Slashdot Mirror


Trump Has Grand Plan For Mission To Mars But Nasa Advises: Cool Your Jets (theguardian.com)

Donald Trump would like to see Americans walk on Mars during his presidency. Nasa would love to get there that quickly, too. The reality of space travel is slightly more complicated, however. From a report: On Monday, during a call with astronaut Peggy Whitson, who was aboard the International Space Station, Trump pressed her for a timeline on a crewed mission to Mars, one of Nasa's longest standing and most daunting goals. "Tell me, Mars," he asked her from the Oval Office, "what do you see a timing for actually sending humans to Mars? Is there a schedule and when would you see that happening?" Whitson answered by pointing out that Trump, by signing a Nasa funding bill last month, had already approved a timeline for a mission in the 2030s. She added that Nasa was building a new heavy-launch rocket, which would need testing. "Unfortunately space flight takes a lot of time and money," she said. "But it is so worthwhile doing." Trump replied: "Well, we want to try and do it during my first term or, at worst, during my second term, so we'll have to speed that up a little bit, OK?" It was not clear whether the president meant the remark as a quip or something more serious.

4 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. Mars by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Enough with Mars. We cannot live on Mars. Ever. The difference in gravity and radiation will guarantee that. You can't fix biology and evolution. And don't say "live in caves" or "underground". Give us all a break.

  2. We went to the moon in under 8 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    and started from practically nothing.

    At least we've got a President now that's actually interested in space travel again.

    1. Re:We went to the moon in under 8 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Right, I understand that about Obama, that's why Trump is a pleasant change.

  3. Re:Ego vs Science by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0, Troll

    He wants to cut all sorts of science and research budgets

    The EPA isn't science, it's a Liberal and Bureaucratic propaganda and shakedown racket.