.

    4. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Another use of normal quotation marks is to indicate that you are using a common or slang term in a more formal piece of writing (like a legal filing) where that word or phrase does not have a ready dictionary definition - the indication makes it clear that the slang meaning is intended rather than the literal meaning.
      So that's not scare quotes either - it's just indicating that the term 'sock puppet' in this context does not refer to the puppets made from socks that we all remember from our childhoods.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    5. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by uberdilligaff · · Score: 1

      So Slashdot is a "more formal piece of writing" now? Who knew?

      --
      Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain. --Friederich Schiller
    6. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flattery doesnt protect this ironclad woman from being hampered by these evil socks always stocking her! The press should steamroll this Faux News company!

      re: You're so right buddy also you're awesome BTW.

    7. Re:'sock puppet' in scare quotes? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      No, but the legal complaint that inspired the article that got copy-pasta'd into the summary was.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  3. Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have no idea who Andrea Tantaros is.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      She's not a blonde like the majority of Fox women. I'm surprised she got hired in the first place.

    2. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      She's not a blonde like the majority of Fox women. I'm surprised she got hired in the first place.

      Well, when they do get non-blondes, they are usually HOT!!

      The latest one that I"m drooling over is Abby Huntsman ....WoW!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's not a blonde like the majority of Fox women. I'm surprised she got hired in the first place.

      Given what is now known about the Fox News organization, it is reasonable to assume that any woman who reached a position of prominence fucked her way up the ladder.

      Not judging, I can't say I wouldn't do the same in those circumstances.

    4. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Nutria · · Score: 1

      when they do get non-blondes, they are usually HOT!!

      The ones on Red Eye sure did melt steel. (Now that I've googled "Andrea Tantaros", I do recognize her.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    5. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got me beat - I googled her and still don't recognize her.

    6. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Every man has dreams of 'fucking their way up the ladder'. But that's all about 'female privilege'.

      Perhaps if you found a gay boss, but still not likely, gay men are just too slutty.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is 'female privilege' to sue for sexual harassment when you don't get that job promotion, increase in salary, or be able to have someone fired that you don't like.

      I've worked for a company of mostly women as an IT person. It was a company full of women blaming others of why they couldn't do their job. I left after 4 months. I told recruiter after recruiter I left because there was too many women there. Everyone of them understood, including the female recruiters.

    8. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yep...say what you want about Fox News, but they sure do win when it comes to the "Hot News Chick" category.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. 3 men on the floor. CEO, the IT guy and me, the coder/devops guy. (Truth there was a fourth, but 'he' was 'in between' and worked a woman's job.)

      Never again. The worst part, couldn't even use the office as a dating pool, that and the coffee. (Yuban in pre measured bags, I once dared use 2 bags to try and make coffee worth drinking (failed), known as 'Mr. Twobagger' after that. Truth is, total darkness is more my M.O.)

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...say what you want about Fox News, but they sure do win when it comes to the "Hot News Chick" category.

      Um, yeah. So beautiful on the outside, so ugly on the inside. If I didn't know any better, I would almost say that it seems to be a requirement for "news chicks" to work for Fox "News".

    11. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I told recruiter after recruiter I left because there was too many women there. Everyone of them understood, including the female recruiters.

      I've seen marketing departments with all women staff implode from the infighting. Not a pretty sight.

    12. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. So beautiful on the outside, so ugly on the inside.

      Err...I don't get what you mean....?

      They all seem pretty nice to me looks AND personality?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Fox News is trying to create a more diverse workplace.

      "We got blondes, redheads, brunettes..."

    14. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I'd rather get my news from Castle Anthrax. The women in Fox Castle are just too perilous.

    15. Re:Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Remember, this is the same pack of clowns who recommended that McCain choose Sarah Palin for a running mate.

      Thanks John- now whenever I need to suppress an erection I have someone to think about other than my mother.

    16. Re: Proof of how long since I've watched FNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta admit this is not the first time I've heard similar store is about companies with majority female workers... He'll most is the women that I know in IT (technical) say they don't want to work with other women for much the same reasons

  4. OT - but why are comments bunched up on the left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For the last week or so /. has been hard to read because all the comments are squashed up in the left half of the screen. If you zoom in to read more easily it's even worse!
    Am I the only one to notice this? I haven't seen anyone mention it (not that it's easy to read comments now).
    What's going on? Same on a number of browsers and PC's, NoScript or not.
    WTF?

    Thanks in advance for any replies

  5. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    I've seen this problem only on my iPhone. Not seeing it on the PC.

  6. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wouldn't say "squashed up in the left half of the screen", i'd say "perhaps 20 percent narrower". probably to make room for more advertisements.

  7. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, probably for ads. The only effort put into this website for the past few years, beyond reading through news submissions and reposting them, is to make more space for ads.

  8. It's Trump's world now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the ladies are just going to have to live with it. #MAGA

  9. Why is this even on Slashdot? by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is this even on Slashdot?

    1. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - you'd think the Hillary Clinton email server articles would've gotten more play on Slashdot than this...
      But that didn't seem to be "news for nerds"

    2. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Why is this even on Slashdot?

      What hacking & surveillance aren't enough for you?

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    3. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Because there just aren't enough Microsoft stories anymore, and if slashdot commenters go 24 hours without squee'ing "M$" or "Faux News" somewhere, they feel they have written nothing clever all day. The slashdot editors are concerned about their readers' self-esteem and are happy to oblige them.

    4. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by andydread · · Score: 1

      One would think you would want to know how your go-to news source is a propaganda machine strait from the insiders.

    5. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      I have a question too- why does this same stupid comment get posted in every story on Slashdot?

    6. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by bongey · · Score: 1

      No Dip shit because BeauHD still isn't over the election, and he believes what Obama said that people shouldn't watch Fox News.
      His twitter feed, "Trump is a saggy sack of shit. If any one of you is even remotely considering voting for him this November, please unfollow me. "
      "That sack of shit next to Hillary is attracting flies! #debate"
      "Clinton wiped the floor with Trump tonight. Say hello to your next president, America!"
      " It's only a story because it has the 'Trump' buzzword. Stupid media is stupid."
      "I bet Trump hired the climber for publicity."

    7. Re:Why is this even on Slashdot? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      LOL- You're clearly obsessed with this guy's tweets.

      https://politics.slashdot.org/...

      https://politics.slashdot.org/...

      https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

      https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

      Nothing original, "Dip shit", just the same crap pasted into one comment after another. Sad!

  10. Fox News to Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I learned it from YOU!"

    1. Re:Fox News to Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats BS Ailes has been doing this for years before Obama was even a senator.

  11. Quote slang, jargon, unusual words, weird context by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Quotation marks are also used for slang, jargon, and similar unusual words, including ordinary words used for an unusual meaning, in a context in which the reader may be unfamiliar with the meaning. In this usage, quotes take the place of the phrase "what is called". Essentially you're quoting a group, rather than a person.

    For example, a newspaper article written for the general public, one might write "he met up with his 'homeboy' or "Intel's Pentium computer processors had a bug in the 'floating point unit', the part of the processor which handles fractions."

    http://www.writingwithclarity....

    http://blog.apastyle.org/apast...

  12. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    Someone is messing with the columns and DIVs on slashdot and has completely messed it up. Account information box floating all over the fucking place (hey, morons, I know who I am, I don't need it giant size right there on the screen) covering up content

    Then they fixed that by shoving the column over to the left taking up half the screen.

    Two words for you morons: "Staging" "Environment"

    Then, maybe some "testing"

    But whatever, the content, submissions, editing, and comments are all crap now too so I suppose it fits.

  13. Unprecedented by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is completely shocking. Who would have thought that a subsidiary of News Corporation would stoop to something like hacking and electronic surveillance? /s

    1. Re:Unprecedented by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      This is completely shocking. Who would have thought that a subsidiary of News Corporation would stoop to something like hacking and electronic surveillance? /s

      Next she'll be saying they hacked her phone... oh wait

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:Unprecedented by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      That reference is so long ago, it's pre-President-Trump era, before time slowed to a crawl. Nobody remembers what you're babbling about.
      [citation needed]

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re: Unprecedented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also shocked that claims made with apparently no evidence to back them up are distributed as legitimate news.

  14. RICO, flip 6 - two hole by Kevin+by+the+Beach · · Score: 1

    Now all we would need is an independent FBI and Justice Department to investigate News Corp....

    .
    .
    .
    (me rolling on floor laughing)

    Another record high temperature day by the Beach

  15. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Seems to be a cold war going on with ad-blockers. They tried to make the ads under the summary hard to ad-block with simple filters. You need to use CSS selectors to get rid of them.

    Bring back subscriptions. I'm happy to pay for the abuse I get here.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. Like grandpa used to say: by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You lie down with dogs and you get up with fleas.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Like grandpa used to say: by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      She agrees to go to work for known scumbags and then complains when she gets scumbaggered. Grandpa was right: Fleas.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    2. Re:Like grandpa used to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lie down with dogs and you get up with fleas.

      No. We must not ever shift the blame to the victim.
      Those who did the illegal hacking, surveillance, and stalking are to blame, and absolutely nobody else.
      Don't help these sociopaths shift responsibility for their illegal actions to others.

    3. Re:Like grandpa used to say: by hey! · · Score: 1

      Assigning blame to the victim is not tantamount to shifting the blame to the victim. Everyone should get the amount of blame he or she deserves.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Like grandpa used to say: by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      It's more like she didn't want to lie down with dogs, she just wanted to work for them.

      And yes, I am purposefully being thick here. Even if she worked at a nightclub with real scum bags, I would still want her protected.

  17. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    For the last week or so /. has been hard to read because all the comments are squashed up in the left half of the screen. If you zoom in to read more easily it's even worse! Am I the only one to notice this? I haven't seen anyone mention it (not that it's easy to read comments now). What's going on? Same on a number of browsers and PC's, NoScript or not. WTF?

    Thanks in advance for any replies

    Must be just you. /. has worked fine in chrome on android and firefox on windows all week for me. Maybe reset your browser to factory default and disable your addons?

  18. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look... voted up again as "informative" for another inane comment while the OP gets nothing...

  19. Just like Obama did to NY Times' James Risen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Climate of Fear: Jim Risen v. the Obama administration

    NYT reporter Jim Risen says Obama's actions "will have a chilling effect on freedom of the press in the U.S."

    The Obama DOJ’s effort to force New York Times investigative journalist Jim Risen to testify in a whistleblower prosecution and reveal his source is really remarkable and revealing in several ways; it should be receiving much more attention than it is. On its own, the whistleblower prosecution and accompanying targeting of Risen are pernicious, but more importantly, it underscores the menacing attempt by the Obama administration — as Risen yesterday pointed out — to threaten and intimidate whistleblowers, journalists and activists who meaningfully challenge what the government does in secret.

    ...

    Yep - Obama went after a New York Times reporter.

    Aaaand Trump is the "fascist"!?!?!

    1. Re: Just like Obama did to NY Times' James Risen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama hacked, surveilled and stalked and outright harassed a reporter who had successfully dug up dirt on the Obama Administration and made them look bad under the guise of "national security" to silence him.

      But then, what the fuck difference at this point does it make?

      I'm convinced Obama supporters are total hypocrites.

    2. Re: Just like Obama did to NY Times' James Risen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does this have to do with Obama in any way?

      I'm convinced Trump supporters lack object permanence.

      So, posting facts about Obama being a cryptic, statist control freak makes one a Trump supporter?

      Way to demonstrate how Obama apologists can't think at all, much less think logically.

    3. Re: Just like Obama did to NY Times' James Risen! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Obama hacked, surveilled and stalked and outright harassed a reporter who had successfully dug up dirt on the Obama Administration and made them look bad under the guise of "national security" to silence him.

      Who, Sharyl Attkisson? (He launched a cyberattack on her backspace key to get it stuck so it would delete an article on Benghazi she was writing. Thanks, Obama.)

    4. Re: Just like Obama did to NY Times' James Risen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cryptic, statist control freak

      Doubleplusgood Trumpspeak. Congratulations, comrade, at no point did you risk using your brain. All good Party members can be freely outraged without having to worry about whether any of that made sense.

      Quack!

  20. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because they are comments from progressives. If they were from conservatives, they would be bunched up on the right!

  21. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [titlequote]

    OT - but why are comments bunched up on the left?

    [/titlequote]
    To match the owners' politics.

  22. Re: OT - but why are comments bunched up on the le by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because /. has joined the liberal echo chamber.

  23. *gets popcorn* by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Funny

    It appears Fox is unravelling at the seams.

    Apparently some wishes do come true.

    1. Re:*gets popcorn* by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      As long as there's a market for right wing nonsense, there'll always be something like Fox News. If it really does crash and burn, expect Brietbart TV or Stormfront Vision to take its place.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:*gets popcorn* by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Could you not have let me have my daydream for just a little bit longer? :(

    3. Re:*gets popcorn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not 100% true. A lot of advertisers are moving away from some "opinion" based cable news, right wing websites, and especially AM right wing hate radio.

      Rush Limbaugh is funded mostly by right wing think tanks after his remarks about Sandra Fluke got him in hot water (if I was Sandra Fluke's father I'd have taken the fat POS out behind the bar). Advertisers dropped him like the hot turd he is.

      Bill O'Reilly lost his gig because advertisers dropped him. Sadly, he got twice as much walking away money as the women he perved on did.

      Corporations are very concerned with PR in the Brave New World of social media, and they don't want to be associated with hate/racism.

      It's the reason Trump is no longer releasing the White House visitor logs, and the reason why corporations and right wing think tanks fight so hard to keep their political donations secret. They want to hump Trump's leg but don't want anyone to know.

      Boycotts work, and they fear their customers.

  24. Re:Quote slang, jargon, unusual words, weird conte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "thanks"

  25. everyone who works for fox news should be violentl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    qed

  26. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm seeing it too, a no-addons SeaMonkey browser.

    I welcome it since it makes the line length something close to 80 characters which is much better for reading. Looks pretty ugly though.

  27. Re:Show us the naked photos! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Oh, please no!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  28. Re:I stopped reading Ars because of crap like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberal SJW? This is a story about hacking and surveilling a previous employee, all appropriate Slashdot material. Would you prefer that it not be reported when it's Fox news? Because we might hurt their feelings?

    Grow up.

  29. Fox Is Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fox News just keeps looking better and better!

    If, by better, you mean worse.

  30. Re:I stopped reading Ars because of crap like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good bye, not good by.

    Anyway, bye!

  31. Re:I stopped reading Ars because of crap like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Online harassment is 100% relevant on a technology website.

    For the 20 years I've been in corporate IT, preventing some form of bad behavior enhanced by technology has been part of my job.

    If there's a way to reach out and hurt someone with a keyboard, someone will find it.

  32. This was posted on Ars, and it was kind of funny.. by gosand · · Score: 1

    This was the headline there:
    Lawsuit: Fox News group hacked, surveilled, and stalked ex-host Andrea Tantaros

    And the headline for the story right next to it:
    Ars Technica Live: Why it’s important to defend hackers, even the not nice ones

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  33. "Good by" then. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This new "SJW" term seems to follow some strange grammatical rules- for example, it can only appear in conjunction with spelling mistakes.

    1. Re:"Good by" then. by bongey · · Score: 1

      It's better to make spelling mistakes than be a complete liberal idiot like you and BeauHD that thinks the Russians, Fox News and the FBI stole the election from Hillary.
      Dipshit BeauHD put this on his twitter feed, yep it is really mature writing there, no spelling mistakes, but complete shit.

        "Trump is a saggy sack of shit. If any one of you is even remotely considering voting for him this November, please unfollow me. "
      "That sack of shit next to Hillary is attracting flies! #debate"
      "Clinton wiped the floor with Trump tonight. Say hello to your next president, America!"
      " It's only a story because it has the 'Trump' buzzword. Stupid media is stupid."
      "I bet Trump hired the climber for publicity."

  34. Re:I stopped reading Ars because of crap like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    colin_faber is probably triggered. Let's make sure he's able to get to a safe space.

  35. Re:This was posted on Ars, and it was kind of funn by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Did you miss where it says "Lawsuit:" at the beginning?

  36. i heard her hole smelled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these are just unsubstantiated rumors though

  37. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, for the first 15 seconds, the whole screen bounces up and down like a yo-yo and you click on things at your peril, because what was there when you started the click probably won't be what was there when the click registers.

    Amateurs.

  38. Re:OT - but why are comments bunched up on the lef by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    On Firefox I get a stripe like what I'm told is called "a half Brazilian" at any zoom level where the text is readable.

    It's OK on chrome. However it was working on FF before, I haven't upgraded it or anything.

    Perhaps some genius is being the clever dickie with the user-agent header.

    Are we back to the days of "This site best viewed with Nutscrape Nevergetthere"?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."