Slashdot Mirror


Stray WiFi Signals Could Let Spies See Inside Closed Rooms (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit quotes a report from Science Magazine: Your wireless router may be giving you away in a manner you never dreamed of. For the first time, physicists have used radio waves from a Wi-Fi transmitter to encode a 3D image of a real object in a hologram similar to the image of Princess Leia projected by R2D2 in the movie Star Wars. In principle, the technique could enable outsiders to "see" the inside of a room using only the Wi-Fi signals leaking out of it, although some researchers say such spying may be easier said than done. Their experiment relies on none of the billions of digital bits of information encoded in Wi-Fi signals, just the fact that the signals are clean, "coherent" waves. However, instead of recording the key interference pattern on a photographic plate, the researchers record it with a Wi-Fi receiver and reconstruct the object in a computer. They placed a Wi-Fi transmitter in a room, 0.9 meters behind the cross. Then they placed a standard Wi-Fi receiver 1.4 meters in front of the cross and moved it slowly back and forth to map out a "virtual screen" that substituted for the photographic plate. Also, instead of having a separate reference beam coming straight to the screen, they placed a second, stationary receiver a few meters away, where it had a direct view of the emitter. For each point on the virtual screen, the researchers compared the signals arriving simultaneously at both receivers, and made a hologram by mapping the delays caused by the aluminum cross. The virtual hologram isn't exactly like a traditional one, as researchers can't recover the image of the object by shining more radio waves on it. Instead, the scientists used the computer to run the radio waves backward in time from the screen to the distance where wave fronts hit the object. The cross then popped out.

18 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2013: http://m.slashdot.org/story/188149
    2009: http://m.slashdot.org/story/125417

    How long until someone else "discovers" the same thing again?

    1. Re:old tech by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2013: http://m.slashdot.org/story/18... 2009: http://m.slashdot.org/story/12...

      How long until someone else "discovers" the same thing again?

      According to the pattern, 2021

  2. It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    What this is really showing is that they have worked out how to make an array antenna and composite that data to "see" what is blocking RF signals which is normally metals. I think you would be hardpressed to identify if a person was standing in the room. Still interesting though.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Yes, very interesting. Not sure why they are marketing it with the fear of spies! It's already cool tech; it seems like the article could stand on its own without the need for drama.

    2. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Yep. And the only interference it can "see" is that of metal. And only a certain distance. And only if it is still for a long time.

    3. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I think you would be hardpressed to identify if a person was standing in the room

      Unless they are wearing their tinfoil hat. Think about it...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, crap - they can ONLY see my if I wear my tinfoil hat !
      But if I take it off...
      But if I...
      But...

      NO CARRIER

    5. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, it would work on Wolverine.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:It's "seeing" blocked RF signals by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      It's more like a passive MRI if the logarithm and device sensitivity could be dialed in just right.

      Whether screening for disease at the hospital, scanning for weapons at the airport or in public or looking through walls to see people making drugs or bombs it could be useful. Miniaturized enough this could be a precursor to a star-trek tricorder.

      There are real possibilities here.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  3. More "security research" by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Funny

    What is next? They can use "light waves" to detect a cross placed in a room? Its like magic and stuff!

    1. Re:More "security research" by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      If this is too theoretical for you then perhaps you would like this article titled, Most mammals need only 12 seconds to poop ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:More "security research" by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      What is next? They can use "light waves" to detect a cross placed in a room? Its like magic and stuff!

      If you think light waves are magic, wait until you see what they can do with magnets! #4 will shock you!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:More "security research" by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Like it? I WROTE that article! Cutting edge.

  4. Re:Lol 7 walls by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Yet you can still post on Slashdot.... Is that your mother's basement you're in?

  5. Tomography by Solandri · · Score: 1

    They basically took a CT scan (computed tomography) using radio waves instead of x-rays.

    Tomography has been around for over 80 years. It's why there's no lens when you have a traditional x-ray taken. You just fire the RF rays in a uniform direction (in this case the single WiFi course acts as a point source with all rays radiating radially), and capture them using a flat photographic plate (or in this case, by moving the WiFi receiver around on a plane). What they're doing isn't even as sophisticated as a CT scan because without moving the RF source as well, they can't capture 3D information.

    1. Re:Tomography by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I don't see why this process would have any such limitation, you can place sensors wherever you like, capture views from multiple sides and combine them.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  6. This isn't exactly new by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Sounds a little more fancy in the implementation, but using wifi as a passive radar isn't a new idea.

    https://www.extremetech.com/ex...

  7. MRI competition? by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    If this were true it could possibly get rid of MRI's.