Slashdot Mirror
A Sophisticated Grey Hat Vigilante Protects Insecure IoT Devices (arstechnica.com)
Ars Technica reports on Hajime, a sophisticated "vigilante botnet that infects IoT devices before blackhats can hijack them."
Once Hajime infects an Internet-connected camera, DVR, and other Internet-of-things device, the malware blocks access to four ports known to be the most widely used vectors for infecting IoT devices. It also displays a cryptographically signed message on infected device terminals that describes its creator as "just a white hat, securing some systems." But unlike the bare-bones functionality found in Mirai, Hajime is a full-featured package that gives the botnet reliability, stealth, and reliance that's largely unparalleled in the IoT landscape...
Hajime doesn't rashly cycle through a preset list of the most commonly used user name-password combinations when trying to hijack a vulnerable device. Instead, it parses information displayed on the login screen to identify the device manufacturer and then tries combinations the manufacturer uses by default... Also, in stark contrast to Mirai and its blackhat botnet competitors, Hajime goes to great lengths to maintain resiliency. It uses a BitTorrent-based peer-to-peer network to issue commands and updates. It also encrypts node-to-node communications. The encryption and decentralized design make Hajime more resistant to takedowns by ISPs and Internet backbone providers.
Pascal Geenens, a researcher at security firm Radware, watched the botnet attempt 14,348 hijacks from 12,000 unique IP addresses around the world, and says "If Hajime is a glimpse into what the future of IoT botnets looks like, I certainly hope the IoT industry gets its act together and starts seriously considering securing existing and new products. If not, our connected hopes and futures might depend on...grey hat vigilantes to purge the threat the hard way."
And long-time Slashdot reader The_Other_Kelly asks a good question. "While those with the ability and time can roll their own solutions, what off-the-shelf home security products are there, for non-technical people to use to protect their home/IoT networks?"
Hajime doesn't rashly cycle through a preset list of the most commonly used user name-password combinations when trying to hijack a vulnerable device. Instead, it parses information displayed on the login screen to identify the device manufacturer and then tries combinations the manufacturer uses by default... Also, in stark contrast to Mirai and its blackhat botnet competitors, Hajime goes to great lengths to maintain resiliency. It uses a BitTorrent-based peer-to-peer network to issue commands and updates. It also encrypts node-to-node communications. The encryption and decentralized design make Hajime more resistant to takedowns by ISPs and Internet backbone providers.
Pascal Geenens, a researcher at security firm Radware, watched the botnet attempt 14,348 hijacks from 12,000 unique IP addresses around the world, and says "If Hajime is a glimpse into what the future of IoT botnets looks like, I certainly hope the IoT industry gets its act together and starts seriously considering securing existing and new products. If not, our connected hopes and futures might depend on...grey hat vigilantes to purge the threat the hard way."
And long-time Slashdot reader The_Other_Kelly asks a good question. "While those with the ability and time can roll their own solutions, what off-the-shelf home security products are there, for non-technical people to use to protect their home/IoT networks?"
While those with the ability and time can roll their own solutions, what off-the-shelf home security products are there, for non-technical people to use to protect their home/IoT networks?
A hammer.
Hajime prevents these devices from being taken down. Instead it adds them to a botnet under the control of someone we don't know. Just because they say they're whitehat doesn't mean they are, and none of their behavior actually supports that claim. They attack other people's systems, instate defenses to maintain the ill-gotten control and use the devices to attack more devices, all without a public mandate. That's black hat.
Sorry, but my Tandy COCO needs none of this nonsense.
I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg
I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon
take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall
APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo
I like your host file system by Karmashock
I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech
* My code's liked + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!
APK
P.S.=> See subject - /.ers say it all... apk
... but the comments, so far, are not of value to those who want some red meat.
"While those with the ability and time can roll their own solutions, what off-the-shelf home security products are there, for non-technical people to use to protect their home/IoT networks?"
I gotta think of everything?
Hire this genius to make blister-pak retail-ready solutions available to everyone.
Inject the goddam thing by remote to protect it.
There's gold in them thar hills, I tell yun.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
Dear UNIDENTIFIABLE true coward, see subject: If a device doesn't allow hosts OR other security methods? IT IS NOT SECURE (nor was it intended to be imo).
As far as smartphones & hosts? Easy - ADB pull command for rooted droids OR ssh into GodMode Apple phones (Apple workers can for a fact).
Pull smartphones etc. off routers alone (security bugs galore https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9995967&cid=53488785/ FAR from a full list mind you) or depending on DNS alone (full of security issues too https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9007355&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=51969075/ ? They're UNPROTECTED - period (& not well protected by EITHER of those eggshell perimeter only BUGGY weak methods).
APK
P.S.=> I don't trust "IoT" internet of THREATS devices - does anyone SANE? Doubt it - everyone KNOWS they're security nightmwares waiting to happen (already have)... apk
That is the answer. If it is cheaper to maintain and secure devices it will be done. If it is cheaper to not do it, it will not be done.
This is not a technological issue but has to be resolved using regulations and fines.
Both "non-technical people" amd "home networks" combined make that a tough one. A business full of non-technical people, or just people who don't specialize in security, can use a "experts included" solutions from companies like Alert Logic, but that's probably not reasonable for a home network.
A typical home network can be made noticeably more secure from these kinds of attacks by simply turning off UPnP on the router, though. Without UPnP, by default devices on the network can't be accessed from outside, from the internet. The standard router configuration using overloaded NAT (aka PAT) has the side effect of acting like a strict firewall. It's not an enterprise-grade firewall, just a simple packet filter, but it does prevent incoming connections / attacks, except for any port-forwards that are manually configured.
Other than disabling UPnP, the other main thing I can think of is keeping software and firmware up to date, at least for security patches. Devices running old versions are the low-hanging fruit for bad guys. The new software might have new security holes that nobody knows about, but the old version definitely has security holes that everybody knows about, and the bad guy and just run a script to automatically exploit those vulnerabilities.
Sorry I don't have better answers right now. The lack of good answers is why Australia is looking at having the ISP take care of some protection. The ISP can see trends across the whole network, and more importantly they can spend a few thousand dollars per month to contract with companies like Cisco TALOS and Alert Logic to deploy and monitor sophisticated, modern security systems. Yeah that brings up privacy issues, so there is no great solution that I can see.
He's not protecting devices. He's compromising them.
He's exploiting a machine, to make it do what he wants it to do. Maybe most of us agree with why (stupid unsecured devices) but he's still exploiting it.
He's not a "greyhat" he's a blackhat (or a script kiddy, depending on how you look at it). He's making peoples computers do things they never agreed was acceptable to them.
Vigilante justice. Lets not celebrate this person.
Parent poster blows dead goats, IMHO.
Oh, hai apk
I suppose this might be a better solution than brickerbot, if people just replace their bricked IoT gadget with another insecure IoT gadget.
Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
What have I done better? I went out and bought a Sinclair Spectrum to use instead!
From flea market? Had one as a kid in the 80's. Does it work? Did you invent it? No to both. Hosts work still. Apk made his engine. People like and use it.
Also, most tcpip stack implementations lack the presence of hosts in their implementation. In VB 6, one can use hosts.dll to prevent that. Also to circumvent any issues nevertheless, handy is a gidney pig host file that piggies back on the VB 6 udp layer kernel stack.
Coupled with the speed of kernel lookups inherent to the special host module built-into every OS, this sure stops electricity wastes and cuts down on your power bill.
Even more; since one would then get less irradiated by electromagnetic waves generated by the extra current used by not using hosts countermeasures, your family will reproduce more given the fact that in-kernel mode always prevail.
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
companies will always drop *** on security until the moment we start suing their ****s
The problem with this solution is that the companies are not getting the negative financial feedback (punishment) that they need to correct their behavior.
I've said it before but it's worth repeating.
IoT vendors will only secure their devices after it starts costing them money or are legally required to do so.
The best option is to hijack the IoT devices to DDoS their makers because it creates a direct feedback loop. The more insecure devices they sell, the more it will cost them to host their company's website(s). For extra points, only target their parent company. ;)
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Most OS use mostly standard almost bone stock BSD derived IP stack. Linux, MacOS X, Windows (as admin it can do more than non admin users like raw sockets) do. Android has one. iOS has one. Rooted phones can use them. Any device stripping hosts is making them insecure.
VB6 is long dead unsupported by Microsoft. Do they even put that in Visual Studio anymore? Not last I knew. VB.NET yes. No VBScript is not VB6 either. Similar but not same only a subset.
Kernel mode lookups are what tcpip.sys does getting the most possible cpu versus yes slower due to that usermode messes like the Windows usermode dnscache service that breaks on large hosts files. Usermode gets a lot less priority than the IP stack, tcpip.sys a resolver, does.
I think you're either stupid or wasted on drugs! That or trolling which makes you doubly stupid.
You talk reproducing family. Don't. Please don't in your case. Please.
Most OS use mostly standard almost bone stock BSD derived IP stack. Linux, MacOS X, Windows (as admin it can do more than non admin users like raw sockets) do....
I agree, very clever.
But nowadays, if you Intel cpu has the special and very powerful vmx flag you can use raw sockets as a regular user process.
This open great opportunities with regards to in-kernel mode lookups and power efficiency of host only based lookups..
Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
And completely missing the point. You're trying to say "stop IoT attacks by removing the roadsigns" when you really need to dynamite the road.
long-time Slashdot reader The_Other_Kelly asks a good question. "While those with the ability and time can roll their own solutions, what off-the-shelf home security products are there, for non-technical people to use to protect their home/IoT networks?"
Can you read? She said HOME network (not just "IoT") & hosts work for GOOD security - want proof from security pros? Ask!
(I do count 'smartphones' (dumbphones) as IoT & they're just as big a security nightmare - even AFTER 10++ yrs. of having a chance to get better...)
* IF you could read, evidently you can't very well, I said IoT is a SECURITY NIGHTMARE waiting to happen (that already has TONS of times https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54331847/ - want evidences/proofs galore? Ask!).
Above ALL else? Don't tell me what I am trying to say. I didn't say that. Putting words in my mouth is bullshit idiot!
APK
P.S.=> I wouldn't recommend that "IoT" CRAP for a LONG time & if "smart" (stupid) phones are ANY indicator? No thank you... apk
APK, you're a fucking psycho.
Apk made his engine. People like and use it.
The 3 users like it very much!
APK
P.S. - I suck cocks.
Every village needs an idiot.
Ezekiel 23:20
1.) Blocks of known bad sites/servers from 10 reputable security community sources & 2.) What users give it for hardcoded favorites!
The latter speeds them up & secures them vs. DNS tracking & security fails!
(As a bonus, that lightens DNS server loads & this is a BIG plus for their admins - dns does go down a LOT & yes, it's loaded w/ security issues https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9007355&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=51969075/ ))
* Chinese academics are IMITATING MY WORK (the sincerest form of flattery is imitation) ala Chinese Academy of Sciences thinks it has a way to give DNS a backup to save users plagued by DNS outages http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/ & as the saying goes?
A BILLION CHINESE CAN'T BE WRONG...
APK
P.S.=> Lastly, quit IMPERSONATING ME, unidentifiable troll!
How can you say that after you projected you wish you were apk when he pointed it out to everyone https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332637/ ?
See subject: For endpoints that have hosts files APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/
Ads/script & malware rob speed/security/privacy
Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).
Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!
Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!
* Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!
APK
P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/
Oliver Day (SYMANTEC/SECURITYFOCUS):
http://www.securityfocus.com/c...
"The host file on my day-to-day laptop is now over 16,000 lines long. Accessing the Internet -- particularly browsing the Web -- is actually faster"
"More recently, projects like Spybot Search & Destroy offer lists of known malicious servers to add a layer of defense against trojans & other forms of malware"
OReilly hosts security -> http://oreilly.com/pub/a/windo... & speed -> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/...
Steve Gibson endorses hosts https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-045....
Aryeh Goretsky/ESET/NOD32: hosts = good security http://it.slashdot.org/comment...
Malwarebytes hpHosts' hosts/RECOMMENDS me!
Brocke Wilders of WILDERS' SECURITY does inferior clone of MY work http://www.wilderssecurity.com...
APK
P.S.=> China = imitation = flattery too http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/
Stop lying. It doesn't work. Downloaded it now, doesn't run on my BSD system!
I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg
I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon
take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall
APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo
I like your host file system by Karmashock
I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech
* My code's liked + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!
APK
P.S.=> It doesn't get any better than that (well, malwarebytes & China imitating me = HUGE plus)... apk
BSD? What runs on it unless it's Apple MacOS X? Nothing compared to Windows or even Linux. Hosts are from BSD. Export result from his program to your BSD shitbox.
Apk made his engine. People like and use it.
The 3 users like it very much!
APK
P.S. - I suck cocks.
Don't their talons cut-up your face?
See subject (europe owes us vs. turkic muslims + poland wins ACM contests lots): U wish u were me https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54331779/ don't you? Yes, obviously.
* What I thought was TRULY hilarious was your IMPERSONATING ME, unidentifiable anonymous "ne'er-do-well" PROVING you WISH you were ME https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332637/ which I pointed out there & yes I am of polish descent (I am a US Citizen 1st generation though, first).
APK
P.S.=> It's too bad you weren't fortunate enough to be polish, eh? Steve Wozniak, another /. poster & of Apple fame = polish too... apk
I agree hosts lists like this are useful protection. However, they are unfortunately off-topic for this discussion. Hosts lists are used only by the more techncalliy knowledgeable users. Insecure IoT devices are more commonly used by the _less_ techncalliy knowledgeable users. Someone who knows enough to use a host list, probably also knows enough to change default passwords and disable UPnP.
10++ yrs. ago in security guides I was paid for (to raymorris above) https://www.google.com/search?q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&gbv=1/
Take a GOOD read of The_Other_Kelly quoted in article summary: She's NOT just about "IoT" (internet of THREATS for fools imo), she's about her home network - I'm FAR from off topic.
* Thanks though Doke - you're yet another of roughly 300-400 folks here I KNOW use hosts files (many use my program, I only posted some (can't fit them all & their testimonials to my work in 1 post as AC - /. unfairly restricts us in posts length(whipslash filters me posting too, gosh "wonder why"? NOT - admoney = why!)).
As far as OFF TOPIC? Why not say that to the trolls harassing me above vs. me??
APK
P.S.=> My program makes it as EASY as hosts get - point & click GUI easy... apk
What is an IoT device, exactly? My conception is stuff like cameras and connected toasters, but in TFA the only device maker mentioned is MicroTik, who do routers and APs. Most articles like this are similarly fuzzy on what exactly they are talking about.
Use a video server like Blue Iris or a home automation gateway like Vera to provide a single T on the I for your remote viewing needs.
Use vera/homeseer/ISY for your home automation. Now you have at most 2 Ts on the I to worry about.
I have almost 2 dozen HA devices (locks, power outlets, switches, bulbs, thermostat, sensors) and only 2 IP addressable devices.
I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
If they are grossly negligent, they already ARE liable.
The question is, who was hurt and by how much? They are liable *to somebody* for *some* amount of money. That's the hard part.
I'm curious - how/why do IOT devices have sufficient memory to support communications protocols/addresses, a bittorrent-based client, etc.?
I am not a number - I am a free man!
IoT is a marketing term like Cloud. All of my network connected devices (NCDs, not IoT) run Linux, so it's pretty easy to secure them. This is why I build my own "IoT" devices. Anyone that buys a "smart" TV is a dumb ass.
Please tell us more about your experiences taking elephant cock.
Agreed, insurance companies are really good at analyzing and mitigating risk. Insurance companies created the fire code and Underwriters Laboratories to reduce fire risk. If you don't meet fire code and UL your insurance rates are much higher, so businesses make and buy UL approved stuff. That hints at general approaches which may work well for information security, and specifically at *enforcement* - insurance companies look at a property before they underwrite a multi-million dollar policy, and require regular inspections.
That's good as far as it goes. Insurance companies are concerned with damages they'll have to pay, though. When a company builds or markets a product that has a vulnerability, how much do they or their insurance company need to pay, and who do they need to pay? They have to pay the people who had damages as a result, and pay enough to correct the damage. That's the general law. It's very difficult to know who was hurt by a security vulnerability in an IoT device, amd how much each was hurt.
Even to the extent you can figure out who was hurt and how much damage there is, each consumer who was actually affected might be entitled to $100 - hardly worth filing suit over. Our current best answer there is class action suits. Not exactly a great answer.
See subject & proof thereof here https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10020701&cid=53529963/ & 95++ of threats use hostnames (not IP addresses).
* IF an "IoT" (internet of threats) device cannot accept hosts it wasn't meant for GOOD layered security & security + web pros back me hosts = good layered security/defense in depth here https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332779/ even imitating me in China!
APK
P.S.=> I know - I've built a host file for well over 22 yrs. now & hang around + work often with the security community in this area... apk
Figure out why it needs to be on the internet in the first place.
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
The elephants rather enjoy a tosser like myself
when they reach climax it is like a firehose
APK
P.S. - I suck only the best elephant cocks unlike you u limp wristed whiny bitch .
Insurance companies also created the IIHS, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. In twenty years they've compelled the automakers to go from cars that have a high likelihood of killing their occupants in moderate-speed collisions and cars that are extremely expensive to repair in 5mph collisions to cars that will do a much better job of protecting their occupants in even fairly high-speed collisions and are generally reasonable to fix if involved in 5mph collisions. It took a combination of embarrassing automakers by showing how badly their cars handled realistic collisions to the public and using the collected data to change insurance rates, but ultimately it has worked.
Unfortunately it'll probably take court precedent to demonstrate that insurance payout is the correct remedy in order to compel the situation to change. That means initial court cases will have to be fought the hard way to show that the entity's insurance really is liable.
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
To IoT. No need for it. Just a way to get into your home to directly advertise to you to spy on you or worse to steal what you have.
Well I can't smoke elephant pole better than APK.
/. better than APK
/. better than APK
I can't shit post better than APK
I can't spam
I can't argue with myself better than APK
I can't fake post support better than APK
I can't be an internet keyboard tough guy warrior better than APK
I can't draw out the full hatred of
Imitation? You might want to look up the meaning as you don't seem to know what it means. You did not come up with the idea of a hosts file. You are not the first to use the hosts file. You are not even the first person to aggregate block lists into a single block list. You've made nothing original. You made a Windows list aggregator. That is all. If anything, you've flattered the thousands who've made scripts to do this already.
See subject: Hypothesize 'the sky is falling'. I never said "hosts cure all" buddy. Just that hosts do more than any other 1 method for less.
APK
P.S.=> In case you didn't notice? Search "HOW TO SECURE Windows 2000/XP" on Google/Bing & you find ME (all about multiple methods & layered security) - nice try @ "framing" this though (not)... apk
Then buy a more powerful DUMBPHONE stupid (you've got to be STUPID to own one anyway they're SO damn full of security issues & bugs).
OK, bigmouth "ne'er-do-well"? Got it?? Now, STFU douche.
APK
P.S.=> Ah yes, more "edge cases" (dimwits, get THIS straight - I never ever said "hosts cure all" - especially nimwit stupidity which you are an EXCELLENT example of (doing 'dumbo phones' especially) or IoT (idiots of things))... apk
See subject "big talker" (punk), & know my program is no mere "script" a punk no mind that YOU can't even manage (lol, truth).
* PROVE YOUR WORDS, show you've done better douchebag.
APK
P.S.=> You fucking can't you little weasel shitbag fakename fuck... apk
See subject & https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54337959/ & such an "original" reply (you "ne'er-do-well" NOBODY little fuck, lol).
APK
P.S.=> "Big Talk" Brockpuss, the DO NOTHING DILDO (truth)... apk
Hahahahahahaha https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54337959/ come on bigmouth: back it up 'expert'! You've done guides for it or software for it?? Prove it DO NOTHING DILDO!
Back up your crap blowhard https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54337959/
I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell
his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg
I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon
take a look at the APK hosts file engine by SuperKendall
APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo
I like your host file system by Karmashock
I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech
* My code's liked + recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!
APK
P.S.=> No DOUBT about it - you WISH you were me (& could manage the above yourself, but a "ne'er-do-well" like YOU? Never can or will (& you KNOW it, lol))... apk
See my subject: I block known threat sources via hosts & firewalls + patching etc. all outlined here (guided by CIS Tool, highly esteemed which took PATCHES & SUGGESTIONS from me too) https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/
It's TOTAL layered security/defense in depth (it did VERY well, & even got me PAID for that security guide for how effective it was for others).
AGAIN: I never said hosts "cure all" just that they do more for less vs. any other SINGLE solution & want something I've admitted hosts CANNOT stop, upmodded +5 for it? BGP abuse http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1901826&cid=34490450/
APK
P.S.=> You're NOT going to sucker me via some email either (or ware) as I don't allow scripts in my email client either & payloads I filter out in emails by viewing source (or Malwarebytes' hpHosts Phish & Spam filters too)... apk
You've done the same or better? Prove it: I've never seen code with the name UNIDENTIFIABLE "Anonymous Coward" on it as the author.
* It's EXTREMELY well-written on MY end (/.ers prove that) - show us our peers here saying THAT about YOUR non-existent work!
(I doubt you can even code, let alone a GUI system for this type of work - prove it you can (you can't, lol)).
That's only a TINY fraction of work I've done in this area since 1994 professionally (commercially successful code to this day is out there with my name on it too that won a finalist position @ MS TechEd 2 yrs. in a row in its HARDEST CATEGORY - SQLServer Performance Enhancement, for example (1 of many)).
APK
P.S.=> Come on bigmouth, back up your crap - you've done better, BIG "critic"? PROVE IT blowhard bullshitter... apk
See my subject: U REALLY do WISH u were ME (I can't blame ya! It's not easy being 'world class' https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332301/ like me - you know: Doing things the "likes of U & 'your kind' never can or will, hahahaha!)
APK
P.S.=> Truth hurt? It always does to unidentifiable "ne'er-do-wells" like you - whose fault is that? YOURS - your kind always does it to themselves... apk
See subject: A bit like your FOOT in your MOUTH ramming your words back down your chicken neck throat https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7804977&cid=50269031/ washed down with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat vs. me as always?
LMAO!
(See you had to "downmod hide" this LAST TIME I POSTED IT TOO https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332691/ via your many sockpuppet accounts, rotflmao (ashamed? Yes, & you should be punk! In that link, I also see you accidentally posted trolling me using your registered 'luser' acct vs. UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous too stupid (you are that dumb as always, lol)).
APK
P.S.=> The village idiot = K.S. Kyosucky, the "ne'er-do-well", lol... apk
See subject: I see you're a "wee bit 'butthurt'" after security & web pro "elephants" in MY corner, not yours, shoved their rods up your behind https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332779/ lmao!
* You're BUTTHURT (I suggest you get PREPARATION H for your hemorrhoids, lol) FOOL!
(So much so, you had to try "downmod hide" that fact the last time I posted this here https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54334833/ using your registered 'luser' account vs. UNIDENTIFIABLE ANONYMOUS trolling me (yes, I have handed you your ass before & it's why you do it - you know I can toss your many fuckups vs. me RIGHT BACK @ YA easily, lol))
APK
P.S.=> Quit while you're behind (or you'll get even MORE elephant pencil up your poop shoot trolling off topic fool)... apkyou had to try "downmod hide" that fact the last time I posted this
See subject: UR too weak to do anything well. You took security & web pro elephants dicks up your ass https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332779/ lol!
You are ALL shitposts off topic UNIDENTIFIABLY trolling me - I have OBVIOUSLY handed you YOUR ASS many times before & you know it - it's why you do it. I can show those times under your registered 'luser' account failing vs. me, lol, publicly to your dismay.
I don't spam. /.ers like & USE my work praising it https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332797/ NOT YOUR NON-EXISTENT CODE (you don't have the skills).
You argue against logic & facts.truth losing everytime vs. myself, lol!
Hatred? Fucker - shitbrain do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" like YOU (zeros in anything you try, hence your inability to show anything good from you) hate yourselves.
APK
P.S.=> You're a LOSER weasel - & you KNOW it... I don't exactly WIN (but I always do) against you - "your kind" defeats themselves (as you do in life, lmao)... apk
See subject: Impersonating me proves u wish you were me & you took web+security pro elephants up ur ass https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10554305&cid=54332779/ & YOU did it like a REAL "PRO" (professionally taking it up the ass losing vs. "yours truly" as "your kind" in "ne'er-do-well" DO NOTHING ZEROS always do, lmao).
APK
P.S.=> You can't FAIL to fail, can you? Look @ the bright side - you're really GOOD @ being a LOSER (rotflmao) & especially vs. myself... apk