Microsoft Tests a Secured Edge Browser For Business (techradar.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Microsoft is in the testing stage of a new feature in its Edge browser for Windows 10 that is malware-proof as it partitions the browser window from the rest of the computer. This will be a welcome addition for users who are worried about the legitimacy of sites they want to visit. The new feature, catchily dubbed Windows Defender Application Guard, is part of the recently launched Windows Insider Previews. In order to access it you'll need to be a member of Microsoft's business service Enterprise, and have your settings calibrated so you're in the testing group called Fast Ring. Application Guard works by creating a virtual PC that is entirely separate from all storage, other apps, and the Windows 10 Kernel, meaning that the browser should be completely impervious to malware.
"Microsoft attests Edge browser is insecure by nature" as it does try to develop a separate "secure one"?
-><- no
That's like telling your wife you wore a condom every time you visited a whore house in Haiti.
Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
It's a copy of Edge running in a virtual machine. How else would it be "separate from the kernel"?
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Because nobody has escaped a VM before. It may be difficult, but to say "impossible" is only challenging the hackers of the world.
MS never learns. they are still trying to force feed their browser and are probably going to get slapped by the EU commission and possibly a few others fro anti-trust violatios. Windows 10 S was a real interesting POS. "Get Windows 10 Professional to get default browser change ability". WTF. Time for Linux, unless you are a gamer I guess.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
Hackers around the world are now saying "Challenge Accepted...". With all the corporate VPNs that work via the browser, I'm sure this is going to cause some compatibility issues somewhere.
What about putting the 'not' immediately to the left of Microsoft? Or finishing a sentence with a 'not!' ?
There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
is that there are too many software packages in use by organizations that require legacy support that won't work within many new browsers. My company has software that requires IE9 with outdated plugins that haven't been developed since 2003. It's the only software that the company makes avaivable to interface with their engines. And the same employees have requirements for newer versions of IE, Firefox or Chrome. Then there are the Java apps that won't run in Firefox or Chrome anymore even with the latest Java release installed.
It's a fricken nightmare anymore.
"A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson